The UK Parliament will be holding a public debate regarding the proposed "Pandemic Treaty." IT IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO BE WELL-INFORMED IN ADVANCE OF THIS PROPAGANDA EVENT.
You make a valid point about paying pandemic merchants will make more pandemics.
I propose that every time someone in the world dies before their time funding to the WHO is REDUCED. If there is a new pandemic all the management at the WHO are jailed because they did not prevent the pandemic.
Failure to promote generous or at least physiological dosing of Vitamin-D3 in the face of well known deficiencies and benefits means that they were NOT PREVENTING A PANDEMIC, they were remiss in their claimed task.
Dear James, yes I know the 50 questions can easily be copied into an email, and I most certainly could do so, but who would I send it to for signatures? I don't have any followers...You have quite a few.
In an emergency case on an airplane you first put your oxygen mask on before you put others on, your beloved come second. Well I think in the same way concerning this holy business about preparedness. A lifetime being prepared for a possible disaster, and what when nothing happens? A wasted life, but suppose something happens will we be prepared enough? All measures and countermeasures considered they will fall short a 100%. What are we talking about in both cases? A life devoid of all life, all feelings all preciousness.
It depends on each one of us to spread the word and the questions James has asked: they have the power to show the blatant silence and perversity of the governments to again commit treason against the citizens, and continue their wave of crimes against humanity.
It depends on us to stop them.
They know perfectly what are they doing. It was and is intentional: it is an agenda. Some act more consciously than others, but all of them are responsable of this agenda against freedom, rights and health. We must prevail.
Hi again, sorry James, I know you must be a busy man, but in answer to your reply to my comment...I have already seen where all the politicians names are, and have sent loads of your stuff to them, but I didn't see that wonderful set of 50 questions so bluntly put, in amongst what was available to send to them? Maybe I'm mistaken? If so my apologies. Otherwise, you misunderstood my question...I was suggesting that those...(and I quote...'50 questions that should be answered before any negotiations should be allowed to continue')...questions alone be forwarded to your Subscribers and anyone else who might be interested in adding their signature/names to that list with all those questions and THEN with all the signatories, the letter be sent to all our politicians. That list in particular, on its own, signed by many may, I believe, pack a real punch to any politician too lazy to read detailed stuff. Thank you James, hope I'm not wasting your time.
We have to ask WHO what is the purpose of the TREATY, and if they say that is for the good of mandkind, You got them. They have to prove it. And then many experts can come forward.
It’s extremely hard to read documents from the WHO They are badly written vague and confusing and long I’m used to reading undergraduate writing and the WHO documents wouldn’t be acceptable.
I think this makes it difficult both to read and to reply to. The contents are totally abhorrent
Great work, James. I admire your considerable efforts in exposing this huge issue. However, I don’t think people should expect to see much opposition from the UK Parliament. I’ve petitioned many times, including writing to local MP’s etc., but sadly, I can see exactly how this debate will go. For example, just look at the UK Parliamentary response to Andrew Bridgen MP’s powerful, evidenced statements on vax injuries - MP’s were basically rounded up and left the hall as he went to speak. Only a handful remained - as they had an obligation to. MSM then ran a successful hit campaign on him. Likewise, other MP’s who’ve attempted to stand up to Covid policies and the vax have been sidelined and smeared. The “Mother of all Parliaments” is sadly now the mother of corruption and self-interest, and as long as that state of affairs remains, I can’t put any faith in our parliamentary system, especially with our unelected, mega-rich, globalist prime minister or so-called leader of the “opposition”.
I just sent emails to Salem radio host Sebastian Gorka and freedom@CharlieKirk show about Monday 17th, debate in the UK. I hope this helps.
You make a valid point about paying pandemic merchants will make more pandemics.
I propose that every time someone in the world dies before their time funding to the WHO is REDUCED. If there is a new pandemic all the management at the WHO are jailed because they did not prevent the pandemic.
