Thank you, James, for all you do to help protect our inalienable right to choose the medical plan suited to our needs and not by the unelected WHO! I'm attaching the email I sent Senator Rand Paul over a week ago. I am still awaiting any correspondence besides the same 'form letter' thanking me for contacting his office.
Dear Senator Paul,
You fought to have Dr. Fauci exposed for crimes against humanity. He has not been charged for participating in the gain-of-function vaccine; he still needs to be investigated for his part in the COVID-19 sham!
Another pressing concern is the WHO's encroachment on our sovereign medical rights. It is disheartening to note that, per my understanding, no senator has yet voted to 'EXIT THE WHO.' This is a matter of significant importance that needs immediate attention from you. The urgency of this issue cannot be overstated.
As our Kentucky senator, I implore you to copy H.R. 79 (The WHO Withdrawal Act) and submit it as companion legislation in the Senate to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization.
Please do not respond with a 'form' letter. Each issue I've addressed to you affecting our nation's welfare has been a returned form letter 'thanking me for contacting your office.' It would be best if you didn't thank me. Please act on our country's behalf. As an elected official for the people, I/we expect nothing less! Your actions are crucial in this matter.
I look forward to hearing your decision on these matters.
Thank you, James, for all you do to help protect our inalienable right to choose the medical plan suited to our needs and not by the unelected WHO! I'm attaching the email I sent Senator Rand Paul over a week ago. I am still awaiting any correspondence besides the same 'form letter' thanking me for contacting his office.
Dear Senator Paul,
You fought to have Dr. Fauci exposed for crimes against humanity. He has not been charged for participating in the gain-of-function vaccine; he still needs to be investigated for his part in the COVID-19 sham!
Another pressing concern is the WHO's encroachment on our sovereign medical rights. It is disheartening to note that, per my understanding, no senator has yet voted to 'EXIT THE WHO'. This is a matter of significant importance that needs immediate attention from you. The urgency of this issue cannot be overstated.
As our Kentucky senator, I implore you to copy H.R. 79 (The WHO Withdrawal Act) and submit it as companion legislation in the Senate to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization.
Please do not respond with a 'form' letter. Each issue I've addressed to you affecting our nation's welfare has been a returned form letter 'thanking me for contacting your office.' I don't need you to thank me. I need you to act on our country's behalf. As an elected official for the people, I/we expect nothing less! Your actions are crucial in this matter.
I look forward to hearing your decision on these matters.
This is long but you'll want to read: I have an idea regarding this matter
While we're dealing with two issues
1. The Amendments to the IHR's
2. The Pandemic Agreement
The former is a modification of a congressional-executive agreement that got us into the WHO back in 1948; the second one is a framework convention that effectively gives them the ability to do what they did before but with more power and money (something I think we all can conclude they don't need and we don't want).
In both cases we need to contact our legislators
For the former we need them to pass H.R.79 which withdraws all funding to the WHO, and we should also apply pressure to Senators to pass companion legislation since the House and Senate are both required to get a bill passed
For the latter we need to contact our Senators only and provide them solid reasons to reject this (many reasons are provided here). Use arguments that are hard to fact-check away since the use of social media will be vital.
Because Twitter not only allows us to easily get a hold of legislators (as well as all the others), but also put them on the spot where others can see our message: I suggest we do that since that has historically been a way to force responces. While we should focus on all legislators, I'd probably more heavily weight my message towards conservatives (particularly those who have endorsed HR.79) and Senators with similar attitudes.
With text limitations being a major problem on Twitter, one do simple things like make a text-message; then screen-cap it (I've done this and it works) or use one of Mr. Roguski's infographics to get around said limitations. I would focus on things that cannot be easily fact-checked away since even Twitter does this, and it's election season (and fact-checkers tend to be on high-alert during this time period).
Tagging people is important as well as that applies additional pressure: You'll want to do the following.
1. Find every libertarian party for the legislator you're messaging (so, if they're from Georgia, look up Libertarian Party of Georgia, you can also find stuff under "LP Mises"): They tend to be sensitive to things that infringe upon their individual liberties and it woudl stand to reason many would be opposed to this on principle.
