Early access to the updated version in advance of the eighth meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body. Please note that Article 12 is NOT yet available.
Many Australians died and many have been injured or immune compromised for life from a questionable mRNA “vaccine” that NEVER should have been mandated. The only pandemic was the urgency by which the WHO and our government treated its citizens to get jabbed. We have sovereignty rights over our own body and the Australian government and the WHO corporation have no rights to make decisions over each person’s body autonomy.
The Australian Parliament needs to hold an inquiry into the International Health Regulations. Given the dire consequences to these WHO amendments it would be prudent of our government to ditch the WHO all together and make our own rules & regulations with the cooperation of the people of Australia.
The public is entirely misled about illnesses, prescription drugs, stressful lifestyles and malnutrition, just like in the past.
Almost 70% of all diseases & conditions are a direct result of unhealthy foods. Genetically enhanced products are also in our diets which is a serious threat to our health.
The media also plays a big part in this, forking out millions of $ for advertising junk foods, day in and day out.
Belgium (Flanders and Wallonië HAS already research and production facilities (AI, everything SMART, Pharma, bioweapons, all of it).
In fact our economy is already dependent on it. (For now, that is...)
I mean, what was Bill Gates doing here in the gut (sewerage) of Brussels a few months ago?
And that is represented here as frivolous news?
It is too late for Europe. Top politicians are fishing for jobs in the EU because they are jumping ship.
The WEF has laid its eggs. We are infested. The reasons why the US will probably be able to counter all this is because of your fight-spirit! (For example YOU). And you are a BIG country. We are miserably small…
Europe is lost!
I stand by Rob Roos and Christine Anderson though!
I understand the far reaching undermining of our health autonomy and countries’ sovereignty with this so called treaty to and by unelected globalists who have little to zero experience or background in human health sciences but how do we use this to stop this fascist insanity?
Very important video that, among other things, deals with the strawman (legal fiction, person vs. human being) in connection with the private WHO contracts.
I find the corporations that are going along with this communistic state they forget Killer Putin famous for his poisonings . Wait till they rob your corporate selves do you really believe you'll be exempt.. NO one is exempt even from the highest to lowest. They like all despots will rule with an iron fist using the deep state black shirted military to rule us all. Commie Despots always court the military for when their decrees go wrong the despots need protection . They already flee in their underground cities and fancy yachts so we cannibalize each otheŕ and they come back to an empty land of humans burnt to the ground. . This will be is our fate? Terminator is already here.
I don't care what the WHO revises in the the Nuremberg Code, it states you cannot change one word of the code written expressly this reason for creatures like you. You are a nazi communistic organization illegal under the Code and the US constitution why would anyone in the US pay you mind?Or obey your dribble. Except those traitors to the oath they took to destroying our sovereignty. Traitors and lyers like John Kerry, Joe Biden, Seth Moulton ,Pompano, Wray,. Trudeau and many many others using fake climate change for their totalitarian takeover. Traitors shall be hanged remember that from the highest to the lowest. No exceptions this must be stamped out to ensure our constitution and freedoms are ensured .
Article 3 in my view amounts to a very manipulative redefinition (even restriction) of fundamental rights. Besides subtle exclusions such as the right to physical autonomy, freedom of choice and association, it does not deal with how fundamental rights are affected, altered and curtailed by the national and international interest and to what extent on what scale of danger and risk. I have not read the rest of the document but such sweeping statements made so manipulatively raises myriads of red flags ion my view. Very alarming indeed. I assume that what I downloaded is the WHO`s original document and not an edited version.
An important fundamental right is to have any legal matter heard in an appropriate independent and impartial forum. Having regard to the fact that departments of justice such as the DOJ in the USA are clearly compromised to a significant degree, people need to learn how to ensure that they are not being heard by the enemy. To get that message across, people with experience in that field need to collaborate and start creating podcasts and the like to train the populous how to ensure that their rights are not trampled on. Once the forum (court) is secured, then one can look at training people to bring matters in the public interest (actio popularis) and ask for declarations of rights that can be built on to obtain restraining orders against public officials etc. This will not be simple or easy and is long overdue. The longer we remain asleep the easier they will kill us in our sleep. The alarm bells have been sounding for quite some time now so it really is time to wake up!
Moreover, all any country needs do is to declare people to be domestic terrorists and then most fundamental human rights (even in respect of a fair trial) are suspended. Most countries have copied such legislation into their statutes. A police commissioner in a first world country recently asked the public (in a TV news broadcast) to report persons as domestic terrorists if they were premillennialists, distrusted big government, were antivaxxers, conspiracy theorists and adhered to or studied sovereign citizenship (the last description being an oxymoron for those that know the differences).
On Article 1,2,3: the Transparency Clause of "accurate information and data" with the subsequent "risk assessment" is especially concerning, as the WHO, CDC/VARES, the hospitals, the clinical trials, our US and County Health Agencies, the media, the courts even, failed to demand followup records of the mRNA, Covid-19 treatments. They were negligent in this lack of case studies and reporting on several experimental products---because it would shed light of it's risk, safety, immune suppressing functions, and subsequent debilitation of several visceral and hormonal systems, therein. What kind of an experiment is this, to not monitor a follow-up, and cull data, impose changes to death reports, advertise false claims, without correction, adjust clinical data to hide age related anomalies, prohibit subsequent treatment, "vaccinate" the control group, continue to offer genome designed boosters, without knowing the effects of the first treatment, to name a few,? Their last term: Accountability, is laughable, because they omit the companies that made and profited from the products! Their only interest is the accountability of our government, agencies and businesses to comply with a no-liability industry product, en mass!
Hope all is well. The 27th I was to understand was the last date to submit changes to the Amendments/Treaty ( forgive me as I do at times et them confused) & saw your interviews stating the nations group did not submit their changes timely to meet deadline ( you appeared happy as good news) but stating we have this hurdle approaching in May/2024 that we must watch them for any closed door changes and can we be that confident as you state to know it may not get passed? Or can We the Ppl do more to assist this not happening making the WHO the Central Command Decision Maker for all pandemics worldwide? I heard you state happily in an interview that we can take a breather but need to continue to be diligent in 2025 as they ( the WHO et al) will start again to gain power over decisions made to call and run pandemics & we must stay diligent as they will not give up as we must not either!
I reviewed what they presented as preliminary & see they use word salad to sweeten it up to be so inclusive worldwide but yet the WHO did such a horrible job of managing the cov19 issue why would we the ppl of the world want them to be at the helm?
There is much money needed for this proposed ER PREP PLAN! We should all be concern Ed w/ the WHO managing that as well accountability of where Monroe’s are spent. Also no mention of when to end the call to duty of a Pandemic Team to call the trackers off from their set protocols which are tailored for a One Health program (no statements of religious beliefs of folks nor individual plans to ensure personal care for everyone who may have special co-morbidities… which is written very generally & open to interpret full control /orders come from the WHO).
Frequent review & report off dates should be included to be transparent to the public as to how soon the pandemic can be called off or need to renew and why? Third party- non-affiliated clinicians are needed to be a double check on the WHO as to ensure no abuse of power are not listed. This is written as full ER care is a dictatorship by the WHO and once in it … what’s the way out?
Just some points that maybe were there but in a more general print that could be open to too much interpretation & power given to one entity… the WHO!
Hi, I see. Sorry I got mixed-up with the amendments to the IHR. I would like to ask my question regarding the IHR. Can you point me to the article where it would be most appropriate to ask. thank you.
Many Australians died and many have been injured or immune compromised for life from a questionable mRNA “vaccine” that NEVER should have been mandated. The only pandemic was the urgency by which the WHO and our government treated its citizens to get jabbed. We have sovereignty rights over our own body and the Australian government and the WHO corporation have no rights to make decisions over each person’s body autonomy.
The Australian Parliament needs to hold an inquiry into the International Health Regulations. Given the dire consequences to these WHO amendments it would be prudent of our government to ditch the WHO all together and make our own rules & regulations with the cooperation of the people of Australia.
The public is entirely misled about illnesses, prescription drugs, stressful lifestyles and malnutrition, just like in the past.
Almost 70% of all diseases & conditions are a direct result of unhealthy foods. Genetically enhanced products are also in our diets which is a serious threat to our health.
The media also plays a big part in this, forking out millions of $ for advertising junk foods, day in and day out.
I WILL NEVER CONSENT TO THESE WHO AMENDMENTS.
"Whose 'we'?"
– Lt.-Cmdr Geordi LaForge
Belgium (Flanders and Wallonië HAS already research and production facilities (AI, everything SMART, Pharma, bioweapons, all of it).
In fact our economy is already dependent on it. (For now, that is...)
I mean, what was Bill Gates doing here in the gut (sewerage) of Brussels a few months ago?
And that is represented here as frivolous news?
It is too late for Europe. Top politicians are fishing for jobs in the EU because they are jumping ship.
The WEF has laid its eggs. We are infested. The reasons why the US will probably be able to counter all this is because of your fight-spirit! (For example YOU). And you are a BIG country. We are miserably small…
Europe is lost!
I stand by Rob Roos and Christine Anderson though!
But we are contemplating to leave.
NO GROUP HAS ANY POWER OVER MY BODY……F**K THEM ALL. I WILL NOT SUBMIT TO THE who OR ANY OTHER ENTITY.
Thank you James for your outstanding work. This is fantastic information 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
I understand the far reaching undermining of our health autonomy and countries’ sovereignty with this so called treaty to and by unelected globalists who have little to zero experience or background in human health sciences but how do we use this to stop this fascist insanity?
Dear James,
this is all based on a lie, manipulation and fraud and is therefore illegal from the outset anyway - nobody should forget that!!!
Very important video that, among other things, deals with the strawman (legal fiction, person vs. human being) in connection with the private WHO contracts.
015_WHO & andere Verträge - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5wLG9k9Jfg
(use auto-translate option if necessary)
--
See also "Contagion" - Movie about Coronavirus taken in 2011 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5V-UrQHwSg
This movie is based on another fiction: the virus.
PS: James, ~38:20: NEIN
https://brownstone.org/articles/the-german-origins-of-the-pandemic-treaty/
I find the corporations that are going along with this communistic state they forget Killer Putin famous for his poisonings . Wait till they rob your corporate selves do you really believe you'll be exempt.. NO one is exempt even from the highest to lowest. They like all despots will rule with an iron fist using the deep state black shirted military to rule us all. Commie Despots always court the military for when their decrees go wrong the despots need protection . They already flee in their underground cities and fancy yachts so we cannibalize each otheŕ and they come back to an empty land of humans burnt to the ground. . This will be is our fate? Terminator is already here.
Regards
Barbara Guillette
I don't care what the WHO revises in the the Nuremberg Code, it states you cannot change one word of the code written expressly this reason for creatures like you. You are a nazi communistic organization illegal under the Code and the US constitution why would anyone in the US pay you mind?Or obey your dribble. Except those traitors to the oath they took to destroying our sovereignty. Traitors and lyers like John Kerry, Joe Biden, Seth Moulton ,Pompano, Wray,. Trudeau and many many others using fake climate change for their totalitarian takeover. Traitors shall be hanged remember that from the highest to the lowest. No exceptions this must be stamped out to ensure our constitution and freedoms are ensured .
Amen…I will help to carry out the sentencing. An introduction to Mr. Hemp.
Article 3 in my view amounts to a very manipulative redefinition (even restriction) of fundamental rights. Besides subtle exclusions such as the right to physical autonomy, freedom of choice and association, it does not deal with how fundamental rights are affected, altered and curtailed by the national and international interest and to what extent on what scale of danger and risk. I have not read the rest of the document but such sweeping statements made so manipulatively raises myriads of red flags ion my view. Very alarming indeed. I assume that what I downloaded is the WHO`s original document and not an edited version.
An important fundamental right is to have any legal matter heard in an appropriate independent and impartial forum. Having regard to the fact that departments of justice such as the DOJ in the USA are clearly compromised to a significant degree, people need to learn how to ensure that they are not being heard by the enemy. To get that message across, people with experience in that field need to collaborate and start creating podcasts and the like to train the populous how to ensure that their rights are not trampled on. Once the forum (court) is secured, then one can look at training people to bring matters in the public interest (actio popularis) and ask for declarations of rights that can be built on to obtain restraining orders against public officials etc. This will not be simple or easy and is long overdue. The longer we remain asleep the easier they will kill us in our sleep. The alarm bells have been sounding for quite some time now so it really is time to wake up!
Moreover, all any country needs do is to declare people to be domestic terrorists and then most fundamental human rights (even in respect of a fair trial) are suspended. Most countries have copied such legislation into their statutes. A police commissioner in a first world country recently asked the public (in a TV news broadcast) to report persons as domestic terrorists if they were premillennialists, distrusted big government, were antivaxxers, conspiracy theorists and adhered to or studied sovereign citizenship (the last description being an oxymoron for those that know the differences).
How? I read it and i found it much better than the previous version where they scrapped huamn rights alltogether.
My bad its abut the "pandemic agreement" not the IHR ammendements.
I believe that the documents are legitimate.
DOMINION = https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=700.343955039978,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/159/069/424/original/c3e51af50d54610d.jpg --- Globalists aiming to "peacefully" depopulate six billion people with mass euthanasia. --- UNITE WITH GOD AND LIKE MINDED PATRIOTS AND PRAY FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR WINNING, OUR LORD WONT DECEIVE US + ONE NATION UNDER GOD
On Article 1,2,3: the Transparency Clause of "accurate information and data" with the subsequent "risk assessment" is especially concerning, as the WHO, CDC/VARES, the hospitals, the clinical trials, our US and County Health Agencies, the media, the courts even, failed to demand followup records of the mRNA, Covid-19 treatments. They were negligent in this lack of case studies and reporting on several experimental products---because it would shed light of it's risk, safety, immune suppressing functions, and subsequent debilitation of several visceral and hormonal systems, therein. What kind of an experiment is this, to not monitor a follow-up, and cull data, impose changes to death reports, advertise false claims, without correction, adjust clinical data to hide age related anomalies, prohibit subsequent treatment, "vaccinate" the control group, continue to offer genome designed boosters, without knowing the effects of the first treatment, to name a few,? Their last term: Accountability, is laughable, because they omit the companies that made and profited from the products! Their only interest is the accountability of our government, agencies and businesses to comply with a no-liability industry product, en mass!
Thank you James, I find all this so overwhelming.
Did you watch the video?
Which one?
Does anyone know which countries are on track to NOT accept these amendments?
This article is about the proposed "Pandemic Treaty."
I am confident that it will be totally rejected.
Please see my latest article...
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/stop-the-treaty
http://StopTheTreaty.org
Hi James,
Hope all is well. The 27th I was to understand was the last date to submit changes to the Amendments/Treaty ( forgive me as I do at times et them confused) & saw your interviews stating the nations group did not submit their changes timely to meet deadline ( you appeared happy as good news) but stating we have this hurdle approaching in May/2024 that we must watch them for any closed door changes and can we be that confident as you state to know it may not get passed? Or can We the Ppl do more to assist this not happening making the WHO the Central Command Decision Maker for all pandemics worldwide? I heard you state happily in an interview that we can take a breather but need to continue to be diligent in 2025 as they ( the WHO et al) will start again to gain power over decisions made to call and run pandemics & we must stay diligent as they will not give up as we must not either!
I reviewed what they presented as preliminary & see they use word salad to sweeten it up to be so inclusive worldwide but yet the WHO did such a horrible job of managing the cov19 issue why would we the ppl of the world want them to be at the helm?
There is much money needed for this proposed ER PREP PLAN! We should all be concern Ed w/ the WHO managing that as well accountability of where Monroe’s are spent. Also no mention of when to end the call to duty of a Pandemic Team to call the trackers off from their set protocols which are tailored for a One Health program (no statements of religious beliefs of folks nor individual plans to ensure personal care for everyone who may have special co-morbidities… which is written very generally & open to interpret full control /orders come from the WHO).
Frequent review & report off dates should be included to be transparent to the public as to how soon the pandemic can be called off or need to renew and why? Third party- non-affiliated clinicians are needed to be a double check on the WHO as to ensure no abuse of power are not listed. This is written as full ER care is a dictatorship by the WHO and once in it … what’s the way out?
Just some points that maybe were there but in a more general print that could be open to too much interpretation & power given to one entity… the WHO!
TY for all you do,
Regards, Suzanne Delaney, RN, BS, MSHSA
Hi, I see. Sorry I got mixed-up with the amendments to the IHR. I would like to ask my question regarding the IHR. Can you point me to the article where it would be most appropriate to ask. thank you.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/enforcearticle55