BREAK THE SPELL
The world is under a hypnotic spell cast by the World Health Organization. Recommendations are mistakenly treated as if they are obligations.
A message to all of the actors at the World Hypnosis Organization:
“We the people” see through your charade. We know what you are up to. We comprehend the game that you are playing and we intend to inform the world of your ongoing and upcoming deceptions.
The actions of the WHO are a very cleverly designed theatrical production.
When the World Health Assembly votes to approve the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, it will probably appear to be real to anyone who remains under their spell. I hope that this article will help you to break the spell that has been cast over the world.
CLICK HERE to learn more about the proposed amendments, and learn quickly, because this attempted theft of your sovereignty is scheduled to begin this May 22-28, 2022.
The main power of the WHO is their hypnotic ability to coerce each of the 194 member nations into passing legislation within their countries, according to their individual legal systems, in order to VOLUNTARILY fall into “lockstep” with the hypnotic dictates of the WHO.
The member nations of the WHO are trapped in an illusion. They are likely to vote to approve the amendments that give away their sovereignty simply because they have failed to read and comprehend the reality of the documents.
The WHO can “approve” all the amendments that they want, but that does not mean that the United States (or any other country) has to allow themselves to be tricked into thinking that the are obligated to then pass legislation within their own country in order to voluntarily move in “lockstep” with the “suggestions” of the WHO.
Recommendations are suggestions. Suggestions that are repeated over and over and over are a form of hypnosis. Hypnotic suggestions can compel people to obey recommendations AS IF they were legitimate law. Please see the difference.
The potential approval of amendments to 13 of the Articles of the International Health Regulations by the World Health Assembly is a finely crafted ruse.
The “Emperor” has no clothes.
The WHO is like the Wizard of Oz. The only power that they have over the nations of the world is the power that the WHO uses to trick the member nations into complying voluntarily to “recommendations” because those “recommendations” are mistakenly seen as obligations.
The World Health Organization has the money and the capacity to conduct an extensive and ongoing theatrical production. However, their theatrical productions do not carry the force of law. Currently, they have little power. We need to act now in order to keep it that way. The WHO skillfully tricks countries into thinking that their “recommendations” are legal requirements, and the 194 member countries obey the “suggestions” of the (WHO) hypnotists as if they are under a spell, because they are.
THERE IS A REASON WHY ITS CALLED PROGRAMMING
When the United States agreed to join the WHO in 1948 (before television programming was widely available), Section 5 of Public Law 80-643, 62 STAT 441 clearly stated:
In adopting this joint resolution, the Congress does so with the understanding that nothing in the Constitution of the World Health Organization in any manner commits the United States to enact any specific legislative program regarding any matters referred to in said Constitution.
COULD THAT HAVE BEEN ANY CLEARER?
The United States was pretty clear-eyed at that time. They didn’t just “check the box” and agree to the terms and conditions built into the WHO Constitution. They stood up to protect our freedom. They gave themselves a way out. They protected our sovereignty.
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS
PROPOSAL FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS
In 2005-2007 the United States AGREED to (mostly) allow the International Health Regulations (IHR) to supercede and override the U.S. Constitution.
There is a difference between a legal obligation and the obligations that come from voluntarily entering into a contract or agreement.
The United States, did exercise its right to reject and/or express their reservations and understandings regarding portions of the International Health Regulations (2005).
Article 59, Section 1 of the International Health Regulations clearly states the following…
The period provided in execution of Article 22 of the Constitution of WHO for rejection of, or reservation to, these Regulations or an amendment thereto, shall be 18 months from the date of the notification by the Director-General of the adoption of these Regulations or of an amendment to these Regulations by the Health Assembly.
Article 61 Rejection
If a State notifies the Director-General of its rejection of these Regulations or of an amendment thereto within the period provided in paragraph 1 of Article 59, these Regulations or the amendment concerned shall not enter into force with respect to that State. Any international sanitary agreement or regulations listed in Article 58 to which such State is already a party shall remain in force as far as such State is concerned.
