44 Comments

This is the letter I received from Senator Jeff Merkley. It does not appear that he has read the proposals and instead is spouting the party politic.In response to your message about the World Health Organization

Inbox

Senator Jeff Merkley

Tue, Jan 16, 8:49 AM (1 day ago)

to me

Oregon's Senator Jeff Merkley

Dear Diane,

Thank you for contacting me to share your concern about amendments proposed by the United States to the World Health Organization’s (WHO) International Health Regulations. I appreciate hearing from you.

The Biden administration proposed several amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations, the current legal framework used to detect and respond to emerging disease threats by the World Health Organization (WHO), the specialized UN agency responsible for international public health. The amendments aim to strengthen global pandemic preparedness, response, and information sharing by establishing clear criteria and timelines for countries to notify the WHO of disease outbreaks within their borders.

I have heard from a number of Oregonians who are concerned that the proposed amendments risk a significant expansion of the WHO’s authority over the United States’ public health policy. Others have voiced concern about the lack of oversight and participation by the U.S. public in the amendment process, namely that the amendments are not subject to approval by U.S. Congress.

As we have painfully learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, outbreaks that begin in other countries will not stay there and global cooperation is essential for protecting Americans’ health and safety here at home. It is in our best interest that other countries be expected to meet high standards for detecting and containing new disease outbreaks and sharing information with the WHO early.

As the leading international public health agency, the WHO is uniquely positioned to share scientific data, coordinate research priorities, and accelerate the development of treatments and vaccines at global scale. Ensuring the WHO is equipped with the authority and resources it needs to respond to pandemics more effectively will only advance U.S. prosperity and security in the long term. At the same time, such reforms must be taken with an eye toward reinforcing the WHO’s objectivity and independence.

Please know that as a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I am monitoring the WHO’s global health response closely. Thank you, again, for writing to me. I hope you continue to share your views and ideas about the issues that matter most to you.

All my best,

Jeffrey A. Merkley

United States Senator

Expand full comment

RE: Art 55 of the IHR mentions the Member States. But on this occasion the amendements are held by the Working Group for the IHR . They are a different entity from teh Member States and thus the Rt does not apply to them. This is the reason given by the legal expert or whoever as to why Jan 27th does not apply to them. And they rule World wide Public Health policy . WE do not need to travel far and wide to claim they are usurping a function that should not even exist till each State regain thei monetary sovreignity

Expand full comment

Monica: this report was on Corona Investigative Committee some time ago. The speaker was a leader of a progressive Danish political party I think, opposing the covid agenda at the time. Without searching the CIC archives, which is too time consuming, I cannot give you more details ATM. A similar report surfaced recently from Romania I think, where persistent citizen opposition apparently led to government back down on covid measures. Christian Tehres, a Romanian member of the EU parliament, is on record as having stated in a speech in the EU parliament in September 21, that the coronavirus experimental vaccines are not safe. There may even have been a Romanian conference recently, hosting alternative experts opposing the official narrative. There certainly were such conferences in Iceland, Sweden and the UK parliament, covered on Doors to Freedom, Due Diligence and Art, Pierre Korey's and other substacks.

Expand full comment

This and what the Fed is planning on doing is sneaking under the radar. Keep us informed.

Expand full comment

Just curious ...

Could you please explain the logic of LogicZombie.

Thank you.

Expand full comment

Many are now clearly aware of the real situation.

However, there is always hope.

Apparently Danish activists at least contributed to, if not caused, the Danish government to back down on vaccine mandates, by focusing on the associated risks.

There is evidence, of this strategy being effective elsewhere too, to further desired goals.

Politicians are risk adverse.

At present it it risky, to rock the political powerboat, antagonising those at the helm.

However, the point can be forcefully made, that those who continue to support proven WHO led crimes against humanity, risk criminal liability and very serious possible future outcomes.

Some of us have changed our input, to focus on the real risks involved for politicians, who choose to remain on board the WHO pirate ship regardless.

We are firing warning shots, hopefully unsettling and upsetting, both captains and crew.

Perhaps as they carelessly sip their champagne, fully assured of victory, they will begin to question if they will survive to enjoy their anticipated ill-gotten rewards.

We are acting, according to the rules of engagement in international warfare, hopefully consistent with the Roguski Politeness Bureau (RPB) protocols, or otherwise off the RPB radar.

Expand full comment

Thank you for all the great work you do. I don't think any member of Congress should be allowed to hold dual citizenship. Maybe a petition to all members to create such a law would be a good idea?

Thanks,

Bo

Expand full comment

Wonderful. A correction: in the "Top Ten Reasons" document, please change #1, line 5, from "it's" to "its."

Expand full comment

James, Thank you for your research on the WHO & the steps they have & are taking.

