James Roguski

Share this post

Happy Birthday Patriot Act

jamesroguski.substack.com

Discover more from James Roguski

Exposing MDM (Mis-Information, Dis-Information and Mal-Information)
Over 55,000 subscribers
Continue reading
Sign in

Happy Birthday Patriot Act

The Patriot Act was put into effect 21 years ago on October 26, 2001. Did this protect us from biological warfare, or did it just set the stage for the situation we find ourselves in today?

James Roguski
Oct 26, 2022
78
Share this post

Happy Birthday Patriot Act

jamesroguski.substack.com
31
Share

Please watch the video below…

Download the Patriot Act below…

Patriot Act
487KB ∙ PDF file
Download
Download

1. Why did the Patriot Act (Title 18 Section 175b) exempt restricted persons from penalty?

Restricted persons are defined in the Act as criminals, drug users, illegal aliens, mentally defective, dishonorably discharged and terrorists.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/175b

WHY?

Below is page 116 of the Patriot Act:

CLICK ABOVE FOR DETAILS

Kind of gives you a warm fuzzy feeling, does it not? To know that the criminally insane can dance down the street with a vial of anthrax between their teeth, if Mother Government deigns to allow them to.

And why did the US fail its mandate to report this change in legislation to the international treaty organization known as the Biological Weapons Convention? Is it true, as alleged, that this piece of legislation constitutes a de facto violation of the treaty?

As Latin America gears up to celebrate “The Day of the Dead,” we in “Anglo-America” might take a moment to look back on the birth of the USA PATRIOT Act and consider if it might better be renamed “The Death of America” Act. Along with the destruction of our civil liberties and privacy rights, it may actually have struck a blow against our very health and viability.

-Janet Phelan

https://www.activistpost.com/2022/10/the-usa-patriot-act-turns-twenty-one.htm

James Roguski
The U.S. Department of Defense Funded and Operated Biological Labs in Ukraine
Read more
2 years ago · 18 likes · 2 comments · James Roguski

2. Why is the Lancet advocating for the World Health Organization to be given regulatory powers over gain-of-function research?

WHO should be given new oversight authority regarding the biosafety, biosecurity, and bio-risk management of national and international research programmes that are engaged in the collection, testing, and genetic manipulation of potentially dangerous pathogens.

Please read the article below…

James Roguski
I Thought the Lancet was a Medical Journal
The video below is a very good example of the type of thinking that drives some people to support proposals to give more power, legal authority and money to the World Health Organization. This video is an excerpt from the original video which is available…
Read more
a year ago · 78 likes · 38 comments · James Roguski

3. Why has the World Health Organization set up a BioHub system to collect and distribute pathogens?

Based in Spiez, Switzerland, the facility will serve as a centre for the safe receipt, sequencing, storage and preparation of biological materials for distribution to other laboratories, in order to inform risk assessments, and sustain global preparedness against these pathogens.

In parallel, WHO will broaden its BioHub System for the use of biological materials by qualified entities – such as manufacturers – for the development of medical by-products for fair allocation to countries. WHO is currently running a pilot phase, using SARS-COV-2 and its variants, to test the feasibility and operational arrangements for sharing such materials with the facilities of the BioHub System.

Following results from the pilot project, the BioHub will expand from SARS-COV-2 and its variants, to other pathogens, and connect partners with other repositories and laboratory networks in 2022

https://www.who.int/news/item/24-05-2021-who-and-switzerland-launch-global-biohub-for-pathogen-storage-sharing-and-analysis

https://cdn-auth-cms.who.int/media/docs/default-source/campaigns-and-initiatives/biohub/who_biohub-system_1_year_progress_report_may_2021_may_2022.pdf

4. Shouldn’t Gain-of-Function research be shut down completely?

All so-called biodefense research is biowarfare research. There’s no hard line separating the two. Hence the term ‘dual use’ research. What we need is a ban on dual use gain of function research, i.e., research in which a pathogen is equipped with new functions that makes it more dangerous, which could be used for good or ill.

What we really need is a ban on dual-use, gain-of-function research, i.e., research in which a pathogen is equipped with new functions that makes it more dangerous, which could be used for good or ill. We simply do not need this kind of research. It’s all offensive, as it hasn’t prevented a single epidemic or pandemic to date.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/gain-of-function-research-funding-cola/

by James Roguski

The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.

If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.

JamesRoguski.com

JamesRoguski.substack.com/about

JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive

310-619-3055

All content is free to all readers.

All support is deeply appreciated.

Share

James Roguski’s newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

78
Share this post

Happy Birthday Patriot Act

jamesroguski.substack.com
31
Share
31 Comments
Share this discussion

Happy Birthday Patriot Act

jamesroguski.substack.com
Ivan M. Paton
Writes In Pursuit of Truth
Oct 27, 2022Liked by James Roguski

James,

Your work deserves so much more reach than this.

Evidence of the censorship slowing it down.

If Elon Musk sets Twitter free to tweet and fly around the world like it did originally perhaps that will help writers like us to reach more.

Keep up the GREAT work.

Ivan

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
Guido
Oct 27, 2022

DOH !! That ties it together nicely. The Gov excepts a "Restricted Person" as an agent and it mysteriously voids the unlawfulness? How sneaky of them. I would have never thought of that by reading the text, but that sounds like just the type of subversive, crooked, Gov Nut Job tactic that would be employed in current times. Most of what I have seen and read in the last few years does nothing more than serve up an uneasy, sinking feeling that we are all, .... in for a very bumpy ride. (Because I didn't want to say F***ed) I am on the verge of being what I believe they call BlackPilled, wishing I didn't know any of the things that I can not unsee and un-know. sigh.

Expand full comment
Reply
Share
29 more comments...
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 James Roguski
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing