125 Comments

In the mean time they are preparing the next PLANDEMIC.

https://rforresistance.files.wordpress.com/2023/03/the-spars-pandemic-2025-2028-a-futuristic-scenario-to-facilitate.pdf

https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2022/12/13/catastrophic-contagion-the-next-plandemic/

The way it works is:

- they have their infiltrated agents in every governments (WEF young global leaders or other types of organizations like CFR, Bilderberg, Gates foundation etc...).

- Their operatives push for these amendments without public scrutiny most of time

- Unelected, unaccountable 'representatives' are sent to the WHO meetings. In general they represent only private vested interests and are there to push these amendments through.

- 'Negotiations' are done for the show, throwing so many bad amendments that after eliminating the worst ones, the WHO and the globalists still get what they want: an organization and 'treaties' superseding our sovereignty, digital id's, removal of natural rights, etc..

The WHO is the only UN branch which has a 'constitution'. Why ? Because their goal is to impose a one world dictatorship that they dare to call a 'government'.

They might actually launch their new PLANDEMIC when the 'negotiations' are over to implement their agenda of mass forced jabbing, digital surveillance and enslavement.

It should be noted that the USA like other western countries is being filled with 5G infrastructure which will permit massive, permanent surveillance and control added to constant harmful radiations (like living inside a microwave oven).

It is linked to the UN agenda 2030, so-called 'sustainable goals' and the climate change fraud. They use health & the climate hoax to try to enslave us and grab all our planet resources.

The WHO is just one Trojan horse among others.

Expand full comment

James, you've been doing a great job so I hate to nitpick, but I've been trying to send people to ExitTheWHO.com in my tweets etc. However, I think two things would make this more effective:

1. A person has to scroll for a long time to get to the "Take Action" part of the website. Most people don't want to read or watch all the info you provide and may simply become impatient and leave the site before clicking. (sorry. That's the reality). If you had a 2 or 3 sentence summary of why we should exit the WHO as soon as one enters the website and then a link, many would go straight to that. After all, they probably got to the website by doing something like reading a tweet/article suggesting leaving the WHO, so they're already at least partly on board. And the name of the site indicates the same thing.

For those who want more info, you can say "want more information? Read below." and provide the extra info there, giving a second link for action after the additional reading material for those who wanted that.

Or you might want to try what the Children's health defense fund did (you cite their link also) They have explanatory info in a column next to the link for action. Again, a person immediately sees the link which will allow them to take action RIGHT AWAY. They can read why they should do it in a column next to it, but many will be sold before they read everything and just want to get on with the clicking.

2. When I post your link in twitter, I get a full picture of you with a button saying "subscribe." I am afraid that that makes my link look suspect, like it's really just an ad for your site rather than a call to urgent citizien's action. I actually write "you don't have to subscribe, just click to get inside, scroll and click on the link." As you can see, this is long and awkward (esp. bad on twitter) If there is a way for that not to happen when I post the link, or a different link to use, I would appreciate it.

Expand full comment

The Big MWGFD- Online Symposium titled “Gene-based “vaccines” /COVID vaccination – the pharmaceutical crime of the century?” will take place on Tuesday, February 28, 2023 from 6 p.m. to midnight German time (CET). Here is Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr Ronald Weikly, and Pascal Najadi with details. There is mention of the WHO Amendments by Mr. Najadi in the preliminary video. The topic of the WHO will be discussed at the Symposium - https://drtrozzi.org/2023/02/27/crime-of-the-century-revealed-by-bhakdi-and-others/

Expand full comment

Observers ; Knights of Malta, Holy See, don't forget all these royalies are knights of malta and they are running the Holy See, never forget the papal bloodlines our real enemy , they are the black nobility together with their bankers court jews.

Expand full comment

As I mentioned before and many alternative medias laughed at me saying this is misinformation

the Glucksburg of Denmark are patrons of the WHO.

https://www.who.int/europe/about-us/partnerships/patron

All those stakeholders mentioned by James have royalty hiding behind. I am exposing them one by one.

Expand full comment

This is interesting, I received a response about the IHR WHO by a Rep. Daniel Webster it reads as follows: February 24, 2023

Dear Yolanda,

Thank you for contacting me regarding the World Health Organization (WHO) Pandemic Response Treaty.

I share your strong skepticism about the WHO and I supported President Trump’s decision to suspend U.S. financial support to the WHO given its mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic. The amendments under consideration before their Health Assembly were originally developed under President Trump as his administration sought to push back on China's lack of transparency around COVID and the Communist Party of China (CCP) hiding data on COVID from the world. Nothing in these proposed amendments changes or supersedes the U.S. Constitution or our national sovereignty to write and enact our own laws.

