VOLUNTEERS NEEDED
VOLUNTEERS NEEDED
I am working on an enormous project. Please contact me directly if you are interested in volunteering to help. +1 310-619-3055
Please watch the video below…
JOIN ME IN THIS BATTLE
To all my readers:
This article is an open invitation for you to contact me directly if you would like to collaborate with me on this enormous project:
I am working to organize a worldwide, DECENTRALIZED network of health freedom advocates who are courageous enough to stand up in defense of their unalienable rights and freedoms.
If you are interested in collaborating, then contact me directly A.S.A.P.
Realistically, the best way to make initial contact with me is via text message, but I invite everyone to give me a call directly, because the best communication happens when people have a one-to-one conversation.
James Roguski +1 310-619-3055
Phone, Text, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp
Skype: james.roguski
Please watch the video below…
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1rjCIg8vQvYZ/
ThePeoplesDeclaration.com
ExitTheWHO.org
ExitTheWHO.com
StopTheGlobalAgenda.com
StopTheAmendments.com
StopTheWHO.com
ScrewTheWHO.com
MaskCharade.com
RejectDigitalEnslavement.com
HealthFreedomBillOfRights.com
PreventGenocide2030.org
DoorToFreedom.org
James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
I know that many people must be aware that Reiner Fuellmich is at present in prison in Germany. Please could you add your names to this petition calling for his release.
https://www.change.org/p/free-dr-reiner-fuellmich
I also asked Google BARD the following question:
Do you know of any explanation regarding one of the proposed amendments from India in Section 3 that are crossing out the words ‘with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons’ in the following regulation?
The implementation of these Regulations shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities of the States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development.” (page 58/197)
ANSWER
Yes, I am aware of the proposed amendment from India to cross out the words "with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons" in Section 3 of the International Health Regulations (IHR). This amendment, if adopted, would remove the requirement for countries to respect the human rights of individuals when implementing the IHR.
There are a number of potential reasons why India may have proposed this amendment. One possibility is that India is concerned that the current IHR do not give countries enough flexibility to implement the regulations in a way that is consistent with their own domestic laws and regulations. For example, India may be concerned that the requirement to respect human rights could prevent it from taking certain measures to protect public health, such as mandatory quarantines or travel restrictions.
Another possibility is that India believes that the human rights language in the IHR is too vague and could be interpreted in a way that is harmful to India's interests. For example, India may be concerned that the human rights language could be used to challenge legitimate public health measures, such as vaccination programs or surveillance programs.
Finally, it is also possible that India's proposed amendment is part of a broader effort by certain countries to weaken the human rights protections in the IHR. In recent years, there has been a growing movement among some countries to promote a more narrow interpretation of human rights, with an emphasis on state sovereignty and non-interference. India's proposed amendment may be part of this trend.
There are a number of potential consequences if India's proposed amendment is adopted. First, it would weaken the human rights protections in the IHR. This could lead to human rights abuses during public health emergencies, as countries would have more flexibility to implement the IHR without regard for human rights.
Second, it could undermine the legitimacy of the IHR. The IHR are based on the principle that public health and human rights are mutually reinforcing. If the IHR are seen as being at odds with human rights, it could make it more difficult for countries to implement the regulations effectively.
Finally, it could damage the global response to public health emergencies. The IHR are a global instrument that is designed to coordinate the response to public health emergencies. If countries are not willing to respect human rights when implementing the IHR, it could make it more difficult to mount a unified global response to public health threats.
Overall, India's proposed amendment to cross out the words "with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons" in Section 3 of the IHR is a concerning development. It has the potential to weaken human rights protections, undermine the legitimacy of the IHR, and damage the global response to public health emergencies. It is important to carefully consider the potential consequences of this amendment before making a decision about whether or not to support it.