You are a prolific writer. What is the average non writer supposed to do in order to help stop the WHO? I hand out articles and the first thing I hear is what am i supposed to do with this? just a thought........ thanks for your efforts
We should make it clear to everyone in congress that if they don't leverage the debt ceiling to get us out of the WHO, we will look for and rally behind a challenger to their seat in the next primary.
Judging from the hurg number of impressive comments online to this site as well as to many others, there are many Americans who seem to be tuned in. Absorbing truth is not going to fix a damned thing. Only action, mass dissent, civilized civil protests just might influence a lobbied and intimidated congress. It is worth a try. See "A Letter to a Generation" at www.bigeye.org/letter.htm
How about we exit the idea that we need government? I'm not joking. Why do you think we need government AT ALL? Do you really think there'd be chaos without government? And what about the fact that we have now moved on and have the ability to make proposals ourselves and vote on them ourselves? What about the fact that we don't need banks anymore just to transfer numbers? We can do all that now so they too can become obsolete like they made us. Are we still going to remain in horse-and-buggy mentality?
Probably most people can't afford to pay separately for then-privatised and individually-personally-paid-for services, such as the upkeep of sections of sidewalks and roads in front of our homes, plumbing upgrades, streetlights, fire, security and other services.
Well, the wealthiest could... but in a real democracy, far lower rates of pooled public money (paid according to ability, rather than excluding those with the most wealth from putting in for anything and expecting the poor to make up for them,) would cover all of these, if with none wasted on efforts to, in example, act as the world's corrupt police in globally terrorising and starving the citizens of other, still-independent countries.
All while waaaaay the heck out of their own jurisdiction and waaaaay the over the line of international law. At their own public's cost, of course. Children 'at home' can go hungry and homeless, so that the children of other countries can suffer even worse.
Does this strike anyone as legitimate democratic policy, as opposed to being due to the insanity and pathological insatiability of a bunch of unduly powerful control-freaks using political puppets in turn using and draining (among too-many others) the US, both country and people, to head an agenda to weaken and take over all countries and people not already strangling in their tentacles?
Democracy literally means self-rule of/by/for the people, with NO-ONE allowed to claim they are 'above the law' that all are to be equal under.
This being a very obvious problem in the US, where the (limited-to-the-)Two-Party Trap selection cycle is enforced by corrupt politicians NOT allowing the American people actual electoral choice, so that they have been left with effectively no option but to keep voting (a postulated 'Lesser) Evil' among those of either of both-corrupted Parties back in.
This, even though the long-standing concern of politicians of (and heading) both Parties has been keeping the campaign money flowing from, and the cushy-job revolving door open between, themselves and the too-often ruthlessly-selfish billionaire/corporate self-interests funding these.
This means that the US has had no legitimate democratic of/by/for the people government of the sort that was ALSO always Constitutionally required. With an early warning: 'You have a Republic - if you can keep it.'
The purpose of democratic government is supposed to include such responsibilities as those of protecting and defending sovereignty and human and other rights, maintaining public services that have been gradually increasing from, in the US, the Congressional Constitutional obligation to maintain the roads and postal services - something ELSE that STILL has yet to be properly supplied and long being illegally/unconstitutionally taken in the opposite direction, toward destruction of this mandated essential public service for privatisation for billionaire/corporate-interest profiteering and population movement/communications control.
(In the US, 'equal rights, treatment and opportunity' were Constitutionally guaranteed in every State of the Union', although that warranty has always needed back-up that it typically never had; also - States Rights are HUMAN/CITIZEN rights belonging to The People of that State, not to just a few inhabiting government and who are supposed - and publicly salaried - to be representing the interests of their people,)
In any event, any legitimate democratic government is formed of honest, well-qualified fellow-citizens sharing the concerns of/by/for their fellows - and NOT of self-labelled 'elites' looking down on 'the masses' of individuals they manipulate, use and drain as they please.
Any modern civilisation requires administrative staff to work on serving the public good and as forming the unified public's arm in such as the protection and upholding of national sovereignty and of the human and other rights of their people. Otherwise, things will fall apart in isolated pockets easily taken down by predatory parasites, such as criminal gangs like the WHO/UN/WEF, et al.
What we (the countries of the world) don't need is to have such as the representatives of just such unduly powerful criminal gangs infiltrating government that's too-often been long-corrupted past the point of ever being self-cleaning.
The Swamp(s) (not just in the US, but in many places) need to be fired off and almost completely re-stocked with those fellow-citizens having no loyalties over those to their sovereign countries and their fellow-citizens.
The public seriously needs to be able to hold their own snap investigations/elections, to immediately have investigated/voted out anyone in their administration showing any provable signs of corruption; if the people don't hold their public servants within the law by weeding out all those who provably won't, it seems that no-one else will.
How we GET there, in our respective countries, I've no idea... but I live in my dreams... a better, gentler, kinder place, than this...
