My heart is filled with love and compassion for those who were deceived and harmed by those who lied. Many of us tried with all of our heart and soul to warn you. Join us now in our shared truth.
My suggestion is that you believe no one. Belief is dangerous. Knowledge is power. I encourage you to attend this lecture tomorrow: http://well.ac/GPMCevents It may reveal some information that you find valuable.
Its seemingly a nice day with Fraudci out, but I am not convinced that things are better. Lets see what they do, seems they are saying the big mistake was not having more control not less.
If Democrats win in November we will be in full totalitarian mode. Our time to act is brief. Deaths and injuries are increasing. Further, war with Russia will be used to increase the death rate and cover up the crimes. I do not see much resistance, no one will bell the cat.
While I don't have a crystal ball, I am fairly certain that the Democrats (fans of the pandemic & jabs) are NOT going to win the next elections in the USA. Many Dems have left the party and have become Independents, Libertarians, & even Republicans in the past 2 to 3 years. I used to be a progressive Democrat but now I don't even recognize the party. So I'm just winging it now while the world is in major flux. Meanwhile, I think the Republicans & Libertarians are making the most sense these days.
Fraud trumped Trump. US Census over counted Democrat controlled States and undercounted Republican. There is no way these gangsters will give up power. I cannot think that election fraud is improbable, nor do I think Democrats care for honest elections. The more interesting question is outcome from the vote fraud.
.....YOU & me BOTH, Karen; QUICKLY came to HATE Obama, ALWAYS did 'Joey Hands' (i.e., his VICE-president; NO pun intended) and have LONG felt STRANDED on what Clinton referred to as, the 'bridge to the 21st century' - I'm hoping to advance a new model which could be VERY attractive to MOST closest to the middle on EITHER side, that will clearly demonstrate TRUE 'progressivism' & 'conservatism' as IDENTICAL.....
I met Ken and his wife at a fruit and veg store recently.
They are tripled-jabbed and masked in the store. So are their three children - 23, 20, teen. They took two each.
We chatted whilst his wife went to do her things.
Ken is your typical media-informed majority.
I contradicted everything he said with reasons and facts, causing him to pause and think since he could feel that I was well-informed. No, he did not ask me to share my information or sources.
Me: What is this, all masked up? You have vaccinated?
Wife: For double protection.
Me: ???
Ken: I am taking the vaccines in order to protect my mother, who is 85 yo.
Me: 85? Let her go!
Ken was appalled!
Ken: I don't want her to go.
Me: She will go one day anyway.
Ken was appalled with my blase attitude again!
Ken: I want her to go naturally.
After getting slammed by me with facts and reasons too often, Ken cut to the chase:
Ken: If I passed it to her and killed her, I would feel uncomfortable for the rest of my life.
Me: If you are so concerned about infecting her, don't visit her! She will understand.
Me: What if something had happened to you because of the vaccine?
Ken: That was my decision. I would live with that.
Me: How would she feel knowing you took it to protect her?
Ken was silent.
Me: You are a parent yourself. How would you feel if your children took something risky in order to protect you?
Ken was silent again!
Ken: Ok. The vaccines do not prevent infection and transmission. [As you can see, he contradicted himself. Proving he lied to me about his reason or he hid his true reasons from me.] But, they reduce the severity,
Me: Can you prove that claim?
Ken: There was some study....
Me: Did you know that pfizer, moderna and AZ never claimed their vaccines reduce severity? Since the makers did not make such a claim, why would any one else make it? That lie about 95% was about prevention.
Ken was silent again!
Me: Why would they need to force people to take something if they can prove it is safe, effective, and necessary?
Ken was silent again!
Ken: How about you?
Me: If they say take the vaccine or take a bullet; I would say "give me a bullet!". (I said it three times to ensure he understood me!)
Me: Have the covid deaths been verified? Most covid deaths were deaths "with" covid; not "by" covid.
Ken was silent!
Me: Did you know that the average age of covid death is higher than the average life expectancy?
Ken was silent!
Ken: Have you personally seen anyone die from the vaccines?
Me: My sister attended three funerals: 52; 72; 69 year olds.
Ken: But, have you personally seen anyone die from the vaccines?
Me: Have you personally seen anyone die from covid?
