Yellow means the text has been agreed to in a working group. Green means it has been agreed to in the plenary of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB).
Thanks for the update, this agreement has a large amount of DELs and ADDs, making it confusing to work out what is still in and what is out. I’d be surprised if they manage to agree final text in just 10 days across all those countries but they have another week of negotiations.
Agreement looks to be creating a vast, global, pandemic related industry, coordinated by the WHO (in partnership with undefined “stakeholders” – think corporates and NGOs), who will also manage the global supply chain. Initially the idea is to create stockpiles and then ramp up production, each time a “pandemic emergency” is found. State parties are asked to contribute more public funds to both R&D and production and share technology at affordable prices so that everyone else can do the same. The PABS system needs to give WHO 20% of pandemic products, 10% free and 10% at not-for-profit prices.
The word “shall” appears frequently, adding pressure to comply, however, no penalties for non-compliance are mentioned (but, if it is profitable to participate, that would likely be enough).
Note that in Article 1: Pandemic-related health products includes “cell- and gene-based therapies”.
IMO, they should fully define “safe”, “effective” and “quality”, in relation to health products as, these terms have become so subjective and can mean dodgy, don’t work and inconsistently manufactured.
Article 5 looks to build in a new “One Health” legally binding agreement which must be operational by 31 May 2026.
Article 14: streamline regulatory processes for more rapid approvals of products. They talk about “vigilance to monitor the safety and effectiveness of pandemic-related health products”, but nothing about actually taking action on harmful products; so given current experience, it is doubtful that this will protect anyone.
Article 22: regional organisations can vote on behalf of their member states and they get all the votes of any member states who do not exercise their own vote. (This should get the numbers up!).
Article 29-31: this agreement can be changed later via Conference of the Parties to introduce new amendments and protocols later.
Article 32: Once signed, can’t get out of it for 3 years (even if agreement amended later).
How did Tedros a well known mass murderer who actually help conduct genocide against a rival tribe in his own country get this job or is it that easy they WANTED someone who can commit genocide without a second thought besides Bill Gates and the CCP?
This is long but you'll want to read: I have an idea regarding this matter
While we're dealing with two issues
1. The Amendments to the IHR's
2. The Pandemic Agreement
The former is a modification of a congressional-executive agreement that got us into the WHO back in 1948; the second one is a framework convention that effectively gives them the ability to do what they did before but with more power and money (something I think we all can conclude they don't need and we don't want).
In both cases we need to contact our legislators
For the former we need them to pass H.R.79 which withdraws all funding to the WHO, and we should also apply pressure to Senators to pass companion legislation since the House and Senate are both required to get a bill passed
For the latter we need to contact our Senators only and provide them solid reasons to reject this (many reasons are provided here). Use arguments that are hard to fact-check away since the use of social media will be vital.
Because Twitter not only allows us to easily get a hold of legislators (as well as all the others), but also put them on the spot where others can see our message: I suggest we do that since that has historically been a way to force responces. While we should focus on all legislators, I'd probably more heavily weight my message towards conservatives (particularly those who have endorsed HR.79) and Senators with similar attitudes.
With text limitations being a major problem on Twitter, one do simple things like make a text-message; then screen-cap it (I've done this and it works) or use one of Mr. Roguski's infographics to get around said limitations. I would focus on things that cannot be easily fact-checked away since even Twitter does this, and it's election season (and fact-checkers tend to be on high-alert during this time period).
Tagging people is important as well as that applies additional pressure: You'll want to do the following.
1. Find every libertarian party for the legislator you're messaging (so, if they're from Georgia, look up Libertarian Party of Georgia, there's also LP Mises groups as well): They tend to be sensitive to things that infringe upon their individual liberties and it woudl stand to reason many would be opposed to this on principle.
2. Look at the replies to the legislator on messages he's made. You'll find some people who are quite pleased with him, others who are angry at various things he/she's said/done. Generally you can tell that certain people would be receptive and you want to tag them.
