I know that many people must be aware that Reiner Fuellmich is at present in prison in Germany. Please could you add your names to this petition calling for his release.
Do you know of any explanation regarding one of the proposed amendments from India in Section 3 that are crossing out the words ‘with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons’ in the following regulation?
The implementation of these Regulations shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities of the States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development.” (page 58/197)
ANSWER
Yes, I am aware of the proposed amendment from India to cross out the words "with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons" in Section 3 of the International Health Regulations (IHR). This amendment, if adopted, would remove the requirement for countries to respect the human rights of individuals when implementing the IHR.
There are a number of potential reasons why India may have proposed this amendment. One possibility is that India is concerned that the current IHR do not give countries enough flexibility to implement the regulations in a way that is consistent with their own domestic laws and regulations. For example, India may be concerned that the requirement to respect human rights could prevent it from taking certain measures to protect public health, such as mandatory quarantines or travel restrictions.
Another possibility is that India believes that the human rights language in the IHR is too vague and could be interpreted in a way that is harmful to India's interests. For example, India may be concerned that the human rights language could be used to challenge legitimate public health measures, such as vaccination programs or surveillance programs.
Finally, it is also possible that India's proposed amendment is part of a broader effort by certain countries to weaken the human rights protections in the IHR. In recent years, there has been a growing movement among some countries to promote a more narrow interpretation of human rights, with an emphasis on state sovereignty and non-interference. India's proposed amendment may be part of this trend.
There are a number of potential consequences if India's proposed amendment is adopted. First, it would weaken the human rights protections in the IHR. This could lead to human rights abuses during public health emergencies, as countries would have more flexibility to implement the IHR without regard for human rights.
Second, it could undermine the legitimacy of the IHR. The IHR are based on the principle that public health and human rights are mutually reinforcing. If the IHR are seen as being at odds with human rights, it could make it more difficult for countries to implement the regulations effectively.
Finally, it could damage the global response to public health emergencies. The IHR are a global instrument that is designed to coordinate the response to public health emergencies. If countries are not willing to respect human rights when implementing the IHR, it could make it more difficult to mount a unified global response to public health threats.
Overall, India's proposed amendment to cross out the words "with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons" in Section 3 of the IHR is a concerning development. It has the potential to weaken human rights protections, undermine the legitimacy of the IHR, and damage the global response to public health emergencies. It is important to carefully consider the potential consequences of this amendment before making a decision about whether or not to support it.
Hi James, I asked Google BARD (Ai) the following question:
Do you know of any explanation regarding one of the proposed amendments from Bangladesh to cross out the word non-binding in the article 15? That assumes then to be understood as aiming to change the nature of these recommendations from non-binding to binding, and giving a binding effect to WHO recommendations and requests as proposed in other articles. Any explanations available on this isse?
ANSWER
Yes, I am aware of the proposed amendment from Bangladesh to cross out the word "non-binding" in Article 15 of the International Health Regulations (IHR). This amendment, if adopted, would make the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) binding on countries.
There are a number of reasons why Bangladesh may have proposed this amendment. First, Bangladesh may believe that the current IHR are not effective enough in preventing and responding to public health emergencies. The WHO's recommendations are currently non-binding, which means that countries can choose whether or not to follow them. This can lead to a situation where some countries follow the WHO's recommendations and others do not, which can make it difficult to coordinate a global response to a public health emergency.
Second, Bangladesh may believe that the WHO needs to have more power to enforce its recommendations. The WHO currently has no legal authority to compel countries to follow its recommendations. This means that the WHO can only rely on the goodwill of countries to comply with its recommendations.
Third, Bangladesh may believe that the WHO's recommendations should be binding on countries because they are based on the best available scientific evidence. The WHO has a team of experts who are constantly monitoring the global health situation and providing advice to countries on how to prevent and respond to public health emergencies.
However, there are also a number of potential drawbacks to making the WHO's recommendations binding on countries. First, it could lead to a loss of sovereignty for countries. If the WHO has the power to compel countries to follow its recommendations, it could mean that countries no longer have full control over their own health policies.
Second, it could make it more difficult for the WHO to reach consensus on its recommendations. If the WHO knows that its recommendations will be binding on countries, it may be more hesitant to make recommendations that are not supported by all countries.
Third, it could make it more difficult for the WHO to respond to public health emergencies. If the WHO has to go through a lengthy process to get its recommendations approved by all countries, it could delay the WHO's response to a public health emergency.