I was just in Vancouver, BC and it was like stepping back in time... ALOT of people still masked, even outdoors, A LOT of businesses still required masks....yes, mandatory...I did not go in but if they were close enough to the front door, I told them what I thought, politely......A LOT of businesses did not take CASH only debit or credit so I told them that it's wrong not to take CDN currency and it's discriminatory...they said COVID, I said nope, digital ID....it was crazy, disappointing and scary......my hotel did not clean rooms until after day 3 because, you know, COVID...I said that if it was about COVID you would clean more not less.......unbelievable...... it's soooo clear to see the insanity, mass formation and plandemic now, more than ever.....
Half my family, including my oldest son, got the shots. They insist it was the best thing to do, but my son now has heart issues. So, the rest of us watch, wait and pray for them every day.
I will never forgive Fraudci, Birx, Collins, Wolensky, every politician and doctor who promoted and mandated these shots. Never!
James, with much respect I urge you to re-examine one statement, and if the many, clear objections (ie raised by Midwestern Doctor, and others, including Dr Richard Fleming), can't be adequately explained, to please omit this statement, even for strategic reasons -
"The virus that has been named SARS-COV-2 has never been properly isolated. No one has provided actual evidence of its existence, even though hundreds of Freedom of Information Act requests for such evidence have been submitted."
Please see these clear points, that mention the FOIA requests, from others who also understand that those in charge are lying criminals. (And a Midwestern Doctor did give the perspective that this virus doesn't exist fair consideration.)
****"For example, Christine Massey’s claim to fame (and her username) is that she filed FOIA requests that proved the CDC and other governmental agencies have never isolated SARS-CoV-2 and thus cannot prove it exists, thereby proving SARS-CoV-2 is a hoax. However, if you read through her FOIA requests it becomes clear that she used a very unique definition of what it means to isolate and purify a virus that no one else in the virology field uses (because it does not make sense), so as a result, no records matching her stipulations existed. If an argument like that were to be used in court, it would immediately result in the dismissal of the case.
Going forward, one of the most important things our movement can do is agree on effective strategies for addressing our common goals in the immediate future, while ensuring the same issues don’t emerge again a few years down the road after the public forgets what has happened. I hope this was helpful for providing insights in this regard. Please watch the video at the start; it is the most important part of this article. Thank you for reading this and sharing it with those who can benefit from hearing this message."
The video shared is from Dr Richard Fleming, who is so much deeper in the understanding of this lab-altered virus, and the trail of where it came from, than those who claim it does not exist. Dr Fleming wants as much as you do there to be serious accountability for crimes against humanity.
Those who created this through gain of function have committed treason. If we're also saying it doesn't exist ... that sabotages everything else. Perhaps it is not a virus in the sense of what viruses always have been. But, really, Dr Fleming is more knowledgeable about what this thing is than those who say it doesn't exist and point to the FOIA request and challenges to prove something according to impossible circles.
Please - DO elucidate, Ellen - what HAVE 'viruses' ALWAYS been?
Answer: MISPERCEIVED - and, TRAGICALLY so; 'AGONIZED' by environmental insults, POISONING (as the very word itself MEANS 'poisoner'.....)
Additionally, if you can contextualize for me WHY they (like MOST other PROTEIN-based, but CRYSTALLINE-structured biologics) produce up to a full VOLT of piezoelectric charge (EXTREMELY critical consideration to causing 'disease-states', mutagenetic conditions, functional disregulation) although a RHETORICAL query as I already know, that would be ESPECIALLY appreciated.....
Hi Hamish, I think Dr. Zach Bush's work could explain better than I what viruses have always been. I think Dr. Richard Fleming could explain better than I (and better than Dr's Cowan, Kaufman, Bailey, Massey), what this particular not-natural-virus is.
Thanks, Ellen - appreciate your graciousness; APOLOGIZE for my lack of it and yes, am quite familiar with Zach's model, as well as Stefan, Tom & Andrew's (communicated for a time with Tom's assistant, actually) - my prevailing concern - and reason for forceful comment in reply, is that we've let these creatures dictate the narrative for a century and a half (if NOT longer) from Pasteur's intellectual dishonesty, to Rockerfeller's (AND noxious 'Flexner Report') of which EXTERNALIZED 'viruses', are a CRUCIAL piece.....feeling IS, needs to be an ACTUAL alternative when those who BEGIN to ask the REALLY big, [re]DEFINING questions, DO.....
