80 Comments

Listen to June Slater from 24 minutes 14 June 2023 https://tntradio.live/shows/the-freeman-report-with-james-freeman/ explain our predicament “Beaurocrats have passed over our sovereignty while benefiting from diplomat immunity. In the UK there is an MP called Scott Blanton who is one of the 11 charged with overseeing the signing of this vicious document. [WHO IS DOING THIS WHERE YOU LIVE?] I suggest…you start lobbying your MP now. And don’t assume that they know more than you…they keep what we need to know sheltered from our eyes…if you don’t want to be subject to lockdowns where you are fined for driving your car IT HAS TO BE STOPPED BEFORE IT STARTS!

Expand full comment

40,000 foot view of a very serious problem, bigs getting bigger, Psyop is so heavy. Wishing you great fortitude.

Expand full comment

Thanks James. Their Secrets are us commoners conspiracies!

Expand full comment
Jun 12, 2023Liked by James Roguski

I strongly feel we need law enforcement to step up to the plate. There are people "negotiating" this transaction who have committed crime s against humanity and war crimes.

The US military is said to be willing to start spraying Mrna on people. If this is not an inducement for some person in law enforcement to stand up, I don't know what is. Do they think the spray will not harm them and their loved ones?

Look, we should do everything: file suit, write letters, do videos, protest and create a parallel society. I think all of these are important actions and I support every one doing them. However, we are at such a dangerous pass right now and it seems to me that 1. clearly crimes have been and are being committed and 2. there has to be some courageous people in law enforcement somewhere in this world who will make arrests. 3. There has to be some place on this planet where there are still courageous prosecutors. I know we have courageous judges and brave people, some of them must be prosecutors and law enforcement.

IF NOT NOW, WHEN?

Expand full comment

WEAK MEN MAKE HARD TIMES: --- UNITE WE ARE MANY WE ARE STRONG AND ARE GUIDED BY GODS LIGHT THROUGH THESE EVIL DARK TIMES 💪 🇺🇸

Expand full comment

I’m not seeing how I start to contact the people who are making this decision without my (our) consent. I’ve never been particularly active on things like this... But the time has come.

I click and click but I don’t know WHO (punny) to contact exactly. It’s a huge list of names and numbers of “alternates” and executives but who do I email or call exactly? I don’t know where to start. It’s all very confusing.

Expand full comment
author

Participate in the "listening sessions" and send in written comment...

http://SilenceEqualsConsent.com

Expand full comment
author

In which nation do you live?

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/delegates-to-the-76th-world-health

Expand full comment

I see page 54 and onward is USA... but I’m not sure where to start. Many names don’t come with contact information. I want to stop this so much but like I said - I’m definitely not an activist... therefore I’m quite confused.

Expand full comment
author

Scroll down in the article. I have located many emails

Expand full comment

Overwhelming.

Expand full comment

At this stage of the game, I am certain that I do not trust the World Health Organization. For Covid, they continued to peddle inaccurate information. Plus, they were very slow to retract any inaccuracies. They were also great at helping to discredit people with questions about origin of virus, lockdowns, masking, vaccine safety and efficacy, and passports. I am also very much questioning their climate crisis scheme. I seem them as the machine of fear and propaganda. I also have less trust in the Canadian government. Yet, I am now aware that governments initiate policies through UN, W.HO. and WEF directives. I am tired of not having government for the people.

Expand full comment

Response on The WHO takeover from Senator Chuck Schumer. He is all-in as stated in this ridiculous message:

"Thank you for contacting me to express your support for H.R.79, the World Health Organization (WHO) Withdrawal Act.

The United States, through its humanitarian aid and support for international bodies such as the United Nations, has traditionally been at the forefront of global efforts to combat poverty and disease. The World Health Organization (WHO) in particular has been instrumental in battling several international outbreaks, such as the Ebola crisis in West Africa, the Zika virus in Latin America, and the COVID-19 pandemic that has impacted every corner of the globe.

At a time of tremendous global uncertainty, the US should not withdraw from world leadership. We have a long and proud tradition in this country as a shining beacon of hope, and to turn our back on that tradition would be a travesty. To reduce funding for these vital health programs would seriously affect the safety, prosperity and health of the United States and the world-therefore, I will do everything in my power to support them.

