27 Comments
User's avatar
Jon Sovereign's avatar

Then REMOVE chem-trail POLLUTION CRAZINESS.

EK MtnTime's avatar

I’m always struck by the stupidity of some of the commentators or the willfully blind. I mean, sometimes I can be slightly obtuse but I blame my ADD for speed reading or skimming when I really should be digesting. How anyone could possibly think lead poisoning, among all the other poisons effecting us, was a hoax or a joke is beyond me.

I haven’t read any article you’ve posted that was frivolous, farfetched, or lacking importance to our everyday lives. I’m so thankful for your important contributions to exposing areas/topics many people aren’t aware of and explaining plainly why it matters. Your dogged dedication to the greater good is inspiring and motivating. Thanks for all you do.

drummerboy's avatar

Sorry drummerbouy had a mispell chemtrail

drummerboy's avatar

Remove the chemtrails unless using dry ice for rain. I read the dangerous metals in c hff entails are making humans sterile.

Also no add ins that undermine the quality act bill .

Willow Rains's avatar

REMOVE THE LEAD AND ANY OTHER TOXINS PUT INTO OUR ATMOSPHERE!!!!

Philip Kelleher's avatar

Remove All lead from All aviation fuel now.

Also remove All harmful chemicals that are added to aviation fuel.

Sophilo's avatar

Good take the lead out. But this reeks of distraction. What aviation fuel contains should be public knowledge in minute detail. And people and corpirations should start paying a steep price for what they are poisoning the world with

LT Robert Powell's avatar

Jame Roguski - First and formost, thank you for your fine works. There is no caveat to that statement. As an old (80 years & change ) with the unfortunate drafting in 1965, i as an old Historical Forensic Correlative Analyst, wish to both applaud lead removal, noting the Catalytic converter and the now better air quality created concerns automotive issues.

My conversation with you concerns the Logic against logic that so often appears in these very important health issues.

Having commented, it is my thoughts to you for your response in these areas: first my positions as an old analyst Military & Civilian:

Orwell spoke quite elegantly concerning double speak and double think. If the issue of FAA and lead, is singular fine why even are they asking? Noting the FAA is notably ( all agencies are to a degree ) corrupted by Socio-communist internecine warfare, is this to as a minor element, to deflect from the real issues, and or to confuse between them? The rules against lead in autos is enough to formulate reality and just do it.

The biggest issue, from my position and having document that I would provide is that exhaust from aircraft is being used as the Logic against logic interface to confuse reality of the citizen in their concerns.

Geo-engineering is real, being openly tested ( deceptive terminology ) on the Global citizen. That if we forget every other species on the planet. We, as knowledgable individuals are in the main responsible for controlling Government in seditionist or environmental-ism using deception against the altruistic family, or citizen ( not sanctuary person ). Now, being 80 & change, my ability concerning substacks is infantile, we must at all cost stop the Geo-engineering. period.

My last point from being both Military specialist, and citizen: Political conflict and Military conflict are twins in the absolute need of deception to achive goals.

Am open to conversation and documents.

TruthGleaner's avatar

All this bruhaha about lead and we STILL have to deal with the plethora of toxic substances in the Stratospheric Aerosol Emissions excreted from those C-130 Hercules super tankers every figgin" day!!!!!!!

Fager 132's avatar

Yeah, not signing up for that. 100LL is 100 "low lead." Avgas might be "the dominant source of lead emissions in our air" but that's not saying much. "Exposure to lead" causes problems in kids? Why suddenly does everyone believe the government on that? Why believe those studies but no others? Who bought them? Do they meet a higher standard of research than all the other wrong research papers out there? Who says it's bad? The CDC? WHO?

I'm completely over everyone running around like chickens with their heads off over "Won't someone think of the children?!" as a justification for yet another government intrusion into people's lives. They quit making lead paint in the 1970's because kids had to *eat* it to get enough exposure to cause problems--and I'd argue that paint-eating is at least as likely to be an effect of brain damage as a cause. Blood lead levels in kids fell below 3.5 micrograms per deciliter by 1995, the threshold the CDC now designates as “elevated.” By the 20th century, humans had lead levels thousands of times higher than those in prehistory. And yet here we all still are, with lead emissions having declined from more than 200,000 tons in 1970 to levels so low by 1999 that they don't even register on the EPA's chart. Then there are the alleged symptoms of lead poisoning (from MedicineNet): "Abdominal pain, constipation, loss of appetite, nausea, muscle pain, headache, weakness, high blood pressure, fatigue, decreased libido, infertility, pain and tingling in the extremities, problems with sleep, trouble concentrating, depression, memory problems, mood changes." It sounds like menopause.