Overall, the proposed amendment from Bangladesh to cross out the word "non-binding" in Article 15 of the IHR is a complex issue with both potential benefits and drawbacks. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks carefully before deciding whether or not to support this amendment.
Here are some additional explanations on this issue:
Bangladesh may believe that the current IHR are not effective enough in preventing and responding to public health emergencies. The WHO's recommendations are currently non-binding, which means that countries can choose whether or not to follow them. This can lead to a situation where some countries follow the WHO's recommendations and others do not, which can make it difficult to coordinate a global response to a public health emergency.
Bangladesh may believe that the WHO needs to have more power to enforce its recommendations. The WHO currently has no legal authority to compel countries to follow its recommendations. This means that the WHO can only rely on the goodwill of countries to comply with its recommendations.
Bangladesh may believe that the WHO's recommendations should be binding on countries because they are based on the best available scientific evidence. The WHO has a team of experts who are constantly monitoring the global health situation and providing advice to countries on how to prevent and respond to public health emergencies.
Bangladesh may believe that making the WHO's recommendations binding on countries would help to ensure that all countries are taking the necessary steps to prevent and respond to public health emergencies.
However, there are also a number of potential drawbacks to making the WHO's recommendations binding on countries:
It could lead to a loss of sovereignty for countries. If the WHO has the power to compel countries to follow its recommendations, it could mean that countries no longer have full control over their own health policies.
It could make it more difficult for the WHO to reach consensus on its recommendations. If the WHO knows that its recommendations will be binding on countries, it may be more hesitant to make recommendations that are not supported by all countries.
It could make it more difficult for the WHO to respond to public health emergencies. If the WHO has to go through a lengthy process to get its recommendations approved by all countries, it could delay the WHO's response to a public health emergency.
Overall, the proposed amendment from Bangladesh to cross out the word "non-binding" in Article 15 of the IHR is a complex issue with both potential benefits and drawbacks. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks carefully before deciding whether or not to support this amendment.
But why do we NEED a replacement to the WHO? Why isn't the aim to eliminate the WHO, and ALL other unasked for, unnecessary, unwelcome, and frankly, unhealthy global organizations?
Health is a local - right down to the individual, and only as far outward as the family extends - concern, and NOT an issue that needs to be coordinated globally. The only reason there have ever been epidemics and pandemics is that they were artificially induced for reasons that include fabricating the pretext for global health coordinating organizations.
Enough! Enough of the WHO, enough of the UN, and the World Bank, and the IMF, and enough also of the WWF (I mean the World Wildlife Fund, and not that perverse homoerotic pantomime with grown men playing pretend fisticuffs). Enough of all these (centralized) global crime syndicates.
THOUGHT TO PONDER,,,,MONEY IS A SLAVE RELEASER,,, BUT ITS NOT . WE ARE ALL SLAVES THAT ARE NOT ELITES OR WEALTHY, BECAUSE WE WORK HARD FOR THE MONEY WE MAKE, TO SPEND IT ON OUR FREEDOM OF CERTAIN THINGS WE ARE ALLOWED
What are you needing volunteers for? I'm happy to help as long as it's legal (😬), relatively close to my area. We need more info to give a definitive Yes.
What does it mean to be legal? The government is criminal, and therefore all the laws enacted and enforced by the police are all illegitimate. What is needed is wide-scale - nation-wide, and in all localities everywhere - civil disobedience.
Facts: There have been at least 40 incineration attacks in CA and now Maui. And probably other places on Earth as well. A very HOT war! We have family who could be next! We are living in a war zone. We trust you will take action and expose this very hot-war attack on our country immediately.
Cars incinerated, engine blocks turned to dust, glass melted, molten aluminum rivers – even cars not in the fire zone surrounded by homes not touched by a source of fire were.
“Fire can melt glass, however, glass has a melting point of 2552 to 2912 degrees Fahrenheit. This means most sources of fire will not burn hot enough to reach that point”. No grass or forest fire gets that hot. An average surface fire on the forest floor…, reach 1471 Degrees Fahrenheit”. All the glass from all the cars and homes was melted.
• Flammable trees and their leaves, lawns and grass, not burnt up as they would be in natural wild/ grass- organic fire. The water severely dried out of them by radiation. The leaves, trees and grass remain as you can see. Wood things survived.
• Blue things survived as per the physics of radiation space- light- energy technology.