Ensuring that the WHO was impartial and transparent was a priority for President Trump. The WHO rightly faced criticism for believing and repeating the CCP’s false claims and not providing information on the COVID-19 sooner. The CCP refused to allow an impartial investigation into COVID’s origins and undermined the review by the WHO. Because of these failures, I recently joined my Republican colleagues sending a letter to the Biden Administration calling for the U.S. to withdrawal from the WHO, and requested documents and communications between the administration and WHO.

While I believe it is important to improve transparency, I will never support policies that undermine U.S. sovereignty or dilutes Congressional authority. I have consistently advocated that Congress take back Constitutional authority they have given away to the Executive Branch.

I am opposed to other amendments proposed by the Biden Administration that would create a “Compliance Committee” and grant the Director-General of the WHO to develop temporary recommendations regarding trade policy. This is the Biden Administration seeking to defer economic policy to an international governing body.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact me. To stay updated on what’s happening in Washington, sign up for my weekly Webster Wire. Thank you for allowing me to serve as your U.S. Representative.

Your servant,

Daniel Webster

Member of Congress

P.S. If you are having difficulty with a federal agency, my office would be happy to look into your situation.

Please visit http://webster.house.gov or call 352-241-9220.

Mr. Webster is not my Rep but he should read the US Supreme Court cases of Missouri vs Holland and the United States vs Belmont, so we shall see.

Expand full comment

Yolanda,

Thank you so much for sharing this with me. I would greatly appreciate it if you could forward his email to me at james.roguski@gmail.com That is very encouraging.

I am searching to see if I can find the letter.

Please ask Representative Daniel Webster to provide the letter that he says he and his Republican colleagues send to Biden. Please review the following... http://ExitTheWHO.com

Expand full comment

The Big MWGFD- Online Symposium titled “Gene-based “vaccines” /COVID vaccination – the pharmaceutical crime of the century?” will take place on Tuesday, February 28, 2023 from 6 p.m. to midnight German time (CET). Here is Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr Ronald Weikly, and Pascal Najadi with details. There is mention of the WHO Amendments by Mr. Najadi in the preliminary video. The topic of the WHO will be discussed at the Symposium - https://drtrozzi.org/2023/02/27/crime-of-the-century-revealed-by-bhakdi-and-others/

Expand full comment

Peggy Hall says that the US is NOT giving its sovereignty to the WHO

https://www.youtube.com/live/sLRKFxX9bp0?feature=share

Expand full comment

It is a wolf in sheep's clothing.

Expand full comment

Everyone has an opinion. The facts, documents and evidence say otherwise.

Expand full comment

Has anyone received responses from US Senators or US Congress and your very own Reps? The Defund the WHO Act...I have been receiving a bundle of responses.

Expand full comment

If you didn't already can you please forward them to James please.

Thanks.

Expand full comment

This just in: 100% of vaccine deaths reported to the U.S. CDC were caused by 5% of the batches, and the majority of those batches were sent to "red" (republican) states: https://expose-news.com/2023/02/19/cdc-confirms-deadly-covid-vaccine-batche-sent-red-states/

Expand full comment

Hi James, Donald Trump was right to get the U.S. out of the W.H.O. Of course, the WHO was rescued by Biden. I guess you know by now that Trump was approved by our elite rulers to further divide Americans? (see 'Shadows of Power: the Council on Foreign Relations and the American Decline" by James Perloff www.jamesperloff.com )

Expand full comment

Please visit...

http://ExitTheWHO.com

Expand full comment

Trump has had to play both sides of the poker table. I think his motives were good, but he has also had to "keep 'm guessin." I do not believe he had a choice.

Expand full comment

None of this surprises me.

Expand full comment

This just out from "The Epoch Times" by the Crossroads Team and headed up by journalist Joshua Philipp "Who 's Power to Govern US Pandemics Back on Table ; Biden Launches Sweeping "Equity" Programs" - Feb. 21, 2023

https://www.theepochtimes.com/whos-power-to-govern-us-pandemics-back-on-the-table-biden-launches-sweeping-equity-programs_5071392.html?utm_source=MB_article_paid&src

Expand full comment

Another comment/question: The 10 reasons why we should exit the WHO listed in the Call to Action website (at least the one-click one) doesn't, as far as I recall, mention what I think is the biggest reason to leave the WHO - The loss of our SOVEREIGNTY. You have one point called "power grab" but it doesn't spell out the fact that there is something OUTRAGEOUS about a nation just handing over its sovereignty to a bunch of unelected people on the other side of the world. I don't know if it's unreasonable for me to suggest a bit of a re-write, but I find sovereignty a very compelling issue, so if you have the time, you might want to think about doing a little re-writing.