A True Pandemic is when Solar Flare weakens immune system over a Huge Geography starting at the Highest planes. Boosting the immune System is all that's required. Russia treated Tuberculosis in Miners by forcing them to get nude in direct Sunlight & Solar Bath to combat TB. It was a way to induce Vitamin D-3 which has been proven to be effective with Corona V. Alternative Health CHOICE MUST be funded & supported in a Day of Civilian intellectual insight & knowledge.Minerals, Enzymes, ProBiotics,Energy Medicine,Dr.Hulda Clark ZAPPERS!!! Also Disease caused by EMF Technology & Poison in air,water & Food. The enemy is NOT Nature...
It is quite clear that is not what everyone goes on about, it even says in its beginning clause that it allows the countries to take suite their procedures. And it uses words like "equity" and "sustainability" as an excuse to scare people for another pandemic (if its propaganda for it works this time around that is) and also as an excuse to trade more Big Pharma products, be it "vaccines" or something else. Also their surveillance part is a use of tyranny.
It's just a bogus document and treaty where we the people have no say and people need to speak out against it. People need to also recognise the local tyrants.
James could you pass this to Julian Assange’s wife Stella. I been trying to reach her but not mastered this site yet.
Friday 17 May 2024
More to Julian Assange's wife Stella Assange to stop the Extradition.
The below laws pasted are to help Stop the illegal non jury court powers and deportation planned against Julian and under Article 61 must force the King to stop it or the King automatically commit treason against his and all from 1066/68 Coronation Oath.
Now read the below why real Magna Carta Written Constitutional Laws, as be evidence against everybody s far against Julian.
The below is also pasted from U.K Parliament records in 1960's print of Magna Carta 1215’s Preamble & relevant Articles 1, 38, 39, 40, 61 that the Governments and legal system and staff have all been illegally breaking for years to gradually overturn the U.K and will try to cover-up their break these jury laws against civilians without an open court jury trial of my 12 civilian peers first as the real judges of law and facts, not justices planted by the political government. So
The below that is pasted all the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights Act 1948 30 Articles England’s ever Parliament signed unto since 1948 and so agreed not to break the 30 as long as they from U.N do change them nor allow the U.K to break Magna Carta 1215’s Maxims that founded our English Crown. All public Departments & staff are Defenders of the faith of Jesus, so be defenders of Moses Major 10 Commandments law maxims against any murder of Julian Assange.
‘‘MAGNA CHARTA (Anno Domini 1215)
JOHN, by the grace of God King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, Greeting.
KNOW THAT BEFORE GOD, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal 0of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household, Brother Aymeric master of the knighthood of the Temple in England, William Marshal earl of Pembroke, William earl of Salisbury, William earl of Warren, William earl of Arundel, Alan of Galloway constable of Scotland, Warin fitz Gerald, Peter fitz Herbert, Hubert de Burgh seneschal of Poitou, Hugh de Neville, Matthew fitz Herbert, Thomas Basset, Alan Basset, Philip Daubeny, Robert de Roppeley, John Marshal, John fitz Hugh, and other loyal subjects: -
(1) FIRST, THAT WE HAVE GRANTED TO GOD, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired. That we wish this so to be observed, appears from the fact that of our own free will, before the outbreak of the present dispute between us and our barons, we granted and confirmed by charter the freedom of the Church's elections - a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance to it - and caused this to be confirmed by Pope Innocent III. This freedom we shall observe ourselves, and desire to be observed in good faith by our heirs in perpetuity.
TO ALL FREE MEN OF OUR KINGDOM we have also granted, for us and our heirs for ever, all the liberties written out below, to have and to keep for them and their heirs, of us and our heirs:
Articles - …..
(38) In future no official shall place a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible witnesses to the truth of it.
(39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.
(40) To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.
(61) SINCE WE HAVE GRANTED ALL THESE THINGS for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons, and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, for ever, we give and grant to the barons the following security:
The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter.