• Plastic, rubber items such as trash bins, children’s’ toys did not burn/melt, and were carted away in the cover up.
• There is a known Air Force ‘Directed Energy Dictectorate ‘in Maui.
• Many Maui children are unaccounted - Where are they and their parents?
• Perfected siren system turned off on Maui.
• Hawaii has the largest single integrated public safety outdoor siren warning system in the world.
• The all-hazard siren system can be used for a variety of both natural and human-caused events; including tsunamis, hurricanes, dam breaches, flooding, wildfires, volcanic eruptions, terrorist threats, hazardous material incidents, and more.
• The sirens output is 121 decibels and propagate with a manufacture radius of 3400ft. This range may vary due to environmental and surrounding physical conditions. The sirens are battery-powered and use a photovoltaic charging system. https://www.mauisirens.com
• People blocked from escaping incinerated in their cars.
• Metal on boats moored in the ocean disintegrated, wood not burnt.
• No fireboats shooting unending water into the fires.
• Firetrucks could not get in, not alerted in time. Why was there not fire equipment there?
• Radiation fires INSIDE the most water-laden trees burnt from the inside-out. – No leaves are burnt. Palm fronds and trees that go up like a match, not burnt up.
• As per the National Hurricane Center and Central Pacific Hurricane Center: On Tuesday morning Hurricane Dora was 685 miles south of Hawaii. And Dora was heading further south away from Hawaii fast. So it is impossible for terrific winds from Dora to have hit Maui. Those winds were not natural, not wet like EVERY island hurricane always is, not like any ever experienced according to the life long residents.
• We need all hands on deck in defense now, of our own DOD? What other explanation is there?
• There was no water in the winds as all hurricanes do have- Geoengineered-created winds that citizens had never experienced before on Maui fueled the radiation fires. The day before citizens report something hazy in the air- sprayed to make the incineration worse? Remember what Dane Wigington taught us in your interview Mr. Kennedy.
• “Hurricanes bring extreme rainfall. Warm air can hold more moisture than cool air. In tropical cyclones, the air is particularly warm and can hold a tremendous amount of moisture. The moisture cools as it rises and condenses into heavy rain often much more than a typical low pressure system. These rains can occur not only at the coast, but many miles inland, causing flooding that can continue for days or even many weeks after a storm. Always follow evacuation orders and never drive into flooded roadways. If you live in low-lying or flood prone area, always have an evacuation plan before a storm begins”
• The Governor used the term ‘ fire hurricane’. There is no such thing in real weather. Hurricanes are always dangerously wet with sheets of rain, flooding, huge waves, of course. We learned this in 2nd grade. It is actually another oxymoron much like social-distancing. This is a new W.E.F. created false term, just like many other terms were invented or new definitions given these last years. Lies. As if we are all fools. We are not.
• Maui was set up to be a smart city island. The plans to rebuild set before the Incineration- Attack. The Governor plans on making ‘work-force-housing” for those not incinerated and prevented from rebuilding and living back at their homesites in Lahaina. Planning with the World Economic Forum for years setting it all up. See Standtogetherhawaii.com created by Hawaiian Michelle Melendez. The People of Maui desperately need help legally. This is a crime of immense proportion https://www.nedo.go.jp/content/100864936.pdf
Proof:
Robert Brame is a professional arborist of 48 years a backpacker, naturalist and has been to 39 different incineration events, 106 visits and thousands of photos. He has saved evidence.
1. This is a Robert Brame interview with California activist Peggy Hall-The Healthy American before the Maui Event- astounding evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHeoaIh7cx8
3. Hawaiian Michelle Melendez has created https://www.standtogetherhawaii.com/mauifires to inform and plea for help. Please read and watch the information she is showing us on this site.
4. Eric West of Hawaii Real Estate in Maui has been reporting via his Real Estate Youtube channel under his videos and community tabs-https://www.youtube.com/@hawaiirealestateorg/featured
9. One parent only so far has been found and is speaking. They were probably the only family who made it IN to find their son in his room hugging his dog, His mother stated:” but he was not as I expected, he was not in ashes, God maintained him”. Maintained him? Dogs and cats have also been found-‘maintained”. This is not the way bodies burn up in a wild fire. His father had to carry his radiated body to the police station. Was there an autopsy performed as need be in a crime?