PS - go cashless and we are not only controlled but toast; that's what Central banking is about; it's their programmable money - not yours; you'll be told what you can and can't buy and from whom, with a limit on what you can spend, although it seems that they're also making it lose value over time - IF, for example, you have savings you thought might enable your retirement; your account can be cut off without notice and you'll have no humans to deal with to even find out why you're instantly rendered penniless, unless this is simply for a particular product that they don't/the algorithm doesn't want to let you have/be sold anywhere. They are killing off all Indie cashless money and plans have been stated to make it illegal.
People are using cash as much as possible, both to try to keep the cash supply going and as that's less easily and thoroughly tracked and traced and harder to control, that being the problem that the Central banksters/WEF, et al, have with it.
The agenda is to know and control what's being spent where and from whom and ensure that people buy what they're limited to and from the right billionaires; going by everything, healthy food and supplements will not be permitted any more than will be treats.
We don't need predatory banks - we need smaller local/publicly-controlled banks and credit unions, where we are members, not targets for extra charges.
We need cash, the existence of which is not contingent on power/internet function - especially for when the lights are planned to go off. The WEF has been threatening - among many other things - infrastructure attacks, potentially using created 'natural disasters/accidents, and we'll know exactly what groups to blame.
Once they take away cash, all hell will break loose; a 'brief' period on a UI is apparently slated for all, before complete acceptance of slavery and the surrender of all rights and assets will be demanded to let you have a stipend so you can be happy to live in a surveillance cubicle to supply experimental data to the perps. (They plan to be able to remotely conduct genetic changes on any still-surviving people, to see what happens to them, at some point,)
All this, so that they'll let you buy and eat Bill and Melinda's toxic, inflammatory chitinous insects and toxic, non-nutritional synthetic 'foods' as a treat and, apparently, each other. We've heard the 'predictive programming' on that and they've even tried getting people to eat what was supposed to be made from a culture of various famous people's flesh, saying that cannibalism was to become the future food supply. (Since they're killing off planetary life, as we speak.)
WHY are we letting the lunatic Mad Scientists ruin our only asylum?
Visited my representative's office today, dropped off the top ten reasons list and told his secretary about your substack.Thanks for all your work.
You are a prolific writer. What is the average non writer supposed to do in order to help stop the WHO? I hand out articles and the first thing I hear is what am i supposed to do with this? just a thought........ thanks for your efforts
Tedros himself is reason enough to get out faster than the speed of light. Such a monkeylike slave with a masked face belongs in a zoo.
Have you seen this?
https://rumble.com/v2fcnoq-dr-roger-hodkinson-march-28-2023-fort-st-john-bc-canada.html
Excellent. Let's not only exit the notorious WHO, but let's arrest the evil plotters & put them behind bars for life.
Thanks James.
A review of faxts first:
https://rumble.com/v2gxumk-special-presentation.html
Many thanks once again Mr. Roguski for your diligence and staying abreast of the WHO’s devilish deeds!!💪💪🎯
We should make it clear to everyone in congress that if they don't leverage the debt ceiling to get us out of the WHO, we will look for and rally behind a challenger to their seat in the next primary.
I would add Controlled by Globalists/CCP to create absolute control and take away people’s inalienable rights and freedoms.
Judging from the hurg number of impressive comments online to this site as well as to many others, there are many Americans who seem to be tuned in. Absorbing truth is not going to fix a damned thing. Only action, mass dissent, civilized civil protests just might influence a lobbied and intimidated congress. It is worth a try. See "A Letter to a Generation" at www.bigeye.org/letter.htm
Founded by Rockefeller the WHO is about one thing and one thing only: Global Eugenics.
WOW!!!!!
How about we exit the idea that we need government? I'm not joking. Why do you think we need government AT ALL? Do you really think there'd be chaos without government? And what about the fact that we have now moved on and have the ability to make proposals ourselves and vote on them ourselves? What about the fact that we don't need banks anymore just to transfer numbers? We can do all that now so they too can become obsolete like they made us. Are we still going to remain in horse-and-buggy mentality?
Probably most people can't afford to pay separately for then-privatised and individually-personally-paid-for services, such as the upkeep of sections of sidewalks and roads in front of our homes, plumbing upgrades, streetlights, fire, security and other services.
Well, the wealthiest could... but in a real democracy, far lower rates of pooled public money (paid according to ability, rather than excluding those with the most wealth from putting in for anything and expecting the poor to make up for them,) would cover all of these, if with none wasted on efforts to, in example, act as the world's corrupt police in globally terrorising and starving the citizens of other, still-independent countries.
All while waaaaay the heck out of their own jurisdiction and waaaaay the over the line of international law. At their own public's cost, of course. Children 'at home' can go hungry and homeless, so that the children of other countries can suffer even worse.
Does this strike anyone as legitimate democratic policy, as opposed to being due to the insanity and pathological insatiability of a bunch of unduly powerful control-freaks using political puppets in turn using and draining (among too-many others) the US, both country and people, to head an agenda to weaken and take over all countries and people not already strangling in their tentacles?