2. Look at the replies to the legislator on his/her messages. You'll find some people who are quite pleased with him, others who are angry at various things he/she's said/done. Generally you can tell that certain people would be receptive and you want to tag them.
Hi Jim, just to let you know, received my first reply having emailed all those senators you listed.
Good Afternoon Brenda,
We understand your concerns around this subject, and we would like to assure you that Conservatives believe only Canada's Parliament should set policy and direction on what is best for Canada. As you know, we have been a strong voice for lifting federal vaccine mandates and restrictions. We will examine the recommendations of the INB and their draft report when it is submitted to the Assembly. We will not support anything that infringes on Canada’s sovereignty and capacity to manage its own affairs.
Conservatives have proposed reasonable made-in-Canada solutions to end the Prime Minister’s division and stigmatization by following the science, just as many provinces and countries around the world have already done. I will share your email with Dr. Ellis as he appreciates hearing from his constituents.
Everyone please call Rep. Michael McCaul of TX, Chairman, House Foreign Affairs Committee, who did not sign. https://mccaul.house.gov/ Let's flood his phones.
I just called all the Republican reps in the House Foreign Affairs Committee. I got a reaction of shock from the staffer of Rep. Baird of Indiana. He might be a good one to get this moving.
As our public servant, I demand that you copy H.R. 79 (The WHO Withdrawal Act) and submit it as companion legislation in the Senate in order to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization and work to pass it. We are notifying you that the People never granted consent over private matters of health to the government. Please be reminded that as a public servant, you can be held personally liable and/or a claims against your surety bond can be made if you are derelict in your duty, are improperly bonded, or commit or conspire to commit a crime or injury against the people.
We will hold our legislators accountable, because "the right to self-determination over one’s own body is neither tethered to, nor predicated upon, objective fact-finding of what is purportedly right, correct, or true as judged by contemporary society. It is the province of the soul. It cannot, and ought not be, legislatively usurped and second guessed by the Executive Branch in reliance on the best intentions of experts in a decidedly novel, and ever evolving area of indisputably unsettled science.
Nothing is more fundamental to the role government plays in the Great American Experiment, than the notion that mankind is “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights[.]” (Declaration of Independence, 1 Stat. 1.) As such, only “to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed[.]”
In keeping with rights being inherent to the very nature of mankind, the Bill of Rights grants none. Instead, it prohibits governmental intrusion upon the intrinsic, existing rights of the governed, by further making clear, for example, that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press[.]” (U.S. constitution amendment I.)
In the avoidance of doubt, the “enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” (U.S. constitution amendment IX.)
In times of strife and turmoil, it is perhaps more important than ever to keep in mind the very foundation on which our nation was built. Indeed, it is that foundation which chartered the course for where we find ourselves today. Private matters of personal, bodily choice are reserved by the governed. The governed have not granted that power to the government. Under the Constitution then, those matters retained by the governed are to be decided by the individual, on a case-by-case basis. Not by sweeping mandates making that decision for all, without regard to the various medical situations, beliefs, and morals of each person. The High Court teaches that our Constitution “is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States.” Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45, 76 (1905).
The people have, and have retained, the right to self-determination, particularly in matters of choice concerning bodily autonomy. The people have never delegated those rights to the government. As such, the government has neither the just power, nor the consent of the governed, to forcibly decide for them."
I've emailed/called not only my U.S. senators and rep, but also the Senate Foreign Relations and House Foreign Affairs Committees, including Republicans who did not sign H.R.79. Any replies I've gotten said they support the wonderful WHO . How do I get their attention? I also contacted my state senators about the one anti-WHO bill in PA. Crickets. Any suggestions on senators/reps who might be able to be persuaded? All Sen. Ron Johnson's S.444 says is that a treaty requires Senate approval which is already in the Constitution Art. 2 Sec. 2. They can't even commit to following the Constitution.