10. It just so happens that Maui is the location for one of two major sites for the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFLR) Directed Energy Directorate. You read that correctly; within 40 miles of Lahaina on the Island of Maui is located the Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing (AMOS) site, which is part of the AFLR Directed Energy Directorate. The AFLR states “the Directorate develops and transitions technologies in four core technical competencies: laser systems, high power electromagnetics, weapons modeling and simulation, and directed energy and electro-optics for space superiority.” https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2023/08/20/lahaina-is-within-40-miles-of-a-u-s-government-directed-energy-facility-on-maui/
11. Catherine Austin Fitts as you know is an excellent resource and is a staple of CHD. She reports Maui and CA fire attacks are engineered to burn people out of the country lands , as you can hear her here: https://rumble.com/v3nxehi
America is under a HOT WAR ATTACK. Yes we are, no other logical explaination --- Please make these two efforts for us if you will: #1. contact Childrenshealthdefense.org contact page and request they investigate and help. #2. contact Kennedy24.com contact page and request RFKJr. to investigate and help the People of Maui to expose the incineration attacks on the United Statees from within. He is the one man who can reallly expose it and I think it will propel him into the White House. And the fact is we all now bear the burden, the responsiblity to investigate this and take action. Imagine if 40 bombs had been dropped? The incinerations are just as bad, worse. as they were hidden! For God's sake they were hidden. If anyone is not scared to death, outraged and demanding Justice then they are brain dead, not thinking and too scared or in denial and that is not okay. We are under a hot war attack. Use those links above PLEASE folks. Robert Brame is probably in serious danger as well. Robert Brame is a professional arborist of 48 years, a backpacker and naturalist. He has made 106 visits to 39 different incineration events. He saved evidence and has taken thousands of photos. Please make sure to watch both these interviews, one is before Maui and one is after Maui. And save them to your computer for evidence. And then everyone take these videos and other evidence you can easily find and make a police and sheriff's report. We must to help save ourselves.
1. This is a Robert Brame interview with California activist Peggy Hall-The Healthy American BEFORE the Maui Event- astounding evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHeoaIh7cx8
This is a comment on her Youtube channel for this video: “ I’m a microwave engineer (no, I don't build microwaves. My career was to design and build microwave radio links all round the world). All conclusions that Robert makes works perfectly from an engineering perspective. What he showed is exactly what would happen under microwave energy.
'The WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence works closely with Member States, WHO regional and country offices. With a presence in more than 150 countries, 6 regional offices, and its Geneva headquarters, the global scope of WHO allows for the ability to treat pandemic, epidemic, and public health risks with urgency and diligence around the globe.'
They have attacked by lazer weapon Maui and CA . We are under attack via a very hot incinerating weapon.Robert Brame is a professional arborist of 48 years a backpacker, naturalist and has been to 39 different incineration events, 106 visits and thousands of photos. He has saved evidence.
1. This is a Robert Brame interview with California activist Peggy Hall-The Healthy American before the Maui Even- astounding evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHeoaIh7cx8
I know that many people must be aware that Reiner Fuellmich is at present in prison in Germany. Please could you add your names to this petition calling for his release.
https://www.change.org/p/free-dr-reiner-fuellmich
I also asked Google BARD the following question:
Do you know of any explanation regarding one of the proposed amendments from India in Section 3 that are crossing out the words ‘with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons’ in the following regulation?
The implementation of these Regulations shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities of the States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development.” (page 58/197)
ANSWER
Yes, I am aware of the proposed amendment from India to cross out the words "with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons" in Section 3 of the International Health Regulations (IHR). This amendment, if adopted, would remove the requirement for countries to respect the human rights of individuals when implementing the IHR.
There are a number of potential reasons why India may have proposed this amendment. One possibility is that India is concerned that the current IHR do not give countries enough flexibility to implement the regulations in a way that is consistent with their own domestic laws and regulations. For example, India may be concerned that the requirement to respect human rights could prevent it from taking certain measures to protect public health, such as mandatory quarantines or travel restrictions.
Another possibility is that India believes that the human rights language in the IHR is too vague and could be interpreted in a way that is harmful to India's interests. For example, India may be concerned that the human rights language could be used to challenge legitimate public health measures, such as vaccination programs or surveillance programs.
Finally, it is also possible that India's proposed amendment is part of a broader effort by certain countries to weaken the human rights protections in the IHR. In recent years, there has been a growing movement among some countries to promote a more narrow interpretation of human rights, with an emphasis on state sovereignty and non-interference. India's proposed amendment may be part of this trend.