The WHO Constitution empowered the Organization to adopt regulations to prevent the international spread of disease (Articles 21, 22). Its power to adopt regulations is far‐reaching—binding on Member States unless they affirmatively opt out.
Article 62 Reservations
1. States may make reservations to these Regulations in accordance with this Article. Such reservations shall not be incompatible with the object and purpose of these Regulations.
2. Reservations to these Regulations shall be notified to the Director-General in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 59 and Article 60, paragraph 1 of Article 63 or paragraph 1 of Article 64, as the case may be. A State not a Member of WHO shall notify the Director-General of any reservation with its notification of acceptance of these Regulations. States formulating reservations should provide the Director-General with reasons for the reservations.
3. A rejection in part of these Regulations shall be considered as a reservation.
4. The Director-General shall, in accordance with paragraph 2 of Article 65, issue notification of each reservation received pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Article.
The Director-General shall:
(a) if the reservation was made before the entry into force of these Regulations, request those Member States that have not rejected these Regulations to notify him or her within six months of any objection to the reservation, or
(b) if the reservation was made after the entry into force of these Regulations, request States Parties to notify him or her within six months of any objection to the reservation.
States objecting to a reservation should provide the Director-General with reasons for the objection.
COULD THAT HAVE BEEN ANY CLEARER?
Member nations currently have 18 months to reject any amendment. No country can be forced to give up their sovereignty. They have the right to reject any amendment to the IHR. Member nations can only be coerced into doing so by the master hypnotists at the World Health Organization.
Inalienable rights are just that - inalienable. They can never be lost. You can only be made to forget that you are free. Once you remember that you are sovereign and free, all you have to do is click your heels together and DECIDE TO WAKE UP.
The illusion and deception spewed out by the WHO seem to be exceedingly powerful, but only until you realize that you have always had the power to choose to defend your inalienable sovereignty, rights and freedom.
Currently, every country in the world has 18 months to tell the World Health Organization that they simply reject any new amendments to the International Health Regulations. All the countries have to do is send a notification to the WHO that they reject the amendments This is similar to a line item veto.
If the upcoming May 22-28, 2022 75th World Health Assembly passes the amendments that were proposed by the United States on January 18, 2022, that period of time to voice their rejection may be reduced to 6 months, but nevertheless, every country in the world will still have the ability to tell the World Health Organization to take their amendments and shove ‘em.
There is no spoon.
The WHO has no legal power. They cannot make countries comply. They can only use coercion and deception. They can’t make countries join in lockstep, but they certainly can hypnotize and coerce them into compliance.
Every one of the 194 member nations has the right to opt out of any amendments to the International Health Regulations that may be passed by the 75th World Health Assembly this May 22-28, 2022.
The United States clearly acted to preserve our sovereignty when they joined the WHO in 1948 and they exercised their right to reject and/or express their reservations again in 2007.
Any country that votes FOR the amendments is choosing to voluntarily relinquish their sovereignty. Any country that fails to express their desire to reject the amendments within the time period is also VOLUNTARILY HANDING OVER THEIR SOVEREIGNTY TO THE WHO.
It is very likely that your “government” officials are caught in the WHO's hypnotic Matrix and will blindly comply with their hypnotic suggestions to collude with the corporate world to bring forth a one world fascist dictatorship.
After the International Health Regulations were adopted by the World Health Organization on May 23, 2005, all member nations had the opportunity to express their reservations and understandings before the IHR went into effect on June 15, 2007. The United States Mission to Geneva DID exercise their right to submit their “reservations” to certain details of the IHR.
On July 18, 2007, the United States of America submitted their Reservations and Understandings (yeah, I know - the date certainly seems to have missed the deadline.):
Appendix 2, page 60-61 of the International Health Regulations:
I. RESERVATIONS AND UNDERSTANDINGS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Mission, by means of this note, informs the Acting Director-General of the World Health Organization that the Government of the United States of America accepts the IHRs, subject to the reservation and understandings referred to below.
