UK Parliament Debate
Watch live or watch the recording if you are unable to watch the live event Monday 17 April 2023. 8:30am Pacific, 9:30am Mountain, 10:30am Central, 11:30am Eastern, 4:30pm UK
Please watch the video below…
CLICK HERE FOR THE TRANSCRIPT
Danny Kruger
Andrew Bridgen
Ester McVey
Additional videos…
Download and read the “Zero Draft” of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty:
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdf
The European Union recently proposed a very substantial addition to the proposed Zero Draft. CLICK HERE for my recent article on the EU proposal.
OFFICIAL WHO WEB PAGE:
https://inb.who.int/
OFFICIAL UK POSITION DOCUMENT:
https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9550/CBP-9550.pd
The document below highlights some of the important details of the proposed WHO CA+ or “Pandemic Treaty.” Please use it as a guide when you read the “Zero Draft.”
TAKE ACTION:
Everyone should CLICK HERE and HERE.
If you live in the United States, CLICK HERE and HERE.
Click on your country if you live in: Australia, Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom.
Call me directly if you have any questions: James Roguski +1-310-619-3055
by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
What amazes and angers me is that only 156,000 people actually bothered to sign this petition, when will the rest of the population catch on, when gates and schwab have them by the throat!!!!!!!
Here is the reply from my MP following being sent WHO treaty questions......
“Thank you for contacting me about a potential new international treaty for pandemic preparedness and the Westminster Hall Debate on 17 April regarding e-petition 614335, which calls for the UK Government to not sign any WHO Pandemic Treaty unless it is approved via public referendum.
The Covid-19 pandemic has been one of the greatest challenges to the established international order since the Second World War; a global threat that has required global solutions borne out of global cooperation. It has been immensely heartening to have seen the peoples and nations of the world pull together as they have. I pay tribute to all, everywhere.
As in the late 1940s, where, to avert a repeat of the cataclysm of total war, world leaders came together to establish the multilateral system we have today, a similar effort on the part of world leaders could strengthen preparedness for potential future pandemics.
As such, the former Prime Minister suggested, writing with other world leaders in 2021, that the international community should commit to producing a new international treaty for pandemic preparedness and response. Such a treaty would aim to foster greatly enhanced cooperation in order to better protect the UK from the health, social and economic impacts of pandemics.
Discussions are ongoing at the World Health Organisation to this end. The UK Government wants to reach agreement on its priority areas such as improving transparency, timely data sharing and supporting equitable access to vaccines and treatments.
The Government will not support any treaty which compromises the UK's sovereignty. There is nothing in the proposed treaty that would impact our ability to take decisions about national lockdowns or associated measures at the national level.
Once adopted, international treaties only become binding in the UK when ratified by Parliament in accordance with our constitutional process. No international treaty can by itself change UK law. If changes to the law are necessary, then a treaty could not be ratified until domestic legislation, agreed by Parliament, was put in place.”
Is this a typical reply from MP’s?