As you know, H.R.79 was introduced by Congressman Andy Biggs on January 9, 2023. This legislation would direct the President to withdraw the United States from WHO and repeal the original legislation that authorized the US to join the organization. Additionally, H.R.79 would prohibit the use of federal funds for US membership in WHO. This bill is currently being reviewed by the House Foreign Affairs Committee and I will continue to monitor its progress closely as it makes its way through Congress.

Again, thank you for contacting me. Please keep in touch with your thoughts and opinions.

Sincerely,

Charles E. Schumer

United States Senator"

Expand full comment

They lie as they breathe. The World Health Organization (WHO) in particular has been instrumental in several international outbreaks, such as the Ebola crisis in West Africa, the Zika virus in Latin America, and the COVID-19 pandemic that has impacted every corner of the globe. Yes, remove battling ... they caused all of these one way or the other.

Expand full comment

James Roguski writes:

"END THE SECRECY"

.

Hello James - you are exposing GREAT COURAGE here - as for THAT SAME IDEA, to "END THE SECRECY", your President John F. Kennedy was killed by your criminal CIA in 1963, and the American Government criminals are keeping SECRET all those bitter FACTS for 60 years now!

.

HERE this famous speech of President John F. Kennedy to the American Newspaper Publishers Association in the Waldorf Astoria Hotel on April 27th, 1961 - that cost JFK his life - when he was murdered by so called American "intelligence", which in reality is American PSYCHOSIS, that outsources "security" to the REAL CRIMINALS & REAL PSYCHOPATH's like the CIA, that live on perpetual LIES & STEALTH CRIMES . . . !

http://grundrechtsschutzinitiative.de/95e5cd090ea0d0fabb01134df77f3aa6_J%20F%20Kennedy%20Rede%2027%20Apr%201961.pdf

https://www.jfklibrary.org/archives/other-resources/john-f-kennedy-speeches/american-newspaper-publishers-association-19610427

.

My opinion:

DEMOCRACY & SECRECY are completely OPPOSITE positions - like left or right, hot or cold, honest or criminal - so the American SECRECY is in my reality that REAL INTERNAL TERRORISM, that is killing the American dream of "We The People" NOT any more living in a FREE DEMOCRACY . . . !

Expand full comment

James, I watched the meetig quite a bit. Soporific! Only 2 countries were a bit critical of the documents so far? But something doesn't add up. Tunesia said: 'This is supported by all the stakehlders.' What Stakeholders? Aren't we Stakeholders? We are customers? And we are not happy with their products? They dn't work? And we are not included as stakeholders in the negotiations? Definitions of stakeholders:

What Is a Stakeholder?

A stakeholder is either an individual, group or organization that’s impacted by the outcome of a project or a business venture. Stakeholders have an interest in the success of the project and can be within or outside the organization that’s sponsoring the project. Stakeholders are important because they can have a positive or negative influence on the project with their decisions. There are also critical or key stakeholders, whose support is needed for the project to exist.

2. External Stakeholders

External stakeholders are outside of the organization and are indirectly impacted by the project. They’re influenced by the organization’s work but are not employees of the organization. These people can be suppliers, customers, creditors, clients, intermediaries, competitors, society, government and more.

* Customers: These stakeholders want the product or service that the project delivers and they expect it to be of quality and contain value.

from:https: //www.projectmanager.com/blog/what-is-a-stakeholder

Does that mean we can ALL refuse everything The WHO proposes?!!

Expand full comment
author

I understand. However, technically, a stakeholder is anyone who impacts or is impacted by an organization's actions or products.

We will have to find something / somehow to topple them!

Expand full comment

I assume their definition of "stakeholder" means, "paying player", not the general riff-raff like us.

Expand full comment

Dear Olde Edo, is there a law which states that their definition of Stakeholder is the ultimate lawful definition of Stakeholder? Where is that law? I can't find it? Am I wrong?

Expand full comment

I believe you are correct, based on the legal definition. But given the way the WHO is operating in great secrecy to pass what anyone would objectively understand to be a blatant overreach of their original mandate, to the detriment of the sovereign integrity of the affected countries and their citizens, I find it hard to believe that they are actually interested in honoring the genuine meaning of "stakeholder". The contractual framework under which the WHO operates specifies that they can freely revise their terms of contract, and after a defined period of time, such changes will automatically go into effect for all member nations except for any nations that decide to explicitly opt out of the changed content by officially registering such intention through the representatives of such nations during the defined period of time for such action, in this case, 6 months after the content of the changes has been finalized.

No national congress or parliament etc. is required to review and explicitly approve the changes for them to go into effect, it is only required that no intention to opt out of such changes be expressed during the allotted time period. In other words, do nothing, and the changes are accepted. This puts local politicians off the hook, if they try to claim ignorance and blame the WHO while complaining that their hands are tied. Very sneaky and sinister, and thus my suspicion that they don't care about any stakeholders who are not monetarily supporting the WHO.

Expand full comment

What do you suggest we should do then?

Expand full comment

Here, briefly, is my suggestion:

Read James Roguski's Substack entries and educate yourself and be able to inform others about the situation. Then actively petition your elected governmental representatives about the issue and how important it is to you, and how their response to the situation will affect their prospects for reelection.

Roguski offers many practical suggestions and even button-push methods for contacting and "politely nagging" your public servants in Congress and locally.

Expand full comment

Dear Olde, I follow Roguski. I have been nagging my ministers to pieces. My question is and remains, how come a group of rich people can decide for themselves, out of the blue, who the stakeholders are? MY QUESTION IS: Can we not do the same then? We are or can be stakeholders within a healthy society set up by US and it is binding that people who do not abide to that stay out of it and won't be stakeholders. Do you see what I am trying to say? We are not the stakeholders for them BUT WE ARE THE LAYER THAT IS USED FOR THEM TO FEED ON! How much more abuse do we have to take? To me societies are ready to split in two. Is there any other option? THAT IS WHAT I AM TRYING TO SAY!

Expand full comment

It is not just secrecy, the language itself has been weaponized to hide truth. Conspiracy theory and antisemitism are examples of weaponized language. Also anti-vaxxer and climate denier. And terms like racist. Who are the most racist people on Earth? Who has the most restrictive immigration policy, but promotes immigration to white cultures to promote multiculturalism? Don't say it, you will be labeled antisemetic.

Expand full comment

HOW ABOUT BIDEN TELLING GRADS AT HOWARD U. THAT THE BIGGEST THREAT TO AMERICA IS WHITE SUPREMACY.IF THAT WAS NOT INTENDED TO CAUSE A RACE WAR; THEN WHAT WAS IT?

Expand full comment

Yes, like, what the heck is wrong with this guy? Such a creep.

Expand full comment

You are aware Biden is on record in a video stating he is a Zionist, right?

Expand full comment

HE & HIS WIFE ARE DIVOUT CATHOLICS.HE IS ON BOARD FOR ABORTION & THEIR DAUGHTER IS A LESBIAN.BUT THEY ARE STILL GOING TO HEAVEN.I WAS BRAINWASHED CATHOLIC (NOW ATHEIST) & THATS NOT THE WAY IT WORKS.THEY LIE CHEAT & STEAL, BUT ACT HOLY.B S I AINT BUYING IT.

Expand full comment

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ou8kcOrI0gJO/ via BitChute

This 12 hour documentary will help you erase the brainwashing perpetrated against the world since before WW1.

Expand full comment

IN THE 60'S HE SAID HE WOULD NOT LET HIS KIDS GO TO SCHOOL IN THE JUNGLE.

Expand full comment

Whatever it takes to keep the money rolling in...

Expand full comment

Thank you James for such important job n info you do for us!!

I think people who are suffering of jabs consequences n losses should apply to the rich WHO for refunds, even nations health insurances should!

Expand full comment

Only money counts for them, so hit them where it hurts...

Expand full comment
Jun 12, 2023Liked by James Roguski

Thank you James!!!

Expand full comment

Whilst Americans have been extremely mangled by the machine, they now evolve into healthy and angry resistances. This is what America was and is about. They scream for the abolishing of the vaccines and the BioTech. In Europe unfortunately, it's another story; The WHO and the European Community are lovers! And Belgium is the biggest cocksucker of them all. (I understand why I have had one hideous reply from my government pleading to exit The Who. (I think I wrote something like 10 friendly, constructive, clear emails to them about The Who and Why Quit them)). 'Despite the unprecedented events of the pandemic, Belgium quickly established itself as a global leader in the development, production, and distribution of coronavirus treatments and vaccines. It's home to some of the biggest pharmaceutical giants, including Pfizer, Janssen Pharmaceutica, GSK, and Plasma Industries.