If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us – or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice – to declare it and claim immediate redress. If we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, make no redress within forty days, reckoning from the day on which the offence was declared to us or to him, the four barons shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons, who may distrain upon and assail us in every way possible, with the support of the whole community of the land, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon. Having secured the redress, they may then resume their normal obedience to us.
Any man who so desires may take an oath to obey the commands of the twenty-five barons for the achievement of these ends, and to join with them in assailing us to the utmost of his power. We give public and free permission to take this oath to any man who so desires, and at no time will we prohibit any man from taking it. Indeed, we will compel any of our subjects who are unwilling to take it to swear it at our command.
If one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is prevented in any other way from discharging his duties, the rest of them shall choose another baron in his place, at their discretion, who shall be duly sworn in as they were.
In the event of disagreement among the twenty-five barons on any matter referred to them for decision, the verdict of the majority present shall have the same validity as a unanimous verdict of the whole twenty-five, whether these were all present or some of those summoned were unwilling or unable to appear.
The twenty-five barons shall swear to obey all the above articles faithfully, and shall cause them to be obeyed by others to the best of their power.
We will not seek to procure from anyone, either by our own efforts or those of a third party, anything by which any part of these concessions or liberties might be revoked or diminished. Should such a thing be procured, it shall be null and void and we will at no time make use of it, either ourselves or through a third party.’’
The Coronation Oaths binding all after 1066 ever U.K Kings, Queens, and M.Ps, to Obey Magna Carta full open court Jury trial system before adult civilians lose anything. Magna Carta 1215’s Article 61 Commands the King to himself stop what they have done to both me Delroy and fiancée Miss L Douglas. The below Anti slavery Act 1833 was not needed after Magna Carta 1215 forced it to be passed against slavery forever after 1833.
The emailed James same day but it was sent his wife Stella-
Assange's wife needs to know: Transporting any civilians from England or elsewhere is forever illegal when you look in anti slavery laws precedents before our 1807 Abolishment of slavery Act's forever prevents the Crown from agreeing to any transportation of any black and white people onto any type of British Ship, because Magna Carta 1066 and its over 100 years Heabeas Corpus civilian safety laws prevented U.K' slavery anyway even before Abolishment of Slavery Act 1833 that they now hide to political party extradite. Transporting Julian to people that maybe kill him is also against asylum laws.
NOTE:
Yellow means the text has been agreed to in a working group. Green means it has been agreed to in the plenary of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB).
We are in deep shit. I have only read to 6 and i am worried as all hell.
Did you hear Atty Todd Callender on Dr Jane Ruby podcast this morning?
Please share a link
Did Tricia mean this one? https://rumble.com/v51gyl4-marburg-fever-already-declared-18-ghz-activates-the-jabbed.html
1/ It won't have escaped your attention that cell- and gene-based therapies are listed among the 'health products'.
2/ 'One Health' means One Equal-Opportunity Tyranny.
3/ "Liability risk management for novel pandemic vaccines" means legal immunity for all medical killers and their accomplices.
4/ Global Supply Chain and Logistics (GSCL) means Genocide Supply Chain and Lethality.
I'm trying to remember IF I have read somewhere that the vx has been ruled as a poisonin court
If this rings any bells ..please reply
I'm not sure I'm that worried about it having read it. Nothing in this article strikes me as being "out and out authoritarian". I'll keep watching.
Thanks for the update, this agreement has a large amount of DELs and ADDs, making it confusing to work out what is still in and what is out. I’d be surprised if they manage to agree final text in just 10 days across all those countries but they have another week of negotiations.
Agreement looks to be creating a vast, global, pandemic related industry, coordinated by the WHO (in partnership with undefined “stakeholders” – think corporates and NGOs), who will also manage the global supply chain. Initially the idea is to create stockpiles and then ramp up production, each time a “pandemic emergency” is found. State parties are asked to contribute more public funds to both R&D and production and share technology at affordable prices so that everyone else can do the same. The PABS system needs to give WHO 20% of pandemic products, 10% free and 10% at not-for-profit prices.
