51 Comments

Yup, received the answer from our scummy globalist government.

Expand full comment

Thanks fot you comment. I hope so much that they do fund themselves in their own quicksand of lies that overwhelms them very soon..

Expand full comment

Whoops! I signed it as a US citizen

Expand full comment

this alliance formed over 80 yrs ago seeks total control and was activated in 2020 the year of the rainbow . statements in 1978 and aain in 1987 by Michael Swift stating they would become the oppressor is happening FORCED ABORTIONS / DENIAL OF FREEDOMS OF SPEECH AND HUMAN RIGHTS / PERSECUTION OF CHRISTIANS / AND POLICE NOT FIGHTING REAL CRIME / 15 MINUTE CITIES / COVID CONTROL / ALL ORGANIZED. HEAD OF WEF SON OF A NAZI

Expand full comment

Every Country World Wide needs to Exit the WHO, UN, CDC, FDA & WEF. Their all in bed together

Expand full comment

Our government in UK seem to be ignoring the fact that if they don't legally withdraw from the WHO Pandemic Treaty we will lose sovereignty as well as control of our own health & freedoms.

Expand full comment

people of the uk the petition currently has over 59000 signatures as you know it needs a minimum of 100000.....as an aside are you aware that if you post something on censor book that they frown on and dislike they have the ability power to make sure that very few if any actualy see it this explains clearly why the petition doesnt have anywhere near the amount of signatures that it should have..by doing this they create an illusion with the public who are taken in by the alleged lack of response so they dont bother and in so doing are taken in by the censor book lie/manipulation...when this clearly couldnt be any further from the truth..the truth is how on earth can the uk public respond to something that very few if any can actualy see....folks there are many alternative outlets out there that can all be used in getting to and beyond the target figure of 100000 signatures be sure to use each and everyone of them

Expand full comment

I signed this petition and today received a govt reply, a veritable finger pointing lecture on why the UK is working closely with the 'very important' WHO and will not make an exit, ever.

Expand full comment

Isn't it amazing that our gov are so happy to be controlled by the likes of Tedros, a known member of the Tigray Liberty Front, a known terrorist group. Are they themselves terrorists too I wonder!

Expand full comment

They are indeed, and conspiring against us, their own people. They are bogus and not representing us but obviously quite desperate to silence anyone with questions about their plotting. It may seem like the disastrous colonial UK past is catching up with them, and I believe these scumbags soon will be swallowed up by their own lies and deceits as the people are waking up.

Expand full comment

Dear James

Thought you might be interested to see this email I received after signing the petition:

Dear Olivia Langton,

The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “End the UK’s membership of the World Health Organization”.

Government responded:

The UK Government will not end our WHO membership. We are committed to working with the WHO to tackle the world’s health issues. We do not and will never cede sovereign powers through our partnership.

The UK continues to have a strong relationship with the World Health Organization (WHO), which, as the United Nation’s specialised agency for health, and the world’s main technical and co-ordinating body in global health, has a vital role to play in supporting public health globally. The Government will not end the UK’s WHO membership.

The WHO is a Member State-led organisation and works on a wide range of technical health areas. These areas are agreed with Member States, including the UK, in advance and are based on our collective health needs and priorities; they are outlined in the WHO’s General Programme of Work (GPW) which are adopted and reviewed regularly by Member States. The current GPW runs from 2019 to 2024; the UK, amongst other Member States, is engaged in the development of the next GPW which will run from 2025 to 2029.

The WHO is the cornerstone of global health cooperation. It is through the WHO that Member States share with each other information on disease outbreaks around the world, share best practice on how to counter health threats and emergencies, and make commitments to each other to undertake activities to promote health and to avoid activities which could be detrimental to health.

The UK has long partnered with the WHO and its Member States to tackle the world’s most pressing health challenges. The UK continues to engage with the WHO, including on improving the global health system so the world better prepares and responds to future health emergencies. The UK is also an active attendee at the WHO governing body meetings including the WHO World Health Assembly and the WHO Executive Board. The World Health Assembly (WHA) is the decision-making body of the WHO; it is attended by delegations from all WHO Member States and focuses on a specific health agenda prepared by Member States on the Executive Board. The UK is a rotating member of the WHO Executive Board including most recently until May 2023, and we use these opportunities to hold WHO to account for delivering the General Programme of Work and other commitments.