Here are twenty more for consideration. Not in order of importance (some biggies later in the list), probably not complete, and apologies for any duplicates:
21. Covid19 had an extremely age-stratified risk profile with respect to severe disease and death, which was ignored by the government health policy to the detriment of the public, but could have been used to avoid a general lockdown and the associated harms that accrued.
22. The Covid19 Task Force was poorly run and allowed to become dysfunctional by having insufficient quantity of health policy experts as members, and by ignoring the advice of the one health policy expert that was on the team for a short few months.
23. The original study data presented by pharma for EUA, which showed higher all cause mortality and included signals for cardiac issues, was not diligently interpreted and used to disqualify the biologics but rather was recklessly disregarded in favor of advancing them to the public to the detriment of the public. A surrogate metric, relative risk reduction, was used to overstate the benefit to the public.
24. Animal trials were skipped or results hidden from the public to hide unfavorable symptoms and outcomes.
25. The Covid19 injectable biologics, a.k.a. Covid19 vaccines, are and have been since the early days of the pandemic, unlawful experimental biologics due to the existence of inexpensive and effective treatments that are fully FDA approved and listed internationally as WHO Essential Medicines, to wit Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.
26. Data supporting the use of Ivermectin were presented publicly and subsequently suppressed and overwhelmed by unfounded propaganda from government and pharma companies that misinformed the public into believing this eminently safe and helpful medicine to be harmful and ineffective. Results of Ivermectin metastudies, which looked across several randomly controlled trials and other observational studies, were ignored and suppressed, and actively undermined by key scientists in positions to influence government policy.
27. Fake science was perfomed by a cabal of investigators, in cahoots with the medical-scientific-pharma-military complex, who set up Ivermectin studies to fail by applying a variety of techniques such as improper dosing and inaccurate data definitions.
28. Public health data collection was compromised by changing the definition of becoming vaccinated, from the traditional definition of the moment of injection, to two weeks after injection or two weeks after two injections for “fully” vaccinated. This move distorted the results so that misleading conclusions could be advanced to the public to the detriment of the public.
29. The definition of a vaccine was changed to wipe away the traditional definition that it conveys immunity, to a watered down definition that it stimulates an immune response, thus allowing the biologics to be called a vaccine only in respect of the new definition, and putting the biologics on par with yogurt.
30. Scientific and medical journals abdicated their responsibility to publish scientific studies without prejudice, specifically those that would potentially undermine the government’s narrative, and instead actively published propaganda opinion pieces supporting the government narrative.
31. Other treatments that showed promise such as HCQ and Vitamin D3 were not sufficiently and honestly pursued to quantify their true benefit.
32. The Nuremburg code is the most authoritative, internationally recognized document in the history of medical ethics. The Nuremburg Code unquestionably asserts the primacy and dignity of the individual human being over the greater good of the state, or society. (credit: Vera Sharav, 8/20/2022) The Nuremburg code establishes ethical requirements for uncoerced consent and places the burden on those who conduct the experiment to ensure proper informed consent and right of refusal.
33. Doctors, pharmacists, nurses and medical professionals and administrators failed to provide informed consent, failed to call out the government narrative, failed to call out unscientific policies, failed to do no harm, and actively worked to advocate the experimental injectable biologics to the public to the detriment of the public.
34. Governments failed to protect the elderly by establishing policies that sent infected people back to nursing homes thereby spreading disease among the most vulnerable, and by depriving them of their dignity, humanity, rights, and agency, through forced sequestering.
35. Government failed to protect our children and continues to put them in harms way by approving EUA for experimental “preventative” biologics that they do not need and that pose increased risk of harm, making them counter-productive.
36. Years of knowledge about the ineffectiveness of masks were ignored in favor of a symbolic policy that forced compliance from the public and manipulated them into accepting other bad policies.
37. The policy to inject children, in the absence of medical justification for the net benefit of those children, for the professed benefit of protecting adults and the elderly, is grossly unethical: particularly so since children are not a significant source of transmission to adults, and Nuremberg. Children cannot possibly be in a position to understand risks and benefits and therefore are not able to engage in informed consent and should be excluded from medical experiments.
38. Parents and public institutions that pushed jabs on kids and young adults must have an opportunity for a moment of reckoning and spiritual soul searching for what they have perpetrated upon our children, so that they can reaffirm the principles of Nuremberg and regain their status of protector of our youth.
