Eswatini's delegation to the World Health Organization submitted proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations on behalf of the nations in the WHO's African region. What's wrong here?
Have the WHO delegates been exposed to the reports of catastrophic consequences of the "vaccines?" The "one health" concept on its face is contrary to individual assessment a customized treatment. It occurs to me that with this top down control, centered in the sole dictates of the Inspector General , the WHO is trying to set itself up to be the new Colonial Master--an insight that would certainly resonate among delegates from Africa and South America.
Time we disbanded or simply defunded the WHO...it appears to be an exercise in flying to meetings, deciding on courses of action of which 99.999% of the world's population know absolutely NOTHING...the number of blank looks I get when I mention the IHR amendments' or the treaty being negotiated that will make obeying the WHO 'legally binding', are constant.
It appears to be very costly to the uninformed public to be paying people to decide how we should all be treated medically, as if we don't know how to see to it individually, if on a whim of the WHO the common cold could be designated as a pandemic. Considering the idiocy and harm done of social distancing and lockdown put into being in 2020, they declaring a cold pandemic isn't that far fetched.
It costs money to fly, accommodate and feed these negotiators of our future health. What good will it do this uninformed public to have spent so much money over the years, never mind just recently, when to date all actions promoted or suggested by the WHO have NOT improved peoples health world wide by one iota. On the contrary, the mass injecting of women in Kenya supposedly to prevent Tetanus (if it wasn't Tetanus it was some other common illness) was also found to create infertility, not exactly what one would expect of a jab to stop a disease. And that not just is the convid jab a gene editing serum, not a vaccine, but more recently it's also been found to contain bits of DNA, not just mRNA which encapsulated as it is, in nano sized lipid particles that can actually enter cells, so I've read and CHANGE ONES DNA!!! And this 'world health organisation' (I have to laugh at it's title) wants to be able to jab everyone on the planet with similar stuff, making lab guinea pigs of us all. And as the WHO is majorly funded by Bill Gates, who is heavily invested in the pharma industry and who's Tetanus jabs it was (if it wasn't Tetanus it was some other common illness) made women infertile, I wouldn't trust the WHO any further than I could throw it.
These peoples game...those who pull the WHO and other strings...is up. We see them for what they are.
And thank you James for being one of the few who have informed us...the trusting, previously uninformed peoples of the planet!
Hello James. I am a retired clinical psychologist. I have a substack and a subscriber suggested I speak with as she thought you might be interested in my recent post about the 15 minute cities. I'm curious if it's on your radar. Apparently there is quite an upheaval in Oxford UK regarding these proposed issues by the council, whose expressed purpose appears to be related to climate change. It's horrifying to say the least. I've tried to get additional information about it but haven't been very successful. I'm curious if it's been on your radar? The support by the WEF causes me additional concern as well. Please don't hesitate to get in touch. I'm regretful that I don't have your email so I could have sent this privately.
If one actually does the math, the difference between 425 PPM atmospheric content of CO2 and 350 PPM is a minuscule .0075%! CO2 as molecules is NOT the problem. The problem is industrial pollution, mono-cropping, desertification, clear cutting of rain forests. ocean plastic (Order the Navy to deal with that, under the direction of competent oceanographers), HAARP and EMF pollution, and aerial spraying with aluminum, strontium and barium.
The attack on our freedom is multi-pronged, robust and deeply embedded, that’s for sure, but let not that dissuade any one of us from our focus and objective. More importantly is our conviction and resolve that while at times it may appear daunting and insurmountable our belief is that we Will without doubt succeed. Momentum is building. Yes, time is running out but there is still time. Let’s all do what we can
I graduated Nursing school 1983, USA. "New vaccine" for Hepatitis. Was railroaded into taking it, against my true will. Working in Emergency care, Labor & Delivary, Surgical, etc. made it "Mandatory" although there was No Law, No "Health Mandate", etc.
There were only 3 of us in a Staff of Hundreds "required" to get the jab. We were all New, Graduate Nurses.
We have all developed severe, disabling, permanent Neurological damage although we all have different "Diagnosis"
I had 2 children born healthy, normal prior to entering College. 2 years after graduation( and the mystery injection) I became pregnant. The pregnancy was fraught with Health problems for both myself and my child. 2 yrs later, another pregnancy/ birth with more and different health problems.
Until the Clot shot reactions began to be reported It had never crossed my mind that the 3rd and 4th pregnancies and birth problems could have been caused or related to the mystery injection.
We lived in a very small, rural farming community in Michigan. The total Patient capacity of the First Hospital I worked for ( and got that unknown jab) was 125! As I started to learn of the B&M Gates Atrocious across this World in the name of "Health vaccinations" I still hadn't put it together with my health issues but STOPPED getting the "Childhood vaccination" scheduled jabs for my 4 sons.
This is all so Evil, So Tragic! There are so many aware now!! HOW DO WE INTERVENE TO STOP THIS MADNESS!
I have 22 grandchildren and 4 great grandchildren. Many of them are vax injured, although their parents will not accept that cause to their children's ill health despite the Facts being presented to them. So many more are not even able to be aware or make a choice. God help us!!
The frames of all laws & constitutions in all western nations : are you under the impression that they put into the laws that "politicians can do anything with impunity?" Do you think they FORGOT to leave us any legal recourse to block them from assuming this power?
Yet you're all behaving like screaming children who have No Options but to beg Daddy to voluntarily change his own mind? For YEARS?
The same people here screaming AT Daddy together because they think their voices will CONVINCE Daddy to change his mind voluntarily can band together behind a legal effort to FORCE THE POLITICIANS to end the mandates now. Under law, politicians are exempt from nothing: if it's illegal for YOU to do it, it's illegal for THEM to.
Is it legal for YOU to inject or force, coerce or mandate anyone ELSE to inject untested or known harmful products?
No, I am not forgetting that there are Laws and processes. Are you not aware that that has not made any difference in outcome in the past 3 years? There are many compromised individuals that have been and currently are blocking legal processes by " kicking the can down the road" tactics? Lawsuits filed regarding the content/ comments in this feed have been unheard and not processed "according to law" by Judges passing the case on to other Judges and this process gets repeated multiple times on the same filing? This has allowed laws to be broken for over 3 years in many cases to the Health detriment of our Citizens and sovereignty of personal health choices.
As to the screaming children....sometimes the frustration and anger from the feelings of helplessness, not being heard, the lack of action being taken by those who have been placed in positions if responsibility needs to be relaesed. Doing so clears the emotions to then be able to make solid decisions, not based in emotions, and take actions.
I suggest if you are offended, simply move past it.
Wow. Even if I had written "& now, I'll sit back & read as Everyone Projects Their Cowardice & Excuses onto me" you'd still have written this. People went knowingly onto the courts under the control of corrupted individuals in power and LOST?
What are the ODDS?
You're here ON a social media newsletter Precisely Because you KNOW that we need MASS Public Support to overturn people in power while at the same time using individuals trying the legal route as proof that that can't work.
Gee, then how can anything including everything you're trying now work? Walk me through what you're doing & how it will result in succeeding, & at what. I can't wait. I cannot wait to hear how a populace that won't gather together to hold those the law allows them to gather together & hold accountable will gather together & somehow hold them accountable - or better yet, beg Daddy to show he loves them so that they can get their Grand Moment of Reconciliation with their authority figures & go back to worshipping them. OBVIOUSLY I'm pointing out that if we Band TOGETHER & become too big to stop or ignore, we could win.
But of COURSE you immediately jumped to the "Daddy doesn't ALLOW US to counter him" argument to protect your belief in the sanctity & power that politicians SHOULD have.
Same as when I am watching a video report and they talk about some story I have not seen in the feed, the media, the inbox newsletters etc, and they toss something on the screen that I can use for searching, I go looking for the actual article they are talking about so I can save that to my files rather than their entire video of many topics.
Well, except for page 9 where they mention " generate vaccine demand and ensure acceptability;".... because they seem to have done a fair job of THAT !
Or this point on page 10: "respond with timely information, when public concerns about safety and efficacy of vaccines are raised to sustain public trust in vaccines and vaccination;" They have sure put plenty of effort into THAT !!
Or This on page 14: "responding to national requests to implement innovative risk minimization measures, for example, peel-off labels on vaccine vials; " Who exactly benefits from peel-off labels and who exactly does that minimize risk FOR ??
Every other point I have read so far seems to be a total fail. But I have not read it all, because I got WAY too drunk playing the WEF Drink Slamming game while reading. lmao Down your drink every time you read the word STAKEHOLDERS.
THIS ONE looks pretty juicy too and might even be the one Stew Peters was talking about, rather than the one I found based on his on-screen image used in the video. And it is from much earlier than the one from 2022, before the quaxxines were rolled out.