The word “shall” appears frequently, adding pressure to comply, however, no penalties for non-compliance are mentioned (but, if it is profitable to participate, that would likely be enough).
Note that in Article 1: Pandemic-related health products includes “cell- and gene-based therapies”.
IMO, they should fully define “safe”, “effective” and “quality”, in relation to health products as, these terms have become so subjective and can mean dodgy, don’t work and inconsistently manufactured.
Article 5 looks to build in a new “One Health” legally binding agreement which must be operational by 31 May 2026.
Article 14: streamline regulatory processes for more rapid approvals of products. They talk about “vigilance to monitor the safety and effectiveness of pandemic-related health products”, but nothing about actually taking action on harmful products; so given current experience, it is doubtful that this will protect anyone.
Article 22: regional organisations can vote on behalf of their member states and they get all the votes of any member states who do not exercise their own vote. (This should get the numbers up!).
Article 29-31: this agreement can be changed later via Conference of the Parties to introduce new amendments and protocols later.
Article 32: Once signed, can’t get out of it for 3 years (even if agreement amended later).
How did Tedros a well known mass murderer who actually help conduct genocide against a rival tribe in his own country get this job or is it that easy they WANTED someone who can commit genocide without a second thought besides Bill Gates and the CCP?
This is long but you'll want to read: I have an idea regarding this matter
While we're dealing with two issues
1. The Amendments to the IHR's
2. The Pandemic Agreement
The former is a modification of a congressional-executive agreement that got us into the WHO back in 1948; the second one is a framework convention that effectively gives them the ability to do what they did before but with more power and money (something I think we all can conclude they don't need and we don't want).
In both cases we need to contact our legislators
For the former we need them to pass H.R.79 which withdraws all funding to the WHO, and we should also apply pressure to Senators to pass companion legislation since the House and Senate are both required to get a bill passed
For the latter we need to contact our Senators only and provide them solid reasons to reject this (many reasons are provided here). Use arguments that are hard to fact-check away since the use of social media will be vital.
Because Twitter not only allows us to easily get a hold of legislators (as well as all the others), but also put them on the spot where others can see our message: I suggest we do that since that has historically been a way to force responces. While we should focus on all legislators, I'd probably more heavily weight my message towards conservatives (particularly those who have endorsed HR.79) and Senators with similar attitudes.
With text limitations being a major problem on Twitter, one do simple things like make a text-message; then screen-cap it (I've done this and it works) or use one of Mr. Roguski's infographics to get around said limitations. I would focus on things that cannot be easily fact-checked away since even Twitter does this, and it's election season (and fact-checkers tend to be on high-alert during this time period).
Tagging people is important as well as that applies additional pressure: You'll want to do the following.
1. Find every libertarian party for the legislator you're messaging (so, if they're from Georgia, look up Libertarian Party of Georgia, there's also LP Mises groups as well): They tend to be sensitive to things that infringe upon their individual liberties and it woudl stand to reason many would be opposed to this on principle.
2. Look at the replies to the legislator on messages he's made. You'll find some people who are quite pleased with him, others who are angry at various things he/she's said/done. Generally you can tell that certain people would be receptive and you want to tag them.
You can contact me at
Zipper730@gmail.com
A True Pandemic is when Solar Flare weakens immune system over a Huge Geography starting at the Highest planes. Boosting the immune System is all that's required. Russia treated Tuberculosis in Miners by forcing them to get nude in direct Sunlight & Solar Bath to combat TB. It was a way to induce Vitamin D-3 which has been proven to be effective with Corona V. Alternative Health CHOICE MUST be funded & supported in a Day of Civilian intellectual insight & knowledge.Minerals, Enzymes, ProBiotics,Energy Medicine,Dr.Hulda Clark ZAPPERS!!! Also Disease caused by EMF Technology & Poison in air,water & Food. The enemy is NOT Nature...