39. Corporations that engaged in the government propaganda and who coerced employees to take medical interventions against their wishes or lose their job as a consequence, and who intrusively asked for employee health status with respect to injections, must be rooted out, identified, lambasted, and penalized. Laws must be passed so that they do not ever again have incentive to repeat the behavior.
40. Citizens of every state should consider advocating for state legislation regarding a medical bill of rights, that references and incorporates Nuremberg code and that provides priority and autonomy to individuals with respect to their own medical procedures where the life of another is not directly and imminently jeopardized.
Some measure of Sanity is starting to prevail. We need to press on with accountability and judicial inquiry. There is now an awareness in the general public that this all needs to be opened up and that we have all been lied to. The CDC is desperately trying to regain some kind of authority. I am pleased they have reconsidered their statements.
Re C D C change of tune… they still claim that it is the unV who are experiencing higher rates of hospitalization and death.
Their statement here could just as easily be used to support ongoing frequent boosters, as they (correctly) state that the primary series is insufficient but also claim that being “up to date (with boosters)” is the way to protect against severe illness, death, and long vid.
Nice try. I never said "virus not real." I said evidence of isolation and causation has not been provided by those who have promoted the mainstream narrative. Please recognize the clear difference.
James, I'm on your side and apologize for any disrespect you may have perceived. I just hate to see this movement divided by the question of whether viruses exist or not, and this folly of isolation and purification of virions. (Steve Kirsch and the Midwestern Doctor have addressed this subject at great length.) Your work against mandates and the globalist agenda is too powerful, too timely, and too critical at this moment to be sidetracked or shunted into this topic. We need the full, unifying force of your message to be transmitted to the persuadable and awakening middle group.
If there are three sides (or more) then, among those of us working together, maybe we could boot this one statement ("no evidence virus exists") from the manifesto? It can't possibly be a central issue.
FAUCI is the big monster in this picture. He lied about money he designated for gain of function He’s now trying to weasel out by quitting but Senator Kennedy said he’ll subpoena him to grill him before Congress
My suggestion is that you believe no one. Belief is dangerous. Knowledge is power. I encourage you to attend this lecture tomorrow: http://well.ac/GPMCevents It may reveal some information that you find valuable.
Hi Sir James are you aware about Yuval Noah Harari ? Check out about him in Odysee he’s an evil unimaginable!
Yes. He continually states out loud what many others keep quiet.
I like him in the sense he tells who, what, where and how of their plans to end humanity by a jaw dropping march to a dystopian transhuman slavery.
Time to lock them all UP
.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fefa293e4-4420-457b-a5f8-c203fd055fa9_714x947.jpeg
.
https://ibsc.com.cy/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/bill-gates-0339.jpg
YES, PLEASE!
Its seemingly a nice day with Fraudci out, but I am not convinced that things are better. Lets see what they do, seems they are saying the big mistake was not having more control not less.
Exactly.
If Democrats win in November we will be in full totalitarian mode. Our time to act is brief. Deaths and injuries are increasing. Further, war with Russia will be used to increase the death rate and cover up the crimes. I do not see much resistance, no one will bell the cat.
While I don't have a crystal ball, I am fairly certain that the Democrats (fans of the pandemic & jabs) are NOT going to win the next elections in the USA. Many Dems have left the party and have become Independents, Libertarians, & even Republicans in the past 2 to 3 years. I used to be a progressive Democrat but now I don't even recognize the party. So I'm just winging it now while the world is in major flux. Meanwhile, I think the Republicans & Libertarians are making the most sense these days.
Fraud trumped Trump. US Census over counted Democrat controlled States and undercounted Republican. There is no way these gangsters will give up power. I cannot think that election fraud is improbable, nor do I think Democrats care for honest elections. The more interesting question is outcome from the vote fraud.
.....YOU & me BOTH, Karen; QUICKLY came to HATE Obama, ALWAYS did 'Joey Hands' (i.e., his VICE-president; NO pun intended) and have LONG felt STRANDED on what Clinton referred to as, the 'bridge to the 21st century' - I'm hoping to advance a new model which could be VERY attractive to MOST closest to the middle on EITHER side, that will clearly demonstrate TRUE 'progressivism' & 'conservatism' as IDENTICAL.....
I met Ken and his wife at a fruit and veg store recently.
They are tripled-jabbed and masked in the store. So are their three children - 23, 20, teen. They took two each.
