Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Ginsburg's avatar

This is getting way too convoluted to me and I think for many others. Maybe it's time to start aiming and speaking about ONE single goal and forget about everything else:

DEPARTURE FROM THE W.H.O.

Forget about everything else.

Expand full comment
Jennifer Jones's avatar

Mr. Roguski

You may be already aware of this, but because its results could be so momentous, I feel obligated to tell you.

RFK, Jr., when asked by JJ Couey in a zoom meeting a couple of months ago, with a group including Dr. Mercola, Mikki Willis, Dr. Tenpenny, and several others, his position on whether he would Exit the WHO as President, replied that "The WHO helps many poor countries." "So, I WILL NEGOTIATE WITH THE WHO FROM WITHIN."

Also, about a month ago, in a video interview, when again asked whether he would Exit the WHO as President, again said, "I WILL NEGOTIATE WITH THE WHO FROM WITHIN TO MAKE CHANGES." He added that if, and only if, our negotiations from within the WHO were not successful, would he consider Exiting the WHO.

Very surprisingly, in her Substack within the last week, Dr. Meryl Nass, of all people, took the position in both the body and the title of her Substack, that we could/should SLOW DOWN the WHO versus Exiting the WHO, when JFK, Jr. became President. She was referring to our negotiating from within the WHO.

Several of us questioned in the Comments, her surprising SHIFT from her previous, clear position that WE MUST EXIT THE WHO, (not to mention her voluminous work in support of our exiting the WHO), to suggesting that as a Member, we could/should "slow down the WHO."

I engaged her in a somewhat lengthy dialogue in the Comments about her SHIFT in position, and whether her shift was related to RFK, Jr. and his position on the WHO. Among a number of other comments, she stated that "RFK, Jr. will do the right thing." She said that we have future opportunities in upcoming months to argue against the IHR Amendments, and to vote against them. She added that, "You just don't understand the documents."

In consternation, several us replied that the WHO will never negotiate, and words to the effect that, "That ship has already sailed," and added, "WE MUST EXIT THE WHO."

Perhaps I'm missing something, because I know of Dr. Nass's clear and strong position she expressed in her writings that WE MUST EXIT THE WHO.

I hope you will be able to take a look at this.

Expand full comment
68 more comments...

No posts