Have you done this? I know it works because my friend served her reps on another matter and and they stopped their illegal actions. I've never done it and there isn't enough time for me with the WHO matter.
Not any more! My country is an over migrated to UN sanctioned dumping ground run by and for minorities. Foreign investors and minority groups run and own the place, while our woke education system wants to re-write our history so we will be ashamed of Australia, hate the country, and embrace Socialism
Following the USA exit from the WHO, Australia should follow. But, wait. Forgot that our sycophantic Socialist Elitist, weak, China and UN loving vacuous, corrupt Fed Govt will be too afraid to actually do anything that may rock the boat. Silly me!
Not any more. Australia is nothing more now than a UN enforced refugee, migrant, dumping ground where our history is re-written so to make us hate the country and only embrace woke socialist ideology. Aus is a follower. Never a leader in anything
Please realize that everyone can contact all 100 Senators. They accept campaign donations and meet with lobbyists from other states.
CALL THEM ALL
Thank you, James, for all you do to help protect our inalienable right to choose the medical plan suited to our needs and not by the unelected WHO! I'm attaching the email I sent Senator Rand Paul over a week ago. I am still awaiting any correspondence besides the same 'form letter' thanking me for contacting his office.
Dear Senator Paul,
You fought to have Dr. Fauci exposed for crimes against humanity. He has not been charged for participating in the gain-of-function vaccine; he still needs to be investigated for his part in the COVID-19 sham!
Another pressing concern is the WHO's encroachment on our sovereign medical rights. It is disheartening to note that, per my understanding, no senator has yet voted to 'EXIT THE WHO.' This is a matter of significant importance that needs immediate attention from you. The urgency of this issue cannot be overstated.
As our Kentucky senator, I implore you to copy H.R. 79 (The WHO Withdrawal Act) and submit it as companion legislation in the Senate to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization.
Please do not respond with a 'form' letter. Each issue I've addressed to you affecting our nation's welfare has been a returned form letter 'thanking me for contacting your office.' It would be best if you didn't thank me. Please act on our country's behalf. As an elected official for the people, I/we expect nothing less! Your actions are crucial in this matter.
I look forward to hearing your decision on these matters.
Barbara H.
Agreed, contacting people on social media helps, but it's not comparable to actually calling.
Further, applying pressure on Congressmen would be something we should begin rolling as well since HR.79 is a House Bill.
Thank you, James, for all you do to help protect our inalienable right to choose the medical plan suited to our needs and not by the unelected WHO! I'm attaching the email I sent Senator Rand Paul over a week ago. I am still awaiting any correspondence besides the same 'form letter' thanking me for contacting his office.
Dear Senator Paul,
You fought to have Dr. Fauci exposed for crimes against humanity. He has not been charged for participating in the gain-of-function vaccine; he still needs to be investigated for his part in the COVID-19 sham!
Another pressing concern is the WHO's encroachment on our sovereign medical rights. It is disheartening to note that, per my understanding, no senator has yet voted to 'EXIT THE WHO'. This is a matter of significant importance that needs immediate attention from you. The urgency of this issue cannot be overstated.
As our Kentucky senator, I implore you to copy H.R. 79 (The WHO Withdrawal Act) and submit it as companion legislation in the Senate to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization.
Please do not respond with a 'form' letter. Each issue I've addressed to you affecting our nation's welfare has been a returned form letter 'thanking me for contacting your office.' I don't need you to thank me. I need you to act on our country's behalf. As an elected official for the people, I/we expect nothing less! Your actions are crucial in this matter.
I look forward to hearing your decision on these matters.
Barbara H.
For informational purposes: 'Safeguarding the Pandemic Agreement from Disinformation" :
https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/safeguarding-pandemic-agreement-disinformation?utm_source=thinkglobalhealth&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=TGH%202024May24&utm_term=TGH
This is long but you'll want to read: I have an idea regarding this matter
While we're dealing with two issues
1. The Amendments to the IHR's
2. The Pandemic Agreement
The former is a modification of a congressional-executive agreement that got us into the WHO back in 1948; the second one is a framework convention that effectively gives them the ability to do what they did before but with more power and money (something I think we all can conclude they don't need and we don't want).
