These proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) seek to remove respect for your dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms. NOW is the time to take action to stop this.
James; First of all, thank you for your efforts in this matter; this is huge! As to the proposed alteration of the phrase "non-binding advice" wherever it occurs in the existing regs, by the deletion of the word "non-binding", such a change is actually no more than the cleaning up of a grammatical redundancy. I will explain. The concept of advice is that an advisor communicates something, information, to the advisee; implicit in the concept is the acknowledgment that it is the advisee who is making the decision, ie, it is the advisee who holds the power; the advisors role is, ideally, to help the advisee improve the quality of their decision. In other words, "binding" advice is not advice, its an order, and orders only exist within the concept of "authority", and as far as the people of the United States of America are concerned the WHO has no authority whatsoever. For Americans, their authorities are their local and state govts, and the Federal govt.
Having pointed the above out, I agree completely with your underlying concern. An elitist, globalist cabal of totalitarians, and their stooges, have converged upon and now "own" the WHO, and it is clearly their intention to use that pretense (the WHO) to exterminate all free societies, most particularly the USA. The proposed change in phrasing itself demonstrates this emergent phenomena; the existing language, with its redundancy, was deliberate; it was meant to hammer home relentlessly that the concept of the WHO was for it to be a venue for nations to come together voluntarily, and to work together voluntarily pursuing mutual self interest in health matters. Now, after many years, that the totalitarians finally control the institution, such language is complete anathema to them and they are abolishing it. While the change in phrasing, in and of itself does not achieve their purpose (as I've pointed out, above), it is a spectacular "tell." I'm guessing (can you confirm?) that these proposed changes are not accompanied by any sort of textual narrative detailing the rationale for each and every change. If what was going on here was a democratic process, such a narrative would be a "slam dunk" part of it. That the totalitarians have completely omitted it suggests to me that among their many delusions, the totalitarians at this moment in time feel strong and in command; ie there is no need to concoct a rationale of lies for each text change to successfully achieve their agenda in this matter.
To date, I have been following (only casually) but not focusing upon this issue. My main source of information has been Dr. Meryl Nass, in my estimation a truly great American ( Go Meryl Go!). A detailed examination of the entire body of textual changes should make clear the totalitarian template in all its abominableness. If I anticipate correctly, at some point the revisions will include new regs in the form of "must"s, as in " must obey the commands of" the uber totalitarian stooge heading the organization (Is it still the unindicted criminal, Tedros?) Have you already found them all, so that all I need do is read on? That would be excellent, and with such hopes I shall.
YOU FUCKING LIARS,THIS ISNT SOMETHING TO LIE ABOUT , OH YOU WANT ATTENTION? YOUR JUST AS WHATS WRONG WITH SOCEITY 💰💰💰 there you go! YOU GOT ENOUGH MONEY YET? YOU WILLING TO FUCK WITH EVERYONE SOME MORE? THOSE "SECRET" AMENDMENTS ARE FAKE AS FUCK! THERES NO SEAL NO SIGNATURES NOTHING OFFICIAL! YOU LYING TO GET SUBSCRIBERS, 🖕🏽🖕🏽🖕🏽 YOU'RE WHATS WRONG, NO HONOR NO LOYALTY TO ANYTHING EXCEPT MONEY AND POWER JUST LIKE THEM. THIS IS NOT HOW WE CHANGE THE WORLD FOR THE BETTER!🤦🏼♂️
James, you have done a gargantuan amount if work. Thank you. I have been contacting people with a farther breach than mine to help. I heard you on Housatonic and a few other podcasts. I'm trying to lend my hands to carrying this load. Thank you. You'll see me online as Dee Lite.
Hi James, in legal language words with capital letters like States Parties or Developed Countries are defined on the definition list or page. These definition can be quite long in text. That is the reason why these words with capital letters are used throughout the document.
The World Health Organisation does not serve the people; it serves the elite and the pharmaceutical Companies. The only remedy is for EVERY NATION to EXIT the WHO. Never ever give any organization the power to regulate what you can or cannot do with your own body.