These factors, together with Belgium's strategic location, above-average patent approval rate, and attractive tax benefits, make the country a biotech hotspot'.

Biotech is Booming...Belgium's biotech industry is doing exceptionally well. The country has garnered international interest since the pandemic, establishing itself as a key player in developing, producing, and distributing coronavirus treatments and vaccines.

The EU introduced the Pharmaceutical Strategy for Europe in 2020, which aims to ensure a robust, competitive, and fair life sciences industry that delivers healthcare products timeously, even during a crisis. Belgian policymakers echo these sentiments, having launched various regulatory initiatives to:

* Optimize procedures for accelerated access to innovative therapies

* Accelerate access to Advanced Therapeutic Medicinal Products (ATMPs)

* Integrate telemedicine into Belgium's healthcare system

In 2021, the EU Regulation 2017/745 on medical devices came into effect. It seeks to reinforce pre-market product control and post-market monitoring, combat counterfeiting, and facilitate the recall of defective devices. (Some of this info I found on: https://www.mondaq.com/healthcare/1251462/the-economic-climate-of-belgiums-biotech-industry-in-2022

This all is a war / money machine completely removed from the beautiful, elegant and intelligent core of life itself. To be fair, sometimes I panic.

And Hello from Belgium!

Sad Smiley...

Expand full comment

Romans 8:38,39 ♥️💔❤️‍🩹

Expand full comment

Everyone needs to call or write House Representatives to demand H.R. 79 is passed to get us out of the WHO...a good number of representatives are co-sponsoring it. Also, H.R.343 needs to pass...no more using American taxpayer dollars to financially support the WHO Our Constitution states that our tax monies are not to go to foreign countries or entities. They are to be used for our infrastructure, our military and our own domestic needs.

Expand full comment

James Roguski is warning about Censorship in the WHO Pandemic Treaty, Article 18 -

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/censorship?utm_source=substack&utm_

CALL TO ALL AMERICANS - Contact Your Congressman to "Exit The WHO" - All info. and contact numbers are on the James Roguski Substack site - https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/exit-the-who?utm_source=substack&utm

A core group of 18 House Reps from both major Parties recently gave a Press Conference. They are calling themselves “The Sovereignty Coalition” and they are supporting Bill HR 79 – The Exit The Who Bill. They have given short speeches and these can be viewed on James Roguski’s Substack – https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/sovereignty-coalition-press-conference?utm_source=substack&utm_

The Main Page for The Sovereignty Coalition is here – https://sovereigntycoalition.org/ There is an option for Foreign Supporters to sign their Declaration to Get Out of The WHO, at the bottom of their Main Page. There is lots of WHO info. on the James Roguski Substack Archives.

Expand full comment

DONALD DEFUNDED W.H.O. .AS SOON AS THE DEMS TOOK OVER THEY GAVE THEM BACK FUNDING FOR THEIR AXIS OF EVIL

DEATH AGENDA.

Expand full comment

Is there ANY other way except a formal departure from the WHO to stop the global digital vaccination passport Tedros the terrorist announced last week? What else can people do in the interim James?

https://open.substack.com/pub/actionabletruth/p/global-digital-covid-19-vaccination-certificate

Expand full comment
author

AWARENESS is the first step...

http://RejectDigitalEnslavement.com

Expand full comment

Agree 100% and am doing my best on that front. What's the step after that?

Expand full comment

I would follow James Roguski's suggestions to petition your gov't representatives, 1. to educate them about the matter, and 2. to CLEARLY express that this matter is so important to their electorate that it will influence their prospects for reelection.

You saw how these so-called "public servants" gleefully jumped at the chance to wield power to suppress we the people through unscientific, medically unsound lockdowns, vaccine mandates, pointless masks etc. etc. Unfortunately, the kind of power that politicians can wield attracts many psychopaths to run for office, and the best interests of anyone but themselves hardly enters their minds. But losing the next election will deprive them of the generous contributions from lobbyists, income from influence peddling, insider trading etc., which WILL get their attention.

Roguski's carefully explained and implemented methods of "politely nagging" our political representatives are absolutely invaluable, and perhaps our best chance to effect meaningful results.

Expand full comment