These artificial, man-made, silicon-based compounds are ubiquitous and have been linked to cancer, endocrine disruption, and developmental, reproductive and liver toxicity.
I AM GOINTHISG TO CHECK MY FACIAL CREAMS TO SEE IF THIS INGREIENT IS IN IT.IT IS A DISGRACE THAT THIS IS ALLOWED IN ONE OF THE MOST SENSITIVE AREAS OF OUR BODIES.WE MUST BE VERY CAREFUL WHAT WE ESPECIALY ON OUR FACES.
A few years ago there were widespread reports of foam on the roads during rain storms. Your report says this compound is an anti-foaming agent. Since we no longer see that foam in the roads, it's apparent they are adding this compound to their geoengineering activities to hide the evidence of what they are doing. They are using geoengineering to falsely create the narrative that our CO2 footprint is causing climate change. It's NOT co2, it's the governments clandestine geoengineering activities polluting our air and damaging our ecology. Zeldin is correct, it IS jet exhaust. But not just jet condensation. They are putting many of these compounds in jet fuel, the rest is being released through atmospheric aerosole injection. Zeldin and RFKjr need to delve deeper into these destructive programs.
oh i do hate those stripes in the sky and the constant milky gray up there where the Sun used to live; climate change is all manmade in this sense and many others. Consider haarps ionospheric heaters too- all working together to try to poison life so resilient it simply won't just die. It's actually amazing any of us are surviving - and also a testimony to the higher power in our bones and blood
My analysis suggests that you totally got wrong what is the worse kind of methylsiloxane and also the worst effect of exposure.
IMO it's not the volatile D4 and D5 forms that really matter in the long term. They are reactive so in theory the body can remove them if given enough time.
No, it's the non-volatile variants in things like lubricants, foods, and lotions. They use PDMS=Polydimethylsiloxane, the "safe" variant. What's the issue? Look at the brain of a dead old person. You'll find microscopic silicone granulomas. See PubMed if you question me:
This is scar tissue encapsulating PDMS from years of exposure.
Here are two realistic examples of series issue not stupid random testimonies from some women using implants or the random exposure you cite:
Example 1:
You have Intercourse every day/(x days) and don't want to cause issues so you use a condom. It's got a lubricant made of water and PDMS. But wait, there's more! Unless you have time for like a molasses slow session you'll be adding even more silicon lubricant on top. Ok an 8 oz bottle might last a while, but think over the years... Over the years both partners will absorb some of the PDMS and it will end up in your brain.
Example 2:
You notice that in the winter you have dry skin that’s not ideal. Go to a dematologist or other doc. They have a preference on the solution: after showers always coat body with Aveeno. Well, it’s 1% PDMS. Over the years…
Will these examples cause a glioblastoma? Endocrine disruption? Cancer? Any of the things you listed in your article?
Jason, I agree that PDMS is a problem. If you read the article closely, I think you will see that it was discussed. Also, personal lubricants were listed as one of the products/sources. Not everyone has breast implants. Not everyone uses condoms and artificial lubricants during sex. Each person encounters these compounds in their own unique way. Much like the concept of "shedding" one of the issues to consider is the exposure to aerosolized compounds that people are exposed to EVEN IF THEY HAVE PERSONALLY AVOIDED USING SUCH PRODUCTS.
"...I agree that PDMS is a problem. If you read the article closely, I think you will see that it was discussed. "
I disagree with the thrust of your reply since it is incorrect that you impart equal or due blame to PDMS. Let's ask Gemini Pro:
'in the following article, the author seems like he is trying to warn the user of some chemical(s). which exact form is he mostly warning the user about? please only give a short, most likely, answer unless it is clear there's no difference in implied risk.
"There is an increasing awareness of, and a growing concern about, the environmental and health hazards associated with methylsiloxanes.
Based on the article, the author is primarily warning the user about cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes (cVMS)—specifically the forms D4, D5, and D6 (cyclotetrasiloxane, cyclopentasiloxane, and cyclohexasiloxane).