If people don't see PSY-OP in the very first sentence, then they may need to look at the second entry, from 2019 ! (Yeah, it's an UPDATE from the 2014 manual. It even reads like a psy-op brainwashing attack)
Wouldn't it be accurate to say that the WHO is contracting with governments to implement criminal policies? These policies include restriction of movement, forced medical treatment, restriction of food, living space, energy consumption, genocide and sterilization (not an exhaustive list). The WHO is not chartered to commit crimes nor to require any govt. to commit crimes against their citizens.
As this is NOT in their charter and cannot lawfully be in their charter: 1. they should be disbanded for violating their charter and 2. funding them is illegal as it is funding a criminal enterprise.
Those in the WHO who are demanding that governments implement criminal policies should be arrested and also sued in their personal capacity.
Those in any govt. who agree to implement these criminal policies should also be arrested and sued in their personal capacity as they do not represent a legitimate governmental employee. No employee may abrogate the inalienable rights of the people. That is a criminal act and they are no longer acting as a government agent. They are simply criminals.
The WHO is defrauding investors and the public by taking actions outside its charter. Business law is often stronger than any other because it effects the wealthiest people. I believe defrauding investors is considered a really bad crime. Lying about your charter is a real bad crime as well.
Just like the BIS is chartered as a bank and the BMGF is chartered as a "charity", they may not demand that any government carry out crimes on their behalf. That isn't their charters and they should also be disbanded for committing fraud. on investors.
Warner Mendenhall knows Denise George, the prosecutor in VI who was willing to charge Chase Bank in connection w/Jeff Epstein's human traffic operation. She was immediately fired for this courageous action. My thought is to find her the jurisdiction which won't fire her for filing charges against powerful people and institutions and let her do this job. She's already shown that she will go up against very powerful entities.
I also wonder if an expert in securities, maybe someone like Martin Armstrong, who already has a great many people stationed around the world, knowledgeable in this subject and the law of those nations as well as the US, would be worth contacting.
This looks like the product of extended negotiations between "interested parties". There are accommodations made to national prerogatives in the beginning, but it is unclear what those "suggestions" are reduced-to in the many specific entries dealing with "obligations" and funding.
This is the setting in which some obscure sentence will turn out to be pivotal to the entire meaning of the treaty.
Please include a box at the top of all of your posts with an easy to understand summary of what's going on and what people should do. I'm trying to spread the word and include a link to your site, but most of your posts are incomprehensible to most people (including to me). You should always start with a summary box saying something like: "The WHO (give actual name and what it supposedly does) is not an entity that was voted in by anyone, but because of its funding and ability to give or take away funds, it has been acting as a shadow government. It is now in the process of passing a treaty called "the pandemic treaty" that would give it the power to tell all governements what to do or not do in this or future "pandemics," as well as to decide when there is a pandemic. Because of its funding, and that of numerous other global bodies such as x, y and z, which support it, and the clout that goes with that, countries around the world are treating these "treaties" as law, and have essentially given the WHO the power to enforce them. The treaty includes things like vaccine passports, digital currency, worldwide digital ID's requiring adherence to a social credit system telling people what they can buy, eat, or write or where they can go, and (fill in with other easy to understand undesirable things that the treaty would enact) . Thus, the treaty would essentially be a gateway to a one-world government run by the WHO. The WHO will be voting on this treaty on x date. If you do not want the WHO to have this power, read on" You really need to do this, or people will just be turned off when they come to your site.
Fair enough. I have put bullet point summaries at the top of articles in the past and I will take your advice and try to do so again in the future.
In reality, I did put a summary at the top. This article, however was designed, on purpose, to challenge deep thinkers to do their own independent analysis and to express their opinions. The point of this article was to get opinions FROM the readers rather than give my opinion to you. The summary of this article was crystal clear. It was just a very different type of article.
Please invite them to review this article in order to really know what is going on...
While I agree that most posts are very long and info intense and that it takes me a long time to get through them and usually negates the clearing of my inbox of other emails for a day, ... or series of days (lol) I find that the format for this post is perfect for the purpose. I may take a long time to get through it and I may never completely get through all of it, but others will and comment with enlightening information. So even if I don't get through it all, the comments section will be my summary. Rather ingenious actually.
I realize your instructions were to digest ALL the information before commenting, and I wouldn't have commented beforehand, but for providing a positive thumbs up.
