DEBATE PREPARATION
The UK Parliament will be holding a public debate regarding the proposed "Pandemic Treaty." IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO BE WELL-INFORMED IN ADVANCE OF THIS PROPAGANDA EVENT.
If you live in the United Kingdom, CLICK HERE to sign the NEW petition.
Please watch the video below…
https://rumble.com/v2huugk-live-uncensored-eu-makes-insane-proposals-to-the-who-treatyihr.html
The “first ever public debate” regarding the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” is scheduled to be held on Monday 17 April 2023 at 4:30pm UK time (8:30am Pacific, 9:30am Mountain, 10:30am Central, 11:30 Eastern)
WATCH IT HERE: https://www.youtube.com/UKParliament
https://whatson.parliament.uk/commons/2023-04-17/
https://whatson.parliament.uk/event/cal42173
To my readers:
If I could attend the upcoming Parliamentary debate of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” that is scheduled to occur at 4:30pm UK time on 17 April 2023 in Westminster Hall, there are a lot of questions that I would ask. My questions are listed below.
Please review the questions and add to the comment section any questions that you would like to ask that I may have missed.
Please download and read the Zero Draft of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty”:
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdf
and CLICK HERE to review the additional text that has recently been submitted by the European Union.
20 GENERAL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE “PANDEMIC TREATY”:
Why are we allowing negotiations towards a “Pandemic Treaty” and amendments to the IHR to continue before full-fledged post-mortem analyses of the public health response, of the mistakes and of the crimes of the past 3+ years have been conducted?
Why are we allowing negotiations to be conducted before analyzing which measures were effective and which measures actually caused harm and even death?
Why are we allowing negotiations to occur before a full-fledged and conclusive investigation into the origin(s) and cause(s) of COVID-19 has been conducted?
Why are we allowing negotiations to restructure the “global health architecture” before holding officials accountable for the mistakes and crimes that have been committed? No one has been held accountable until everyone has been held accountable.
Please refrain from mindlessly repeating the phrase “prevention, preparedness, response and recovery” without first properly defining those terms. What are the official definitions of the much-repeated terms: “prevention, preparedness, response and recovery?”
What is the goal of these negotiations other than a blatant attempt to consolidate and centralize power? How can you possibly negotiate a meaningful and effective agreement when the words that are being used to define the negotiation’s fundamental goal are not clearly defined?
Who are the members of our delegation to the WHO that are purporting to speak for our nation and our people? Why are they unknown, unaccessible and unaccountable?
Are the negotiators knowledgeable about health? Have they ever treated people who are ill? Do they know anything at all about health?
Why are we allowing the vast majority of these negotiations to be conducted in secret?
The preamble of the WHO Constitution states that “active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.” Why are you allowing the WHO to ignore the crystal clear will of the people?
Why are we allowing the unelected, unaccountable and largely unknown delegates to the WHO to be involved in negotiations regarding the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” or amendments to the IHR while ignoring the will of the people and by neglecting public input or comment?
On 12-13 April 2022, 33,884 people submitted written public comments to the WHO. The overwhelming majority (99+%) of these comments were opposed to the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.” The WHO clearly ignored those comments. Their immediate response was to cancel the second round of public comments that had been scheduled for mid June, 2022. Why are you unable to comprehend that we do NOT want a global pandemic treaty or amendments to the IHR to be negotiated?
The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body has a list of nearly 400 “relevant stakeholders” who have had a seat at the negotiating table. Why are regular people not considered to be “relevant?” Why do we not have a seat at the negotiating table?
On 9-16 September, the WHO accepted public comment in video format. Hundreds of people from around the world submitted their videos, and these videos have been ignored. “Relevant stakeholders” also submitted their comments. The disparity in opinion was crystal clear. Universally, the “relevant stakeholders” supported the treaty while the people of the world opposed it. CLICK HERE to review the videos submitted by people around the world.