While the article mentions methylsiloxanes (like PDMS) as a whole, it repeatedly singles out these specific cyclic forms as the primary culprits linked to cancer, endocrine disruption, reproductive toxicity, and irreversible skin barrier damage.'
And I did not even show it your featured image. It's smarter than people give it credit for IMO.
EDIT: I did some more digging and it's not so clear to me now. The url I gave mostly points to cases near the location of a ruptured breast implant, not cerebral. But, there was one study cases where they traced it going to the brain. The molecular weight argument (silicone gel can't get past intestinal walls) seems semi-robust. The cases to look might be cognitive tests of women given silicone balloon-free breast implant injections by quacks.
meanwhile, my takeaway is look at the growing awareness of chronic degenerative conditions as more and more toxic synthetic chemicals flood past the blood brain barrier into the parenchyma. i love seeing them all singled out this way, and i deeply understand their effects - but i'm no biochemist, so on that i can't comment.
Due to the butterfly effect, there are always at least a thousand things affecting an observable output. But, of them, there's always exactly one that is the dominant factor. (This is a basic result of math 101.) So, when some agent uploads a "sky is falling" video that's about a non-dominant factor, and the FAANG companies viralize it by sticking it into our feeds, it does a great job of misdirecting energy and attention away from what really matters. So, it might sound good to be know about and be hunting over a dozen chemicals that cause Alzheimer's disease, but not really. It's better to know the #1, and check it off first, before going to #20.
i like that use of "butterfly effect" Jason. it's wide-angle and succinct.
as for me, i appreciate all the manageable bites of biochemistry as it relates to toxicity. It gently increases my already vast scope of scientific and medical knowledge
My heart goes out for your friends suffering. If she was vaccinated during covid, this may unfortunately be the byproduct of this diaboliical poison she and all of us were coerced to take. God bless you.
I'm a handyman. I scrape and sand, cut and nail, caulk and paint almost every day. If there are methylsiloxanes in paint and sealants, I am constantly inundated with them. Many caulks are silicone based, and over time I have learned to avoid 'pure' silicone caulk because it doesn't take paint well. I am very good at caulking, because it is fundamental to a fine, finished appearance of repair and replacement work, which is a lot of what I do. When finishing a bead of caulk around a trim, there is no more useful tool than the human finger, for many reasons, the first of which is availability. I never have forgotten my finger and had to climb down off a ladder to go fetch it. However, caulks are sticky and tend to foul your finger, so it is useful to lubricate the finger with water before smoothing the bead. Unfortunately plain water isn't very viscous, and quickly drips off the finger, runs down your arm and wets your sleeve. Handily, saliva is much more viscous, and from my first day as a finish carpenter to the present, it is a common sight to see carpenters licking their finger before smoothing caulk. I have come to hate the taste of caulk because you have to do this over and over on every window, shelf, or trim you finish.
So, I learned from this post that I have probably been licking methylsiloxanes from my fingertips for decades. I deeply appreciate the information, and will reform my practices in order to avoid contaminating my poor, abused corpus with such toxins going forward. Also, however, sealants and paints dry, which involves them outgassing volatile fractions that enable them to be applied in a plastic state necessary to spread them evenly and completely. I am pretty sure that involves toxic fumes being produced by drying paint and caulk, along with adhesives, solvents, and many other commercial products used in the construction industry. I can't possibly work wearing any kind of PPE that could effectively prevent such airborne toxins from being inhaled and reaching my skin, my eyes, and etc. There is no way such toxins can be prevented from impacting construction workers except that they be not included or excipients in solvents, adhesives, sealants, or protective coatings in the first place.
I remember someone saying once that dosage makes the difference between a medicine and a poison. The many and varied uses of methylsiloxanes put them in so many different things that sitting in an office chair could be a health hazard (although just sitting in a chair is hazardous to my back). When I worked as a fisherman, logger, and farmer there were many more immediate health hazards I faced daily, so the long term health damage from the many solvents, sealants, paint, and adhesives I use tend to seem quite mild in comparison.