We chatted whilst his wife went to do her things.
Ken is your typical media-informed majority.
I contradicted everything he said with reasons and facts, causing him to pause and think since he could feel that I was well-informed. No, he did not ask me to share my information or sources.
Me: What is this, all masked up? You have vaccinated?
Wife: For double protection.
Me: ???
Ken: I am taking the vaccines in order to protect my mother, who is 85 yo.
Me: 85? Let her go!
Ken was appalled!
Ken: I don't want her to go.
Me: She will go one day anyway.
Ken was appalled with my blase attitude again!
Ken: I want her to go naturally.
After getting slammed by me with facts and reasons too often, Ken cut to the chase:
Ken: If I passed it to her and killed her, I would feel uncomfortable for the rest of my life.
Me: If you are so concerned about infecting her, don't visit her! She will understand.
Me: What if something had happened to you because of the vaccine?
Ken: That was my decision. I would live with that.
Me: How would she feel knowing you took it to protect her?
Ken was silent.
Me: You are a parent yourself. How would you feel if your children took something risky in order to protect you?
Ken was silent again!
Ken: Ok. The vaccines do not prevent infection and transmission. [As you can see, he contradicted himself. Proving he lied to me about his reason or he hid his true reasons from me.] But, they reduce the severity,
Me: Can you prove that claim?
Ken: There was some study....
Me: Did you know that pfizer, moderna and AZ never claimed their vaccines reduce severity? Since the makers did not make such a claim, why would any one else make it? That lie about 95% was about prevention.
Ken was silent again!
Me: Why would they need to force people to take something if they can prove it is safe, effective, and necessary?
Ken was silent again!
Ken: How about you?
Me: If they say take the vaccine or take a bullet; I would say "give me a bullet!". (I said it three times to ensure he understood me!)
Me: Have the covid deaths been verified? Most covid deaths were deaths "with" covid; not "by" covid.
Ken was silent!
Me: Did you know that the average age of covid death is higher than the average life expectancy?
Ken was silent!
Ken: Have you personally seen anyone die from the vaccines?
Me: My sister attended three funerals: 52; 72; 69 year olds.
Ken: But, have you personally seen anyone die from the vaccines?
Me: Have you personally seen anyone die from covid?
Ken was stunned into silence!
I was just in Vancouver, BC and it was like stepping back in time... ALOT of people still masked, even outdoors, A LOT of businesses still required masks....yes, mandatory...I did not go in but if they were close enough to the front door, I told them what I thought, politely......A LOT of businesses did not take CASH only debit or credit so I told them that it's wrong not to take CDN currency and it's discriminatory...they said COVID, I said nope, digital ID....it was crazy, disappointing and scary......my hotel did not clean rooms until after day 3 because, you know, COVID...I said that if it was about COVID you would clean more not less.......unbelievable...... it's soooo clear to see the insanity, mass formation and plandemic now, more than ever.....
BC is like California. Not too much upstairs.
Today, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the
Nobel Human Stupidity Prize for 2021 to the Real Anthony Fauci
for his excellent Covid-19 Plandemic Leadership.
He'll be leading the Money pox scamdemic management until December 2022.
Two weeks to flatten the curve!!!
Faucian C-19 Allergic and Infectious Dogmas (High Priest of Voodoo Science)
Natural Immunity doesn’t matter! O no, sometimes it does - It depends on the audience.
SARS-Cov-2 originated from a bat zoonotic jump. Cannot come from a lab.
Read my lips – I never funded gain-of-function research.
The virus fears locked down individuals!
A 25µm mask can stop 1µm viruses!
2 x 25µm masks are better!
3 x 25µm masks are best!
No, use KN95 instead!
Your mask protects me and vice versa ... WE'RE ALL IN TOGETHER!
SARS-Cov-2 visits bars only after 10PM – curfew is needed!
Asymptomatic transmission has been proven!
Early treatments don’t work – wait for quackcines..
The virus knows that 6 feet is a no go zone!
A glass fence between cubes at the work place prevents the virus from circulating!
Leaky quackcines can be used to control a scamdemic – Immunology 101!
Quackcines are Safe and Effective… Repeat this mantra 24/7 and they’ll work for you!
All experts agree that the Quackcines are Safe and Effective!
The Quackcines will stop the spread of the virus…
Quackcinating 70% of the population will guarantee herd immunity….