No process for accepting public comment seems to have been made available. How can people contact their nation’s delegates in order to express our position on this matter?
What does preparedness actually mean? On 21 September 2022, at the first Informal Focused Conference, a panel of experts clearly admitted that the “metrics” that they had been using to determine whether or not a nation was “prepared” for a future emergency had been shown to be useless. What metrics are being used to determine what constitutes preparedness?
Why have we not investigated the violations of human rights by overzealous officials who overstepped their lawful authority over the last 3+ years?
Do you really think that giving the WHO additional funding and legally-binding authority will help prevent the next “pandemic situation?” Isn’t building an entire industry that is reliant on never-ending crises far more likely to result in a never-ending series of “pandemic situations?” The more profitable pandemics become, the more likely they are to be declared.
Why are we allowing the focus to be placed upon the “equity of access to pandemic response products” rather than investigating the divergent disparity and lack of “equity in health outcomes?”
Why are we allowing the data on the WHO’s website to be ignored which clearly shows that deaths were 16+ times greater in the WHO’s European and North and South American Regions than in the WHO’s African region?
50 QUESTIONS THAT MUST BE ANSWERED BEFORE ANY NEGOTIATIONS SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE.
Why is it being assumed that the WHO should be given additional money, control and legally binding authority regarding pandemics when they have failed to even attempt to learn from the mistakes of the past 3+ years?
With the benefit of hindsight, what would you do differently in a possible future “pandemic?”
In the past 3+ years, how many autopsies have been performed on people whose death has been attributed to COVID-19?
How many people died FROM COVID-19, and how many people died from something else but had their deaths attributed to COVID-19?
How do you explain the nearly complete disappearance of influenza during a large time period over the past 3+ years?
Why are you NOT investigating the injuries and deaths caused by Midazolam?
Why are you NOT investigating the injuries and deaths caused by Remdesivir?
Why are you NOT investigating the failures of Paxlovid and Molnupiravir?
Why are you NOT investigating the failure of the AstraZeneca injections and the harm and devastation that it caused?
Will you state, for the public record, whether or not you think that the Pfizer vaccine is safe? One word answer: Yes, or No.
Will you state, for the public record, whether or not you think that the Moderna vaccine is safe? One word answer: Yes, or No.
Can you please point out where the word safe is legally defined?
What scientific study proved that 6 feet was the optimal measurement for “social distancing?”
The endpoints of the Pfizer study that was used to justify the initial Emergency Use Authorization did not include data on death, hospitalizations or transmissibility. The main endpoint tracked was “cases” that were effectively determined by RT-PCR which was implemented at an unspecified number of cycles. When it was reported that the clinical trials showed that the injections were 95% efficacious, was that mis, dis or mal-information?
Why are you NOT investigating the thousands of adverse events reported after injection with the gene therapy mRNA injections from Pfizer and Moderna?
What studies were used to determine that the COVID-19 was “safe” for pregnant women?
What are the implications of the effect of the jabs on fertility for both men and women?
Why is the act of continuing to state that the “vaccines” are “safe and effective,” not considered to be mis-information when the data from around the world has clearly shown that the jabs have been responsible for tens of thousands of adverse events and have failed to prevent infection and /or transmission?
Can you provide data to show that people who receive more COVID-19 injections live longer and are healthier than those who receive fewer injections, or none at all?
What was the survival rate of patients who were placed on mechanical ventilators? What percentage of people placed on ventilators for COVID-19 died while still on the ventilator?
How many lives were saved by mask mandates?
How many lives were saved due to social distancing?
How many lives were saved by lockdowns, curfews and travel restrictions?
How many lives were irreparably harmed by masking, social distancing, lockdowns, curfews, and travel restrictions?
How many lives were destroyed by vaccine mandates?
Was “two weeks to flatten the curve” a success?
How many people have been hospitalized after receiving the COVID-19 injections?
How many people have suffered permanent disability after receiving the COVID-19 injections?