"Analysis of Covid-19 attributed deaths … shows convincingly here in Aotearoa that getting boosted is one of the most important things you can do to reduce your risk of death from Covid-19.
That is not a "zoom" phone. That is my phone number and it is available for calls, text, Signal, WhatsApp and Telegram. You can also use Skype: james.roguski
I reject these proposed amendments for myself, my daughter and family. I am a divine human being with innate human rights that aren't for sell and cannot be stolen. I do not give you permission for this. Signed from USA. I encourage people to let me know their thoughts on GPMS.WORLD
I have a question. I believe I signed this, but I never received a confirmation email. The screen said to call a representative that was on the screen. Does this mean the emails were sent?
Thanks James, for your continued efforts to get truly vital information out to people to disseminate and act upon.
Would add that you did very well re-directing your recent "Sgt.Report" interview back to the topic of immediate import- despite repeated attempts to mire you down in rabbit holes...! ;)
I have shared this with as many people as I could on my small Instagram. I am an expat in Korea now so I don't know what else I can do. I don't know the language here but I try to spread the word as much as I can.
James; First of all, thank you for your efforts in this matter; this is huge! As to the proposed alteration of the phrase "non-binding advice" wherever it occurs in the existing regs, by the deletion of the word "non-binding", such a change is actually no more than the cleaning up of a grammatical redundancy. I will explain. The concept of advice is that an advisor communicates something, information, to the advisee; implicit in the concept is the acknowledgment that it is the advisee who is making the decision, ie, it is the advisee who holds the power; the advisors role is, ideally, to help the advisee improve the quality of their decision. In other words, "binding" advice is not advice, its an order, and orders only exist within the concept of "authority", and as far as the people of the United States of America are concerned the WHO has no authority whatsoever. For Americans, their authorities are their local and state govts, and the Federal govt.
Having pointed the above out, I agree completely with your underlying concern. An elitist, globalist cabal of totalitarians, and their stooges, have converged upon and now "own" the WHO, and it is clearly their intention to use that pretense (the WHO) to exterminate all free societies, most particularly the USA. The proposed change in phrasing itself demonstrates this emergent phenomena; the existing language, with its redundancy, was deliberate; it was meant to hammer home relentlessly that the concept of the WHO was for it to be a venue for nations to come together voluntarily, and to work together voluntarily pursuing mutual self interest in health matters. Now, after many years, that the totalitarians finally control the institution, such language is complete anathema to them and they are abolishing it. While the change in phrasing, in and of itself does not achieve their purpose (as I've pointed out, above), it is a spectacular "tell." I'm guessing (can you confirm?) that these proposed changes are not accompanied by any sort of textual narrative detailing the rationale for each and every change. If what was going on here was a democratic process, such a narrative would be a "slam dunk" part of it. That the totalitarians have completely omitted it suggests to me that among their many delusions, the totalitarians at this moment in time feel strong and in command; ie there is no need to concoct a rationale of lies for each text change to successfully achieve their agenda in this matter.
To date, I have been following (only casually) but not focusing upon this issue. My main source of information has been Dr. Meryl Nass, in my estimation a truly great American ( Go Meryl Go!). A detailed examination of the entire body of textual changes should make clear the totalitarian template in all its abominableness. If I anticipate correctly, at some point the revisions will include new regs in the form of "must"s, as in " must obey the commands of" the uber totalitarian stooge heading the organization (Is it still the unindicted criminal, Tedros?) Have you already found them all, so that all I need do is read on? That would be excellent, and with such hopes I shall.