The Government wants to best protect the UK population including from future pandemics. COVID-19 has demonstrated that no-one is safe until we are all safe, and that effective global cooperation is needed to better protect the UK and other countries around the world from the detrimental health, social and economic impacts of pandemics and other health threats.

The best way to protect the UK from the next pandemic is by ensuring all Member States can contain and respond to disease outbreaks through compliance with International Health Regulations (IHR). Therefore, the Government is supporting the processes of negotiating an Accord on pandemic preparedness and response, and agreeing targeted amendments of the IHR as a means of strengthening preparedness for and in response to future health emergencies.

The Pandemic Accord is intended to prevent and tackle pandemic threats, whereas the IHR is a technical framework, the purpose and scope of which is to prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease. Both processes aim to strengthen global health coordination, cooperation and mutual accountability to address the weaknesses seen in global health security during the COVID-19 pandemic and other recent health emergencies.

Both negotiations processes are led by Member States. No content of the Pandemic Accord or amendments to the IHR have been agreed yet. The two processes are separate but are intended to complement each other in supporting improvements to global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. Member States have agreed to finalise the Accord and IHR amendments to be submitted to the WHA in May 2024. The UK is an active participant in both processes and we will continue to work with our international partners to achieve a good outcome for the UK.

The Pandemic Accord and amendments to the IHR must be adopted by Member States at the WHA for them to then come into force as a matter of international law for all Member States. The proposed amendments to the IHR, current and previous drafts of the Pandemic Accord, and relevant papers including reports from both processes are available publicly on the WHO website.

Throughout both negotiations, the UK has been and will continue to be clear that we would not agree any amendments to the IHR or sign up to an Accord that would cede sovereignty to the WHO in relation to making domestic decisions on national measures concerning public health, such as, domestic immunisation programme rollouts and other similar measures.

Any new or amended domestic legislation necessary to reflect new international obligations under the IHR or the Accord would be made through the applicable parliamentary process. In all circumstances, the sovereignty of the UK Parliament would remain unchanged.

Department of Health and Social Care

Click this link to view the response online:

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/648609?reveal_response=yes

The Petitions Committee will take a look at this petition and its response. They can press the government for action and gather evidence. If this petition reaches 100,000 signatures, the Committee will consider it for a debate.

The Committee is made up of 11 MPs, from political parties in government and in opposition. It is entirely independent of the Government. Find out more about the Committee: https://petition.parliament.uk/help#petitions-committee

Thanks,

The Petitions team

UK Government and Parliament

Expand full comment

Thanks for positng.

I got the same insulting, pompous reply.

Hope their Christmas dinner shrivels up to nothing.

Expand full comment

Here's the government response. I doubt that anyone in Parliament actually read (or is capable of reading) the draft International Regulations which are 400 pages long.

Notwithstanding that, here you go:-

Dear Laura pasternack,

The Government has responded to the petition you signed – “End the UK’s membership of the World Health Organization”.

Government responded:

The UK Government will not end our WHO membership. We are committed to working with the WHO to tackle the world’s health issues. We do not and will never cede sovereign powers through our partnership.

The UK continues to have a strong relationship with the World Health Organization (WHO), which, as the United Nation’s specialised agency for health, and the world’s main technical and co-ordinating body in global health, has a vital role to play in supporting public health globally. The Government will not end the UK’s WHO membership.

The WHO is a Member State-led organisation and works on a wide range of technical health areas. These areas are agreed with Member States, including the UK, in advance and are based on our collective health needs and priorities; they are outlined in the WHO’s General Programme of Work (GPW) which are adopted and reviewed regularly by Member States. The current GPW runs from 2019 to 2024; the UK, amongst other Member States, is engaged in the development of the next GPW which will run from 2025 to 2029.

The WHO is the cornerstone of global health cooperation. It is through the WHO that Member States share with each other information on disease outbreaks around the world, share best practice on how to counter health threats and emergencies, and make commitments to each other to undertake activities to promote health and to avoid activities which could be detrimental to health.

