214 Comments
User's avatar
Mrs. Hamesandwich's avatar

As far as Pharma goes, stay away from all of it! The root word, pharmaka means witchcraft! So what does that tell you. God's medicine is better, He created it. Don't go to the Dr. Eat healthy, stay active and most of all make sure Jesus Christ is your Lord and Savior.

Expand full comment
Mrs. Hamesandwich's avatar

Right on Trump!!!!

Expand full comment
Michael Ginsburg's avatar

What's the play here James (and others)?

What am I not seeing?

https://substack.com/profile/1631143-michael-ginsburg/note/c-89149792

Expand full comment
Joe williams's avatar

Trump has withdrawn funding from the WHO and given it to GAVI which is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation is this true......

Expand full comment
Barbara Crljen's avatar

In case you don't know, David Martin talks about the member nations contributions to the UN various agencies as appears on their financial statements. This is the first time I have heard this.

There are two entries - for each nation, in the case of the US:

United States of America and immediately below it

Corporation for the United States of America.

The way the EO reads now it reads USofA and so they could continue to keep funding via the 'Corporation....'

At 28 min 30

https://clubgrubbery.com.au/graham-and-john-speak-in-this-part-2-interview-with-dr-david-martin/

Thanks for all your fantastic work.

Expand full comment
Follow the Silence's avatar

HEADLINE: After Meeting with Bill Gates, The Trump Transition Team Sidelines Two Key Figures Spreading Vaccine Truth

This is a MUST read—a sobering indication of what we can expect in the coming months and over the next four years. Link: https://www.newstarget.com/2025-01-20-after-meeting-with-gates-trump-transition-team-sidelines-two-figures-spreading-vaccine-truth.html

Excerpt:

Even after recent vaccine failures, Bill Gates continue to influence vaccine policy

The role of Bill Gates in shaping Trump’s vaccine policies has come under renewed scrutiny following revelations that the billionaire philanthropist pressured the president to abandon plans for a vaccine safety commission during the first Trump term. In a 2018 interview, Gates admitted that he had advised Trump against investigating the potential side effects of vaccines, calling such an inquiry a “dead end.”

“In both of those two meetings, [Trump] asked me if vaccines weren’t a bad thing, because he was considering a commission to look into ill effects of vaccines,” Gates said. “And I said, ‘No, that’s a dead end. That would be a bad thing, don’t do that.’”

Gates’ intervention raises questions about the influence of private interests on public health policy. As a major investor in Moderna through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Gates has a vested interest in promoting vaccines. Gates also routinely promoted lockdowns to coerce everyone in the world to take COVID-19 vaccines, which turned out to be a genocidal tragedy.

The irony of Gates’ position is not lost on observers. As a self-proclaimed advocate for science, Gates’ opposition to a scientific inquiry into vaccine safety appears contradictory. If vaccines are indeed “safe and effective,” as proponents claim, why would Gates resist a study that could potentially vindicate his position? The answer, critics suggest, lies in the potential risks such an inquiry could pose to the pharmaceutical industry and its allies.

Expand full comment
Winona Horn's avatar

He can't be trusted and will do whatever the people in Davos and the UN tell him. He's the great deceiver. Maga is the 5th, The Highest degree of the Church of Satan, and so many people have fallen for it.

Expand full comment
LD50's avatar

Another stupid claim!

Expand full comment
Dima X.'s avatar

The keyword here is "needed" or "necessary". Necessary for what?

More lethal genocide, which so far, took 30,000,000+ lives worldwide?

https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/breaking-our-largest-study-of-its

Expand full comment
Roc Findlay's avatar

1. First administration poor politically naive Prez surrounds himself with nefarious creatures but promises to "drain the swamp" he doesn't & then gives most of them awards & rewards.

2. Gets punted & has 4 years to think about this & get it right next time,if there is a next time. Assassination attempts assure a victory.

3. Second administration, same horse different jockey except ALL of the external/ off shore funds will now stay "in house". There are many other ways to apply mandates.

Expand full comment
Roc Findlay's avatar

The Mar a Lago merry go round. "Here's the basic plan Billy boy & Albert; I'll sign us out 😉 of the WHO ( chuckles all round) but I'll need reputable, trustworthy people, ahem, to become the new WHO & that'll be you two, ( for starters ) yahoo. Now leave the money on the fridge & get out."

Expand full comment
CLIVE WILLIAM GRENVILLE's avatar

JAMES hidden in plain sight

Expand full comment
J Shannon's avatar

Excellent questions/concerns James Roguski, with respect to the way in which the EO language might be interpreted e.g., “pause? Why not permanently terminate?”. Many ss authors assume what is not in evidence when they say that the US has exited the WHO.