Failure to promote generous or at least physiological dosing of Vitamin-D3 in the face of well known deficiencies and benefits means that they were NOT PREVENTING A PANDEMIC, they were remiss in their claimed task.
Dear James, yes I know the 50 questions can easily be copied into an email, and I most certainly could do so, but who would I send it to for signatures? I don't have any followers...You have quite a few.
In an emergency case on an airplane you first put your oxygen mask on before you put others on, your beloved come second. Well I think in the same way concerning this holy business about preparedness. A lifetime being prepared for a possible disaster, and what when nothing happens? A wasted life, but suppose something happens will we be prepared enough? All measures and countermeasures considered they will fall short a 100%. What are we talking about in both cases? A life devoid of all life, all feelings all preciousness.
It depends on each one of us to spread the word and the questions James has asked: they have the power to show the blatant silence and perversity of the governments to again commit treason against the citizens, and continue their wave of crimes against humanity.
It depends on us to stop them.
They know perfectly what are they doing. It was and is intentional: it is an agenda. Some act more consciously than others, but all of them are responsable of this agenda against freedom, rights and health. We must prevail.
All countries need to get out of the WHO.
Hi again, sorry James, I know you must be a busy man, but in answer to your reply to my comment...I have already seen where all the politicians names are, and have sent loads of your stuff to them, but I didn't see that wonderful set of 50 questions so bluntly put, in amongst what was available to send to them? Maybe I'm mistaken? If so my apologies. Otherwise, you misunderstood my question...I was suggesting that those...(and I quote...'50 questions that should be answered before any negotiations should be allowed to continue')...questions alone be forwarded to your Subscribers and anyone else who might be interested in adding their signature/names to that list with all those questions and THEN with all the signatories, the letter be sent to all our politicians. That list in particular, on its own, signed by many may, I believe, pack a real punch to any politician too lazy to read detailed stuff. Thank you James, hope I'm not wasting your time.
I believe the 50 questions can easily be copied from the article and pasted into an email.
I totally agree. Long winded articles do not get looked at by busy people.
Bullet points, like the 50 questions are sound and speedy ammo.
If the vote is rigged like they are in many countries JUST DON'T COOPERATE.
Kirsten B. Schrøder
WHO have to prove that the TREATY is good, and it will take them a lifetime to do that or more.
Kirsten B. Schrøder
We have to ask WHO what is the purpose of the TREATY, and if they say that is for the good of mandkind, You got them. They have to prove it. And then many experts can come forward.
It’s extremely hard to read documents from the WHO They are badly written vague and confusing and long I’m used to reading undergraduate writing and the WHO documents wouldn’t be acceptable.
I think this makes it difficult both to read and to reply to. The contents are totally abhorrent
Recommend Questions 11 and 12 define what “safe” in our terms means. They could say yes they are safe based on 1 in 10000 due or are injured.
Screw the questions! Just say NO!! This will go nowhere! They will just keep messing with us anyways! Do NOT comply! Tell them NO!! PERIOD!!!
Great work, James. I admire your considerable efforts in exposing this huge issue. However, I don’t think people should expect to see much opposition from the UK Parliament. I’ve petitioned many times, including writing to local MP’s etc., but sadly, I can see exactly how this debate will go. For example, just look at the UK Parliamentary response to Andrew Bridgen MP’s powerful, evidenced statements on vax injuries - MP’s were basically rounded up and left the hall as he went to speak. Only a handful remained - as they had an obligation to. MSM then ran a successful hit campaign on him. Likewise, other MP’s who’ve attempted to stand up to Covid policies and the vax have been sidelined and smeared. The “Mother of all Parliaments” is sadly now the mother of corruption and self-interest, and as long as that state of affairs remains, I can’t put any faith in our parliamentary system, especially with our unelected, mega-rich, globalist prime minister or so-called leader of the “opposition”.
I would say just show us the blinking virus and the disease it causes https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/seeing-is-believing
🙏🏽
Thanks James. Be interesting to see how the debate goes.