Perhaps we in the United States could create something analogous to the Great Barrington Declaration that anyone running for any political office in the U.S. could sign, opposing this or any similar attempt by the WEF, WHO, UN or any other organization to in any way reduce our sovereignty as an independent nation. Especially, candidates running in the November midterm elections could make their signing of this declaration an important part of their campaign. This could all be posted on a website where anyone could easily look up what stand, if any, all of the candidates running for any given office have taken.
Greg Hill I agree, because I am still waiting for a response from Rob Astorino and Andrew Giuliani with my questions on the Biden hand over US sovereignty to the WHO and the Great reset they are candidates running for governor in the Vampire State of New York.
And perhaps this declarstion could include a vow to guarantee bodily autonomy, make mandates for medical interventions of any kind illegal and discrimination based on vaccine status a crime.
Here's what I learned from a single (!) Austrian MP who questioned the government about this:
Health Minister Rauch Admits--in Writing--that Procedural Shenanigans are used to subvert accountability and parliamentary oversight: MP Gerald Hauser recently sent some questions to Minister of Health Rauch whose answers speak volumes about how he sees the world, his role, and confirm the danger we're in
Just received this from Senator Cornyn...I smell a rat!
Dear Mrs. Jacobs:
Thank you for contacting me regarding proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) of 2005. I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this critical matter.
At this critical time in our nation's history, we must work with our allies to ensure national security and advance American interests. Under President George W. Bush, the United States took great pride in its position as a leader and a Member State of the World Health Organization (WHO). The IHR, first adopted in 1969 through the World Health Assembly, established an international infrastructure for detecting and reporting global public health emergencies to increase global health security. In 2005, the United States led and engaged other WHO Member States to revise the IHR. This put in place the requirement for participating countries to report events that demonstrate the potential to become a public health emergency of international concern to the other Member States. Pandemics are a global challenge, and the United States must continue to engage as a leader in the international health system.
On January 26, 2022, the Biden Administration's Department of State proposed several revisions to the IHR of 2005, with the support of forty other Member States, to increase transparency, efficiency, and collaboration between the IHR and Member States. In addition, it requests the establishment of a Working Group on Preparedness & Response (WGPR) to discuss the IHR amendments. The United States must remain engaged in global health security measures in the international health system.
The United States Senate plays a significant role in reviewing, advising, and approving international treaties for the United States Government. The proposed IHR amendments have raised concerns regarding the use of Presidential Authority to change an international agreement without the approval of the United State Senate. These amendments to the IHR 2005 require scrutiny, and I am committed to protecting American sovereignty while ensuring checks and balances remain between the Executive and Legislative branches of our government. I will continue to call on President Biden to submit these proposals to the United States Senate for debate, advice, and consent.
I share your concern about the credibility of the WHO, particularly the role of China and Russia in this organization. It is imperative for the WHO to enact reforms to ensure that all Member States fulfill their obligation to the international community. I have grave concerns about China's role in the origins of COVID-19 and its failure to share information regarding this outbreak with other members of the international community. Therefore, I supported the Coronavirus Origin Validation, Investigation, and Determination Act (COVID Act; S. 3463), which calls for a credible and comprehensive international investigation into the origins of COVID-19 at laboratories in Wuhan. The COVID Act was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar for consideration and I look forward to working with my colleagues in the Senate to ensure this legislation becomes law.
I appreciate having the opportunity to represent Texas in the United States Senate. Thank you for taking the time to contact me.
He got some details wrong and threw up a smokescreen of words to hide the fact that he failed to address the issue prior to being alerted to it by his constituents.
Thank you James for enlightening the world, Great Job in such a small timeframe...that made an enormous impact... we’re all watching now !
..something related, also behind the scenes to watch is a new restructuring of NIH called ARPA-H.. (sounds like DARPA, which imo means not good for us)
Hi James I watched a video in which you offered a solution - an alternative to the WHO treaty which gave the people rights. I can't remember where I saw it. Can you please send me access information? I found it so empowering. Thank you.
It seems to me that this all comes down to the Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates: When "leaders" are unjust, it is up to all the rest of us to do what is right - in this case meaning that everyone is entitled to choose freedom of bodily integrity. The Doctrine of Lesser Magistrates is grounded on Biblical and Constitutional principles which must not be abandoned.
Will do the same. Let´s go!
Thanks to all of you who can do this for me upon my behalf.
Shit I have to go beg for money and can't get a job without a prick from hacksxxxxxxine now in s f killafornia.
Please hire me to work if you live near s f
See my substack piece
Ashkenaz says you literally can't go dance there without proof of hacksxxxxxination
I am afraid it will take way more than electronic, and require actually resocializing our interactions.
Like smiling, without a mask
End the WHO.