There are a number of potential consequences if India's proposed amendment is adopted. First, it would weaken the human rights protections in the IHR. This could lead to human rights abuses during public health emergencies, as countries would have more flexibility to implement the IHR without regard for human rights.
Second, it could undermine the legitimacy of the IHR. The IHR are based on the principle that public health and human rights are mutually reinforcing. If the IHR are seen as being at odds with human rights, it could make it more difficult for countries to implement the regulations effectively.
Finally, it could damage the global response to public health emergencies. The IHR are a global instrument that is designed to coordinate the response to public health emergencies. If countries are not willing to respect human rights when implementing the IHR, it could make it more difficult to mount a unified global response to public health threats.
Overall, India's proposed amendment to cross out the words "with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons" in Section 3 of the IHR is a concerning development. It has the potential to weaken human rights protections, undermine the legitimacy of the IHR, and damage the global response to public health emergencies. It is important to carefully consider the potential consequences of this amendment before making a decision about whether or not to support it.
Hi James, I asked Google BARD (Ai) the following question:
Do you know of any explanation regarding one of the proposed amendments from Bangladesh to cross out the word non-binding in the article 15? That assumes then to be understood as aiming to change the nature of these recommendations from non-binding to binding, and giving a binding effect to WHO recommendations and requests as proposed in other articles. Any explanations available on this isse?
ANSWER
Yes, I am aware of the proposed amendment from Bangladesh to cross out the word "non-binding" in Article 15 of the International Health Regulations (IHR). This amendment, if adopted, would make the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO) binding on countries.
There are a number of reasons why Bangladesh may have proposed this amendment. First, Bangladesh may believe that the current IHR are not effective enough in preventing and responding to public health emergencies. The WHO's recommendations are currently non-binding, which means that countries can choose whether or not to follow them. This can lead to a situation where some countries follow the WHO's recommendations and others do not, which can make it difficult to coordinate a global response to a public health emergency.
Second, Bangladesh may believe that the WHO needs to have more power to enforce its recommendations. The WHO currently has no legal authority to compel countries to follow its recommendations. This means that the WHO can only rely on the goodwill of countries to comply with its recommendations.
Third, Bangladesh may believe that the WHO's recommendations should be binding on countries because they are based on the best available scientific evidence. The WHO has a team of experts who are constantly monitoring the global health situation and providing advice to countries on how to prevent and respond to public health emergencies.
However, there are also a number of potential drawbacks to making the WHO's recommendations binding on countries. First, it could lead to a loss of sovereignty for countries. If the WHO has the power to compel countries to follow its recommendations, it could mean that countries no longer have full control over their own health policies.
Second, it could make it more difficult for the WHO to reach consensus on its recommendations. If the WHO knows that its recommendations will be binding on countries, it may be more hesitant to make recommendations that are not supported by all countries.
Third, it could make it more difficult for the WHO to respond to public health emergencies. If the WHO has to go through a lengthy process to get its recommendations approved by all countries, it could delay the WHO's response to a public health emergency.
Overall, the proposed amendment from Bangladesh to cross out the word "non-binding" in Article 15 of the IHR is a complex issue with both potential benefits and drawbacks. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks carefully before deciding whether or not to support this amendment.
Here are some additional explanations on this issue:
Bangladesh may believe that the current IHR are not effective enough in preventing and responding to public health emergencies. The WHO's recommendations are currently non-binding, which means that countries can choose whether or not to follow them. This can lead to a situation where some countries follow the WHO's recommendations and others do not, which can make it difficult to coordinate a global response to a public health emergency.
Bangladesh may believe that the WHO needs to have more power to enforce its recommendations. The WHO currently has no legal authority to compel countries to follow its recommendations. This means that the WHO can only rely on the goodwill of countries to comply with its recommendations.
Bangladesh may believe that the WHO's recommendations should be binding on countries because they are based on the best available scientific evidence. The WHO has a team of experts who are constantly monitoring the global health situation and providing advice to countries on how to prevent and respond to public health emergencies.
Bangladesh may believe that making the WHO's recommendations binding on countries would help to ensure that all countries are taking the necessary steps to prevent and respond to public health emergencies.
However, there are also a number of potential drawbacks to making the WHO's recommendations binding on countries:
It could lead to a loss of sovereignty for countries. If the WHO has the power to compel countries to follow its recommendations, it could mean that countries no longer have full control over their own health policies.
It could make it more difficult for the WHO to reach consensus on its recommendations. If the WHO knows that its recommendations will be binding on countries, it may be more hesitant to make recommendations that are not supported by all countries.
