James, can you put some links up to some major petitions we can sign? I am unable to access the site uk.stoptheamendments.com that you mentioned. Norton blocking me. Then "not found" etc., etc....

Expand full comment

I wouldn't have a problem with shorter rejection times if they gave voting issues the same amount of airtime as they gave bed bath and beyond to notify people their gift cards wouldn't be valid, two weeks before the store closed. Literally they woman said, you should have known it was on all the mainstream news outlets and local papers. I laughed and said, who watches mainstream news? Really appreciate you James for the work compiling this. Do you have a list of political leaders speaking out against the WHO? Do you send this directly to them?

Expand full comment

Dear James, I just heard your enlightening interview with Dr. Campbell. I was wondering if you have looked into history of the formation of the WHO and Rockefellers' role in it? Having stumbled across evidence of Rockefeller' investment in the Nazi eugenics research, via the Abraham Lincoln Foundation as described in Glenn Yeadon's "The Nazi Hydra" in America I have since then thought of this "altruistic" World venture as being a big fanfare created to cover the horrible eugenic tracks left between 1934 and 1945. Eugenics was renamed genetics in order to dispel it's grisly pr image, but with the new WHO pandemic treaties eugenics comes back with a global vengeance that also ought to investigated and publicized by capable people such as yourself. I am a humble freelance visual art is and cultural translator working in Germany and have neither proper qualifications nor credentials for writing such things. Healthy and cheerful greetings from Saxon Switzerland!

Expand full comment


Expand full comment

James Roguski on the rejection period / False Virus-Narrative Revelations


Expand full comment

This appears to be the lead up to the pandemic treaty

World Health Assembly mandate to implement the WHO International Health Regulations (2005): draft 5 year global strategic plan to improve public health preparedness and response. 


Implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005)


five-year global strategic plan to improve public health preparedness and response, 2018-2023, in which the Health Assembly requests the Director-General "to submit every year a single report to the Health Assembly on progress made in implementation of the International Health Regulations (2005),



At a conference on Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies held last December, participants from the public health, animal health, transport and tourism sectors focussed on the growing challenges of tackling outbreaks and health emergencies in urban areas. They called for WHO and partners to designate 2019 as a “Year of action on preparedness for health emergencies”.

Challenges and opportunities in urban areas

3 – 4 December 2018 

Lyon, France


The United Nations estimate that 54% of the world population live in urban areas and more than 40 megacities are expected by 2030, compared with 18 at the beginning of the century. 

The High-Level Conference on Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies- Challenges and opportunities in urban areas, will be held in Lyon, France, at Musée des Confluences. 


Expand full comment

There are obviously several reasons, with the top six included.

The question is, what could speaking out accomplish?

Expand full comment

People, READ THIS!

READ IT! https://www.coreysdigs.com/global/laundering-with-immunity-the-control-framework-part-2-a-powerhouse-of-ruin/

'The WHO is to the UN as PAHO is to the OAS. Two very powerful organizations that are in lock-step, consisting of member states that account for the entire global population, and the OAS with headquarters just steps away from the White House and the UN Foundation even closer, with immunities and privileges that afford them the ability to keep forging ahead with the New World Order agenda. Removing membership from the WHO alone serves no purpose, nor does removing membership from just the UN or just OAS. Getting out of their control grid entirely is what is necessary, and ending or significantly reducing the privileges from the International Organizations Immunities Act, is also necessary.'

Expand full comment
Apr 1·edited Apr 1

Dr. Michael Yeadon suggests due process should drive criminal prosecution of the planners and key personnel responsible for millions of deaths globally - to hold them accountable, here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ywXPD3Z3iH96/

Expand full comment

Thanks for everything you do! I must be dim but I couldn't find the 6 reasons... What are they?

Expand full comment

I would never give ANY president of anything permission to make health choices for me. Trying to get congress involved is an exercise in futility. These guys don't know much of anything except how to lie to get the next vote. There are some 535 politicians in congress and yet you only ever hear about 15 or 20. Where are the rest of these bums? The government in my state is now totally leftist. Going to them is not much of an option.

So you go out in the streets and protest, nothing will happen because nobody is listening. If you get a bit unruly, they will further tighten down the laws to make public protests illegal. It boils down to non-compliance on the personal level. But here is the quirk...if you say no to their medical terrorism, then they want to come in and physically force you to comply. You will then either be injected to death or sent to a prison camp to die of hunger. If you resist, then you will have to shoot it out with UN forces that will have greater fire power then you do. They will kill you anyway.

The objective is for you to be dead. WHO does not care how it is accomplished. Where am I wrong in my thinking? I know it is dark and dreary, but I don't see anyone with any real power on our side. Should I trust God? 100's of millions have still perished trusting God. Maybe some unintended consequences appear to thwart the plans of WHO, gates and the WEF. I think we need more certainty.

Expand full comment

Hello to you all! On May 13th there will be an international event for all of those who suffered from this horrendous last few years. The most visible victims are the ones dead or maimed by the shots and those who died from untreated cv or other infections and diseases, who did not fit well to the narrative.

But there are many of us who suffered in various ways - discrimination, insults, being outcast from the workplace, public life and places, or simply put in repeated lockdowns.

Could you please share if there is anything planned in your country / region / town? It would be interesting and we still have the time to use and improve creative ideas, so that it could not get silenced and would not go unnoticed.

Thank you all!

Expand full comment

Hi James! I ran the clock out on your call today, sorry about that! Glad to have gotten a chance to connect finally, thank you for all your work. See you soon...

Expand full comment

I agree! If anything there should be effort toward organizing a massive protest in the streets in front of the WHO and all of its sub offices.