I have begun going through this, but if I may "cheat" just a bit - 1. when are the health amendments you are so concerned about going to be voted on, 2. when will the pandemic treaty be voted on, and 3. it appears that these things are not binding unless countries agree that it will be binding on them. Did we (meaning, Biden) already agree to that? 4. Can congress nullfy or retract that agreement? While it is good to challenge deep thinkers, in a potential emergency, getting shallow thinkers on board enough to do something has a lot of value. I may not do it tonight, but I will try to plow through what you sent me. Thanks.
Surely it cannot be legal for one State/Country to sign unreasonable World Health Organisation 'Treaties' on behalf of another State or Country?
The WHO is now obsolete and defunct!
We, the people of the UK refute any such unacceptable suggestions as being unconstitutional!
The WHO is now not fit for the Purpose since Bill Gates became their main sponsor (INFLUENCER).
The WHO is now CORRUPT and has lost all credibility as well as any/all authority it is trying to assume!
We, the people have spoken!
And the CDC incompetence (or deliberate appearance of such) is designed to delay the inevitable facts and evidence of collusion that many of us have suspected since March 2020.
The world is BLIND to the impending 'Gates - WHO world take-over' under the smoke screen of World Health, so we must refute all WHO initiatives that supersede personal and National Sovereignty.
Since Gates became the WHO biggest benefactor (INFLUENCER) the WHO have become corrupt and no longer function in the interests of World Health - they now operate as another of Gates's Vax marketing divisions. Vax = DEPOPULATION! Apparently,
Apparently, Bill Gates said this in 2011; "............if you just do a GOOD JOB with VACCINES we can REDUCE the population by 10 - 15%." He then backpedalled by suggesting "......women from poorer countries would be less likely to OVERPRODUCE if their children had a longer life expectancy".
Join the dots after factoring in these new phenomena (since 2021) =
'SADS', 'Sudden Adult Death Syndrome'.
'SIDS', 'Sudden Infant Death Syndrome'.
"died suddenly",
'myocarditis',
'never seen before, inexplicably large multiple blood clots',
I thought the African nations delegations to the WHO meeting a few months ago said they were not for any of this WHO Treaty takeover of all nation's sovereignty. This seems like they are now not only on board but making it more draconian - like changing "should" to "shall." I suppose the bribery money spicket is flowing again.
The "final report" was designed to go directly to The Director-General of the WHO. He will likely then send it to the 194 member nations in order to "notify" them. Last year they kept it very well hidden until I discovered it on March 28, 2022. They finally got around to revealing it on April 12, 2022. It is anybody's guess when they will reveal it to the public this time around. We have the preliminary draft, so help spread the word about that and their secrecy!
Have the WHO delegates been exposed to the reports of catastrophic consequences of the "vaccines?" The "one health" concept on its face is contrary to individual assessment a customized treatment. It occurs to me that with this top down control, centered in the sole dictates of the Inspector General , the WHO is trying to set itself up to be the new Colonial Master--an insight that would certainly resonate among delegates from Africa and South America.
Time we disbanded or simply defunded the WHO...it appears to be an exercise in flying to meetings, deciding on courses of action of which 99.999% of the world's population know absolutely NOTHING...the number of blank looks I get when I mention the IHR amendments' or the treaty being negotiated that will make obeying the WHO 'legally binding', are constant.
It appears to be very costly to the uninformed public to be paying people to decide how we should all be treated medically, as if we don't know how to see to it individually, if on a whim of the WHO the common cold could be designated as a pandemic. Considering the idiocy and harm done of social distancing and lockdown put into being in 2020, they declaring a cold pandemic isn't that far fetched.
It costs money to fly, accommodate and feed these negotiators of our future health. What good will it do this uninformed public to have spent so much money over the years, never mind just recently, when to date all actions promoted or suggested by the WHO have NOT improved peoples health world wide by one iota. On the contrary, the mass injecting of women in Kenya supposedly to prevent Tetanus (if it wasn't Tetanus it was some other common illness) was also found to create infertility, not exactly what one would expect of a jab to stop a disease. And that not just is the convid jab a gene editing serum, not a vaccine, but more recently it's also been found to contain bits of DNA, not just mRNA which encapsulated as it is, in nano sized lipid particles that can actually enter cells, so I've read and CHANGE ONES DNA!!! And this 'world health organisation' (I have to laugh at it's title) wants to be able to jab everyone on the planet with similar stuff, making lab guinea pigs of us all. And as the WHO is majorly funded by Bill Gates, who is heavily invested in the pharma industry and who's Tetanus jabs it was (if it wasn't Tetanus it was some other common illness) made women infertile, I wouldn't trust the WHO any further than I could throw it.
