URGENT: Speak your mind NOW
If you are opposed to the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, then NOW IS THE TIME TO SPEAK YOUR MIND.
Quick link to EVIDENCE: DontYouDare.INFO
Quick link to ACTIVIST TOOLBOX: StopTheWHO.com
THE TIME PERIOD TO SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT HAS BEEN EXTENDED!
Everyone has the opportunity to voice their opinion regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
Send your comments to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Global Affairs (OGA).
The Stakeholder Listening Session will help the HHS Office of Global Affairs prepare the U.S. delegation to the World Health Assembly by taking full advantage of the knowledge, ideas, feedback, and suggestions from all communities interested in and affected by agenda items to be discussed at the 75th World Health Assembly.
The U.S. Government will consider contributions received from the stakeholders as it develops the U.S. positions.
Written comments are welcome and encouraged.
Please send written comments to the email address: OGA.RSVP@hhs.gov [This email is now offline. See below for additional emails.]
We look forward to hearing your comments related to the 75th World Health Assembly agenda items.
Please save a copy of the email that you send to the HHS’ Office of Global Affairs and post it into the comment section below this article.
We are concerned that the HHS will fail to properly and publicly document all of the comments that they receive from the public, so we ask that people ALSO visit InterestOfJustice.org in order to copy and submit your comments to them in order to document the information that you shared with the HHS’s Office of Global Affairs in order to support a legal case against their rogue and illegal actions.
In addition to sending your comments to OGA.RSVP@hhs.gov, you can also send your comments to the official emails of a number of the members of the delegation that attended the special session of the World Health Assembly in November 2021.
We do not know for sure if these people will be attending the 75th World Health Assembly this year, but they most likely know many of the people who will be attending.
OGA.RSVP@hhs.gov
The email above has been shut down. Use the emails below…
OGAMultilateral@hhs.gov
Brittany.Hayes@hhs.gov
Colin.Mciff@hhs.gov
Emily.Bleimund@hhs.gov
Debo.Odegbile@hhs.gov
Gabrielle.Lamourelle@hhs.gov
Gloria.Thomas@hhs.gov
Jose.Fernandez@hhs.gov
Leandra.Olson@hhs.gov
Loyce.Pace@hhs.gov
Maya.Levine@hhs.gov
Natalie.LaHood@hhs.gov
Noila.Sorenson@hhs.gov
Sarah.Emami@hhs.gov
Shuen.Chai@hhs.gov
Xavier.Becerra@hhs.gov
globalhealth@hhs.gov
uvv3@cdc.gov
SPEAK NOW OR BE MUZZLED FOREVER
Many thanks to Interest Of Justice and the World Council For Health for informing me about this urgent call to action.
Multilingual information regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
URGENT: Speak Your Mind NOW!
by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
Quick link to EVIDENCE: DontYouDare.INFO
Quick link to ACTIVTOOLBOX: StopTheWHO.com
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055
Please save a copy of the email that you send to the HHS’ Office of Global Affairs and post it into this comment section.
Dear HHS Office of Global Affairs administrator,
I represent the humans, and I am writing to voice my opinion, negative, on the proposed changes. You were never meant to be in control, you are not my government.
The WHO intends to amend 13 IHR articles: 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59
On January 18th 2022, the United States Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the IHR. These amendments give control over the declaration of a public health emergency in any member state to the WHO Director-General – even over the objection of the member state.
The proposed IHR amendments also cede control to WHO “regional directors,” who are given the authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC). Moreover, the proposed amendments allow the Director-General to ring an international alarm bell, by unilaterally issuing an “Intermediate Public Health Alert (IPHA).”
Put simply, the proposed IHR amendments are directed towards establishing a globalist architecture of worldwide health surveillance, reporting, and management. Consistent with a top-down view of governance, the public will not have opportunities to provide input or criticism concerning the amendments. This, of course, is a direct violation of the basic tenets of democracy and can be compared to the separate new pandemic treaty.
*Increased surveillance: Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from Covid-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.
*48-hour deadline: Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval lead by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states.
*Secret sources: Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.
*Weakened Sovereignty: Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern. The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.
*Rejecting the amendments: Under Article 59, after the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, a member state has six months to reject them. This means November, this year. If the member state fails to act, it will be deemed to have accepted the amendments in full. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no force and effect.
Due to the influence of private money at the WHO, a review in the Journal of Integrative Medicine & Therapy stated that the corruption of the WHO is the “biggest threat to the world’s public health of our time.” This is particularly true in relation to WHO drug recommendations, including its “list of essential medicines,” which a growing number of people believe is biased and unreliable.
Moreover, even though WHO’s documents highlight voice, agency, and social participation as drivers of equity and democracy, it is unknown World Health Assembly delegates who get to make decisions for us.
Given consistent evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by various industries, its usefulness as a guide to public health must be critically re-evaluated, while alternative paradigms and models for ethical health guidance and human rights are built.