South Carolina Seeks to Nullify the Proposed "Pandemic Treaty" and Amendments to the IHR
If you live in a state other than South Carolina, share this information with your state legislators and encourage them to enact similar legislation in YOUR STATE!
Please watch the video below…
H.4246 has been introduced in the South Carolina General Assembly to nullify the World Health Organization’s (WHO) proposed pandemic treaty and IHR amendments.
Please help enact H.4246 by contacting your state legislators. Urge them to support strong measures that uphold and enforce the Constitution.
TAKE ACTION NOW
TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING ARTICLE 27 TO CHAPTER 1, TITLE 1 SO AS TO PROHIBIT THE STATE OR ITS POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS FROM IMPLEMENTING THE PROVISIONS OF FEDERAL TREATIES BEFORE THE TREATY IS RATIFIED BY THE UNITED STATES SENATE.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Chapter 1, Title 1 of the S.C. Code is amended by adding:
Section 1-1-1710. (A) It is the intent of the General Assembly to defend the State of South Carolina against violations of the United States Constitution and further prevent the subjecting of the sovereignty and rights of the United States of America to the Charter of the United Nations.
(B) Notwithstanding another provision of law, no state agency, or political subdivision of this State, including school districts, or publicly funded organizations, or any elected or appointed official or employee of the same, may employ state funds, personnel, or facilities to implement the provisions of any treaty that has not received ratification by a two-thirds vote of the United States Senate as required by the United States Constitution, Article II, Section 2.
This section must be expressly applied to any treaty drafted under the framework of "a WHO Convention, Agreement, or Other International Agreement on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response" or under color of amendments to the International Health Regulations.
(C) A violation of this section raises a cause of action in state court for injunctive and declaratory relief, plus compensatory damages of up to ten thousand dollars per violation, and attorney's fees. A state agency or political subdivision that publishes a rule, regulation, or guidance recommending or requiring compliance with a provision of a treaty that has not received ratification in the United States Senate bears the burden of proof to show that the rule, regulation, or guidance was developed independent of influence by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO), or the United Nations (UN) and that the treaty was not a factor in determining whether to publish the rule, regulation, or guidance.
(D) This section is enacted under the authority of Article VI of the United States Constitution, the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and the inherent power reserved to South Carolina as a sovereign state.
SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
If you live in a state other than South Carolina, share this information with the members of your state legislature and encourage them to pass similar legislation in your state.
by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
James Roguski’s newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Oh my God...This makes me SO happy!!: https://www.internationalcovidsummit.com/ International Covid Summit May 3, 2023 - Brussels.
Good day James,
I was impressed by your knowledge of the National Health Federation (check link: https://thenhf.com/codex/). It is rare these days for anyone to know of the NHF. I have continued to write all the letters you have requested. Thank you for making it easy for us, as I would not know how to contact, or who to contact to accomplish anything. After 50+ years of doing a lot of pushing against the medical/pharma/Agribusiness powers to destroy health, I am exhausted. So thank you for breathing fresh air into our families efforts. I wish to express hope and optimism resulting from the candidacy of RFK jr for president. _/\_, Thank you.
What follows is my reply to Sen Feinstein's reply to one of the letters sent to her through your or others work. Honestly I have little to no hope, still I took time to write to her and share here with you.
Dear Honorable Sen Feinstein,
You replied to me as follows;
> The amendments were interpreted by some as ceding U.S. sovereignty to the WHO. Our country should never cede its sovereignty to any organization, but I do not believe the WHO’s voluntary International Health Regulations cede any sovereignty. It is entirely voluntary for member nations to implement World Health Organization regulations, which are aimed at improving global public health.
You suggest ("...I do not believe...") but you do not certify that the WHO's Health Regulations DO NOT cede sovereignty. You state that "It is entirely voluntary for member nations." It would be plausible what you say if the sovereignty of the individual citizens of the United States were respected as sacred thus with deep respect and reverence for one of the inalienable rights granted by the founding fathers and mothers to maintain ones health and welfare as they see fit, was not trampled.
Thus I am not reassured by your tentative statement regarding US sovereignty. The essence of sovereignty rests with the citizens of the United States, which have been badly abused by current Warp Speed coercion.
Any gene therapy transfection worth it's salt would never need to be mandated with the stick of coercion for all citizens of the USA and the world. Rather it would be compared to a healthy immune system to show it's merits. All opposing views by responsible scientists and lay citizens of the US would be allowed in the debate and no censorship by the government of any kind would be allowed. The government would be vigilant to insure that Public/Private forums that use the Public Air Waves and the Public Utilities to promote and/or censor speech, ideas and criticisms are truly open forums. This is the only way to have an informed electorate. Let the debate, investigation take place in the public forum for all to participate.
When open and public debate does not happen a profound doubt and distrust forms in the mind of the electorate. Who benefits from such folly?
I look forward to your reply. I also appreciate previous replies to my concerns.