The Mission, by means of this note, and in accordance with Article 22 of the Constitution of the World Health Organization and Article 59(1) of the IHRs, submits the following reservation on behalf of the Government of the United States of America:
The Government of the United States of America reserves the right to assume obligations under these Regulations in a manner consistent with its fundamental principles of federalism. With respect to obligations concerning the development, strengthening, and maintenance of the core capacity requirements set forth in Annex 1, these Regulations shall be implemented by the Federal Government or the state governments, as appropriate and in accordance with our Constitution, to the extent that the implementation of these obligations comes under the legal jurisdiction of the Federal Government. To the extent that such obligations come under the legal jurisdiction of the state governments, the Federal Government shall bring such obligations with a favorable recommendation to the notice of the appropriate state authorities.
The Mission, by means of this note, also submits three understandings on behalf of the Government of the United States of America.
The first understanding relates to the application of the IHRs to incidents involving natural, accidental or deliberate release of chemical, biological or radiological materials:
In view of the definitions of “disease,” “event,” and “public health emergency of international concern” as set forth in Article 1 of these Regulations, the notification requirements of Articles 6 and 7, and the decision instrument and guidelines set forth in Annex 2, the United States understands that States Parties to these Regulations have assumed an obligation to notify to WHO potential public health emergencies of international concern, irrespective of origin or source, whether they involve the natural, accidental or deliberate release of biological, chemical or radionuclear materials.
The second understanding relates to the application of Article 9 of the IHRs:
Article 9 of these Regulations obligates a State Party “as far as practicable” to notify the World Health Organization (WHO) of evidence received by that State of a public health risk occurring outside of its territory that may result in the international spread of disease. Among other notifications that could prove to be impractical under this article, it is the United States' understanding that any notification that would undermine the ability of the U.S. Armed Forces to operate effectively in pursuit of U.S. national security interests would not be considered practical for purposes of this Article.
The third understanding relates to the question of whether the IHRs create judicially enforceable private rights. Based on its delegation's participation in the negotiations of the IHRs, the Government of the United States of America does not believe that the IHRs were intended to create judicially enforceable private rights:
The United States understands that the provisions of the Regulations do not create judicially enforceable private rights.
A “reservation” deals with potential U.S. actions. A reservation is a clear statement that the U.S. reserves the right not to be bound by a specific aspect of a treaty.
An “understanding” addresses how the U.S. potentially will act. An “understanding” is how the U.S. interprets a specific aspect of a treaty.
In 2007, the United States “government” expressed their “understanding” in order to protect their military and they also made it clear that they did not care about the “judicially enforceable private rights” of the people.
CLEARLY, the United States knows that the federal government does not have unlimited authority.
Our delegates to the World Health Assembly are planning to hand over our sovereignty to the WHO.
Please share this information with everyone you know as soon as you possibly can.
Watch this video…
Feel free to download it and re-post it on your own channel.
This is the ninth article in this series.
Multilingual information regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
James Roguski’s newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Thank you for your relentless work to #StopTheAmendments, #StopTheTreaty, and #StopTheWHO, James. I have been recommending your articles and Substack to everyone and included an update on the WHO in the announcements section of my last post (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dialogue-with-a-curious-injectee). I will be writing a series of articles on the multi-front campaign against the WHO and will be collaborating with Dr. Tess Lawrie and the World Council for Health on awareness-raising efforts in the coming months. I’m sure we will connect at some point, too, as I know you have been doing wonderful work with them as well.
Meanwhile, I thought it was interesting that you referenced the “Wizard of Oz” and the “Matrix” in this piece as I included both of those along with “Alice in Wonderland” in this post:
• “Are You a Good German or a Badass German?” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/are-you-a-good-german-or-a-badass)
I look forward to working with you to defeat the WHO and its totalitarian aspirations!
Again incredible research and references.. especially powerful 1948 WHO Treaty specifics.
"When the United States agreed to join the WHO in 1948 (before television programming was widely available), Section 5 of Public Law 80-643, 62 STAT 441 clearly stated:
In adopting this joint resolution, the Congress does so with the understanding that nothing in the Constitution of the World Health Organization in any manner commits the United States to enact any specific legislative program regarding any matters referred to in said Constitution."