Anyway, considering all the lies the government has told over the years, I'm disinclined to believe the idea that there's no safe level of lead, because saying there isn't is just a blank check for endless regulation. "Polio victims live in iron lungs for life, swine flu pandemic, bird flu pandemic, covid pandemic, carbs at the base of the food pyramid, doctors recommend Pall Mall, vaccines eliminated disease": It's all bullshit and I'll believe the government on lead when the cows freeze over.

James Roguski's avatar

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=lead+exposure

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=lead+poisoning

If you prefer that the FAA keep the lead in aviation fuel, then by all means, submit your public comment to that effect.

Cows freezing over...

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUG0PBFCKDC/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

Fager 132's avatar

Before the January ice storm we made a big deal about building a temporary, windproof, waterproof shelter for the mini horse, complete with water and hay, and it stood outside all night anyway and looked a lot like that bull in the morning.

james Smith's avatar

Stop the chem trails first, we can worry about avgas when they stop spraying us with poison!

SomeDude's avatar

the simplest way to chemtrail is to contaminate the fuel. jet engines do not burn the majority of the fuel that flows through them.

Bassehound's avatar

BREAKING: Hawaii Moves to Impose SWEEPING EMERGENCY POWERS—Quarantines, Property Entry, Firearm Seizures & Law Suspensions

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/breaking-hawaii-moves-to-impose-sweeping?publication_id=581065&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=k6gro&utm_medium=email

Sandy's avatar

Yes take the lead out and every other harmful chemical that is constantly sprayed over us, through chemtrails. As well as the geo-engineering of weather.

bjørn leif-oscar Liptovari's avatar

Hi James. Ridicolous to read about the lead in aviation fuel and what it does to the skies! Problem is they have been flying since the 1900 on leaded fuel and it has not been a problem before. But maybe it's all those private jets that has arrived in the skies flying all over every day. At the same time there is Darpa, H.A.A.R.P, WHO, UN and Nasa who do chemtrails! Kills ca 10.000 annually in usa!

Another thing is that in america there are to many private jets flying! That's why you have this problem! Commercial planes, transport planes, military planes, thousands of helicopters and thousands of private jets over and around every major city with airports. It makes polution!

I don't think i forgot anything here.

So take away the lead, but also take away chemtrails!

They do equaly or even more damage to the land and all living creatures in usa!

But I understood that the aviation fuel holds such high octane that it all burns when combusted and the smoke don't contain any gases!

So what should you believe? Goverment with no knowledge about aviation fuel or a aviation mechanic who knows how a plane engine works?

You decide!

Regards

Bjørn Leif-oscar Liptovari

Fager 132's avatar

Private jets use jet fuel, not avgas.

James Roguski's avatar

You stated: "But I understood that the aviation fuel holds such high octane that it all burns when combusted and the smoke don't contain any gases!" - This is 100% incorrect.

bjørn leif-oscar Liptovari's avatar

Ok, i asked my friend about how much gases the aviation fuel leaves behind after combustion and he said: Because of the high octane it ignite much faster and harder then regular cargasolin who don't hold that high octane. It also burns twice thru a jet engine so there are not that much, but there are some gases off course. Stating that i am 100% incorrect is bold when you don't correct me where i am wrong om the combustion part! I am sorry if I didn't put it out correctly the first time. I think i got it rigth this time! Prove me wrong!

James Roguski's avatar

You merely need to do a simple online search:

What compounds are found in the exhaust of a piston engine that combusts leaded Aviation gas?

Exhaust from piston engines burning leaded aviation gasoline (Avgas 100LL) contains primarily nitrogen, carbon dioxide, water vapor, and carbon monoxide, along with toxic lead compounds, mainly lead dibromide. It also includes lead oxides, sulfur oxides, hydrocarbons, and nitrogen oxides.

Key Exhaust Compounds:

Lead Compounds: Due to the use of tetraethyl lead (TEL) as an anti-knock agent, the exhaust releases lead particles, specifically lead dibromide and lead oxides. These are often found in nanoscale particles (mean diameter of 13 nm).

Carbon-Based Compounds: Carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and various unburnt hydrocarbons (HC).

Oxides: Nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides.

Other Compounds: Ethylene dibromide, added as a lead scavenger, is also emitted.

These emissions are highly concerning because the lead particles are small enough to pass through the lung's mucosal barriers.

These are not burned in jet engines.

Glynis Walker's avatar

Heavy metals should not be deposited in the sky, this includes the Geoengineering of Weather products.

Stephen Rattenbury's avatar

Yes take the Lead out !!!!