How many people have died after receiving the COVID-19 injections?
Why was the AstraZeneca injectable product removed from the market after countless assurances that it was “safe and effective?”
Why have doctors been denied the right to speak their mind and give their professional opinions regarding proper treatment for their individual patients?
Why have protocols been allowed to replace individualized care?
Is it, or is it not the case, that licensed doctors have the legal right to prescribe medications “off-label” for diseases other than those for which they drugs were approved? Why was this right trampled?
What, if any, measures are or have been in place to ensure the quality, potency, purity, consistency, and proper labeling of COVID-19 “vaccines?”
Why should people have confidence that recipients are not being injected with shots ranging from “sham” injections with very little or no actual pharmacological material in the liquid all the way up to shots containing potentially deadly doses of material, all being distributed under the same label and brand of product?
Why have the detailed reports of independent analyses of each batch not been made available to the public?
Why have there not been official investigations into the reports of undeclared materials being identified in the COVID-19 injections?
Are different ingredients added to different batches of the COVID-19 injections or are all of the many batches analyzed and deemed to be as identical as possible?
In the benefit /risk assessment documents provided by Pfizer and Moderna, what value was reported as the number of people that needed to be injected that would be necessary to save one life?
Since the mRNA that was approved for use in the COVID-19 injections does not match any naturally occurring genetic sequence, should it not be considered to be a biological weapon that is designed to cause a new, man-made disease?
What are the legal definitions of the words “pandemic,” “vaccine,” “safe,” “effective” and “case”?
RT-PCR is not a diagnostic tool, it is a process. What percentage of “cases” determined by the RT-PCR process were asymptomatic and thus not only meaningless, but part of a massive fear-mongering campaign?
What is the definition of an asymptomatic case and how is such a determination truly any different than someone who is simply healthy?
What is the optimal number of cycles to run the RT-PCR process in order to accurately determine whether or not a person is ill and needs to be treated?
What is the optimal number of cycles to run the RT-PCR process in order to accurately determine whether or not a person is contagious and should isolate themselves from others?
What studies must be required and what is a thorough and appropriate length of time to conduct the necessary human clinical trials of a new proposed "vaccine" in order to truly determine that they are “safe and effective?”
Why is the same “stopping conditions” standard that has been used historically with other vaccines and medical products not being used now?
Define your “stopping conditions”? What is the number of adverse events (including deaths) that would cause the regulatory agencies to stop the injections and recall the products?
Where are the data taken from in order to monitor whether the “stopping conditions” have been reached?
What is the threshold of death and devastation that you are willing to accept?
SOURCES:
Download and read the “Zero Draft” of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty:
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdf
The European Union recently proposed a very substantial addition to the proposed Zero Draft. CLICK HERE for my recent article on the EU proposal.
OFFICIAL WHO WEB PAGE:
https://inb.who.int/
OFFICIAL UK POSITION DOCUMENT:
https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9550/CBP-9550.pdf
The document below highlights some of the important details of the proposed WHO CA+ or “Pandemic Treaty.” Please use it as a guide when you read the “Zero Draft.”
Download the UK Flyer
TAKE ACTION:
Everyone should CLICK HERE and HERE.
If you live in the United States, CLICK HERE and HERE.
Click on your country if you live in: Australia, Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom.
Call me directly if you have any questions: James Roguski +1-310-619-3055
by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
Signed.
Yes, I realise they can come after me. Time to stand up and be counted.
Thanks James for your tireless work.
The questions you posted are absolutely excellent. My question is why don't we abolish the WHO? Why don't we examine the built-in hypocrisy in the language we use, such as the term: "Public Health?"
Public Health is an oxymoron; health is personal and also private, it is not Public.
What is public? The use of personal information including "health" as an excuse for Authoritarianism. Since "Necessity" is always the Tyrant's plea, guess WHO is providing it?
World Homicide Organization, says it all.