YOU FUCKING LIARS,THIS ISNT SOMETHING TO LIE ABOUT , OH YOU WANT ATTENTION? YOUR JUST AS WHATS WRONG WITH SOCEITY 💰💰💰 there you go! YOU GOT ENOUGH MONEY YET? YOU WILLING TO FUCK WITH EVERYONE SOME MORE? THOSE "SECRET" AMENDMENTS ARE FAKE AS FUCK! THERES NO SEAL NO SIGNATURES NOTHING OFFICIAL! YOU LYING TO GET SUBSCRIBERS, 🖕🏽🖕🏽🖕🏽 YOU'RE WHATS WRONG, NO HONOR NO LOYALTY TO ANYTHING EXCEPT MONEY AND POWER JUST LIKE THEM. THIS IS NOT HOW WE CHANGE THE WORLD FOR THE BETTER!🤦🏼♂️
Thank you James. I reached out to my congressmen, popular podcasters, and people in my community.
If you get any responses from your public servants, please forward them to me so that I can add them to the collection.
James, you have done a gargantuan amount if work. Thank you. I have been contacting people with a farther breach than mine to help. I heard you on Housatonic and a few other podcasts. I'm trying to lend my hands to carrying this load. Thank you. You'll see me online as Dee Lite.
I agree
Hi James, in legal language words with capital letters like States Parties or Developed Countries are defined on the definition list or page. These definition can be quite long in text. That is the reason why these words with capital letters are used throughout the document.
Yes, that is understood, except these terms are NOT defined in Article 1. THAT is the problem.
The World Health Organisation does not serve the people; it serves the elite and the pharmaceutical Companies. The only remedy is for EVERY NATION to EXIT the WHO. Never ever give any organization the power to regulate what you can or cannot do with your own body.
All nations need to exit the WHO immediately.
https://dailytelegraph.co.nz/news/bloomfield-gets-a-knighthood-full-new-years-honours-list/
Selected as co-chair at the November 2022 meeting - Now ex Directer General of Health NZ.
Co-Chair, WHO Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR)
https://nzdsos.com/2022/08/12/lying-with-statistics/
"Analysis of Covid-19 attributed deaths … shows convincingly here in Aotearoa that getting boosted is one of the most important things you can do to reduce your risk of death from Covid-19.
Very consistent with the international evidence"
ASHLEY BLOOMFIELD - LYING WITH STATISTICS
https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/A_WGIHR1_5-en.pdf
1. The Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) held its first
meeting on 14–15 November 2022 in a hybrid fashion with some participants online and some
physically present at WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland. The Working Group elected
Dr Abdullah Asiri of Saudi Arabia and Dr Ashley Bloomfield of New Zealand as Co-Chairs,
Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of My Knowledge: https://christs.net
Is your zoom phone # 321 619 3055?
310-619-3055
That is not a "zoom" phone. That is my phone number and it is available for calls, text, Signal, WhatsApp and Telegram. You can also use Skype: james.roguski
I reject these proposed amendments for myself, my daughter and family. I am a divine human being with innate human rights that aren't for sell and cannot be stolen. I do not give you permission for this. Signed from USA. I encourage people to let me know their thoughts on GPMS.WORLD
I have a question. I believe I signed this, but I never received a confirmation email. The screen said to call a representative that was on the screen. Does this mean the emails were sent?
Most likely the emails were sent. There is no harm in sending them multiple times. In fact, that is encouraged!
I called Ted Deutch (FL) but all his phone numbers no longer exist. I did send the letter though.
"Shall is only used for future time reference with I and we, and is more formal than will." "expressing a strong assertion or intention."
Thank you for what you are doing.
In legalese, shall means must. It creates legally binding obligations, as opposed to should, could or may.
Thanks James, for your continued efforts to get truly vital information out to people to disseminate and act upon.
Would add that you did very well re-directing your recent "Sgt.Report" interview back to the topic of immediate import- despite repeated attempts to mire you down in rabbit holes...! ;)
Thanks for noticing. I really appreciate it.
Sean at SGTReport is one of the greatest truth tellers in the USA. VERY DISRESPECTFUL.
I have shared this with as many people as I could on my small Instagram. I am an expat in Korea now so I don't know what else I can do. I don't know the language here but I try to spread the word as much as I can.