It is quite clear that is not what everyone goes on about, it even says in its beginning clause that it allows the countries to take suite their procedures. And it uses words like "equity" and "sustainability" as an excuse to scare people for another pandemic (if its propaganda for it works this time around that is) and also as an excuse to trade more Big Pharma products, be it "vaccines" or something else. Also their surveillance part is a use of tyranny.
It's just a bogus document and treaty where we the people have no say and people need to speak out against it. People need to also recognise the local tyrants.
James could you pass this to Julian Assange’s wife Stella. I been trying to reach her but not mastered this site yet.
Friday 17 May 2024
More to Julian Assange's wife Stella Assange to stop the Extradition.
The below laws pasted are to help Stop the illegal non jury court powers and deportation planned against Julian and under Article 61 must force the King to stop it or the King automatically commit treason against his and all from 1066/68 Coronation Oath.
Now read the below why real Magna Carta Written Constitutional Laws, as be evidence against everybody s far against Julian.
The below is also pasted from U.K Parliament records in 1960's print of Magna Carta 1215’s Preamble & relevant Articles 1, 38, 39, 40, 61 that the Governments and legal system and staff have all been illegally breaking for years to gradually overturn the U.K and will try to cover-up their break these jury laws against civilians without an open court jury trial of my 12 civilian peers first as the real judges of law and facts, not justices planted by the political government. So
The below that is pasted all the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights Act 1948 30 Articles England’s ever Parliament signed unto since 1948 and so agreed not to break the 30 as long as they from U.N do change them nor allow the U.K to break Magna Carta 1215’s Maxims that founded our English Crown. All public Departments & staff are Defenders of the faith of Jesus, so be defenders of Moses Major 10 Commandments law maxims against any murder of Julian Assange.
‘‘MAGNA CHARTA (Anno Domini 1215)
JOHN, by the grace of God King of England, Lord of Ireland, Duke of Normandy and Aquitaine, and Count of Anjou, to his archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justices, foresters, sheriffs, stewards, servants, and to all his officials and loyal subjects, Greeting.
KNOW THAT BEFORE GOD, for the health of our soul and those of our ancestors and heirs, to the honour of God, the exaltation of the holy Church, and the better ordering of our kingdom, at the advice of our reverend fathers Stephen, archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England, and cardinal 0of the holy Roman Church, Henry archbishop of Dublin, William bishop of London, Peter bishop of Winchester, Jocelin bishop of Bath and Glastonbury, Hugh bishop of Lincoln, Walter bishop of Worcester, William bishop of Coventry, Benedict bishop of Rochester, Master Pandulf subdeacon and member of the papal household, Brother Aymeric master of the knighthood of the Temple in England, William Marshal earl of Pembroke, William earl of Salisbury, William earl of Warren, William earl of Arundel, Alan of Galloway constable of Scotland, Warin fitz Gerald, Peter fitz Herbert, Hubert de Burgh seneschal of Poitou, Hugh de Neville, Matthew fitz Herbert, Thomas Basset, Alan Basset, Philip Daubeny, Robert de Roppeley, John Marshal, John fitz Hugh, and other loyal subjects: -
(1) FIRST, THAT WE HAVE GRANTED TO GOD, and by this present charter have confirmed for us and our heirs in perpetuity, that the English Church shall be free, and shall have its rights undiminished, and its liberties unimpaired. That we wish this so to be observed, appears from the fact that of our own free will, before the outbreak of the present dispute between us and our barons, we granted and confirmed by charter the freedom of the Church's elections - a right reckoned to be of the greatest necessity and importance to it - and caused this to be confirmed by Pope Innocent III. This freedom we shall observe ourselves, and desire to be observed in good faith by our heirs in perpetuity.
TO ALL FREE MEN OF OUR KINGDOM we have also granted, for us and our heirs for ever, all the liberties written out below, to have and to keep for them and their heirs, of us and our heirs:
Articles - …..
