The super-secret International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) is scheduled to meet January 9-13, 2023. They plan to submit the amendments on January 15, 2023. THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT.
SECRET NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS:
January 9-13, 2023
For five (5) days, from Monday January 9, 2023 to Friday January 13, 2023, the super-secret International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) will be conducting face-to-face meetings in Geneva, Switzerland. The purpose of these meetings will be to finalize their report regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
The work done by the IHRRC is “confidential” and they answer directly to the Director General ONLY. Their work is likely to involve editing the 46 page proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations to eliminate the many typographical errors and redundancies that can be found in the current version.
Download the proposed amendments:
These meetings will NOT be live streamed. The proceedings will not be available to the public. NO public comment period is scheduled. YOUR opinion regarding these amendments is NOT going to be considered. These rules are being negotiated by the members of the International Health Regulations Review Committee, who were chosen, not elected.
January 15, 2023
The self-imposed deadline for the IHRRC to submit its report to the Director General is January 15, 2023. The Director General is then expected to communicate it without delay to the Working Group for amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) and also to the 194 member nations. By submitting the secretly negotiated document by January 15, 2023, the IHRRC will provide the Director General with at least 6 days to forward the submitted documents to the 194 member nations by the deadline of at least 4 months in advance to the 76th World Health Assembly.
INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS REVIEW COMMITTEE (IHRRC) SCHEDULE
PANDEMIC TREATY NEGOTIATION SCHEDULE:
May 21-30, 2023
The “official” statements of the World Health Organization have consistently stated that they do NOT plan to adopt the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations until the 77th World Health Assembly in 2024.
However, if the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations are submitted to the WHO by January 15, 2023, then they COULD be adopted by the 76th World Health Assembly as early as May 2023.
This is the 59th article in this series.
Multilingual information regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
TEN THINGS EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT THE WHO'S PROPOSED "PANDEMIC TREATY"
Get the United States OUT of the United Nations and The World Health Organization A.S.A.P.
World Health Organization Virtual Press Conference on Global Health Issues
The People's Amendments to the International Health Regulations
A friendly, open and urgent letter to Professor Lawrence Oglethorpe Gostin...
The Proposed Amendments to The International Health Regulations
Giving Billion$ to the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex (PHEIC)
by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
James Roguski’s newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
The deceivers want us on the ledge…just terrified helpless stand-by-ers to a crash. I say bullshit to that. There has never been a better time to resist the fear and internalize the great truth “The only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing.” God specifically asks us to take care of each other. 1 Thessalonians 5:11
“Therefore encourage one another, build one another up…” Galatians 6:2 “Bear one another’s burdens…” and that includes calmly, persistently and in caring insisting that our differently opinionated neighbor does not need to be vilified, we are on the same side against these powers that shouldn’t be in power. For the truth is very obvious that to these transnational looters, philanthropaths and God wannabes in the grip of ultimate evil, the human being nor his soul is sacred; their deception blinds them, woefully, for their eventual condemnation is certain. Share the truth w/ea other, especially the gospel. Do not comply and support and love each other, on your knees prayerfully. Never give in to hate, though they foster every variety. Men cannot resist evil awash in hatred without becoming lost in it and it’s useless as a weapon against them anyway, they have plenty of that, it feeds them and it feeds division which is what they hope will be their ally. We must take every precaution not to let that happen. We need to guard against the constant goading to divisiveness, stand firm in the knowledge that we are pawns in a spiritual battle with Jesus, The Holy Spirit and Almighty God in our corner. Believe with all your being that united we will stand. The necessity of understanding this current epic world struggle means an eternity of difference to every single human soul.
Hi James! Robert Malone just shared a tweet about this story so hopefully it will take off now!
Just wanted to make a suggestion as I know they will try to turn anything against us. They are removing the word "non-binding", however there is an "opt-out clause". If I remember correctly a state has 48 hrs (or was it 24?) to submit a written rejection of any offer of "assistance" (a.k.a. orders) from the WHO.
The timeframe obviously shows that this is a symbolic joke, that leaves zero room for any form of national democratic process to take place. In addition it sounds like an all or nothing blackmail clause. Say a developing nation actually would like some help with sanitary equipment to handle some form of outbreak, in order to get this help they can be forced to impose draconian lockdowns on their citizens - or they get no help at all. This is how I read it anyway.
This opt-out clause will be used to claim that this is still voluntary (and that we are conspiracy theorists) so I think it’s good to be prepared with some good counter arguments.
Kind regards and thank you for your hard work on this important story!