These peoples game...those who pull the WHO and other strings...is up. We see them for what they are.
And thank you James for being one of the few who have informed us...the trusting, previously uninformed peoples of the planet!
We are all waiting for actual arrests and prosecutions of these perpe-traitors! Need to call their bluff and fakery. Down with Fauxi!
Time will tell!
Hello James. I am a retired clinical psychologist. I have a substack and a subscriber suggested I speak with as she thought you might be interested in my recent post about the 15 minute cities. I'm curious if it's on your radar. Apparently there is quite an upheaval in Oxford UK regarding these proposed issues by the council, whose expressed purpose appears to be related to climate change. It's horrifying to say the least. I've tried to get additional information about it but haven't been very successful. I'm curious if it's been on your radar? The support by the WEF causes me additional concern as well. Please don't hesitate to get in touch. I'm regretful that I don't have your email so I could have sent this privately.
https://michellerabinphd.substack.com/p/15-minute-cities-another-unbelievable
If one actually does the math, the difference between 425 PPM atmospheric content of CO2 and 350 PPM is a minuscule .0075%! CO2 as molecules is NOT the problem. The problem is industrial pollution, mono-cropping, desertification, clear cutting of rain forests. ocean plastic (Order the Navy to deal with that, under the direction of competent oceanographers), HAARP and EMF pollution, and aerial spraying with aluminum, strontium and barium.
The attack on our freedom is multi-pronged, robust and deeply embedded, that’s for sure, but let not that dissuade any one of us from our focus and objective. More importantly is our conviction and resolve that while at times it may appear daunting and insurmountable our belief is that we Will without doubt succeed. Momentum is building. Yes, time is running out but there is still time. Let’s all do what we can
I graduated Nursing school 1983, USA. "New vaccine" for Hepatitis. Was railroaded into taking it, against my true will. Working in Emergency care, Labor & Delivary, Surgical, etc. made it "Mandatory" although there was No Law, No "Health Mandate", etc.
There were only 3 of us in a Staff of Hundreds "required" to get the jab. We were all New, Graduate Nurses.
We have all developed severe, disabling, permanent Neurological damage although we all have different "Diagnosis"
I had 2 children born healthy, normal prior to entering College. 2 years after graduation( and the mystery injection) I became pregnant. The pregnancy was fraught with Health problems for both myself and my child. 2 yrs later, another pregnancy/ birth with more and different health problems.
Until the Clot shot reactions began to be reported It had never crossed my mind that the 3rd and 4th pregnancies and birth problems could have been caused or related to the mystery injection.
We lived in a very small, rural farming community in Michigan. The total Patient capacity of the First Hospital I worked for ( and got that unknown jab) was 125! As I started to learn of the B&M Gates Atrocious across this World in the name of "Health vaccinations" I still hadn't put it together with my health issues but STOPPED getting the "Childhood vaccination" scheduled jabs for my 4 sons.
This is all so Evil, So Tragic! There are so many aware now!! HOW DO WE INTERVENE TO STOP THIS MADNESS!
I have 22 grandchildren and 4 great grandchildren. Many of them are vax injured, although their parents will not accept that cause to their children's ill health despite the Facts being presented to them. So many more are not even able to be aware or make a choice. God help us!!
The frames of all laws & constitutions in all western nations : are you under the impression that they put into the laws that "politicians can do anything with impunity?" Do you think they FORGOT to leave us any legal recourse to block them from assuming this power?
Yet you're all behaving like screaming children who have No Options but to beg Daddy to voluntarily change his own mind? For YEARS?
The same people here screaming AT Daddy together because they think their voices will CONVINCE Daddy to change his mind voluntarily can band together behind a legal effort to FORCE THE POLITICIANS to end the mandates now. Under law, politicians are exempt from nothing: if it's illegal for YOU to do it, it's illegal for THEM to.
Is it legal for YOU to inject or force, coerce or mandate anyone ELSE to inject untested or known harmful products?
