3 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Astrid Stuckleburger suggests to keep the 2004 WHO IHRs. Institutions stopped training the trainers about it. Agent characterization. pCRs were not designed as a diagnosis tool and for 3 other reasons in the handbook should not have been used to rack up cases. Diagnosis of the virus was not substantiated accoding to the standards. The scientists and specialists didn't weigh in on the response decisions. The WHO wanted to establish the constitution as One Health Article 13-92 they can change the definitions. According to article 19 and 20 if 2/3s of the member states agree ALL member states will have to submit. IFFFI was planning to roll down money from the IMF through gavi to Sepi. WATCH FROM 27 MINUTES EVERYONE. Who consents? https://rumble.com/v26tmhq-w.h.o.-whistleblower-exposes-globalist-agenda.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

We can't accept lies OR Action Trigger Response Orders.

Expand full comment

Carol, this article/effort is not directly about the WHO. Please review the information in detail and consider participation. Your statement: "According to article 19 and 20 if 2/3s of the member states agree ALL member states will have to submit." is not correct.

Most people have been misrepresenting the details of the documents being negotiated.

Expand full comment

I agree my transcript was a bit sketchy. Thanks for your reply and encouragement.

Expand full comment