It could make it more difficult for the WHO to respond to public health emergencies. If the WHO has to go through a lengthy process to get its recommendations approved by all countries, it could delay the WHO's response to a public health emergency.
Overall, the proposed amendment from Bangladesh to cross out the word "non-binding" in Article 15 of the IHR is a complex issue with both potential benefits and drawbacks. It is important to weigh the potential benefits and drawbacks carefully before deciding whether or not to support this amendment.
But why do we NEED a replacement to the WHO? Why isn't the aim to eliminate the WHO, and ALL other unasked for, unnecessary, unwelcome, and frankly, unhealthy global organizations?
Health is a local - right down to the individual, and only as far outward as the family extends - concern, and NOT an issue that needs to be coordinated globally. The only reason there have ever been epidemics and pandemics is that they were artificially induced for reasons that include fabricating the pretext for global health coordinating organizations.
Enough! Enough of the WHO, enough of the UN, and the World Bank, and the IMF, and enough also of the WWF (I mean the World Wildlife Fund, and not that perverse homoerotic pantomime with grown men playing pretend fisticuffs). Enough of all these (centralized) global crime syndicates.
Hello from Sweden
I want to help.
Understand its urgent.
Direct Energy Radiation Weapon Attacks have occurred in CA, Colorado, TENN and now Maui. We are under a hot war attack, does not anyone care?
1 FOR ALL AND ALL FOR 1 https://consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2023/10/how-avoid-medicare-open-enrollment-scams?utm_source=govdelivery
❤️🙏
THOUGHT TO PONDER,,,,MONEY IS A SLAVE RELEASER,,, BUT ITS NOT . WE ARE ALL SLAVES THAT ARE NOT ELITES OR WEALTHY, BECAUSE WE WORK HARD FOR THE MONEY WE MAKE, TO SPEND IT ON OUR FREEDOM OF CERTAIN THINGS WE ARE ALLOWED
I am not at all clear on how I can help you, but very interested in hearing more.
I’m on Rhode Island whatever I can do to help.
This just hit home, as I found out last week, my mother has a brain tumor.
What are you needing volunteers for? I'm happy to help as long as it's legal (😬), relatively close to my area. We need more info to give a definitive Yes.
What does it mean to be legal? The government is criminal, and therefore all the laws enacted and enforced by the police are all illegitimate. What is needed is wide-scale - nation-wide, and in all localities everywhere - civil disobedience.
Willing to Help the Best Time allows James.
Thank you for all you do.
I called but VM is full.
heres a volunteer ready to help (online only)!
Facts: There have been at least 40 incineration attacks in CA and now Maui. And probably other places on Earth as well. A very HOT war! We have family who could be next! We are living in a war zone. We trust you will take action and expose this very hot-war attack on our country immediately.
Cars incinerated, engine blocks turned to dust, glass melted, molten aluminum rivers – even cars not in the fire zone surrounded by homes not touched by a source of fire were.
“Fire can melt glass, however, glass has a melting point of 2552 to 2912 degrees Fahrenheit. This means most sources of fire will not burn hot enough to reach that point”. No grass or forest fire gets that hot. An average surface fire on the forest floor…, reach 1471 Degrees Fahrenheit”. All the glass from all the cars and homes was melted.
• Flammable trees and their leaves, lawns and grass, not burnt up as they would be in natural wild/ grass- organic fire. The water severely dried out of them by radiation. The leaves, trees and grass remain as you can see. Wood things survived.
• Blue things survived as per the physics of radiation space- light- energy technology.
• Plastic, rubber items such as trash bins, children’s’ toys did not burn/melt, and were carted away in the cover up.
• There is a known Air Force ‘Directed Energy Dictectorate ‘in Maui.
• Many Maui children are unaccounted - Where are they and their parents?
• Perfected siren system turned off on Maui.
• Hawaii has the largest single integrated public safety outdoor siren warning system in the world.
• The all-hazard siren system can be used for a variety of both natural and human-caused events; including tsunamis, hurricanes, dam breaches, flooding, wildfires, volcanic eruptions, terrorist threats, hazardous material incidents, and more.
• The sirens output is 121 decibels and propagate with a manufacture radius of 3400ft. This range may vary due to environmental and surrounding physical conditions. The sirens are battery-powered and use a photovoltaic charging system. https://www.mauisirens.com
• People blocked from escaping incinerated in their cars.