Expand full comment

This has all been tried before. American President Wilson tried to sell America out with his proposal for "The League of Nations" following WW1. The Republican Party of the day stopped the ploy citing that it would violate American SOVEREIGNTY. "The League of Nations" is the model for the present day UN.

Expand full comment

Yes, but now we are part of the UN, which undercuts your argument, if you are saying that these efforts are failing. They failed with the League of Nations, but succeeded with the UN, which is essentially the same thing. And now, we have a president that is all set to sign away our sovereignty and most of the country's citizens seem to either not know or care. By the time they find out what is going on, it may be too late.

Expand full comment

American President Calvin Coolidge was the Republican that kept the United States out of "The League of Nations". Correct me if I'm wrong?

Expand full comment

Here is a reference - "The Coolidge administration opposed the U.S. entry into the League of Nations." - https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/presidents-coolidge/

Expand full comment

Question: The Call to Action page mentions that HR79 "the Withdrawal from the WHO Act" was sponsored by a U.S. Representative. There is then a list of senators that we could ask to "co-sponsor" HR79. I'm not sure how this works. If HR79 is only sponsored in the House of Representatives, could it be passed into law by both the House and Senate, or does it have to also be co-sponsored in the Senate to ultimately be come a law?

Expand full comment

Ask the Senators to sponsor companion legislation in the Senate

Expand full comment

Yes, but if they don't, can HR79 still become law?

Expand full comment

No

Expand full comment

Is someone doing this ? I can not do this from here.

Expand full comment

Deb, you are in Canada, correct?

Expand full comment

Yes.

Expand full comment

"House Republicans to investigate COVID jab injuries, development, and mandates"

LifeSite News, journalist Joseph Summers, Feb.23, 2023 - headed by Rep. Rich McCormick

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/house-republicans-to-investigate-covid-jab-injuries-development-and-mandates/?utm_source=daily-canada-2023-02-24&utm_medium

Expand full comment

Remember the lesson of the mafia. Criminals if they can’t be, the face of power will still be able to control the people in power. The criminal elements in the world are organizing through the Internet worldwide. This is a big first step the WHO treaty . It’s going to take everything we have to keep the criminals from running the world through pandemic public health manipulation

Expand full comment

Is there any validity to this information from PolitiFact? My post from Epoch Times about the WHO treaty was flagged by Facebook for being "false" and took people to this link. If anyone has any information about this claim, please let me know.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/feb/21/instagram-posts/who-pandemic-accord-doesnt-replace-us-sovereignty/

Expand full comment

And I just read this in the article:

Like any international treaty, it may technically be legally binding, but Gostin said the draft often uses the word "should," rather than "shall" or "must," something critics have said doesn’t give the treaty any real teeth.

Notice how they casually throw in it "may technically" be legally binding. May? Do they not know? And how does the fact that it may "technically" be binding supposed to mean that it won't be binding and we won't have our sovereignty taken away? Because of course, they're such "good guys" that they wouldn't even THINK of actually taking advantage of a treaty that "may technically" be binding?!!! This is the organization that was involved in coercing countries around the world to enact horribly damaging lockdowns and coerce its people to take toxic, damaging shots with more side effects than benefits, while banning medicines that could have actually helped people. And whether it was more the WEF that did that arm twisting, they're all connected with the same characters and funders.

The sweet talking that they and politifact and the rest of the propagandists use is just like the way parents get their children into pajamas about a half hour before they put them to bed, because they can say, "this doesn't mean you'll have to go to bed! Look! When you finish changing, you can go back to playing!" True. For a half hour. Then, they have to go to bed, and the job is much easier for the parents because the kids are already in their pj's. So first, they sweet talk us into signing, and maybe for a little while things will be quiet while we "play." But then, when they think the time is right, they'll come out with the pronouncements and rules, all still couched in how they're just trying to "help" us - like they did with the lockdowns and bullying to take the shots - all,also couched in tons of sacharine, "caring" language about how much they're trying to "protect" us. Don't fall for it.

Expand full comment

I just read part of it. For starters, it says:

"Sovereignty – States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to determine and manage their approach to public health, notably pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems, pursuant to their own policies and legislation, provided that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to their peoples and other countries. Sovereignty also covers the rights of States over their biological resources."

