Evil Negotiating Tactics
The negotiations for the “Pandemic Treaty” are on the verge of failing miserably. The bad actors involved are desperate, so they are trying to pull a fast one by using a dark psychology technique.
The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) that has been negotiating the “Pandemic Treaty” has done an absolutely horrible job at reaching consensus.
But maybe it is much more complicated than that!
The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body has clearly failed to get the 194 member nations to reach an agreement regarding the details of the following aspects of the negotiations:
One Health (Articles 4-5)
Pathogen Access and Benefits Sharing System (PABS) (Article 12)
Financing (Article 20) and Conference of the Parties (Article 21)
However, rather than admit defeat, they are resorting to a form of negotiating blackmail.
They are attempting to pressure the WHO member nations to adopt an incomplete agreement during the upcoming 77th World Health Assembly which they plan to make available to be signed that very same day (as soon as May 28, 2024).
The not-so-subtle threat is this:
If nations do NOT obediently and immediately sign the unfinished document, then they will not be able to continue to participate in the subsequent negotiations to work out the details.
Please watch the one minute video below:
Proposal for the WHO Pandemic Agreement:
https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb9/A_inb9_3Rev1-en.pdf
Proposed Pandemic Treaty Resolution:
https://www.keionline.org/wp-content/uploads/INB-WHA-resolution-771-draft-16.04.pdf
The proposed “Pandemic Treaty Resolution” is scheduled to be submitted to the 77th World Health Assembly on May 28, 2024. It includes a recommendation to vote to adopt the proposed “Pandemic Treaty,” which is included within the proposed “Pandemic Treaty Resolution.”
Excerpts from the Proposed “Pandemic Treaty Resolution”:
CALLS UPON all States and regional economic integration organizations entitled to do so, to consider signing, ratifying, accepting, approving, formally confirming or acceding to the Agreement at the earliest opportunity, with a view to bringing the Agreement into force as soon as possible;
The Agreement shall be open for signature at WHO headquarters in Geneva, from [28 May] to [28 June] 2024, and thereafter at United Nations headquarters in New York, from [8 July] 2024 to [7 July] 2025;
In the leaked draft of the “Proposal for the WHO Pandemic Agreement,” the date that was specified for the agreement to be available for signature was June 17, 2024.
The date specified in the official “Proposal for the WHO Pandemic Agreement” is not specified.
The date specified in the draft of the “Proposed Pandemic Treaty Resolution” is May 28, 2024.
Regardless, the “Proposal for the WHO Pandemic Agreement” must NOT be signed.
FURTHER URGES all Member States, regional economic integration organizations, international organizations and other interested parties to support the preparatory activities referred to in this resolution, and to effectively encourage prompt entry into force and implementation of the Agreement;
One Health
In order to provide that the instrument/s is/are operational no later than 31 May 2026, the One Health InterGovernmental Working Group shall submit its outcome for consideration by the Seventy-eighth World Health Assembly [May 2025], or to the Conference of the Parties, as appropriate to the legal nature of the proposed international instrument deemed appropriate by the One Health InterGovernmental Working Group;
Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS)
In order to provide that WHO Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (PABS) is operational no later than 31 May 2026, the PABS InterGovernmental Working Group shall submit its outcome for consideration by the Seventy-eighth World Health Assembly [May 2025], or to the Conference of the Parties, as appropriate to the legal nature of the proposed international instrument deemed appropriate by the PABS InterGovernmental Working Group.
Financing and Conference of the Parties
Rules of procedure for the Conference of the Parties and criteria for participation of observers at sessions of the Conference of the Parties (Article 21.5);
Financial rules for the Conference of the Parties and its subsidiary bodies, and financial provisions governing the functioning of the secretariat (Article 21.6);
A draft budget for the first financial period (Article 21.6);
Preparations for the convening of the first session of the Conference of the Parties, following entry into force of the Agreement;
BUT WAIT - THERE’S MORE…
The resolution also requests that the Director-General implement with immediate effect the activities under the following articles:
Article 6.5 (Preparedness, readiness and resilience)
Article 7.3 (Health and care workforce)
Article 10.6 (Sustainable and geographically diversified production, and technology transfer and know-how), [NOTE: They are so desperate and in such a rush that this article doesn’t even exist.]
Article 13.1 (Supply chain and logistics)
Article 13.6 (Vaccine and therapeutic related compensation and liability during pandemics)
Article 14 (Regulatory strengthening)
Article 20.3 (Coordinating Financial Mechanism of the Agreement)
Please read my previous article on this topic:
by James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
The search for an answer must delve into the underlying beliefs commonly held at that time. This investigation is crucial because if those beliefs prevail again we must wonder whether such unconscionable behaviour will likely follow in their path. The origins of the Nazi atrocities do not lie in concentration camps set up by a totalitarian dictatorship. They are rooted in beliefs promoted by particular social philosophies and practices that began in hospitals.
BMC Med Ethics. 2006; 7: 2. Published online 2006 Mar 14. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-2
PMCID: PMC1484488PMID: 16536874
Human dignity in the Nazi era: implications for contemporary bioethics
https://web.archive.org/web/20230331002340if_/https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/341018/WHO-SCI-RFH-2019.02-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
To bully these nations into signing an unfinished document and one they do not agree with is totally despicable and evil. I pray they all have stiff spines and tell the dg to stick it where the sun don't shine. To hell with the WHO and all those that support them. Pray for these nations, and all nations to stand up to them and say HELL NO!!!!!!!!!