The UK has long partnered with the WHO and its Member States to tackle the world’s most pressing health challenges. The UK continues to engage with the WHO, including on improving the global health system so the world better prepares and responds to future health emergencies. The UK is also an active attendee at the WHO governing body meetings including the WHO World Health Assembly and the WHO Executive Board. The World Health Assembly (WHA) is the decision-making body of the WHO; it is attended by delegations from all WHO Member States and focuses on a specific health agenda prepared by Member States on the Executive Board. The UK is a rotating member of the WHO Executive Board including most recently until May 2023, and we use these opportunities to hold WHO to account for delivering the General Programme of Work and other commitments.

The Government wants to best protect the UK population including from future pandemics. COVID-19 has demonstrated that no-one is safe until we are all safe, and that effective global cooperation is needed to better protect the UK and other countries around the world from the detrimental health, social and economic impacts of pandemics and other health threats.

The best way to protect the UK from the next pandemic is by ensuring all Member States can contain and respond to disease outbreaks through compliance with International Health Regulations (IHR). Therefore, the Government is supporting the processes of negotiating an Accord on pandemic preparedness and response, and agreeing targeted amendments of the IHR as a means of strengthening preparedness for and in response to future health emergencies.

The Pandemic Accord is intended to prevent and tackle pandemic threats, whereas the IHR is a technical framework, the purpose and scope of which is to prevent, protect against, control, and provide a public health response to the international spread of disease. Both processes aim to strengthen global health coordination, cooperation and mutual accountability to address the weaknesses seen in global health security during the COVID-19 pandemic and other recent health emergencies.

Both negotiations processes are led by Member States. No content of the Pandemic Accord or amendments to the IHR have been agreed yet. The two processes are separate but are intended to complement each other in supporting improvements to global pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. Member States have agreed to finalise the Accord and IHR amendments to be submitted to the WHA in May 2024. The UK is an active participant in both processes and we will continue to work with our international partners to achieve a good outcome for the UK.

The Pandemic Accord and amendments to the IHR must be adopted by Member States at the WHA for them to then come into force as a matter of international law for all Member States. The proposed amendments to the IHR, current and previous drafts of the Pandemic Accord, and relevant papers including reports from both processes are available publicly on the WHO website.

Throughout both negotiations, the UK has been and will continue to be clear that we would not agree any amendments to the IHR or sign up to an Accord that would cede sovereignty to the WHO in relation to making domestic decisions on national measures concerning public health, such as, domestic immunisation programme rollouts and other similar measures.

Any new or amended domestic legislation necessary to reflect new international obligations under the IHR or the Accord would be made through the applicable parliamentary process. In all circumstances, the sovereignty of the UK Parliament would remain unchanged.

Department of Health and Social Care

Expand full comment

Hi James,

Thank you for posting this. Unfortunately there wasn't a direct link to the petition.

I actually signed this petition about a month ago.

The government is supposed to respond after 10,000 signatures but such is their disrespect for the mere mortals that they have only just responded. I'll try to copy and paste their response, which looks like it was written by chatgbt...

Laura

Expand full comment

I thought they met the required signatures, and it was being ignored in parliament.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much for your sterling work James, I also received the standard letter from the UK Government stating they will not leave the WHO.

I found this statement particularly sickening as we know the WHO are simply weaponizing health care to Cull the Population its a simple as that !

"The WHO is the cornerstone of global health cooperation. It is through the WHO that Member States share with each other information on disease outbreaks around the world, share best practice on how to counter health threats and emergencies, and make commitments to each other to undertake activities to promote health and to avoid activities which could be detrimental to health."

Truth the WHO is the most dangerous risk to our health on this Planet.

I am sharing the this link to support Andrew Bridgens meeting in Parliament on 4th December with a host of experts who will tell the truth about the Deceptions regarding Covid there is a template letter to send off to your MP, we need to pressurize these lazy corrupt MP,s to make them look at the truth, instead of the other direction.

https://saveoursovereignty.co.uk/

I salute you for your tenacity in getting the truth out to people, stay Frosty James Bravo to you !

Expand full comment

Thanks Joan. Yup! I've seen estimates of WHO financial corruption and 'influence' anywhere between 53% to 85% interference by cash contributions, so I try not to exaggerate and stick around the 50% mark! Mick.

Expand full comment