Expand full comment

A Letter to a Generation - DO YOU REMEMBER MARIO SAVIO?

THE CURRENT HORRORS will not be stopped by politicians and/or lawyers. Those efforts were tried unsuccessfully during the Vietnam era, which you may be too young to remember. They will never work today despite thoughtful analytical essays, websites, petitions, conferences, etc.

Here is a little history from a guy turning ninety this year. Roughly twenty years prior to the Vietnam War there was a murderous dress-rehearsal in Korea. Civilized efforts to stop the terrible bloodshed being done in Vietnam failed repeatedly. Jim Rhodes, Ohio’s State Auditor, for whom I saved a Sunday "New York Times" newspaper (when I worked on weekends at Cole’s Pharmacy in north Columbus, Ohio) after moving up from State Auditor to become Ohio’s governor, called out the Ohio National Guard that shot and killed four students, wounding eight or nine others, at Kent State University where there was a small anti-Vietnam-war demonstration. Believe it or not, the public was overwhelmingly critical of the students, not of the National Guard or of the Ohio governor. The famous Peace Symbol was viewed as despicable and the war escalated. A remarkable young President who opposed Vietnam war planning was killed. Given that atmosphere, how could our government's murderous military activity in Vietnam be brought to an end?

Here is how a free people who became fed up with their own government did it. College students held military draft cards. When any war protest arose they were happy to support it. Many fled to Canada to avoid being drafted and sent to the jungles of Vietnam. The antiwar protest was a campus centered thing. Starting at the University of Wisconsin, it spread to the large land-grant state colleges, and then to Berkeley in CA, Columbia in NYC, and elsewhere. Christian clerics became outspoken protesters and tossed animal blood around a draft board office. War protesters chained themselves to columns of government buildings in Washington D.C. Protests, riots and violence (against property, not humans) erupted throughout the country. That is what was required to finally stop the war, active mass protests. I left my job, taking earned vacation time in NYC to return to my college (Ohio State University, in Columbus, Ohio). Growing a ponytail, I joined the long-haired kids. Many respectable Americans were horrified and unsupportive.

Here is how a younger generation changed America's international policy and stopped that war. Every year a bill came up in Congress to fund the war. It was euphemistically titled something like funding for aid to South Vietnam. Guess what! When President Ford sent it to Congress for signing, he was shocked and amazed when the politicians (although compromized as ever) declined to sign it. There was no more money to continue the war. Simple as that. You might wonder, why did the lobbied guys in Congress not sign the bill, as usual? They were terrified to return to their districts if they signed it. Their hometowns were partially ablaze. We did that. The NY Review of Books had great anti-war articles by Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, and others. They were read by a small intellectual minority. Mass protests that required resistance stopped the bloodshed, not philosophy, peace marches, essays, car signs, tatoos and T-shirts.

Without increasingly violent defensive mass protests who knows how much further and longer the Pentagon’s war-mongers, the CIA, and the U.S. Congress would have gone, even after more than fifty thousand young Americans had been killed and tens of thousands injured and crippled? The Pentagon's top military career men, and many American corporations holding government contracts, were getting richer and richer. It has been disclosed that U.S. corporations, supported by their bankers, made and financed equipment for the enemy that killed U.S. troops, just as they had done during both of their two previous World Wars. (If you require confirmation, read the research of Antony Sutton (at bigeye.org/antonysutton.htm). Professor Sutton was attacked by the IRS, which is in the picture today, as usual.

Petitions, a vote, lawsuits, etc., are interesting. Drafting, presenting, defending, and implementing litigation is like watching paint dry. More talk just encourages the usual suspects, letting them sense that all is well for themselves as long as they continue to hoodwink Americans with propaganda (news broadcasts) on their television networks. We need to do the job through online recruitment and active protests regardless of what others think or say. There are enough persons using the internet today that when this program becomes unacceptable to the dreadful few, we will have provided the seeds for massive organized resistance. Perhaps violence (against property only) will be unnecessary. They are few! We are many and we are armed to the teeth for defensive purposes, unlike unfortunate disarmed nationals (such as in Canada, Australia, etc.). Americans are able to protect their Liberty thanks to the predictive ability, historical insight, and foresight of the writers of our great U.S. Constitution, particularly its Second Amendment (which was designed specifically for a time like this).

Young Americans came together, Whites, Blacks, Jews, Gentiles, Hispanics, Asians, etc., those who valued laws encoded in our U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights. They confirmed the fundamental rights given to us, not from any government, but that come from God, "to institute new Government, laying its foundations on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. . ." We Americans are blessed, protected by a legal right to assemble, albeit in justifiable anger, for Liberty, Peace, and basic survival (including personal health decisions). Remember the Vietnam era. Look up the speech by Mario Savio in California. It is applicable today.

These are again "the times that try men's souls". We, Americans of all ages and of various and differing political/social viewpoints, must respond in numbers, defending ourselves when necessary to save our own lives as well as the lives of our companions, our children, their children, and of future generations, not only on this continent but throughout the world.

Note: Just so you don’t have to look them up, here are Mario Savio’s closing words:

"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can’t take part; you can’t even passively take part, and you’ve got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you’ve got to make it stop. And you’ve got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you’re free, the machine will be prevented from working at all!

Are YOU going to help? Enjoy the two sites: NEWSWATCH.ORG and BIGEYE.ORG

Add links to social media and web pages. Mssage them to cell-phone contacts.


Expand full comment

It is not clear to me who or what body or group of people we are voicing our objections to!

Is there one organization collecting signatures?

Is there one organization that has been invited to these secret meetings and given a voice?


Expand full comment