You are certainly right that in almost any occupation involving any of the myriad of occupation specific materials necessary to that job, there are health hazards. I recently learned that the receipts provided by retail stores are toxic and should never touch our skin. Checkers and other retail salespeople handle hundreds of them daily. Seems like if things keep going the way they're headed, we'll have to wear full body armor to try to preserve our health.
Valued; there's a guy in Spain who researched til he knew how to sew EMF protective clothing for his whole body, and he takes his new creations to the park with his EMF meter to measure how safe he will be. It IS full body armor, including head, face, gloves and rubber soled shoes. The park is lethal - the time it took filming his dog got sick. He's on youtube, but i can't find him anywhere in the search. From looking, there are many out there in body armor already now.
Yeah, i learned about the receipts from Dr Chikly in manual therapy coursework for brain and nervous system - he taught us how to help the brain detox all that stuff using subtle osteopathic techniques.
When I heard Wifi could be used to track our movements in our homes, I did wonder if wearing a Faraday cage for underwear would help. I guess I'm not the only guy that had that idea.
it's all good, but the only "most effective" way is full body coverage. And no wifi under an enclosed faraday cage/clothing or frequencies backfire into you.
I spent 15 years working as a carpenter renovating old homes in New England. More recently I have renovated a couple of homes here in California and refinished literally hundreds of pieces of furniture. At the moment, I am working on a project repairing and repainting my house. Luckily, I have also never misplaced any of my fingers. Thanks for making me smile. I have experienced much of what you shared. Luckily, I learned 40 years ago to always grab a bucket of water and a rag whenever a job required caulking. I have been exposed to quite a lot of toxins over the years, including methylsiloxanes. Deft was the worst. I learned my favorite bit of wisdom from a plumber... Don't bite your nails! Thanks for sharing!
I loved Deft! It was half the price of other polyurethane finishes and left interior doors glowing with the natural beauty of the grain of the fine wood used as veneer. I also learned to quit biting my nails. Good advice for new carpenters.
You are welcome. Your article has made me consider abandoning my BiPAP! It is horrible to wear anyway. It really interferes with lymphatic flow too. I am at an age where if I die in my sleep, I'm good. All of my health efforts, at this point, are for functionality - not longevity. And, I am good with God which is the most important thing. Thanks for all your great articles.
Thank you for this most important and alarming post, and your words required to present, and your generosity in making this available to all. You are magnificent. I am assuming this is in the jet chemical spraying (geoengineering0 of our skies...though that was not specifically mentioned in your piece. The skies about our home in Wisconsin are heavily sprayed with toxins all inhaled and making us ill with a plethora of disease that is, of course, not traceable....as most doctors are completely ignorant. Thank you, James. Thank you.
We are living in a time where most of the people on this earth are living and striving to make it a better place. There are however the sociopaths and psychopaths which represent almost 5% of the population. Plus, unfortunately they are also (mostly) the ones that have been placed in the positions of leadership (?) and thus any real progress for the human race is very slow. To the corporate entity, people are only fodder to be used for their ends (Does big pharma ring a bell?,Monsanto, Bayer, etc etc..) Thus, all these compounds have not been made not for the good of humanity, the are there to control and limit humanity.... The human species is an incredibly creative species and we are able to come up with amazing innovations and problem solving. The other side of the coin is those who need and want to limit the creativity of the true, compassionate human. Those are the right now (and temporary in the long run) controlling elites....Your health and existence are in your own hands and if you place it in the hands of others, you give up the responsibility of your own existence.
The more information that becomes available through devoted researchers indicates that human progress is terminal. Everything we touch, if misused and abused, has the capacity to maim and kill many or even destroy God's creation—the habitat He made for us. This has been true since the beginnings of the industrial revolution. I mean the reality is nothing used or created on an industrial scale is safe. The question that needs to be asked all the time, is what are the risks—and few want to ask this and when they do, its always pushed down to the lowest priority to find them out... or will never get answered correctly due to human greed and the love of money. For the average person, if placed to a vote, would we want to return to the horse and buggy era? I think most would likely accept the risks and dangers of the majority of innovations we currently enjoy...my 2 cents.
A dear friend of mine has recently been diagnosed with glioblastoma (brain cancer) and has had most of the tumor removed. This has affected them profoundly, and tragicly, and while she would certainly have accepted the statistical risks of whatever caused the cancer before she fell ill, now that she suffers the exigent harms when applied to her personally and directly, I bet she has changed her mind - although the cancer has already done that for her.
We often make foolhardy choices when we fail to grasp the effects of the consequences sufficiently.
Brilliant! How appropriate that you closed with "my 2 cents", since many/most of these pollution phenomena are the result of putting profits before concern for humanity. Perhaps human existence will mirror the rapid decline of the former American professional football players who reveled in their youth, fame and windfall income, only to spend the majority of their lives afterwards suffering from debilitating skeletal and neurological conditions resulting from those earlier decisions. Such a disconnect between chemists, manufacturers, and the oh-so-trusting consumers. Shame on us.
We are experiencing coordinated and manufactured efforts in dividing & conquering.
Something else. It's all about "give & take", right? That's what machines do. Input/output, give/take, supply/demand, etc. Well, profit/loss too. And that is EQUALLY traded. AN EVEN EXCHANGE. So, the richer these evlfks go, the more hardship upon us all. Like, duh. ;)
How shocking! One account I read claimed "siloxanes are tolerated by humans and are considered to be non toxic or only slightly toxic to human organisms and nature". I assume you would not agree with this statement.
Toxicity generally depends upon the level of exposure and the body's ability to degrade or excrete any potential toxin. My view at this point is that we have a woefully inadequate base of knowledge regarding detoxification and excretion pathways in body systems, so the precautionary principle should apply.
Let me just say that my ears have already heard far too many claims of harmful products being "safe and effective."
Hi James! Thanks for this. There exist several means of detoxing the body, that a follow-up "how to" article would be grand! I'll forward you my findings. Diatomaceous earth being one of em.
Thanks John. I am very familiar with a plethora of detoxification processes and methods of excretion. However, I am not aware of any that SPECIFICALLY detoxify this man-made unnatural compound. I highly doubt that any studies deal with this issue specifically.
it's a longterm study by all of us now, in real time.
with the deluge of chemicals being revealed to the public rapid fire now, there's no way to know how well any of the new products work. Sadly this will take time.
Take time?? We've got solutions that are vibrations & frequencies, from loosening phlegm by humming in different areas of the throat, neck, nose and head to Rife machines. We've got electrostatic, magnetic and dielectric compounds, taken with structure (electrified) water, will pull heavy metals out AND destroy bacteria Our bodies are correctable in the right environmental conditions.
Alas, "this will take time" because we're still so misled medically, it's sickening. No, it's deadly.
If you turn any up, I would be very appreciative of that information. I used a silicone spatula to free my banana bread from it's baking pan last night, and I am sure not the only person interested in finding a better way, or at least excreting the toxins that accumulate in our bodies during our lifetimes.
I AM GOINTHISG TO CHECK MY FACIAL CREAMS TO SEE IF THIS INGREIENT IS IN IT.IT IS A DISGRACE THAT THIS IS ALLOWED IN ONE OF THE MOST SENSITIVE AREAS OF OUR BODIES.WE MUST BE VERY CAREFUL WHAT WE ESPECIALY ON OUR FACES.
excellent education. Thank you for explaining and for showing the various names used for it.
A few years ago there were widespread reports of foam on the roads during rain storms. Your report says this compound is an anti-foaming agent. Since we no longer see that foam in the roads, it's apparent they are adding this compound to their geoengineering activities to hide the evidence of what they are doing. They are using geoengineering to falsely create the narrative that our CO2 footprint is causing climate change. It's NOT co2, it's the governments clandestine geoengineering activities polluting our air and damaging our ecology. Zeldin is correct, it IS jet exhaust. But not just jet condensation. They are putting many of these compounds in jet fuel, the rest is being released through atmospheric aerosole injection. Zeldin and RFKjr need to delve deeper into these destructive programs.
oh i do hate those stripes in the sky and the constant milky gray up there where the Sun used to live; climate change is all manmade in this sense and many others. Consider haarps ionospheric heaters too- all working together to try to poison life so resilient it simply won't just die. It's actually amazing any of us are surviving - and also a testimony to the higher power in our bones and blood
I wonder after reading this ,if that's why my knee is breaking out in a rash . I have a knee brace on it
My analysis suggests that you totally got wrong what is the worse kind of methylsiloxane and also the worst effect of exposure.
IMO it's not the volatile D4 and D5 forms that really matter in the long term. They are reactive so in theory the body can remove them if given enough time.
No, it's the non-volatile variants in things like lubricants, foods, and lotions. They use PDMS=Polydimethylsiloxane, the "safe" variant. What's the issue? Look at the brain of a dead old person. You'll find microscopic silicone granulomas. See PubMed if you question me:
test1 start url
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=%22silicone+granulomas%22&sort=date
test1end url1
This is scar tissue encapsulating PDMS from years of exposure.
Here are two realistic examples of series issue not stupid random testimonies from some women using implants or the random exposure you cite:
Example 1:
You have Intercourse every day/(x days) and don't want to cause issues so you use a condom. It's got a lubricant made of water and PDMS. But wait, there's more! Unless you have time for like a molasses slow session you'll be adding even more silicon lubricant on top. Ok an 8 oz bottle might last a while, but think over the years... Over the years both partners will absorb some of the PDMS and it will end up in your brain.
Example 2:
You notice that in the winter you have dry skin that’s not ideal. Go to a dematologist or other doc. They have a preference on the solution: after showers always coat body with Aveeno. Well, it’s 1% PDMS. Over the years…
Will these examples cause a glioblastoma? Endocrine disruption? Cancer? Any of the things you listed in your article?
No.
Will they shave 1-10 points off of your IQ?
Absolutely.
Jason, I agree that PDMS is a problem. If you read the article closely, I think you will see that it was discussed. Also, personal lubricants were listed as one of the products/sources. Not everyone has breast implants. Not everyone uses condoms and artificial lubricants during sex. Each person encounters these compounds in their own unique way. Much like the concept of "shedding" one of the issues to consider is the exposure to aerosolized compounds that people are exposed to EVEN IF THEY HAVE PERSONALLY AVOIDED USING SUCH PRODUCTS.
"...I agree that PDMS is a problem. If you read the article closely, I think you will see that it was discussed. "
I disagree with the thrust of your reply since it is incorrect that you impart equal or due blame to PDMS. Let's ask Gemini Pro:
'in the following article, the author seems like he is trying to warn the user of some chemical(s). which exact form is he mostly warning the user about? please only give a short, most likely, answer unless it is clear there's no difference in implied risk.
"There is an increasing awareness of, and a growing concern about, the environmental and health hazards associated with methylsiloxanes.
......
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
All support is deeply appreciated.
CLICK HERE TO DONATE"
Based on the article, the author is primarily warning the user about cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes (cVMS)—specifically the forms D4, D5, and D6 (cyclotetrasiloxane, cyclopentasiloxane, and cyclohexasiloxane).
While the article mentions methylsiloxanes (like PDMS) as a whole, it repeatedly singles out these specific cyclic forms as the primary culprits linked to cancer, endocrine disruption, reproductive toxicity, and irreversible skin barrier damage.'
And I did not even show it your featured image. It's smarter than people give it credit for IMO.
EDIT: I did some more digging and it's not so clear to me now. The url I gave mostly points to cases near the location of a ruptured breast implant, not cerebral. But, there was one study cases where they traced it going to the brain. The molecular weight argument (silicone gel can't get past intestinal walls) seems semi-robust. The cases to look might be cognitive tests of women given silicone balloon-free breast implant injections by quacks.
meanwhile, my takeaway is look at the growing awareness of chronic degenerative conditions as more and more toxic synthetic chemicals flood past the blood brain barrier into the parenchyma. i love seeing them all singled out this way, and i deeply understand their effects - but i'm no biochemist, so on that i can't comment.
Due to the butterfly effect, there are always at least a thousand things affecting an observable output. But, of them, there's always exactly one that is the dominant factor. (This is a basic result of math 101.) So, when some agent uploads a "sky is falling" video that's about a non-dominant factor, and the FAANG companies viralize it by sticking it into our feeds, it does a great job of misdirecting energy and attention away from what really matters. So, it might sound good to be know about and be hunting over a dozen chemicals that cause Alzheimer's disease, but not really. It's better to know the #1, and check it off first, before going to #20.
i like that use of "butterfly effect" Jason. it's wide-angle and succinct.
as for me, i appreciate all the manageable bites of biochemistry as it relates to toxicity. It gently increases my already vast scope of scientific and medical knowledge
My heart goes out for your friends suffering. If she was vaccinated during covid, this may unfortunately be the byproduct of this diaboliical poison she and all of us were coerced to take. God bless you.
I'm a handyman. I scrape and sand, cut and nail, caulk and paint almost every day. If there are methylsiloxanes in paint and sealants, I am constantly inundated with them. Many caulks are silicone based, and over time I have learned to avoid 'pure' silicone caulk because it doesn't take paint well. I am very good at caulking, because it is fundamental to a fine, finished appearance of repair and replacement work, which is a lot of what I do. When finishing a bead of caulk around a trim, there is no more useful tool than the human finger, for many reasons, the first of which is availability. I never have forgotten my finger and had to climb down off a ladder to go fetch it. However, caulks are sticky and tend to foul your finger, so it is useful to lubricate the finger with water before smoothing the bead. Unfortunately plain water isn't very viscous, and quickly drips off the finger, runs down your arm and wets your sleeve. Handily, saliva is much more viscous, and from my first day as a finish carpenter to the present, it is a common sight to see carpenters licking their finger before smoothing caulk. I have come to hate the taste of caulk because you have to do this over and over on every window, shelf, or trim you finish.
So, I learned from this post that I have probably been licking methylsiloxanes from my fingertips for decades. I deeply appreciate the information, and will reform my practices in order to avoid contaminating my poor, abused corpus with such toxins going forward. Also, however, sealants and paints dry, which involves them outgassing volatile fractions that enable them to be applied in a plastic state necessary to spread them evenly and completely. I am pretty sure that involves toxic fumes being produced by drying paint and caulk, along with adhesives, solvents, and many other commercial products used in the construction industry. I can't possibly work wearing any kind of PPE that could effectively prevent such airborne toxins from being inhaled and reaching my skin, my eyes, and etc. There is no way such toxins can be prevented from impacting construction workers except that they be not included or excipients in solvents, adhesives, sealants, or protective coatings in the first place.
Thanks!
i think about this all the time, because so many people have real and actual occupational hazards there seems no way around.
I remember someone saying once that dosage makes the difference between a medicine and a poison. The many and varied uses of methylsiloxanes put them in so many different things that sitting in an office chair could be a health hazard (although just sitting in a chair is hazardous to my back). When I worked as a fisherman, logger, and farmer there were many more immediate health hazards I faced daily, so the long term health damage from the many solvents, sealants, paint, and adhesives I use tend to seem quite mild in comparison.
You are certainly right that in almost any occupation involving any of the myriad of occupation specific materials necessary to that job, there are health hazards. I recently learned that the receipts provided by retail stores are toxic and should never touch our skin. Checkers and other retail salespeople handle hundreds of them daily. Seems like if things keep going the way they're headed, we'll have to wear full body armor to try to preserve our health.
Thanks!
Valued; there's a guy in Spain who researched til he knew how to sew EMF protective clothing for his whole body, and he takes his new creations to the park with his EMF meter to measure how safe he will be. It IS full body armor, including head, face, gloves and rubber soled shoes. The park is lethal - the time it took filming his dog got sick. He's on youtube, but i can't find him anywhere in the search. From looking, there are many out there in body armor already now.
Yeah, i learned about the receipts from Dr Chikly in manual therapy coursework for brain and nervous system - he taught us how to help the brain detox all that stuff using subtle osteopathic techniques.
When I heard Wifi could be used to track our movements in our homes, I did wonder if wearing a Faraday cage for underwear would help. I guess I'm not the only guy that had that idea.
it's all good, but the only "most effective" way is full body coverage. And no wifi under an enclosed faraday cage/clothing or frequencies backfire into you.
I spent 15 years working as a carpenter renovating old homes in New England. More recently I have renovated a couple of homes here in California and refinished literally hundreds of pieces of furniture. At the moment, I am working on a project repairing and repainting my house. Luckily, I have also never misplaced any of my fingers. Thanks for making me smile. I have experienced much of what you shared. Luckily, I learned 40 years ago to always grab a bucket of water and a rag whenever a job required caulking. I have been exposed to quite a lot of toxins over the years, including methylsiloxanes. Deft was the worst. I learned my favorite bit of wisdom from a plumber... Don't bite your nails! Thanks for sharing!
I loved Deft! It was half the price of other polyurethane finishes and left interior doors glowing with the natural beauty of the grain of the fine wood used as veneer. I also learned to quit biting my nails. Good advice for new carpenters.
Keep fighting the good fight!
Methylsiloxanes can also be present in aerosol particles emitted by aircraft engines, likely originating from lubricating oils.
Thanks James for studying this!
Going natural is the future!
You are welcome. Your article has made me consider abandoning my BiPAP! It is horrible to wear anyway. It really interferes with lymphatic flow too. I am at an age where if I die in my sleep, I'm good. All of my health efforts, at this point, are for functionality - not longevity. And, I am good with God which is the most important thing. Thanks for all your great articles.
That's quite a shock, although nothing surprises me anymore.
The skin directly absorbs what's smeared on it, so nothing should be put on it that one cannot eat too, because what's on it, gets ingested.
Silicone is everywhere, even in operating rooms on the surgeon's gloves and masks.
Perhaps the most common occurance is cooking utensils. As the material is soft, it probably sheds, too.
As anyone that has ever painted anything has likely experienced, my skin is currently spattered with dried paint from painting a LR. Yum!
Thank you for this most important and alarming post, and your words required to present, and your generosity in making this available to all. You are magnificent. I am assuming this is in the jet chemical spraying (geoengineering0 of our skies...though that was not specifically mentioned in your piece. The skies about our home in Wisconsin are heavily sprayed with toxins all inhaled and making us ill with a plethora of disease that is, of course, not traceable....as most doctors are completely ignorant. Thank you, James. Thank you.
Wisconsin too? argh.
We are living in a time where most of the people on this earth are living and striving to make it a better place. There are however the sociopaths and psychopaths which represent almost 5% of the population. Plus, unfortunately they are also (mostly) the ones that have been placed in the positions of leadership (?) and thus any real progress for the human race is very slow. To the corporate entity, people are only fodder to be used for their ends (Does big pharma ring a bell?,Monsanto, Bayer, etc etc..) Thus, all these compounds have not been made not for the good of humanity, the are there to control and limit humanity.... The human species is an incredibly creative species and we are able to come up with amazing innovations and problem solving. The other side of the coin is those who need and want to limit the creativity of the true, compassionate human. Those are the right now (and temporary in the long run) controlling elites....Your health and existence are in your own hands and if you place it in the hands of others, you give up the responsibility of your own existence.
Good grief. They’re in everything.