No, I am not forgetting that there are Laws and processes. Are you not aware that that has not made any difference in outcome in the past 3 years? There are many compromised individuals that have been and currently are blocking legal processes by " kicking the can down the road" tactics? Lawsuits filed regarding the content/ comments in this feed have been unheard and not processed "according to law" by Judges passing the case on to other Judges and this process gets repeated multiple times on the same filing? This has allowed laws to be broken for over 3 years in many cases to the Health detriment of our Citizens and sovereignty of personal health choices.
As to the screaming children....sometimes the frustration and anger from the feelings of helplessness, not being heard, the lack of action being taken by those who have been placed in positions if responsibility needs to be relaesed. Doing so clears the emotions to then be able to make solid decisions, not based in emotions, and take actions.
I suggest if you are offended, simply move past it.
Wow. Even if I had written "& now, I'll sit back & read as Everyone Projects Their Cowardice & Excuses onto me" you'd still have written this. People went knowingly onto the courts under the control of corrupted individuals in power and LOST?
What are the ODDS?
You're here ON a social media newsletter Precisely Because you KNOW that we need MASS Public Support to overturn people in power while at the same time using individuals trying the legal route as proof that that can't work.
Gee, then how can anything including everything you're trying now work? Walk me through what you're doing & how it will result in succeeding, & at what. I can't wait. I cannot wait to hear how a populace that won't gather together to hold those the law allows them to gather together & hold accountable will gather together & somehow hold them accountable - or better yet, beg Daddy to show he loves them so that they can get their Grand Moment of Reconciliation with their authority figures & go back to worshipping them. OBVIOUSLY I'm pointing out that if we Band TOGETHER & become too big to stop or ignore, we could win.
But of COURSE you immediately jumped to the "Daddy doesn't ALLOW US to counter him" argument to protect your belief in the sanctity & power that politicians SHOULD have.
I texted you name of document to check out. Here is the link.
file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/b7/07/8C4FA30E-E865-48D0-A3CE-41F60AEA9B5E/joe_2035_july16.pdf
Jimmy! Check this out! I just saw it and haven’t dug in yet but if it is true, perhaps criminal charges are in order?
https://odysee.com/@CosmicEvent:5/4CHAN-UNCOVERS-W.H.O.%27S-VACCINE-SCRIPT-EVERYTHING-YOU-HEAR-IS-SCRIPTED-IT%27S-ALL-A-LIE:4?r=3oWj1R3YLkzfoG1Hsz38ZfY4QfERWur6
Same as when I am watching a video report and they talk about some story I have not seen in the feed, the media, the inbox newsletters etc, and they toss something on the screen that I can use for searching, I go looking for the actual article they are talking about so I can save that to my files rather than their entire video of many topics.
Vaccine crisis communication manual: step-by-step guidance for national immunization programmes: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/352029
PDF: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/352029/WHO-EURO-2022-3471-43230-60590-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
There is this also. It Isn't New, (2011) just unnoticed.
https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/blue-print/stv-crisis-comms-handbook-eng-web-v1.pdf
Derived and adapted from Robinson, E.T., Baron D., Heise, L.L., Moffett, J., Harlan, S.V. (2011). Communications Handbook for Clinical Trials:
Strategies, Tips and Tools to manage Controversy, Convey Your Message, and Disseminate Results. Microbicides, Media and Communications
Initiative: Washington DC; Family Health International: Research Triangle Park, N.C
And someone really needs to rub this one in the WHO face as a Total Fail !
https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/covid-19-vaccines-safety-surveillance-manual/covid19vaccines_manual_stakeholders.pdf?sfvrsn=92ea675f_11&download=true
Well, except for page 9 where they mention " generate vaccine demand and ensure acceptability;".... because they seem to have done a fair job of THAT !
Or this point on page 10: "respond with timely information, when public concerns about safety and efficacy of vaccines are raised to sustain public trust in vaccines and vaccination;" They have sure put plenty of effort into THAT !!
Or This on page 14: "responding to national requests to implement innovative risk minimization measures, for example, peel-off labels on vaccine vials; " Who exactly benefits from peel-off labels and who exactly does that minimize risk FOR ??
Every other point I have read so far seems to be a total fail. But I have not read it all, because I got WAY too drunk playing the WEF Drink Slamming game while reading. lmao Down your drink every time you read the word STAKEHOLDERS.
THIS ONE looks pretty juicy too and might even be the one Stew Peters was talking about, rather than the one I found based on his on-screen image used in the video. And it is from much earlier than the one from 2022, before the quaxxines were rolled out.
