On a side note--Now the FDA has made it legal to not inform when there is supposedly low risk(how do they know?) about a drug trial. I guess that is so they can put vaccines in our food and big pharma will not be liable. "Who decides what constitutes “minimal risk”? Researchers and IRBs. This prevents human subjects from deciding for the…
On a side note--Now the FDA has made it legal to not inform when there is supposedly low risk(how do they know?) about a drug trial. I guess that is so they can put vaccines in our food and big pharma will not be liable. "Who decides what constitutes “minimal risk”? Researchers and IRBs. This prevents human subjects from deciding for themselves whether to participate in research studies.
How can they know if a product has “minimal risk”? They cannot; It is disingenuously presumptuous to claim to know a pharmaceutical product or procedure comes with “minimal risk” prior to long-term outcomes determination. This rule obfuscates the detection and discovery of adverse events." https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-defender-fda-makes-it-official SO WE NEED TO STOP THEM.
On a side note--Now the FDA has made it legal to not inform when there is supposedly low risk(how do they know?) about a drug trial. I guess that is so they can put vaccines in our food and big pharma will not be liable. "Who decides what constitutes “minimal risk”? Researchers and IRBs. This prevents human subjects from deciding for themselves whether to participate in research studies.
How can they know if a product has “minimal risk”? They cannot; It is disingenuously presumptuous to claim to know a pharmaceutical product or procedure comes with “minimal risk” prior to long-term outcomes determination. This rule obfuscates the detection and discovery of adverse events." https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-defender-fda-makes-it-official SO WE NEED TO STOP THEM.