Democracy literally means self-rule of/by/for the people, with NO-ONE allowed to claim they are 'above the law' that all are to be equal under.
This being a very obvious problem in the US, where the (limited-to-the-)Two-Party Trap selection cycle is enforced by corrupt politicians NOT allowing the American people actual electoral choice, so that they have been left with effectively no option but to keep voting (a postulated 'Lesser) Evil' among those of either of both-corrupted Parties back in.
This, even though the long-standing concern of politicians of (and heading) both Parties has been keeping the campaign money flowing from, and the cushy-job revolving door open between, themselves and the too-often ruthlessly-selfish billionaire/corporate self-interests funding these.
This means that the US has had no legitimate democratic of/by/for the people government of the sort that was ALSO always Constitutionally required. With an early warning: 'You have a Republic - if you can keep it.'
The purpose of democratic government is supposed to include such responsibilities as those of protecting and defending sovereignty and human and other rights, maintaining public services that have been gradually increasing from, in the US, the Congressional Constitutional obligation to maintain the roads and postal services - something ELSE that STILL has yet to be properly supplied and long being illegally/unconstitutionally taken in the opposite direction, toward destruction of this mandated essential public service for privatisation for billionaire/corporate-interest profiteering and population movement/communications control.
(In the US, 'equal rights, treatment and opportunity' were Constitutionally guaranteed in every State of the Union', although that warranty has always needed back-up that it typically never had; also - States Rights are HUMAN/CITIZEN rights belonging to The People of that State, not to just a few inhabiting government and who are supposed - and publicly salaried - to be representing the interests of their people,)
In any event, any legitimate democratic government is formed of honest, well-qualified fellow-citizens sharing the concerns of/by/for their fellows - and NOT of self-labelled 'elites' looking down on 'the masses' of individuals they manipulate, use and drain as they please.
Any modern civilisation requires administrative staff to work on serving the public good and as forming the unified public's arm in such as the protection and upholding of national sovereignty and of the human and other rights of their people. Otherwise, things will fall apart in isolated pockets easily taken down by predatory parasites, such as criminal gangs like the WHO/UN/WEF, et al.
What we (the countries of the world) don't need is to have such as the representatives of just such unduly powerful criminal gangs infiltrating government that's too-often been long-corrupted past the point of ever being self-cleaning.
The Swamp(s) (not just in the US, but in many places) need to be fired off and almost completely re-stocked with those fellow-citizens having no loyalties over those to their sovereign countries and their fellow-citizens.
The public seriously needs to be able to hold their own snap investigations/elections, to immediately have investigated/voted out anyone in their administration showing any provable signs of corruption; if the people don't hold their public servants within the law by weeding out all those who provably won't, it seems that no-one else will.
How we GET there, in our respective countries, I've no idea... but I live in my dreams... a better, gentler, kinder place, than this...
PS - go cashless and we are not only controlled but toast; that's what Central banking is about; it's their programmable money - not yours; you'll be told what you can and can't buy and from whom, with a limit on what you can spend, although it seems that they're also making it lose value over time - IF, for example, you have savings you thought might enable your retirement; your account can be cut off without notice and you'll have no humans to deal with to even find out why you're instantly rendered penniless, unless this is simply for a particular product that they don't/the algorithm doesn't want to let you have/be sold anywhere. They are killing off all Indie cashless money and plans have been stated to make it illegal.
People are using cash as much as possible, both to try to keep the cash supply going and as that's less easily and thoroughly tracked and traced and harder to control, that being the problem that the Central banksters/WEF, et al, have with it.
The agenda is to know and control what's being spent where and from whom and ensure that people buy what they're limited to and from the right billionaires; going by everything, healthy food and supplements will not be permitted any more than will be treats.
We don't need predatory banks - we need smaller local/publicly-controlled banks and credit unions, where we are members, not targets for extra charges.
We need cash, the existence of which is not contingent on power/internet function - especially for when the lights are planned to go off. The WEF has been threatening - among many other things - infrastructure attacks, potentially using created 'natural disasters/accidents, and we'll know exactly what groups to blame.
Once they take away cash, all hell will break loose; a 'brief' period on a UI is apparently slated for all, before complete acceptance of slavery and the surrender of all rights and assets will be demanded to let you have a stipend so you can be happy to live in a surveillance cubicle to supply experimental data to the perps. (They plan to be able to remotely conduct genetic changes on any still-surviving people, to see what happens to them, at some point,)
All this, so that they'll let you buy and eat Bill and Melinda's toxic, inflammatory chitinous insects and toxic, non-nutritional synthetic 'foods' as a treat and, apparently, each other. We've heard the 'predictive programming' on that and they've even tried getting people to eat what was supposed to be made from a culture of various famous people's flesh, saying that cannibalism was to become the future food supply. (Since they're killing off planetary life, as we speak.)
WHY are we letting the lunatic Mad Scientists ruin our only asylum?
Me, too.
These pricks need to be strung up as far as I’m concerned.