Barking Up the Wrong Tree
Why have so many people chosen to ignore important information regarding the WHO negotiations? Old information is just as bad as mis-, dis- and mal-information.
Please watch the video below:
(Interview begins at 7 minutes)
https://www.brighteon.com/31ac4677-1370-46f8-ac07-3933b363b8d7
The local tyrants who attempted to abuse your rights and freedoms over the past 4+ years did not need any amendments to the International Health Regulations or a new “Pandemic Agreement” to do what they did. These are local issues that must be dealt with locally.
PLEASE read Katherine Watt’s articles HERE and HERE.
Please take the time to watch all the short videos below:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zeoQSkiwBb7B/
Abolish the WHO
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kyQa5QLLJqhi/
Donald J. Trump
Never Forget
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aX04kBONbcbq/
James Roguski
https://www.bitchute.com/video/68noiys4ufyP/
Please watch the videos below:
Patrick Wood
https://rumble.com/v4phb4k-episode-87-how-to-use-speech-to-persuade-and-inform.html
Medical Doctors For COVID Ethics
(Discussion begins at 8 minutes)
https://rumble.com/v4pjrp3-james-roguski.html
VSRF LIVE
https://rumble.com/v4j3b9z-vsrf-live-118-w.h.o.-pandemic-treaty-looms.html
For quite some time, the issues listed below have CLEARLY NOT been relevant. Many, many people continue to beat these dead horses.
The ongoing claims that the WHO negotiations are an attack on national sovereignty are red herrings.
The WHO negotiations are NOT an attack on national sovereignty.
The WHO negotiations are NOT about mandates or lockdowns.
The WHO negotiations are NOT about attempting to seize control of the doctor-patient relationship.
The WHO negotiations are NOT about censorship.
Many people have been ignoring the text that is actually in the “Pandemic Treaty.”
Article 3. Principles
To achieve the objective of the WHO Pandemic Agreement and to implement its provisions, the Parties shall be guided, inter alia, by the following:
1. the sovereign right of States to adopt, legislate and implement legislation, within their jurisdiction, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, the WHO Constitution and the principles of international law, and their sovereign rights over their biological resources;
2. full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of all persons, and the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health of every human being;
Latest version: https://healthpolicy-watch.news/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DRAFT_WHO-Pandemic-Agreement_16-April-2024.pdf
Previous version: https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb9/A_inb9_3-en.pdf (page 4)
Article 24. Secretariat
3. Nothing in the WHO Pandemic Agreement shall be interpreted as providing the WHO Secretariat, including the WHO Director-General, any authority to direct, order, alter or otherwise prescribe the national and/or domestic laws, as appropriate, or policies of any Party, or to mandate or otherwise impose any requirements that Parties take specific actions, such as ban or accept travellers, impose vaccination mandates or therapeutic or diagnostic measures, or implement lockdowns.
Latest version: https://healthpolicy-watch.news/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DRAFT_WHO-Pandemic-Agreement_16-April-2024.pdf (page 19)
Previous version: https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb9/A_inb9_3-en.pdf (page 25)
THIS IS NOT NEW!
On February 6, 2023 the International Health Regulations Review Committee published their “Final Report.” That is not a typographical error. The IHRRC “Final Report” was published over one year ago.
A few excerpts are below:
The sovereignty of States Parties remains foundational to the Regulations.
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_5-en.pdf (page 19)
Article 1
In relation to the two proposed amendments to remove the word “non-binding” from the definitions of “temporary” and “standing recommendations”, the Committee notes that on a plain reading the proposed change would not affect the current understanding of the definition of standing or temporary recommendations as merely advice that is not mandatory. However, given that substantial proposals were made in relation to WHO recommendations in other related articles, the proposed amendments to these definitions could be understood as aiming to change the nature of these recommendations from non-binding to binding, and giving a binding effect to WHO recommendations and requests as proposed in other articles.
That change would require a fundamental reconsideration of the nature of recommendations and the process for their adoption and implementation.
The Committee further notes that during a public health emergency of international concern the recommendations may work better if they are not mandatory and advises against changing the nature of recommendations.
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_5-en.pdf (page 26)
Article 43
This Committee is concerned that these proposals may unduly impinge on the sovereignty of States Parties and give binding effects to what are supposed to be recommendations.
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_5-en.pdf (page 68)
A Discussion With Bruce Pardy
Bruce Pardy has written some very important articles and I recently had the opportunity to have an in depth conversation with him. This information is EXTREMELY important. Please watch the video below…
LEAKED DOCUMENTS
To my knowledge, only Libby Klein seems to have grasped the significance of this leaked document and has demonstrated the courage to speak publicly about it.
I published the article below six weeks ago (March 9, 2024). It seems like it would have received more attention if I had dropped it into a black hole.
THESE AMENDMENTS ARE UNACCEPTABLE
SHARE: RejectTheAmendments.com | StopTheTreaty.org I have FINALLY obtained an unofficial document (archive.org version) that appears to be an updated version of the negotiating text of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
I published the article below regarding one of the most disturbing aspects of the leaked amendments, and no one seems to have noticed.
QUARANTINE
Please watch the videos below… We must #StopTheWHO, and the best way to accomplish that is to clearly and accurately comprehend what is really going on…
by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
Dear James,
You are an amazing, phenomenal man who obviously loves his country, as do we. You feel your words and actions are wasted and totally ignored (you're right). You try to educate and instead get nothing.
I wish I could tell you how much I admire and appreciate you. You are out there busting your ass and Americans are just going about their business, not paying attention to you or any others who are sounding the alarm. It has been planned this way for a long, long time now.
Like you, I also try to educate my friends and family and while a few "get it" and "take action," the majority of them don't believe it, are apathetic, don't want to listen, or are overwhelmed. Some of them have followed you and have done a lot of what you suggest, thank God.
For our part, we have a brother on life support,100+ miles away. We are in the middle of an agonizing situation so piling more on top of our traumatic grief and fear, we are now feeling overwhelmed and are finding it difficult to take action on just about anything but we still try.
The world situation is untenable, particularly here in America, land of the overtaken (by a specific country, bill gates, democrats, the elite, big pharma, evil, stupidity and much more). We are discouraged, disheartened, feeling rage, contempt, and deep, heartfelt sadness. Still, we strive to make a difference and correct America's course so its citizens are once again free (partly illusion), return to a land of opportunity, a land where we can make our own decisions about our bodies and what we put in them, make our own medical decisions, a land that is free of control by others--where we can eat and drink pure food and water, breathe clean air, and on and on.
So, dear man, I wish you every success and urge you to never give up. The amount of work and effort you put into your messages is astounding. My husband and I have the utmost respect and admiration for you and encourage you to keep up the fight. We will do our best to do our part.
"We traced the call - it's coming from inside the house."
Tells us all we need to know.