(38) In future no official shall place a man on trial upon his own unsupported statement, without producing credible witnesses to the truth of it.
(39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land.
(40) To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.
(61) SINCE WE HAVE GRANTED ALL THESE THINGS for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons, and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, for ever, we give and grant to the barons the following security:
The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter.
If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offence is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us – or in our absence from the kingdom to the chief justice – to declare it and claim immediate redress. If we, or in our absence abroad the chief justice, make no redress within forty days, reckoning from the day on which the offence was declared to us or to him, the four barons shall refer the matter to the rest of the twenty-five barons, who may distrain upon and assail us in every way possible, with the support of the whole community of the land, by seizing our castles, lands, possessions, or anything else saving only our own person and those of the queen and our children, until they have secured such redress as they have determined upon. Having secured the redress, they may then resume their normal obedience to us.
Any man who so desires may take an oath to obey the commands of the twenty-five barons for the achievement of these ends, and to join with them in assailing us to the utmost of his power. We give public and free permission to take this oath to any man who so desires, and at no time will we prohibit any man from taking it. Indeed, we will compel any of our subjects who are unwilling to take it to swear it at our command.
If one of the twenty-five barons dies or leaves the country, or is prevented in any other way from discharging his duties, the rest of them shall choose another baron in his place, at their discretion, who shall be duly sworn in as they were.
In the event of disagreement among the twenty-five barons on any matter referred to them for decision, the verdict of the majority present shall have the same validity as a unanimous verdict of the whole twenty-five, whether these were all present or some of those summoned were unwilling or unable to appear.
The twenty-five barons shall swear to obey all the above articles faithfully, and shall cause them to be obeyed by others to the best of their power.
We will not seek to procure from anyone, either by our own efforts or those of a third party, anything by which any part of these concessions or liberties might be revoked or diminished. Should such a thing be procured, it shall be null and void and we will at no time make use of it, either ourselves or through a third party.’’
The Coronation Oaths binding all after 1066 ever U.K Kings, Queens, and M.Ps, to Obey Magna Carta full open court Jury trial system before adult civilians lose anything. Magna Carta 1215’s Article 61 Commands the King to himself stop what they have done to both me Delroy and fiancée Miss L Douglas. The below Anti slavery Act 1833 was not needed after Magna Carta 1215 forced it to be passed against slavery forever after 1833.
The emailed James same day but it was sent his wife Stella-
Assange's wife needs to know: Transporting any civilians from England or elsewhere is forever illegal when you look in anti slavery laws precedents before our 1807 Abolishment of slavery Act's forever prevents the Crown from agreeing to any transportation of any black and white people onto any type of British Ship, because Magna Carta 1066 and its over 100 years Heabeas Corpus civilian safety laws prevented U.K' slavery anyway even before Abolishment of Slavery Act 1833 that they now hide to political party extradite. Transporting Julian to people that maybe kill him is also against asylum laws.
Sorry I have not mastered this site yet.
Update from Lawrence Gostin:
https://twitter.com/LawrenceGostin/status/1791192326724813103
He is involved in both INB-bureau and WGIHR (through the Review Committee):
https://oneill.law.georgetown.edu/experts/lawrence-o-gostin/
The O'Neill institute is WHO Collaborating Centre for National and Global Health Law:
https://apps.who.int/whocc/Detail.aspx?grqVAF43l5NwR+YXh1lCCg==
WE NEED TO STOP THIS DEPOPULATION AGENDA BY THESE WANT TO BE SO CALLESD ELITE.
ALL THEY HAVE IS DEATH TO THE HUMAN RACE.I FOLLED THIS AGENDA FOR ABOUT 40 YEARS OR
MORE.
Check out the blog about WHO.
https://www.considerit.blog/
No WHO Treaty. They are Genocidal Psychopaths!
Thank you James for all your journalism analysis and the posting of it all. It is clear and easy to follow. God Bless.