31 Comments

James,

Your work deserves so much more reach than this.

Evidence of the censorship slowing it down.

If Elon Musk sets Twitter free to tweet and fly around the world like it did originally perhaps that will help writers like us to reach more.

Keep up the GREAT work.

Ivan

Expand full comment

DOH !! That ties it together nicely. The Gov excepts a "Restricted Person" as an agent and it mysteriously voids the unlawfulness? How sneaky of them. I would have never thought of that by reading the text, but that sounds like just the type of subversive, crooked, Gov Nut Job tactic that would be employed in current times. Most of what I have seen and read in the last few years does nothing more than serve up an uneasy, sinking feeling that we are all, .... in for a very bumpy ride. (Because I didn't want to say F***ed) I am on the verge of being what I believe they call BlackPilled, wishing I didn't know any of the things that I can not unsee and un-know. sigh.

Expand full comment

WEF/NWO/WHO = All dubious and sinister Plans to terminate humanity's Freedom and rights to have an opinion that varies from the WEF NWO agenda. LIABILITY must apply to ALL medicines NOW! Common Sense! (F^*K PayPal's postponed 'Fine' intentions) Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed and ready to fight.

Expand full comment

Again do read patriot Act No2 and the Homeland Defence Act and yes we have our equivalents here in the UK Great peace James Thanks.

Expand full comment

I'm 64. I've been awake to Big Brother, Deep State, banksters, medical mafia, etc since my teens. When 9/11 happened, my BS meter knew it was NOT foreign terrorists. (Plus simple physics and observation). I knew the Patriot Act was rigged against America and our Constitutional freedom. With current events, I have the advantage of perspective, of history. For others, not baby boomers, not yet awake, they have people like you, James. THANK YOU, to you and all truthful digital soldiers.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

Expand full comment

Wow. It’s crazy to consider that the Patriot Act was hurriedly put into place less than two months after 9/11. They sure took advantage of THAT crisis, didn’t they?

I remember at the time sort of hearing a few discussions about the risks of the Act. Potential abuse a la spying on American citizens type thing. Frankly, at the time, I was thoroughly buried in a very intense post-grad training program that left little time for any sort of recreation or outside reading, let alone thoughtful attention to current events and possible future ramifications. I wasn’t really keen on the Act (raised to always be suspicious of gov, like our Founding Fathers), but figured I have nothing to hide, and would never be a person of any interest to gov.

Haha, well, we all know how that is working out now, don’t we? Even mamas at the school board meetings are catching their ire nowadays.

I wish this Act would be sent back to hell where it came from and where it belongs.

Expand full comment

As I understand it the Act was already pre-written and waiting for a 'crisis' to push it through

Expand full comment

Maybe I missed something?

"(a) Offense.—

(1) In general.—It shall be unlawful for a restricted person to—

(A) ship, transport, or possess in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce any biological agent or toxin described in paragraph (2); or

(B) receive any biological agent or toxin described in paragraph (2) that has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce."

-----------------------------------------------------------------

" (2) The term “restricted person” means an individual who—

(A) is under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year;

(B) has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year;

(C) is a fugitive from justice;

(D) is an unlawful user of any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));

(E) is an alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States;

(F) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;

(G)

(i) is an alien (other than an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence) who is a national of a country as to which the Secretary of State, pursuant to section 6(j) [1] of the Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)), section 620A of chapter 1 of part M of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371), or section 40(d) of chapter 3 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)), has made a determination (that remains in effect) that such country has repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism, or (ii) acts for or on behalf of, or operates subject to the direction or control of, a government or official of a country described in this subparagraph;

(H) has been discharged from the Armed Services of the United States under dishonorable conditions; or

(I) is a member of, acts for or on behalf of, or operates subject to the direction or control of, a terrorist organization as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(vi) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi))."

I don't see anywhere that states it would be okay for a nut job to run down the street with a deadly virus vial clenched in their teeth as being perfectly okay. I read it as, it would be unlawful for any listed "Restricted Person" to have anything to do with them.

I may have missed something, I am not sure.

Expand full comment

Yes but they allow the government to except anyone as a lawful agent

Expand full comment

Did you watch the video?

Expand full comment

I watched a video on youtube, yes, but it was really late at night and I really may have missed something, as I was getting a little weary by 4:00am. I will have to watch it again I think.