• Metal on boats moored in the ocean disintegrated, wood not burnt.
• No fireboats shooting unending water into the fires.
• Firetrucks could not get in, not alerted in time. Why was there not fire equipment there?
• Radiation fires INSIDE the most water-laden trees burnt from the inside-out. – No leaves are burnt. Palm fronds and trees that go up like a match, not burnt up.
• As per the National Hurricane Center and Central Pacific Hurricane Center: On Tuesday morning Hurricane Dora was 685 miles south of Hawaii. And Dora was heading further south away from Hawaii fast. So it is impossible for terrific winds from Dora to have hit Maui. Those winds were not natural, not wet like EVERY island hurricane always is, not like any ever experienced according to the life long residents.
• We need all hands on deck in defense now, of our own DOD? What other explanation is there?
• CHD’s staple economist and wise woman Catherine Austin Fitz reporting in agreement the incinerations of Maui and Paradise were created- “ an attack”. To move people out of the rural areas clustered into controllable cities. This is a clip of her broadcast. https://rumble.com/v3nxehi-we-are-under-attack-catherine-austin-fitz-reporting-incineration-maui-land-.html
• There was no water in the winds as all hurricanes do have- Geoengineered-created winds that citizens had never experienced before on Maui fueled the radiation fires. The day before citizens report something hazy in the air- sprayed to make the incineration worse? Remember what Dane Wigington taught us in your interview Mr. Kennedy.
• “Hurricanes bring extreme rainfall. Warm air can hold more moisture than cool air. In tropical cyclones, the air is particularly warm and can hold a tremendous amount of moisture. The moisture cools as it rises and condenses into heavy rain often much more than a typical low pressure system. These rains can occur not only at the coast, but many miles inland, causing flooding that can continue for days or even many weeks after a storm. Always follow evacuation orders and never drive into flooded roadways. If you live in low-lying or flood prone area, always have an evacuation plan before a storm begins”
( https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/weather-atmosphere/hurricanes#:~:text=Hurricanes%20bring%20extreme%20rainfall&text=The%20moisture%20cools%20as%20it,even%20weeks%20after%20a%20storm.
• The Governor used the term ‘ fire hurricane’. There is no such thing in real weather. Hurricanes are always dangerously wet with sheets of rain, flooding, huge waves, of course. We learned this in 2nd grade. It is actually another oxymoron much like social-distancing. This is a new W.E.F. created false term, just like many other terms were invented or new definitions given these last years. Lies. As if we are all fools. We are not.
• Maui was set up to be a smart city island. The plans to rebuild set before the Incineration- Attack. The Governor plans on making ‘work-force-housing” for those not incinerated and prevented from rebuilding and living back at their homesites in Lahaina. Planning with the World Economic Forum for years setting it all up. See Standtogetherhawaii.com created by Hawaiian Michelle Melendez. The People of Maui desperately need help legally. This is a crime of immense proportion https://www.nedo.go.jp/content/100864936.pdf
Proof:
Robert Brame is a professional arborist of 48 years a backpacker, naturalist and has been to 39 different incineration events, 106 visits and thousands of photos. He has saved evidence.
1. This is a Robert Brame interview with California activist Peggy Hall-The Healthy American before the Maui Event- astounding evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHeoaIh7cx8
2. This is a Robert Brame interview with Hawaii activist Michelle Melendez after the Maui Incineration . Michelle is a Fitness & Wellness Expert since 1966 and author of a best selling book. https://rumble.com/v3dfbq6-48-yr-arborist-shares-how-maui-fire-was-not-a-wildfire.html
3. Hawaiian Michelle Melendez has created https://www.standtogetherhawaii.com/mauifires to inform and plea for help. Please read and watch the information she is showing us on this site.
4. Eric West of Hawaii Real Estate in Maui has been reporting via his Real Estate Youtube channel under his videos and community tabs-https://www.youtube.com/@hawaiirealestateorg/featured
5. Eric West video of cars incinerated not near a source of fire, not in the fire zone: https://www.youtube.com/@hawaiirealestateorg/videos
6. The Physics of Radiation Lasers and why blue things survived: https://rumble.com/v3ekiln-maui-was-zapped-by-a-direct-energy-weapon-obviously-there-is-a-known-dew-on.html
7. Testimony from a lady who escaped to the North where everyone could have gotten out except they then blocked that exit. https://www.bitchute.com/video/RtJ7IGT3lmCB/
8. Testimony of an Hawaiian Elder, a Kapuna who lost everything: https://rumble.com/v3n2mzi-elder-hawaiian-a-kapuna-testifies-at-a-hearing-in-maui-a-wise-woman-speakin.html
9. One parent only so far has been found and is speaking. They were probably the only family who made it IN to find their son in his room hugging his dog, His mother stated:” but he was not as I expected, he was not in ashes, God maintained him”. Maintained him? Dogs and cats have also been found-‘maintained”. This is not the way bodies burn up in a wild fire. His father had to carry his radiated body to the police station. Was there an autopsy performed as need be in a crime?