Notice the wording "provided that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to their peoples and other contries." - Who (WHO?) decides what is "causing damage?"

For example, if the WHO decides that unvaccinated people cause the "threat" of "transmission" of a very dangerous (in the WHO's opinion) disease, then allowing people not to take whatever measures the WHO thinks would make them "safer" so that they don't spread this disease would be "causing damage" according to the WHO and they could then override that country's decision to allow these people not to take whatever "medicine" the WHO deems they need to take, or they could override that country's decision to allow these people to go out in public.

They write the nice sounding stuff first, and then slip in the "excepts" afterward, and all of the judgments as to what those "excepts" are is up to the WHO - including, according to the IHR amendments, deciding when there is a "Public Health Emergency of International Concern" within the borders of a particular nation. By the way, I think that the WHO recently said that the pandemic is STILL GOING ON. If the treaty and IHR amendments pass, then that view would mean that, for all intents and purposes, that would be the reality, because the WHO gets to DECIDE THAT REALITY FOR US.

Expand full comment

The answer to all this Bull%%t is what Canadian Chris Sky is calling "United Non-Compliance." The sweet talk nonsense is very much like the pyjama scam DF is talking about in the Post above. They have NO real power unless the unwashed masses comply. The opposition of non-compliance requires both critical thinking and spine, but it is MUCH EASIER to do now because everyone has seen the vaxx injuries and the lies. This stuff has also gone to Court. There is NO SCIENCE behind any of these mandates. 80% of the Public knows full well that this is about CONTROL using mind games and sophism.

Expand full comment

You say they have no real power, but what about military power, police power? If the US government honors this, which so far they have, then they would use their troops (which they have been vetting to weed out anyone who has a conscience or uses their own brain) to enforce whatever rules the WHO comes up with. And by the time people wake up, if they do and don't accept the BS alternate "explanations" for reality, it could already be too late to moblilize against that force. After all, in Europe, New Zealan and Australia, many large uprisings of the "masses" have been brutally quashed, and with the globalists' ownership of the media, others don't know about it, so it is next to impossible to combat without a miracle (which many of us hope for). Yet in the meantime, if this is true, an article in the dailyskeptic claimed that over 50% of Britons WANT digital ID's. Why? Because it's a bit more convenient, I guess. Does the complete Big Brother control over the population worry these people? According to the study (if it is real), no.

Expand full comment

Please remember that 9/10 of the people who left Egypt under the stewardship of Moses, were not fit to enter the Land of Israel because they had a slave mentality. The people wandered the desert for 40 years until that generation passed on. Then God allowed the next generation to enter Israel because these people "did not know Egypt". The numbers of people who are leaders are always far smaller than the numbers who are followers. I am not phased by the stuff you are telling me. Yes, I am tired of this stuff. But please remember this - all living things are alive because of a Life Force, otherwise known as the Schumann Resonance -

https://www.drskinhealth.com/blog/schumann-resonance

This frequency which is 7.83 hz, is also the frequency of the Earth. God can pull this frequency from any living thing at any time. God is 100 % in control at all times. I honestly believe we will get through this because we are reaching a tipping point in our favour. There will be massive damage, as this is WW3, but I do believe the Good will win out. Prayer is very important at the Quantuum Level. Things shift at this Level before they are "visible" to us. I leave my Bible open by my bedside and I pray often.

Expand full comment

I agree with your points. By the way, in Rabbinic tradition, 8/10 of the Jewish people in Egypt did not make it out for the same reason.

Expand full comment

What we are actually battling is a slave mentality within the general Public. The Cabal stuff is just a lever to separate out who is where on the scale, like a filter. Leaders have White Light in the Crown Chakra. You can see your Chakra using high speed photography (I have seen my photo).

But the Time for this filtration is limited. We are nearing the end of the Time period for the filtration. For the sake of the Righteous, this will all be resolved in our favour. We do not live in a world of spiritual communism.

Expand full comment

Thank you, both. I think what they unleash on us in the next "pandemic" will be so lethal that they won't have any opposition, despite the fact everyone sees now how they lied to us with COVID

Expand full comment

The next "virus" will be 5G radiation sickness which will present the same type of wishy washy symptoms as a "virus" or as the vaccinated - nose bleeding, nausea, fatigue, headache ... And of course, the new "vaccines" are ready to go. BUT, the Public has just seen this movie. We have had barely any time off for a washroom break. It will not be lethal because otherwise, they will also be affected.

Expand full comment

They may have made other arrangements to avoid the fallout, like the remote Islands the %ers have bought, and who knows what food and water sources, etc.

Expand full comment