Antibodies in the blood stream can stop infection in your airways – Follow the Science!
Booster shots targeting a virus that disappeared in early 2021 can shoot dead Omicron in 2022!
Using the same booster every quarter will control all future variants…
Original Antigenic Sin (OAS) is nonsense!
I did not patent SARS-CoV-2 gp120 HIV insertion - Your cancer-killing T cells are safe…
Remdesivir is Safe and Effective (only ~25% death rate). It’s more effective than AZT…
I am always right. I am the infallible Prophet of Voodoo Science!
Cognitive Dissonance is Appreciated by NIAID
Source: NIAID (Novel Inquisition for Allergic and Infectious Dogmas)
.....you have GOT to be FRICKIN' kidding me.....a NOBEL Prize? For WHAT - successful GENOCIDE?
Half my family, including my oldest son, got the shots. They insist it was the best thing to do, but my son now has heart issues. So, the rest of us watch, wait and pray for them every day.
I will never forgive Fraudci, Birx, Collins, Wolensky, every politician and doctor who promoted and mandated these shots. Never!
No lock up! Inject moderna, J&J, Pfizer vaccines 1, 2, booster, booster. Then sit back and watch.
.....that WOULD be FITTING karmically.....
James, with much respect I urge you to re-examine one statement, and if the many, clear objections (ie raised by Midwestern Doctor, and others, including Dr Richard Fleming), can't be adequately explained, to please omit this statement, even for strategic reasons -
"The virus that has been named SARS-COV-2 has never been properly isolated. No one has provided actual evidence of its existence, even though hundreds of Freedom of Information Act requests for such evidence have been submitted."
Please see these clear points, that mention the FOIA requests, from others who also understand that those in charge are lying criminals. (And a Midwestern Doctor did give the perspective that this virus doesn't exist fair consideration.)
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/thoughts-on-the-existence-of-viruses
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/where-did-covid-19-come-from-and -
****"For example, Christine Massey’s claim to fame (and her username) is that she filed FOIA requests that proved the CDC and other governmental agencies have never isolated SARS-CoV-2 and thus cannot prove it exists, thereby proving SARS-CoV-2 is a hoax. However, if you read through her FOIA requests it becomes clear that she used a very unique definition of what it means to isolate and purify a virus that no one else in the virology field uses (because it does not make sense), so as a result, no records matching her stipulations existed. If an argument like that were to be used in court, it would immediately result in the dismissal of the case.
Going forward, one of the most important things our movement can do is agree on effective strategies for addressing our common goals in the immediate future, while ensuring the same issues don’t emerge again a few years down the road after the public forgets what has happened. I hope this was helpful for providing insights in this regard. Please watch the video at the start; it is the most important part of this article. Thank you for reading this and sharing it with those who can benefit from hearing this message."
The video shared is from Dr Richard Fleming, who is so much deeper in the understanding of this lab-altered virus, and the trail of where it came from, than those who claim it does not exist. Dr Fleming wants as much as you do there to be serious accountability for crimes against humanity.
https://rumble.com/v1cnwvv-25-june-2022-caht-tampa-florida-usa.html
https://rumble.com/user/DrRichardMFleming
https://rumble.com/v1g40kl-10letters.org-campaign.html - If any governments can come to their senses and investigate / prosecute, that will not be helped by conflicting messages.
Those who created this through gain of function have committed treason. If we're also saying it doesn't exist ... that sabotages everything else. Perhaps it is not a virus in the sense of what viruses always have been. But, really, Dr Fleming is more knowledgeable about what this thing is than those who say it doesn't exist and point to the FOIA request and challenges to prove something according to impossible circles.
https://www.flemingmethod.com/
https://10letters.org/
Please - DO elucidate, Ellen - what HAVE 'viruses' ALWAYS been?
Answer: MISPERCEIVED - and, TRAGICALLY so; 'AGONIZED' by environmental insults, POISONING (as the very word itself MEANS 'poisoner'.....)
Additionally, if you can contextualize for me WHY they (like MOST other PROTEIN-based, but CRYSTALLINE-structured biologics) produce up to a full VOLT of piezoelectric charge (EXTREMELY critical consideration to causing 'disease-states', mutagenetic conditions, functional disregulation) although a RHETORICAL query as I already know, that would be ESPECIALLY appreciated.....
You dropped your rock.