12/22/2020: Covid-19 vaccines: safety surveillance manual - Communication:
https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/WHO-MHP-RPQ-PVG-2021.6
PDF: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/covid-19-vaccines-safety-surveillance-manual/covid19vaccines_manual_communication.pdf?sfvrsn=7a418c0d_1&download=true
Can't leave the CDC out of the action !!
Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) Manual: https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/manual/index.asp
If people don't see PSY-OP in the very first sentence, then they may need to look at the second entry, from 2019 ! (Yeah, it's an UPDATE from the 2014 manual. It even reads like a psy-op brainwashing attack)
CERC: Psychology of a Crisis: https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/ppt/CERC_Psychology_of_a_Crisis.pdf
Perhaps?
Wouldn't it be accurate to say that the WHO is contracting with governments to implement criminal policies? These policies include restriction of movement, forced medical treatment, restriction of food, living space, energy consumption, genocide and sterilization (not an exhaustive list). The WHO is not chartered to commit crimes nor to require any govt. to commit crimes against their citizens.
As this is NOT in their charter and cannot lawfully be in their charter: 1. they should be disbanded for violating their charter and 2. funding them is illegal as it is funding a criminal enterprise.
Those in the WHO who are demanding that governments implement criminal policies should be arrested and also sued in their personal capacity.
Those in any govt. who agree to implement these criminal policies should also be arrested and sued in their personal capacity as they do not represent a legitimate governmental employee. No employee may abrogate the inalienable rights of the people. That is a criminal act and they are no longer acting as a government agent. They are simply criminals.
The WHO is defrauding investors and the public by taking actions outside its charter. Business law is often stronger than any other because it effects the wealthiest people. I believe defrauding investors is considered a really bad crime. Lying about your charter is a real bad crime as well.
Just like the BIS is chartered as a bank and the BMGF is chartered as a "charity", they may not demand that any government carry out crimes on their behalf. That isn't their charters and they should also be disbanded for committing fraud. on investors.
I think that you are very much over the target.
Warner Mendenhall knows Denise George, the prosecutor in VI who was willing to charge Chase Bank in connection w/Jeff Epstein's human traffic operation. She was immediately fired for this courageous action. My thought is to find her the jurisdiction which won't fire her for filing charges against powerful people and institutions and let her do this job. She's already shown that she will go up against very powerful entities.
I also wonder if an expert in securities, maybe someone like Martin Armstrong, who already has a great many people stationed around the world, knowledgeable in this subject and the law of those nations as well as the US, would be worth contacting.
My contact is: Jill Berkana at ahzeld@protonmail.com
This looks like the product of extended negotiations between "interested parties". There are accommodations made to national prerogatives in the beginning, but it is unclear what those "suggestions" are reduced-to in the many specific entries dealing with "obligations" and funding.
This is the setting in which some obscure sentence will turn out to be pivotal to the entire meaning of the treaty.
Somebody knows.
I'll gladly assist if I can! Mick.
Please include a box at the top of all of your posts with an easy to understand summary of what's going on and what people should do. I'm trying to spread the word and include a link to your site, but most of your posts are incomprehensible to most people (including to me). You should always start with a summary box saying something like: "The WHO (give actual name and what it supposedly does) is not an entity that was voted in by anyone, but because of its funding and ability to give or take away funds, it has been acting as a shadow government. It is now in the process of passing a treaty called "the pandemic treaty" that would give it the power to tell all governements what to do or not do in this or future "pandemics," as well as to decide when there is a pandemic. Because of its funding, and that of numerous other global bodies such as x, y and z, which support it, and the clout that goes with that, countries around the world are treating these "treaties" as law, and have essentially given the WHO the power to enforce them. The treaty includes things like vaccine passports, digital currency, worldwide digital ID's requiring adherence to a social credit system telling people what they can buy, eat, or write or where they can go, and (fill in with other easy to understand undesirable things that the treaty would enact) . Thus, the treaty would essentially be a gateway to a one-world government run by the WHO. The WHO will be voting on this treaty on x date. If you do not want the WHO to have this power, read on" You really need to do this, or people will just be turned off when they come to your site.
Good summary.
Fair enough. I have put bullet point summaries at the top of articles in the past and I will take your advice and try to do so again in the future.
In reality, I did put a summary at the top. This article, however was designed, on purpose, to challenge deep thinkers to do their own independent analysis and to express their opinions. The point of this article was to get opinions FROM the readers rather than give my opinion to you. The summary of this article was crystal clear. It was just a very different type of article.