Expand full comment

The video will clarify the confusion. Otherwise, read the text that is underlined in red on page 116 of the Patriot Act. Restricted people are exempt from penalty under the law.

Expand full comment

Thanks for pinpointing it. I downloaded the Patriot Act pdf and started reading it, but haven't got that far yet.

Expand full comment

Ok, so I am wondering the same thing.

Perhaps, it is that a gov-designated person MAY run down the street with a vial of anthrax in his teeth, and IF that gov-designated person happens to be criminally insane, they are as exempt from punishment as any other gov-designee?

Perhaps, the point is that NO ONE should be running down the street with anthrax, whether okayed by gov or not?

Expand full comment

Did you watch the video?

Expand full comment

No. I often do not watch videos.

Expand full comment

The video will clarify the confusion. Otherwise, read the text that is underlined in red on page 116 of the Patriot Act. Restricted people are exempt from penalty under the law.

Expand full comment

That may be it, as there seems to be an awful lot of Gov nut jobs running around.

And sadly, that's not even sarcasm. lol

Expand full comment

I see now how all these government overreach acts are malignancies leading to the demise of our constitutional freedoms. Health care act this new biotech xiden initiative. All Mafia style off the books money laundering. Our bodies and minds have been tagged with a price and sold by psychopathic pseudoleaders..

Expand full comment

Even if the intelligence agencies are in charge as today Malone claims. We have the right to have informed consent and die by our directive.

Expand full comment

James, I think a better question is WHY isnt your essay splashed across the headlines of every newspaper and tv screen in the US?

Questions need to be asked and you are spot on...we need to do something about this now.

Id certainly support withdrawal from all bio research at this point. God bless you.

Expand full comment

Thank you for recognizing this day. Painful reminders like this are necessary.

Expand full comment

I had to complete patriot act forms in my last job and hated it. Turning citizens into suspects was exactly what it felt like. It was one of the reasons I quit.

Expand full comment

I admire you for quitting.

Expand full comment

James, there is no risk from gain of function research other than getting ripped off and providing cover for other activities. Dr. Mark Bailey and others have gone over why GOF is a fraud. They cannot create a virus in a lab. Viruses have not been proven to exist in any way.

All that is done is chemical synthesis or modification of bacterial plasmids and then they shove them into an animal (often directly into the brain or abdomen), along with all the other toxins and garbage they use to make a cell culture of this stuff, and claim there is a GOF. All they do is poison an animal with sophisticated methods. The animal is poisoned by the foreign materials and chemicals.

I reviewed the 2015 Shi study in question and it's a joke. The mice actually died in the first ("control" which was not a control) round but only lost 10% of their weight in the second round. How is that a gain of function? That's a loss of function -- of course all referring to lab created nonsense. Pure Frankenscience. I wish I called my Substack this because this is what I discover more and more.

I will be going into GOF at some point, because the basic "science" is not understood and it is wrong. They are just more animal torture experiments and all such experiments should be stopped on that basis. WHO shouldn't have power over anything but if you believe in GOF you don't know the truth of what is going on.

GOF is a lie. Don't give them power they do not have! And please remain open because the science is not understood even by scientists or "experts". Especially "experts".

Expand full comment

Thank you for sharing this point of view. What is your opinion about all the bioweapon labs all over tarnation? What are they for? What are they hiding?

Expand full comment

Legislation is always labeled deceptively in the🤡 DC Cesspool Swamplands 🤡

Expand full comment

Affordable Care Act, for example.

Affordable? Yeah, right.

Care? Ha! Sure.

Act? Well . . . it *is* an act 😂

Expand full comment

🙀😹😹😹

Expand full comment

A few years after this, I tried to speak against it, the whole false flag wars we ended up losing....and of course I was shut down.

I went to jail, lost my business, and they charged me with terrorism

.

I tried to defend myself and was kicked off my own counsel.

Although the trial occurred afterwards, they said I did this all to raise awareness of the election. I lost .

Gavin won, Mr care not cash

.

Solitary isolation came to us all too.

Sorry.

Regards from SF killafornia.

I liked Janet's piece in full.

Thank you for your work.

Rock on

Expand full comment

Wow.

Expand full comment