.....'dropped my rock'? Not sure I understand, James......
A Braveheart reference. Based on your screen name. See the scene where William and Hamish meet again as adults.
AYE, lad - NIUW ae gaetcha! LOL
Hi Hamish, I think Dr. Zach Bush's work could explain better than I what viruses have always been. I think Dr. Richard Fleming could explain better than I (and better than Dr's Cowan, Kaufman, Bailey, Massey), what this particular not-natural-virus is.
https://rumble.com/user/DrRichardMFleming
https://rumble.com/v1553vz-gain-of-function-why-its-unlikely-covid-19-originated-from-a-bat-with-dr.-r.html
Thanks, Ellen - appreciate your graciousness; APOLOGIZE for my lack of it and yes, am quite familiar with Zach's model, as well as Stefan, Tom & Andrew's (communicated for a time with Tom's assistant, actually) - my prevailing concern - and reason for forceful comment in reply, is that we've let these creatures dictate the narrative for a century and a half (if NOT longer) from Pasteur's intellectual dishonesty, to Rockerfeller's (AND noxious 'Flexner Report') of which EXTERNALIZED 'viruses', are a CRUCIAL piece.....feeling IS, needs to be an ACTUAL alternative when those who BEGIN to ask the REALLY big, [re]DEFINING questions, DO.....
Thank you for this detailed comment. Your point is very well-stated and of the utmost importance.
Here are twenty more for consideration. Not in order of importance (some biggies later in the list), probably not complete, and apologies for any duplicates:
21. Covid19 had an extremely age-stratified risk profile with respect to severe disease and death, which was ignored by the government health policy to the detriment of the public, but could have been used to avoid a general lockdown and the associated harms that accrued.
22. The Covid19 Task Force was poorly run and allowed to become dysfunctional by having insufficient quantity of health policy experts as members, and by ignoring the advice of the one health policy expert that was on the team for a short few months.
23. The original study data presented by pharma for EUA, which showed higher all cause mortality and included signals for cardiac issues, was not diligently interpreted and used to disqualify the biologics but rather was recklessly disregarded in favor of advancing them to the public to the detriment of the public. A surrogate metric, relative risk reduction, was used to overstate the benefit to the public.
24. Animal trials were skipped or results hidden from the public to hide unfavorable symptoms and outcomes.
25. The Covid19 injectable biologics, a.k.a. Covid19 vaccines, are and have been since the early days of the pandemic, unlawful experimental biologics due to the existence of inexpensive and effective treatments that are fully FDA approved and listed internationally as WHO Essential Medicines, to wit Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.
26. Data supporting the use of Ivermectin were presented publicly and subsequently suppressed and overwhelmed by unfounded propaganda from government and pharma companies that misinformed the public into believing this eminently safe and helpful medicine to be harmful and ineffective. Results of Ivermectin metastudies, which looked across several randomly controlled trials and other observational studies, were ignored and suppressed, and actively undermined by key scientists in positions to influence government policy.
27. Fake science was perfomed by a cabal of investigators, in cahoots with the medical-scientific-pharma-military complex, who set up Ivermectin studies to fail by applying a variety of techniques such as improper dosing and inaccurate data definitions.
28. Public health data collection was compromised by changing the definition of becoming vaccinated, from the traditional definition of the moment of injection, to two weeks after injection or two weeks after two injections for “fully” vaccinated. This move distorted the results so that misleading conclusions could be advanced to the public to the detriment of the public.
29. The definition of a vaccine was changed to wipe away the traditional definition that it conveys immunity, to a watered down definition that it stimulates an immune response, thus allowing the biologics to be called a vaccine only in respect of the new definition, and putting the biologics on par with yogurt.
30. Scientific and medical journals abdicated their responsibility to publish scientific studies without prejudice, specifically those that would potentially undermine the government’s narrative, and instead actively published propaganda opinion pieces supporting the government narrative.
31. Other treatments that showed promise such as HCQ and Vitamin D3 were not sufficiently and honestly pursued to quantify their true benefit.
32. The Nuremburg code is the most authoritative, internationally recognized document in the history of medical ethics. The Nuremburg Code unquestionably asserts the primacy and dignity of the individual human being over the greater good of the state, or society. (credit: Vera Sharav, 8/20/2022) The Nuremburg code establishes ethical requirements for uncoerced consent and places the burden on those who conduct the experiment to ensure proper informed consent and right of refusal.