Please invite them to review this article in order to really know what is going on...
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/100-reasons
While I agree that most posts are very long and info intense and that it takes me a long time to get through them and usually negates the clearing of my inbox of other emails for a day, ... or series of days (lol) I find that the format for this post is perfect for the purpose. I may take a long time to get through it and I may never completely get through all of it, but others will and comment with enlightening information. So even if I don't get through it all, the comments section will be my summary. Rather ingenious actually.
I realize your instructions were to digest ALL the information before commenting, and I wouldn't have commented beforehand, but for providing a positive thumbs up.
I have begun going through this, but if I may "cheat" just a bit - 1. when are the health amendments you are so concerned about going to be voted on, 2. when will the pandemic treaty be voted on, and 3. it appears that these things are not binding unless countries agree that it will be binding on them. Did we (meaning, Biden) already agree to that? 4. Can congress nullfy or retract that agreement? While it is good to challenge deep thinkers, in a potential emergency, getting shallow thinkers on board enough to do something has a lot of value. I may not do it tonight, but I will try to plow through what you sent me. Thanks.
Answers
1. Unknown for sure. The WHO CLAIMS May 2024. Indonesian Health Minister said May 2023. I say never.
2. Same answer as #1 above.
3. This answer is too long to type. Call me anytime. 310-619-3055
4. Yes.
Best option: http://ExitTheWHO.com
I will continue my deep dive, but thanks for the quick answers.
Surely it cannot be legal for one State/Country to sign unreasonable World Health Organisation 'Treaties' on behalf of another State or Country?
The WHO is now obsolete and defunct!
We, the people of the UK refute any such unacceptable suggestions as being unconstitutional!
The WHO is now not fit for the Purpose since Bill Gates became their main sponsor (INFLUENCER).
The WHO is now CORRUPT and has lost all credibility as well as any/all authority it is trying to assume!
We, the people have spoken!
And the CDC incompetence (or deliberate appearance of such) is designed to delay the inevitable facts and evidence of collusion that many of us have suspected since March 2020.
The world is BLIND to the impending 'Gates - WHO world take-over' under the smoke screen of World Health, so we must refute all WHO initiatives that supersede personal and National Sovereignty.
Since Gates became the WHO biggest benefactor (INFLUENCER) the WHO have become corrupt and no longer function in the interests of World Health - they now operate as another of Gates's Vax marketing divisions. Vax = DEPOPULATION! Apparently,
Apparently, Bill Gates said this in 2011; "............if you just do a GOOD JOB with VACCINES we can REDUCE the population by 10 - 15%." He then backpedalled by suggesting "......women from poorer countries would be less likely to OVERPRODUCE if their children had a longer life expectancy".
Join the dots after factoring in these new phenomena (since 2021) =
'SADS', 'Sudden Adult Death Syndrome'.
'SIDS', 'Sudden Infant Death Syndrome'.
"died suddenly",
'myocarditis',
'never seen before, inexplicably large multiple blood clots',
'athletes dying mysteriously', 'unparalleled excess deaths'
These topics have since been covered up and vehemently denied by the 'establishment'.
Join the dots and reach your own conclusions.
Mick from Hooe (Unjabbed because I joined the dots!)
Thank you. Maybe you can help James create a summary of the issues on this site so that regular people will be able to understand them.
file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/mail.avif
A very good friend and others set this up to make sure that South Africans know the truth...
https://savaers.co.za/
How can we stop this?!!!!!!!
I thought the African nations delegations to the WHO meeting a few months ago said they were not for any of this WHO Treaty takeover of all nation's sovereignty. This seems like they are now not only on board but making it more draconian - like changing "should" to "shall." I suppose the bribery money spicket is flowing again.
Yes. Most everyone else mis-reported what was actually going on last May.
Is the final report out yet?
The "final report" was designed to go directly to The Director-General of the WHO. He will likely then send it to the 194 member nations in order to "notify" them. Last year they kept it very well hidden until I discovered it on March 28, 2022. They finally got around to revealing it on April 12, 2022. It is anybody's guess when they will reveal it to the public this time around. We have the preliminary draft, so help spread the word about that and their secrecy!
Dang, ... I wonder if the next big reveal, ... will be with the use of massive military force for quelling global outrage when the facts hit the fan ?
Thanks. I thought that was the case.