114 Comments

no dictatorships. Power on own health

Expand full comment

How do I find a petition?

Expand full comment
Jun 25Liked by James Roguski

Agree,WHO amendments are heap of garbage designed to scrutinise the world-nothing to do with health-each country can decide themselves,to hell with WHO

Expand full comment

Agree,WHO amendments are heap of garbage designed to scrutinise the world-nothing to do with health-each country can decide themselves,to hell with WHO

Expand full comment
Jun 25Liked by James Roguski

Thx James forever…💗🙏🥰

Expand full comment
Jun 23Liked by James Roguski

The US should immediately STOP membership and any association with the World Health Organization. Their intent is to usurp the US Constitution and take away US Citizen's rights.

Expand full comment

Hi James,

Thank you for your efforts raising awareness on this important topic!

Do you mean that documents on WHO:s website are not revisions och updated proposals on new amendments to the IHR?

https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/index.html

Kind regards

Andreas Sidkvist, activist and party leader Swedish party MoD | Human rights and Democracy

www.partietmod.se

Working on a petition here:

https://www.exitwho.se/

Expand full comment

Question - does anyone know - I've been watching Steven Greer's Disclosure Project about secret alien technology projects run by major tech corporations totally outside of the law.... Apparently there is a timeline for when this shadow government needs to be deal with, and the timeline is suspiciously similar to the timeline of the WEF for making us all into digital slaves. Just wondering if anyone is talking about what is the connection.... Hard to imagine there isn't one. Anyone? Greer seems to think this shadow gov't is calling the shots., and the apparent constitutional gov't actually has no say on issues like, for example, idiotically failing to reject the WHO amendments..

https://siriusdisclosure.com/

Expand full comment
Jun 20·edited Jun 20Liked by James Roguski

James

This is a sincere question and I intend no disrespect for your work. However, wouldn't it be simpler to just tell the House of Representatives one hard-hitting, adequate-all-by-itself, reason to exit the WHO?

The Reason to Exit the WHO

WHO - Bacerra for us - would

(1) determine ALL health or climate Emergencies, and

(2) would unilaterally require all member-nations to mandate vaccines and quarantine.

Rep. Andy Biggs's Bill to exit the WHO hasn't even been selected by Committee to take up, and none of the House Representatives are going to read the lengthy packet you prepared. This is the "no offense" part.

Expand full comment

Secondly, James, please know that we all reap as we sow. The horrors described in Revelation about the end of mercy time are a last, final warning to Humanity: when you choose any alternative to obedience to Jesus, you get satanic horror. Please read the whole New Testament (New Covenant between the Creator and human beings), especially my translation, christfamilybible.co.tz (because translations connected to the global mafia system are problematic to say the least).

Expand full comment

Firstly, James, please know that you are struggling against a global governance mafia system that has operated continuously for centuries (Revelation 13). They're using regulation complexity that you're falling for, getting bogged down in a swamp they designed.

Expand full comment

I received a reply yesterday from the Belgian Minister of Health:

Dear,

Thank you very much for your e-mail. First, we would like to clarify that the international pandemic treaty currently on the table seeks to establish agreements between countries. It does not transfer powers from the regional or national level to the World Health Organization agreements between countries. It does not transfer powers from the regional or national level to the World Health Organization.

Belgium and Europe favor a treaty that draws lessons from the COVID-19 crisis. The world was not prepared for such a pandemic, international cooperation could be much better and in many countries health systems proved insufficiently resilient to absorb the shocks of this pandemic. Many international reports demonstrate this. Moreover, scientists expect that pandemics will follow each other faster in the future: we live with more and more people close together and we travel more and more. In addition, the destruction of pristine nature causes us to come into contact with new unknown pathogens.

With this treaty, the different countries want to agree on, among other things:

- The equitable distribution of vaccines, diagnostics, and therapies

- Measures to prevent the overload of care both in the first and second line (hospitals, ICU)

- The rapid sharing of information, samples and data of new pathogens with pandemic potential

This is based on the view that all countries should be able to successfully take measures to protect their populations from emerging communicable diseases so that they also spread at a slower rate on a global scale. The WHO plays a supporting role in this, but there is certainly no question of transferring powers.

Hopefully we have informed you sufficiently this way.

Kind regards,

Team Minister Frank Vandenbroucke

Expand full comment

Hmmm, today’s youth….nah. They are illiterate idiots, nothing more than products of indoctrination centers.

Today’s things are fought on a much different terrain,and knowledge is Power!

I’d have you in my camp anyday!

Expand full comment

Where is the recording detailing the ten to fifty five objections for the treaty and amendments?

Expand full comment

Not a problem. Cash will always be king! And yes, God’s got this.

Expand full comment

I've downloaded your guide, will send it to the ministries again + the date - deadline for governments to reject the amendments - november '23. Thank you!

Expand full comment