In both cases we need to contact our legislators
For the former we need them to pass H.R.79 which withdraws all funding to the WHO, and we should also apply pressure to Senators to pass companion legislation since the House and Senate are both required to get a bill passed
For the latter we need to contact our Senators only and provide them solid reasons to reject this (many reasons are provided here). Use arguments that are hard to fact-check away since the use of social media will be vital.
Because Twitter not only allows us to easily get a hold of legislators (as well as all the others), but also put them on the spot where others can see our message: I suggest we do that since that has historically been a way to force responces. While we should focus on all legislators, I'd probably more heavily weight my message towards conservatives (particularly those who have endorsed HR.79) and Senators with similar attitudes.
With text limitations being a major problem on Twitter, one do simple things like make a text-message; then screen-cap it (I've done this and it works) or use one of Mr. Roguski's infographics to get around said limitations. I would focus on things that cannot be easily fact-checked away since even Twitter does this, and it's election season (and fact-checkers tend to be on high-alert during this time period).
Tagging people is important as well as that applies additional pressure: You'll want to do the following.
1. Find every libertarian party for the legislator you're messaging (so, if they're from Georgia, look up Libertarian Party of Georgia, you can also find stuff under "LP Mises"): They tend to be sensitive to things that infringe upon their individual liberties and it woudl stand to reason many would be opposed to this on principle.
2. Look at the replies to the legislator on his/her messages. You'll find some people who are quite pleased with him, others who are angry at various things he/she's said/done. Generally you can tell that certain people would be receptive and you want to tag them.
You can contact me at
Zipper730@gmail.com
22 May 24
Hi Jim, just to let you know, received my first reply having emailed all those senators you listed.
Good Afternoon Brenda,
We understand your concerns around this subject, and we would like to assure you that Conservatives believe only Canada's Parliament should set policy and direction on what is best for Canada. As you know, we have been a strong voice for lifting federal vaccine mandates and restrictions. We will examine the recommendations of the INB and their draft report when it is submitted to the Assembly. We will not support anything that infringes on Canada’s sovereignty and capacity to manage its own affairs.
Conservatives have proposed reasonable made-in-Canada solutions to end the Prime Minister’s division and stigmatization by following the science, just as many provinces and countries around the world have already done. I will share your email with Dr. Ellis as he appreciates hearing from his constituents.
All the best,
Austin MacPherson
Members Assistant
Stephen Ellis, MP
Cumberland-Colchester
Shadow Minister of Health
Confederation Building, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0A6
613-992-3366
I have doubts that we'll win this time.
Everyone please call Rep. Michael McCaul of TX, Chairman, House Foreign Affairs Committee, who did not sign. https://mccaul.house.gov/ Let's flood his phones.
I just called all the Republican reps in the House Foreign Affairs Committee. I got a reaction of shock from the staffer of Rep. Baird of Indiana. He might be a good one to get this moving.
Why is the comment number shrinking James? Is someone shadowbanning?
I have no idea
Why is the comment number shrinking James? Is someone shadowbanning?
I worked in some of the complaint from the Health Freedom Defense lawsuit into my letter, because it is pure poetry. (https://healthfreedomdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/FEFF_DE-1_Complaint_HFDF-v-Biden-8-21-cv-02679-MSS-JSS_2021-11-21.pdf)
Dear Senator,
As our public servant, I demand that you copy H.R. 79 (The WHO Withdrawal Act) and submit it as companion legislation in the Senate in order to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization and work to pass it. We are notifying you that the People never granted consent over private matters of health to the government. Please be reminded that as a public servant, you can be held personally liable and/or a claims against your surety bond can be made if you are derelict in your duty, are improperly bonded, or commit or conspire to commit a crime or injury against the people.