https://rumble.com/v3n2nqt-parents-find-their-son-hugging-their-dog-radiated-to-death..html
10. It just so happens that Maui is the location for one of two major sites for the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFLR) Directed Energy Directorate. You read that correctly; within 40 miles of Lahaina on the Island of Maui is located the Air Force Maui Optical and Supercomputing (AMOS) site, which is part of the AFLR Directed Energy Directorate. The AFLR states “the Directorate develops and transitions technologies in four core technical competencies: laser systems, high power electromagnetics, weapons modeling and simulation, and directed energy and electro-optics for space superiority.” https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2023/08/20/lahaina-is-within-40-miles-of-a-u-s-government-directed-energy-facility-on-maui/
11. Catherine Austin Fitts as you know is an excellent resource and is a staple of CHD. She reports Maui and CA fire attacks are engineered to burn people out of the country lands , as you can hear her here: https://rumble.com/v3nxehi
America is under a HOT WAR ATTACK. Yes we are, no other logical explaination --- Please make these two efforts for us if you will: #1. contact Childrenshealthdefense.org contact page and request they investigate and help. #2. contact Kennedy24.com contact page and request RFKJr. to investigate and help the People of Maui to expose the incineration attacks on the United Statees from within. He is the one man who can reallly expose it and I think it will propel him into the White House. And the fact is we all now bear the burden, the responsiblity to investigate this and take action. Imagine if 40 bombs had been dropped? The incinerations are just as bad, worse. as they were hidden! For God's sake they were hidden. If anyone is not scared to death, outraged and demanding Justice then they are brain dead, not thinking and too scared or in denial and that is not okay. We are under a hot war attack. Use those links above PLEASE folks. Robert Brame is probably in serious danger as well. Robert Brame is a professional arborist of 48 years, a backpacker and naturalist. He has made 106 visits to 39 different incineration events. He saved evidence and has taken thousands of photos. Please make sure to watch both these interviews, one is before Maui and one is after Maui. And save them to your computer for evidence. And then everyone take these videos and other evidence you can easily find and make a police and sheriff's report. We must to help save ourselves.
1. This is a Robert Brame interview with California activist Peggy Hall-The Healthy American BEFORE the Maui Event- astounding evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHeoaIh7cx8
This is a comment on her Youtube channel for this video: “ I’m a microwave engineer (no, I don't build microwaves. My career was to design and build microwave radio links all round the world). All conclusions that Robert makes works perfectly from an engineering perspective. What he showed is exactly what would happen under microwave energy.
2. This is a Robert Brame interview with Hawaii activist Michelle Melendez AFTER the Maui Incineration. Michelle is a Fitness & Wellness Expert since 1966. https://rumble.com/v3dfbq6-48-yr-arborist-shares-how-maui-fire-was-not-a-wildfire.html
I want to keep an eye on this:
https://pandemichub.who.int/
'The WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence works closely with Member States, WHO regional and country offices. With a presence in more than 150 countries, 6 regional offices, and its Geneva headquarters, the global scope of WHO allows for the ability to treat pandemic, epidemic, and public health risks with urgency and diligence around the globe.'
They have attacked by lazer weapon Maui and CA . We are under attack via a very hot incinerating weapon.Robert Brame is a professional arborist of 48 years a backpacker, naturalist and has been to 39 different incineration events, 106 visits and thousands of photos. He has saved evidence.
1. This is a Robert Brame interview with California activist Peggy Hall-The Healthy American before the Maui Even- astounding evidence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHeoaIh7cx8
2. This is a Robert Brame interview with Hawaii activist Michelle Melendez after the Maui Incineration . Michelle is a Fitness & Wellness Expert since 1966 and author of a best selling book. https://rumble.com/v3dfbq6-48-yr-arborist-shares-how-maui-fire-was-not-a-wildfire.html