HOWEVER, our fake 'money' (Greek 'mnemosis' = 'memory') OLIGARCH commanded & controlled institutional fake Finance, Media, Religion, Education, Military-Industrial, Legislative, Judicial, Pharma-med, Agriculture system is totally captured. Like 70% of the commenters below, we should no longer uniquely believe-in, lobby, protest, appeal-to or false-economy feed such centralized 'exogenous' (Latin 'other-generated') colonial parasite entities. Yet, how do people organize & rely upon our own strengths & devices? https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy

ALIGNING WITH TRUE 'RELATIONAL-ECONOMY' (Gk 'oikos' = 'home' + 'namein' = 'care-&-nurture')

All humanity's worldwide 'indigenous' (L. 'self-generating') ancestors & First Nations, cultivate local cultural economy 'fractals' ('fraction, multiplier, building-block, where-the-part-contains-the-whole'). These fractals start with the ~100 (50-150) Multihome-Dwelling-Complex (eg. Longhouse-apartment, Pueblo-townhouse & Kanata-village, where intimate, intergenerational, female-male, interdisciplinary, critical-mass, economies-of-scale collaboration thrives with both privacy & proximity. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy/1-extending-our-welcome-participatory-multihome-cohousing

TRANSFORMATIVE EXAMPLE The basis of India's 1947 'Swaraj' (Hindi 'self-rule') is the 'Swadeshi' (H. 'indigenous' aka 'self-sufficiency') movement adopted & exemplified by Mohandas Gandhi in ~1917. Swadeshi focused organization in local mixed Polyculture-Orchard food, spinning cloth (India's spinning-wheel flag), making Khadi clothing, Ayurvedic Medicine, Ashram (~100 person) Multihome & Village Circular-Economies, local production of sea-Salt & much more. Realizing that British empire courts, parliaments, economy, military, industry etc are all captured, Swadeshi adherents went to these economic roots in order to supplant & bypass empire parasites. India mobilized its economic talents & met many essential goods & services needs, by the time just 5% of the foreign empire parasite economy had been displaced. Consequentially, many 100s of British, American, Canadian, Australian & other parasite inefficient companies went bankrupt.

ALIGNING WITH THE WAY WE ARE

Today 70% of people live in MULTIHOMES within an average of 32 dwelling-units & ~100 people. 20% of Multihome dwellers are extended families, living intentionally with privacy & proximity for social & economic concertation. On Turtle-Island / N. America, Multihome-extended families are the largest most individually appropriate care & medical service entities, providing some 2 trillion dollars of health, lifestyle, employment & other services per year. Because of intra-family & community dialogue, Multihome, Extended family neighbourhoods & districts have the lowest uptake of mRNA & other iatrogenic (sickness produced by institutional medicine) medicine & procedures. Government, Institutions, Medicine & Education are so institutionally brainwashed, they can not conceive in these distributed decentralized but critical-mass economy cultural fractal terms & provide no significant collaborative supports to Extended family labours.

Those wishing to organize & provide for local sovereign medical services & cultivate existing local talents, professions & strengths for creating territory outside Oligarch command & controls are welcome to join with the world's real largest economies, as well as our community & web-based neighbourhood software efforts in the Sustainable Development Association & www.indigenecommunity.info

DO-WE-KNOW-WHO-WE-ARE-? http://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/d-participatory-structure/9-do-we-know-who-we-are web Community-Circular-Economy software:

A) CATALOGUE talents https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/a-home/7-membership

B) MAP local proximal collaborative relations for complementary economic concertation. Example: Baseline mapping of 105 Mohawk, Wendat & Algonquian Placenames in Tiohtiake, greater Montreal archipelago https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/a-home/5-tiohtiake-mohawk-placenames

C) ACCOUNT collective contributions, buying, selling & co-investment. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/c-relational-economy

D) COUNCIL PROCESS Both-sided, Equal-time, Recorded & Shared Dialogues as described with web-link above. All humanity’s ancient CIRCLE-of-LIFE, provides checks & balances for loving life functions over many 10s of 1000s of years of vibrant, abundant, distributed wealth in loving societies. https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/a-home/3-indigenous-circle-of-life

Expand full comment

Incredible content and resource. Thank you for your diligence and efforts.

Expand full comment
Jan 2·edited Jan 2

EXTREMELY good video.....Everyone must watch it. We need to DEFUND and EXIT the WHO/UN now, not later. Let your senators/congressmen KNOW this information. Tell them to find and retract the laws made in years previously, in order to support the fraudemic/NWO wanna to be takeover

Expand full comment

You can’t negotiate with terrorists, remember? Don’t fool yourselves---there’s no negotiation going on with ANY of this. The US congress and senate are 100% on board with any and all globalists takeover plans and they know exactly how to profit by this. They want it and there’s not a thing you can do to stop it. Stop dignifying the charade of negotiations with the vile filth who repeatedly demonstrate their hatred of our country.

Look up and see the chemtrails for God’s sake. They spew hundreds of tons of toxic poison pesticides (we ARE the pests by the way) every day. Slow kill poison just like the vaccines. And we think they are negotiating with us? Please.

Turn them all out of office at the voting booth in November or they are going to take everything we own and kill us all. They are well underway already. Convince me I’m wrong. Know what you’re going to do when they come down your driveway.

Expand full comment

Regarding Article 55 Amendments:

Is anyone aware of a clause or other term utilized to mean the same in any of the interlocking structures, foundational documents and all documents emanating therefrom, i.e. United Nations, Treaty, World Health Organization, etc., that would permit utilization of emergency and/or other powers and authorities to bypass the 4 month timed performance or non-performance?

Are we to believe that the entire modern world followed the same script in 2020, i.e. followed these interlocking structures, dictates, yet these amendments in alleged law and form would completely gut our assumed rights [only privileges at this point in fact] and be more coordinated than in 2020?

Could the 4 month time clause be a distraction to make us think it will not pass and that alleged representatives are looking out for us?

Expand full comment

The WHO is just the logical progression of hamiltonianism. https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/hamiltons-betrayal/

Expand full comment