Perhaps we in the United States could create something analogous to the Great Barrington Declaration that anyone running for any political office in the U.S. could sign, opposing this or any similar attempt by the WEF, WHO, UN or any other organization to in any way reduce our sovereignty as an independent nation. Especially, candidates running in the November midterm elections could make their signing of this declaration an important part of their campaign. This could all be posted on a website where anyone could easily look up what stand, if any, all of the candidates running for any given office have taken.
Greg Hill I agree, because I am still waiting for a response from Rob Astorino and Andrew Giuliani with my questions on the Biden hand over US sovereignty to the WHO and the Great reset they are candidates running for governor in the Vampire State of New York.
And perhaps this declarstion could include a vow to guarantee bodily autonomy, make mandates for medical interventions of any kind illegal and discrimination based on vaccine status a crime.
Sharing your great info on my blog @ zionsgate.wordpress.com. We will STOP THE WHO! Prayer with Fasting & recommended action is working.
James, thanks for your efforts!
Here's what I learned from a single (!) Austrian MP who questioned the government about this:
Health Minister Rauch Admits--in Writing--that Procedural Shenanigans are used to subvert accountability and parliamentary oversight: MP Gerald Hauser recently sent some questions to Minister of Health Rauch whose answers speak volumes about how he sees the world, his role, and confirm the danger we're in
Read more here: https://fackel.substack.com/p/who-powr-grab-health-minister-rauch
Just received this from Senator Cornyn...I smell a rat!
Dear Mrs. Jacobs:
Thank you for contacting me regarding proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) of 2005. I appreciate having the benefit of your comments on this critical matter.
At this critical time in our nation's history, we must work with our allies to ensure national security and advance American interests. Under President George W. Bush, the United States took great pride in its position as a leader and a Member State of the World Health Organization (WHO). The IHR, first adopted in 1969 through the World Health Assembly, established an international infrastructure for detecting and reporting global public health emergencies to increase global health security. In 2005, the United States led and engaged other WHO Member States to revise the IHR. This put in place the requirement for participating countries to report events that demonstrate the potential to become a public health emergency of international concern to the other Member States. Pandemics are a global challenge, and the United States must continue to engage as a leader in the international health system.
On January 26, 2022, the Biden Administration's Department of State proposed several revisions to the IHR of 2005, with the support of forty other Member States, to increase transparency, efficiency, and collaboration between the IHR and Member States. In addition, it requests the establishment of a Working Group on Preparedness & Response (WGPR) to discuss the IHR amendments. The United States must remain engaged in global health security measures in the international health system.
The United States Senate plays a significant role in reviewing, advising, and approving international treaties for the United States Government. The proposed IHR amendments have raised concerns regarding the use of Presidential Authority to change an international agreement without the approval of the United State Senate. These amendments to the IHR 2005 require scrutiny, and I am committed to protecting American sovereignty while ensuring checks and balances remain between the Executive and Legislative branches of our government. I will continue to call on President Biden to submit these proposals to the United States Senate for debate, advice, and consent.
I share your concern about the credibility of the WHO, particularly the role of China and Russia in this organization. It is imperative for the WHO to enact reforms to ensure that all Member States fulfill their obligation to the international community. I have grave concerns about China's role in the origins of COVID-19 and its failure to share information regarding this outbreak with other members of the international community. Therefore, I supported the Coronavirus Origin Validation, Investigation, and Determination Act (COVID Act; S. 3463), which calls for a credible and comprehensive international investigation into the origins of COVID-19 at laboratories in Wuhan. The COVID Act was placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar for consideration and I look forward to working with my colleagues in the Senate to ensure this legislation becomes law.
I appreciate having the opportunity to represent Texas in the United States Senate. Thank you for taking the time to contact me.
Sincerely,
JOHN CORNYN
United States Senator
517 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Tel: (202) 224-2934
Fax: (202) 228-2856
http://www.cornyn.senate.gov
He got some details wrong and threw up a smokescreen of words to hide the fact that he failed to address the issue prior to being alerted to it by his constituents.
Thank you James for enlightening the world, Great Job in such a small timeframe...that made an enormous impact... we’re all watching now !
..something related, also behind the scenes to watch is a new restructuring of NIH called ARPA-H.. (sounds like DARPA, which imo means not good for us)
here’s a link explaining what we know..
https://sarahwestall.com/arpa-h-new-darpa-styled-agency-created-to-restructure-the-national-institute-of-health-nih/
Hi James I watched a video in which you offered a solution - an alternative to the WHO treaty which gave the people rights. I can't remember where I saw it. Can you please send me access information? I found it so empowering. Thank you.
It seems to me that this all comes down to the Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates: When "leaders" are unjust, it is up to all the rest of us to do what is right - in this case meaning that everyone is entitled to choose freedom of bodily integrity. The Doctrine of Lesser Magistrates is grounded on Biblical and Constitutional principles which must not be abandoned.
James you need a short catchy set of bullet points that links to where people can look further.
I am seeing people praise Terdos at my old University (University of Glasgow) and praising this treaty. I want something punchy to share.
Thanks for all of your work though.