96 Comments

hi james,

who is David Bell? Brownstone Institute - IHR

*he just wrote this article..

https://brownstone.org/articles/unofficial-qa-international-health-regulations/

i've included some of the links in the article to help you vet this

'An Unofficial Q&A on International Health Regulations' WGIHR

https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/index.html

timeline - https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_4-en.pdf

PHEIC pandemic treaty citing "3 years" of fraud - https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb4/A_INB4_3-en.pdf

WHO the "next threat" - https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/05/1136912

IHR Amendments - https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Compilation-en.pdf

*here also is another article 'The Most Dangerous International Treaty Ever Proposed' by Molly Kingsley

https://brownstone.org/articles/most-dangerous-international-treaty-ever-proposed/

godspeed

Expand full comment

The WHO is getting more and more specifically dictorial in their statement of rules & expectations.

💥 PULL the USA OUT of W.H.O. !

We DON'T NEED THEM for OUR HEALTH SAFETY PRACTICES here in the United States!

MONEY DOWN THE DRAIN !

Expand full comment

Anything that takes away power or control from the individual is wrong.

Expand full comment

URGENT UPDATE as of June 10: There are different deadlines for comments on the WHO power grab IHR listening session than what is stated above, and it seems THERE IS STILL TIME TO COMMENT!:

Per the gov't website instructions (link below):

"RSVP: Persons seeking to speak at the listening session must register by Wednesday, June 14, 2023. Persons seeking to attend the listening session in a listen-only capacity must RSVP by Thursday, June 13, 2023.. ...

Written comments should be emailed to OGA.RSVP1@hhs.gov with the subject line “ Written Comment Re: Stakeholder Listening Session 2 for the IHR ” by Friday, June 30, 2023."

NOTE THE 3 DIFFERENT DEADLINES, one for people wishing to speak at the listening session (JUNE 14); one for people seeking to attend the listening session in a listen-only capacity (JUNE 13), and the other for written comments (JUNE 30).

NOTE THE REQUIRED SUBJECT LINE FOR COMMENTS. People should probably re-submit with this subject line if they've already sent their comments.

Could you please read this and let people know that there is still time, and make these additional stipulations clear?

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/13/2023-07812/office-of-global-affairs-stakeholder-listening-session-on-amendments-to-the-international-health

THANK YOU!

Expand full comment

1. WHO may exist in an advisory capacity, ONLY, NO ENFORCEMENT

2. We the people are the whole of society and we are masters of the whole of government

3. I claim my right to personal, individual sovereignty in all matters, and I cede that authority to no one but God

4. I am responsible for my own health and the WHO has NO authority over me!

Expand full comment

How can the World Health Organization be trusted after the evidence of lies and misinformation regarding the coronavirus, the treatment of those people infected with the virus, and how they deliberately lied about the efficacy of drugs that proved to be highly effective in treating the virus. I think it’s imperative that nations refuse to accept the new amendments of the regulations because they proven to be untrustworthy and recklessly corrupt and rapacious.

Expand full comment

It is not just a section or even several sections. I object to the entire scenario where they appoint themselves as (untrustworthy) guardians of my health! But in particular, as I pointed out to them, deleting this section 3:

shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and

fundamental freedoms of persons based on

How dare they!

Expand full comment
Jun 10, 2023Liked by James Roguski

We need to withdrawal from WHO. Please do not support the amendments. We are loosing our personal freedoms for our heath. We are losing control of our country.

Expand full comment

WHO has failed in efforts during the 3-year-COVID pandemic to preserve the health of elderly people, which was their first aim, in so far as American news media said, “ You must be vaccinated to save Grandma.” The older folk in nursing homes died, after being jabbed, in high numbers, and if they died more slowly, they died alone! I know. My son-in-law who could not visit his his mother till the end of her life, literally saw her then for 15-minutes while in a white anti-contamination suit, with a shield over his face. Per state mandates for Nursing Homes. If they got the Big Bump Funding, I suppose. These mandates may have been “suggested,” but it was a rule everywhere. Lockstep in USA, and around the world, I presume. Second, had WHO not locked down the general population the COVID would have run its course in healthy people and Grandma, who I am, would have been saved. Yes, I got sick as did my husband. Our NorthWestern Physician who adopted WHO-CDC-Fauci Protocol, said no early treatment! Wait till you can’t breathe. Go to hospital. Thank God I found treatment via FLCCC. WHO you failed to allow doctors to treat people, even the Elderly of your first concern. You, WHO, must Stop Mandating Totalitarian Nightmares and Perpetrating Horrors on the world. No more Lockdowns, no more Stopping Real Doctors! No more Centralized WHO- Authoritarianism.

Expand full comment

sent mine in the first round, waiting to hear. will definitely need James' counsel before the big day (June 20), i think it's 9am pacific time.

Expand full comment

Hello -

Please consider the fact that millions of people are opposed to these proposed amendments for obvious reason. We, as a people, do not desire any International Health Regulator overseeing the global dominance of any authority.

Expand full comment

Please where exactly on this site do I sign up? I've looked every where

Expand full comment

Keeping it simple, I, and everyone I know oppose global governance, and oppose giving control of our nation’s health policies over to the WHO’s control. Please do not allow this—thank you

Expand full comment

As a free American citizen, I resent the psychopathic power grabbers at the WHO trying to dictate every term of my existence to me, including my freedom of movement. Carefully restricted travel never applies to illegal aliens, does it? Control is for the rest of us. Tedros committed genocide by ignoring a rival tribe that was afflicted with cholera in his native country. Our Constitution doesn't recognize monsters at the top of any globalist pyramid.

Expand full comment

Following any recommendations from the WHO should be strictly voluntary, yet throughout the document it states that member states "shall" do whatever WHO tells them to do. We saw WHO respond to COVID politically, rather than medically. Therefore, it is essential that the US sign no such amendments and decide on a case-by-case basis whether to accept WHO's suggestions, and come to our own conclusions, including the best course of action for the country and for individuals. Mandatory restrictions for the entire population are illogical, given the fact that people are different. For example, wearing a mask for most adults may be reasonable under certain circumstances; but requiring masks for very young children or for those with conditions such as asthma and COPD, IS detrimental to the patient's health. Mandatory across-the-board restrictions are unreasonable and may exacerbate the very issue you're trying to resolve.

Expand full comment

I have watched the incredulous coordination world wide of this effort to control the western countries since 2020. The "leaders" said the same thing. The "media" parroted the "leaders". All dissenting opinions were silenced. Any option beside the genetic therapy "vaccine" was dismissed. Where was the WHO during this insanity? Leading the the take over of the world. The WHO tried unsuccessfully to repeat this with the monkeypox but the free people of the world would not be fooled again. This is simple. It is a small group attempting to usher in One World Government. Surveillance, lockdowns, digital currency, digital passports, fear, one crisis after the next all for control of the people. Most of the world knows what these three letter NGOs are up to and we will not comply. The WHO, the WEF, etc. The Bill Gates, Klaus Schwabs, John Kerrys, Antony Faucis will face the consequences of their actions and I can not wait for that day to get here.

Expand full comment