Don’t forget about the bait and switch DJT did before, which served to award over 1 billion US

taxpayer dollars to GAVI as a fungible passthrough to the WHO after discontinuing a yearly payment of roughly 282 million. Much more precise language could have been used if the goal was to permanently terminate any and all cooperation with the WHO. The fact that it wasn't is a huge red flag.

Expand full comment
LD50's avatar

There are red flags. A champion poker player never gives anything away. Everything is negotiation, strategy and leverage. A bull in the china shop will come completely unstuck and have energy and attention consumed in crisis management instead of forging forward!

Expand full comment
Follow the Silence's avatar

James,

Thanks for taking the time to read the document and breaking down the fine print, most of which is either confusing, misleading, or both.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(ii) recall and reassign United States Government personnel or contractors working in any capacity with the WHO; and

[contractors?]

(iii) identify credible and transparent United States and international partners to assume necessary activities previously undertaken by the WHO.

[Bill Gates? The Bill Gates Foundation? GAVI? Pfizer? Moderna?]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You hit the nail on the head!

Trump and billionaire bro Bill Gates are salivating at the prospect of exiting the WHO and taking over the global proliferation of vaccines and sharing the profits amongst themselves.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Below are a few excerpts of what Bill Gates—the college dropout with zero medical credentials—had to say about his recent three-hour meeting with Donald Trump, Mr. Operation Warp Speed.

"So, the four of us sat there, and it was quite wide-ranging," Gates said. "You know, global health is the area that I work in, and such amazing things have happened and can happen there."

"I spoke a lot about HIV and that the foundation's literally working on a cure for that. We're at an early stage. And so, you know, he, in the COVID days, accelerated the vaccine innovation. So I, you know, was asking him if maybe the same kind of thing could be done here. And we both got, I think, pretty excited about that."

"And he [Trump] was fascinated to hear what he could do to maximize the chance that during the next four years, that incredible milestone will be achieved," Gates said. "I felt like he was, you know, energized and—you know—looking forward to helping to drive innovation. You know, I was frankly impressed with how well he showed a lot of interest in the issues I brought up."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A link to the interview:

Bill Gates reveals "intriguing” dinner with Donald Trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6XHx5b7vFJo

Expand full comment
LD50's avatar

You have too many assumptions driven by bias and manufactured opinion.

Caution is warranted ... so let's focus on a step at a time and remain engaged and advocate for WHAT WE WANT instead of the reactionary complaints of suspicion, assumptions, and biased opinions.

Keeping a clear head and reading and re-reading the language and considering it all before jumping to conclusions is a far better method and approach for all of us.

We don't have to trust any of it, we just need to examine it and request (or demand) clarification in order to drill down into the details of real possibility vs assumptions fuelled by bias that do nothing more than continue a noisy distraction. (My pov)

Expand full comment
Follow the Silence's avatar

Your profile reads: “Just like and want to read accurate details.”

My comment is not a biased manufactured opinion, assumption, or an attempt to distract. Before you continue disparage the comments of others and further embarrass yourself, you might consider providing your own “accurate details” to support your own unfounded assertions.

Below are some “accurate details.”

With the formation and rollout of Stargate, The Gates Foundation, Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI), and to some extent Microsoft, will play a huge part in the implementation the proposed AI mRNA driven vaccines related to polio.

Link: https://group.softbank/en/news/press/20250122

BREAKING: Trump—Announces Project Stargate

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYUoANr3cMo

STARGATE & AI MRNA: DYSTOPIAN HELL! - KAREN KINGSTON

Link: https://rumble.com/v6cchdg-stargate-and-ai-mrna-dystopian-hell-karen-kingston.html

Expand full comment
Tony Ryan's avatar

After the word "Pause" I knew what the rest of the executive order meant.

A lot of people resented my recent substack (SUBSTACK oziz4oziz) because it seemed so cynical and bereft of hope. I was told that I should have some faith that Trump will honour his predicted navigation. All I can say is wait 42 days then read the post again. Cynical I may be but that is a negative euphemism for "geopolitical realist".

Expand full comment
MariYahu's avatar

Only took 1 day! Incredible

Expand full comment
Gaynor Kay's avatar

Good on Mr Trump. For wanting to exit the W.H.O. I also emailed my NZ Prime ministers to Exit UN full stop.

Expand full comment
Char & Tom's Room Upstairs's avatar

Thank you for all your work sir...There is a lot of news regarding the US now going to pull out of the WHO...In the documents you provided I remember reading that a waiting period of one year is required before this can move forward...Will you respond please?

Expand full comment
LD50's avatar

That link reveals information that indicates that the guideline on "exit" in so far as financial commitment, has been in place since 1948.

For me this raises the question on attitude of policy in wording EO. What I am saying is, in the interests of brevity succinctly describe your intent vs writing a convoluted essay!

(Either way, people everywhere need to calm down and stop feeding into the drama.)

Expand full comment