The more information that becomes available through devoted researchers indicates that human progress is terminal. Everything we touch, if misused and abused, has the capacity to maim and kill many or even destroy God's creation—the habitat He made for us. This has been true since the beginnings of the industrial revolution. I mean the reality is nothing used or created on an industrial scale is safe. The question that needs to be asked all the time, is what are the risks—and few want to ask this and when they do, its always pushed down to the lowest priority to find them out... or will never get answered correctly due to human greed and the love of money. For the average person, if placed to a vote, would we want to return to the horse and buggy era? I think most would likely accept the risks and dangers of the majority of innovations we currently enjoy...my 2 cents.
A dear friend of mine has recently been diagnosed with glioblastoma (brain cancer) and has had most of the tumor removed. This has affected them profoundly, and tragicly, and while she would certainly have accepted the statistical risks of whatever caused the cancer before she fell ill, now that she suffers the exigent harms when applied to her personally and directly, I bet she has changed her mind - although the cancer has already done that for her.
We often make foolhardy choices when we fail to grasp the effects of the consequences sufficiently.
Brilliant! How appropriate that you closed with "my 2 cents", since many/most of these pollution phenomena are the result of putting profits before concern for humanity. Perhaps human existence will mirror the rapid decline of the former American professional football players who reveled in their youth, fame and windfall income, only to spend the majority of their lives afterwards suffering from debilitating skeletal and neurological conditions resulting from those earlier decisions. Such a disconnect between chemists, manufacturers, and the oh-so-trusting consumers. Shame on us.
We are experiencing coordinated and manufactured efforts in dividing & conquering.
Something else. It's all about "give & take", right? That's what machines do. Input/output, give/take, supply/demand, etc. Well, profit/loss too. And that is EQUALLY traded. AN EVEN EXCHANGE. So, the richer these evlfks go, the more hardship upon us all. Like, duh. ;)
yup
🙏Thank You 🙏. 💚🤗Bristol 🇬🇧
How shocking! One account I read claimed "siloxanes are tolerated by humans and are considered to be non toxic or only slightly toxic to human organisms and nature". I assume you would not agree with this statement.
that's what "they" say about everything. Everything. Meanwhile, toxic bioaccumulations are disabling and successfully killing a percentage all life
Toxicity generally depends upon the level of exposure and the body's ability to degrade or excrete any potential toxin. My view at this point is that we have a woefully inadequate base of knowledge regarding detoxification and excretion pathways in body systems, so the precautionary principle should apply.
Let me just say that my ears have already heard far too many claims of harmful products being "safe and effective."
people on the whole have no concept of the true need to focus on detox in this world, or what detox actually means. i finally broke it down as simply as i could in a series. here's part one, short and sweet: https://yolandapritamhari.substack.com/p/avoiding-the-five-biggest-detox-mistakes?utm_source=publication-search
Hi James! Thanks for this. There exist several means of detoxing the body, that a follow-up "how to" article would be grand! I'll forward you my findings. Diatomaceous earth being one of em.
Thanks John. I am very familiar with a plethora of detoxification processes and methods of excretion. However, I am not aware of any that SPECIFICALLY detoxify this man-made unnatural compound. I highly doubt that any studies deal with this issue specifically.
it's a longterm study by all of us now, in real time.
with the deluge of chemicals being revealed to the public rapid fire now, there's no way to know how well any of the new products work. Sadly this will take time.
Take time?? We've got solutions that are vibrations & frequencies, from loosening phlegm by humming in different areas of the throat, neck, nose and head to Rife machines. We've got electrostatic, magnetic and dielectric compounds, taken with structure (electrified) water, will pull heavy metals out AND destroy bacteria Our bodies are correctable in the right environmental conditions.
Alas, "this will take time" because we're still so misled medically, it's sickening. No, it's deadly.
If you turn any up, I would be very appreciative of that information. I used a silicone spatula to free my banana bread from it's baking pan last night, and I am sure not the only person interested in finding a better way, or at least excreting the toxins that accumulate in our bodies during our lifetimes.