We will hold our legislators accountable, because "the right to self-determination over one’s own body is neither tethered to, nor predicated upon, objective fact-finding of what is purportedly right, correct, or true as judged by contemporary society. It is the province of the soul. It cannot, and ought not be, legislatively usurped and second guessed by the Executive Branch in reliance on the best intentions of experts in a decidedly novel, and ever evolving area of indisputably unsettled science.
Nothing is more fundamental to the role government plays in the Great American Experiment, than the notion that mankind is “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights[.]” (Declaration of Independence, 1 Stat. 1.) As such, only “to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed[.]”
In keeping with rights being inherent to the very nature of mankind, the Bill of Rights grants none. Instead, it prohibits governmental intrusion upon the intrinsic, existing rights of the governed, by further making clear, for example, that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press[.]” (U.S. constitution amendment I.)
In the avoidance of doubt, the “enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” (U.S. constitution amendment IX.)
In times of strife and turmoil, it is perhaps more important than ever to keep in mind the very foundation on which our nation was built. Indeed, it is that foundation which chartered the course for where we find ourselves today. Private matters of personal, bodily choice are reserved by the governed. The governed have not granted that power to the government. Under the Constitution then, those matters retained by the governed are to be decided by the individual, on a case-by-case basis. Not by sweeping mandates making that decision for all, without regard to the various medical situations, beliefs, and morals of each person. The High Court teaches that our Constitution “is made for people of fundamentally differing views, and the accident of our finding certain opinions natural and familiar, or novel, and even shocking, ought not to conclude our judgment upon the question whether statutes embodying them conflict with the Constitution of the United States.” Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45, 76 (1905).
The people have, and have retained, the right to self-determination, particularly in matters of choice concerning bodily autonomy. The people have never delegated those rights to the government. As such, the government has neither the just power, nor the consent of the governed, to forcibly decide for them."
(Health Freedom Defense Fund, et al v Biden..)
Thank you
Awesome!
I've emailed/called not only my U.S. senators and rep, but also the Senate Foreign Relations and House Foreign Affairs Committees, including Republicans who did not sign H.R.79. Any replies I've gotten said they support the wonderful WHO . How do I get their attention? I also contacted my state senators about the one anti-WHO bill in PA. Crickets. Any suggestions on senators/reps who might be able to be persuaded? All Sen. Ron Johnson's S.444 says is that a treaty requires Senate approval which is already in the Constitution Art. 2 Sec. 2. They can't even commit to following the Constitution.
Serving them papers will get their attention. Look at bonds for the win on rumble.
Have you done this? I know it works because my friend served her reps on another matter and and they stopped their illegal actions. I've never done it and there isn't enough time for me with the WHO matter.
Do not contact your Senator... Lock them Up and take their phones and Internet away.
By contacting your Senators you give power to the criminal class who is responsible.
Don't be stupid.
Lock them up!
Lockdown / Citizen House arrest all Politicians.
As long as we allow Politicians to change the Law we are at their Mercy.
They make laws to protect them in order to enslave us.
They fuel War and create Problems such as the Pandemic Treaty to give them more Powers
So we must stop them from doing so.
Lock them down in their Houses.
https://fritzfreud.substack.com/p/citizen-uprising-lock-down-all-politicians
Not any more! My country is an over migrated to UN sanctioned dumping ground run by and for minorities. Foreign investors and minority groups run and own the place, while our woke education system wants to re-write our history so we will be ashamed of Australia, hate the country, and embrace Socialism
Following the USA exit from the WHO, Australia should follow. But, wait. Forgot that our sycophantic Socialist Elitist, weak, China and UN loving vacuous, corrupt Fed Govt will be too afraid to actually do anything that may rock the boat. Silly me!
AUSTRALIA would usually have been in the lead!
Not any more. Australia is nothing more now than a UN enforced refugee, migrant, dumping ground where our history is re-written so to make us hate the country and only embrace woke socialist ideology. Aus is a follower. Never a leader in anything
http://AustraliaExitsTheWHO.com
I've e-mailed senator Jeff Merkly more than twice on the who subject.
He usually writes back but not last time.
He wrote that we need the who and cooperation and he is ignorant.