79 Comments
Nov 5·edited Nov 5

https://odysee.com/@Musicofdestruction:5/i-reject-the-WHO-pandemic-Treaty:0 My video decalring my rejection of the WHO global pandemic treaty

Expand full comment

I am totally against THE WHO having any say in my my family my grand childrens health snd future

After their epic failure and false claims they should be disbanded

Expand full comment

The views tell ppl just how stupid the West is.

Expand full comment

We absolutely need and have to stop the WHO.

Expand full comment

Enough is enough! It's time to take control over our own medical choices! As free people we deserve the freedom to choose the path of the rest of our lives - too many like my husband are now permanently damaged from coerced medical intervention, our lives forever changed!

Expand full comment

In November 2023, we the people terminated the Corrupt WHO when Bill Gates became the biggest contributor to their budget. He now controls WHO Policies, Agenda and intentions - all of which will now financially benefit the new 'owner' = Gates. Beware, the obsolete WHO because they no longer have influence on human wellbeing. they now intend to make the population their profit centre by creating diseases and highly profitable pretend cures that are more harmful than Snake Oil!

We, the people, have spoken! Unjabbed Mick (UK).

Expand full comment

Thank you for your effort to stop the Big pHarma from doing further harms!

Expand full comment

Time for talking in over

Expand full comment

1. Grandiose Sense of Importance and Authority:

- "The World Together Equitably": This title suggests a belief in the authors' ability to create a more equitable world, implying a sense of exceptionalism and a belief in their own power to shape global dynamics. It positions the authors as orchestrators of a grand plan for global health.

- "Pandemic-Related Health Products": The agreement focuses on these products as the central solution, suggesting a belief in the power of technology and pharmaceuticals to solve complex global problems. This could be interpreted as a belief in the authors' own expertise and authority in dictating the terms of global health.

- "Sustainable and Geographically Diversified Local Production": The emphasis on "sustainable" and "geographically diversified" production could be interpreted as a belief in the authors' ability to solve complex economic and logistical problems. This suggests a sense of control and authority over global supply chains.

2. Need for Control and Manipulation:

- "The Parties shall take measures...": The use of imperative language ("shall take measures") suggests a desire for control and a belief in the authors' ability to dictate the actions of nations. This reflects a need to impose their vision on the world.

- "Promote and/or Incentivize": The frequent use of "promote" and "incentivize" suggests a desire to influence and shape the behavior of governments and corporations, potentially reflecting a need for control and a belief in their ability to manipulate others.

3. Lack of Empathy and Consideration for Others:

- "Reduce the Potential Gap Between Supply and Demand": This prioritizes economic efficiency over the needs of vulnerable populations, potentially reflecting a lack of concern for the human cost of pandemics. It suggests a focus on abstract goals rather than the lived experiences of individuals.

- "The Parties, in collaboration with WHO...": While collaboration is mentioned, the language implies that the authors are the driving force behind the agreement, potentially overlooking the contributions and perspectives of other stakeholders.

4. Self-Absorption and Lack of Accountability:

- "Sustainable and Geographically Diversified Local Production": This phrase suggests a focus on the authors' vision for global health, without explicitly acknowledging the challenges and complexities faced by developing countries in implementing these changes.

- "WHO shall, upon request...": The language positions WHO as a subordinate entity, potentially reflecting a belief that the authors are the primary decision-makers and that WHO is merely a tool to execute their plan.

Expand full comment

There is absolutely zero reason to subvert and corrupt the USA. Constitution in exchange for WHO membership (conscription into Big Pharma, Bill Gates and by extension Larry ZFink and BlackRock, expressed by Klause Schwab) when the United States already has the best doctors and medical organizations in the planet. The other 195 countries should have paid memberships to the American sphere of influence and care. The USA doesn’t need anything from anyone. This is particularly from the medical and globalist clowns populating the WEF, Club of Rome, WHO, BIS, BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, IMF Business Plan unrelated to World Health and appropriate, profit -free response etc. they use these papers they are all signing as a front to steal everything from everybody on earth forever. They must be credibly exposed and humanity should sit in judgement on the appropriateness of the punishment for Election Interference, Treason, Fraud, Mass Murder, Mass Aggravated assault, Crimes against humanity. Get you acts together ladies and gentlemen. We are dealing with least productive most needy vile pathological garbage ever descending into the living spaces of humanity.

Expand full comment

Toss the WHO to the curb…totally…start with a Trump Executive order on the very first day of his next Administration…this should be written to go day one. This organization is so full of pure Marxists and Globalists/CCP types it must be totally stopped…and not one cent given to it until all these folks are purged and their current head jailed and indicted for crimes against humanity. The WHO is far beyond any saving grace.

Expand full comment

Where is a petition that I can sign? My opinion does not make much difference.

Expand full comment

Have you called for Nuremberg II, death penalty on the table?

Expand full comment

You can rest assured that any statement Big Pharma makes is neither truthful nor "for your own good". What's not to like about the Pandemic Agreement? It will move piles of money from the citizens into the coffers of Big Pharma.

Expand full comment
author

Exactly

Expand full comment