33. Doctors, pharmacists, nurses and medical professionals and administrators failed to provide informed consent, failed to call out the government narrative, failed to call out unscientific policies, failed to do no harm, and actively worked to advocate the experimental injectable biologics to the public to the detriment of the public.
34. Governments failed to protect the elderly by establishing policies that sent infected people back to nursing homes thereby spreading disease among the most vulnerable, and by depriving them of their dignity, humanity, rights, and agency, through forced sequestering.
35. Government failed to protect our children and continues to put them in harms way by approving EUA for experimental “preventative” biologics that they do not need and that pose increased risk of harm, making them counter-productive.
36. Years of knowledge about the ineffectiveness of masks were ignored in favor of a symbolic policy that forced compliance from the public and manipulated them into accepting other bad policies.
37. The policy to inject children, in the absence of medical justification for the net benefit of those children, for the professed benefit of protecting adults and the elderly, is grossly unethical: particularly so since children are not a significant source of transmission to adults, and Nuremberg. Children cannot possibly be in a position to understand risks and benefits and therefore are not able to engage in informed consent and should be excluded from medical experiments.
38. Parents and public institutions that pushed jabs on kids and young adults must have an opportunity for a moment of reckoning and spiritual soul searching for what they have perpetrated upon our children, so that they can reaffirm the principles of Nuremberg and regain their status of protector of our youth.
39. Corporations that engaged in the government propaganda and who coerced employees to take medical interventions against their wishes or lose their job as a consequence, and who intrusively asked for employee health status with respect to injections, must be rooted out, identified, lambasted, and penalized. Laws must be passed so that they do not ever again have incentive to repeat the behavior.
40. Citizens of every state should consider advocating for state legislation regarding a medical bill of rights, that references and incorporates Nuremberg code and that provides priority and autonomy to individuals with respect to their own medical procedures where the life of another is not directly and imminently jeopardized.
I made a few small edits and I added your suggestions to the article. Thank you for your suggestions and for your effort!
Some measure of Sanity is starting to prevail. We need to press on with accountability and judicial inquiry. There is now an awareness in the general public that this all needs to be opened up and that we have all been lied to. The CDC is desperately trying to regain some kind of authority. I am pleased they have reconsidered their statements.
Re C D C change of tune… they still claim that it is the unV who are experiencing higher rates of hospitalization and death.
Their statement here could just as easily be used to support ongoing frequent boosters, as they (correctly) state that the primary series is insufficient but also claim that being “up to date (with boosters)” is the way to protect against severe illness, death, and long vid.
I am not holding my breath yet b
Join whose forces and how? That's the million-dollar question...
Not giving up is indeed essential. Humanity is in the last stage of fighting Evil for survival:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-summary-of-fighting-evil
What good is to be informed:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-is-the-point-in-being-informed
People are stuck:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/stuck-between-fear-and-hope
The takeover didn't start yesterday and the people are deprived of any power and, since 2001, even their constitutional rights...
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/in-case-you-are-in-doubt
Kind of disappointed to see “virus not real” language in the polemic.
Nice try. I never said "virus not real." I said evidence of isolation and causation has not been provided by those who have promoted the mainstream narrative. Please recognize the clear difference.
.....MORE accurately stated as, 'viromic MEDIA (with LITTLE-acknowledged properties cited to Ellen) not NATURAL(ly-occurring)'.....
James, I'm on your side and apologize for any disrespect you may have perceived. I just hate to see this movement divided by the question of whether viruses exist or not, and this folly of isolation and purification of virions. (Steve Kirsch and the Midwestern Doctor have addressed this subject at great length.) Your work against mandates and the globalist agenda is too powerful, too timely, and too critical at this moment to be sidetracked or shunted into this topic. We need the full, unifying force of your message to be transmitted to the persuadable and awakening middle group.
No offense taken. I stand my ground however. I do not accept the assumptions on either side.
If there are three sides (or more) then, among those of us working together, maybe we could boot this one statement ("no evidence virus exists") from the manifesto? It can't possibly be a central issue.
FAUCI is the big monster in this picture. He lied about money he designated for gain of function He’s now trying to weasel out by quitting but Senator Kennedy said he’ll subpoena him to grill him before Congress
.....'grill'? Well FIRST, you need to FILLET him then.....
Senator Rand Paul.