The WHO's Pandemic Treaty Just Broke Itself
I know that hypocrisy is rampant in the world today, but the latest example of WHO's hypocrisy is just too blatant!
There is NO evidence that a “whole-of-government,” “whole-of-society,” or a “One Health” approach will prevent the next pandemic.
NONE. NADA. ZERO. ZILCH.
In the World Health Organization’s “Conceptual Zero Draft” of their proposed “Pandemic Treaty,” the 16th “Principle,” clearly states the following:
If science, evidence and “FAIR” data “should inform all public health decisions,” then the entire Conceptual Zero Draft violates its own 16th Principle because absolutely NO science, NO evidence and NO “FAIR” data has been presented to support the effectiveness of the “guidance” in the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb3/A_INB3_3-en.pdf
The WHO’s own experts have clearly and publicly stated that they do not have any valid metrics by which one can determine what constitutes preparedness.
The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body held their first Informal Focused Consultation on September 21, 2022.
https://inb.who.int/home/informal-focused-consultations
They asked their “experts” what “metrics” could be used to help determine “preparedness,” and their experts essentially told them that they had no idea. They said that the nations that seemed to be better prepared actually did worse and that the “metrics” that they used simply failed.
Please watch the 4 minute excerpt from the First Informal Focused Conference:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wYPLS1CyZBH3/
So naturally, the WHO’s response is to IGNORE the failure of the “metrics” that they had been using to measure “preparedness.”
Instead, their response is to grab for more power, more legally binding authority and more money to make more and larger mistakes in the future.
According to Principle #16, NO public health decisions should be made, and NO guidance should be developed or implemented without science, evidence and “FAIR” data.
There is absolutely ZERO credible evidence that supports making a “public health decision” to spend tens of billions of dollars to set up a redundant bureaucracy will prevent the next pandemic.
Since absolutely no data has been provided to support any of the recommendations in the proposed “Pandemic Treaty,” THE PROCESS OF NEGOTIATING THE TREATY SHOULD STOP IMMEDIATELY.
The process of pretending to negotiate an agreement to prevent the next pandemic is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to launder billions of dollars through the WHO in order to feed the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex.
This is NOT a Pandemic Treaty.
This is NOT about health.
This is a business opportunity for well-connected crony capitalists.
This is the 56th article in this series.
Multilingual information regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
TEN THINGS EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT THE WHO'S PROPOSED "PANDEMIC TREATY"
Get the United States OUT of the United Nations and The World Health Organization A.S.A.P.
World Health Organization Virtual Press Conference on Global Health Issues
The People's Amendments to the International Health Regulations
A friendly, open and urgent letter to Professor Lawrence Oglethorpe Gostin...
The Proposed Amendments to The International Health Regulations
The WHO's Pandemic Treaty Just Broke Itself
by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
The video was recorded before I reported on some of the latest documents to be made public. I am in somewhat regular communications with Dr. Meryl Nass. I have not been able to connect with James Corbett.
CHD TV Dec 15 has a video with Meryl Nass, MD and James Corbett, journalist. The weaponization of the WHO, very interested to watch.
Can there be a collaboration between these 2 people and with you James to make a stronger front against the WHO ?