Take Action in the United Kingdom
The deadline for the heads of state throughout the world to reject the amendments to the International Health Regulations is 1 December 2023. A UK petition with 116,390 signatures has been ignored.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE UK PETITION TO EXIT THE WHO
I would like to give a “shout out” to many, many friends in the United Kingdom who are doing great work, and I would also like to help out as much as I can. Contact me directly at +1 310-619-3055 via phone, text, Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp or via Skype at james.roguski
At the beginning of August, UsForThem2020 used the Freedom of Information Act to ask the [UK] Government to reveal who is heading up each of the two UK negotiation teams working on the IHR Amendments and the parallel Pandemic Preparedness Treaty.
After initially delaying its response, the FCDO responded eventually to say that it could confirm that the lead individuals are senior civil servants but it would not otherwise reveal further details on the grounds that it could be problematic under — you guessed it — data protection law, and because revealing further details could “put at risk the safety of individuals involved”.
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/1012561/response/2426730/attach/3/FOI%202023%2014934.pdf
Yes, read that twice to be sure. The Government has said that it cannot tell the UK public which senior civil servants are charged with negotiating these legally-binding, generationally-significant international accords on behalf of the UK, because revealing their involvement could put at risk their personal safety.
This is not doxxing. This is a public official, speaking in public, on behalf of the public.
Simon Manley speaking for the United Kingdom:
“We firmly believe we need more input in this process from civil society, from the private sector and from other experts who can help us to ensure that this accord works for our citizens, in practice, in the real world.”
Simon Manley
Give Simon Manley the “more input” that he believes is needed…
https://www.gov.uk/government/people/simon-manley--2
https://uk.linkedin.com/in/simon-manley
Simon Manley Twitter account: @SimonManleyFCDO
Simon Manley Instagram account: @SimonManleyFCDO
Delegates to the 76th World Health Assembly:
https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA76/A76_DIV1-en.pdf (page 52)
A total of 116,390 citizens in the United Kingdom have already signed an official Parliamentary Petition requesting a Parliamentary debate regarding the amendments that were adopted by the 75th World Health Assembly on 27 May 2022.
This petition was closed for signatures on 3 October, 2023.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/635904
The above petition has essentially been completely ignored:
The government of the United Kingdom clearly knows about these amendments and the deadline to reject them. They have refused to even discuss them.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE UK PETITION TO EXIT THE WHO
I support the positive actions being taken by the people at TogetherDeclaration.org who are clearly aware of the upcoming 1 December 2023 deadline to reject the amendments to the International Health Regulations that WERE ADOPTED on 27 May 2022.
If you reside in the United Kingdom, please scroll down or click on the link below to take action:
SOURCE: https://togetherdeclaration.org/who-letters/
We ask you to help us lobby the Health Secretary and your Member of Parliament to put pressure on the UK Government to reject the Amendment to Article 59, which reduces the time we will have available to reject future Amendments, BEFORE 1 December 2023.
Below, please find suggested template letters you can send to the Health Secretary, Steve Barclay, and to your local Member of Parliament. If you would like to edit these and add your own thoughts, so much the better.
LETTER FOR Secretary of State for Health and Social Care – Rt Hon Steve Barclay MP
Step 1: OPEN UP A BLANK EMAIL
Open up a blank email to Steve Barclay at:
dhsc.publicenquiries@dhsc.gov.uk
Step 2: USE OR ADAPT THE FOLLOWING TEMPLATE MESSAGE
(use a subject line such as Reject Amendment 59)
Dear Mr Barclay
Re: Rejecting Amendment to Article 59 of the International Health Regulations Adopted in May 2022
You will be aware that on 31 May 2022, the delegates of the WHO World Health Assembly formally adopted five new amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005).
You will also be aware that these amendments come into force, under international law, for all member states after 24 months (31 May 2024) UNLESS they actively opt out of any of them within 18 months (30 November 2023) invoking Article 61 “If a State notifies the Director-General of its rejection of these Regulations or of an amendment thereto within the applicable period provided in paragraph 1 or 1bis of Article 59, these Regulations or the amendment concerned shall not enter into force with respect to that State…”.
Of the 5 new Amendments, there is one which I am very concerned about that will severely compromise the ability of the public to lobby politicians to reject future amendments, by reducing the time available. This is an Amendment to Article 59, which significantly reduces the time allowed for a country’s leadership to reject IHR Amendments adopted at future World Health Assemblies, from 18 months to 10 months.
We are now less than one month away from the deadline for the UK Government to reject this worrying Amendment. Failure to do so will mean that we are legally bound by this new, tighter timeframe for rejecting future amendments.
This will be problematic in the very near future, as there are around 300 Amendments to the International Health Regulations which are currently being negotiated and finalised, to be voted on in May 2024 at the 77th World Health Assembly, by the largely unknown, unelected and unaccountable delegates from each country. Adoption of these amendments will require NO UK Parliamentary scrutiny or vote.
The draft amendments that have been made public include many that pose a serious threat to human rights, and individual and national sovereignty, and which will massively increase the power and reach of the World Health Organisation (WHO). Almost no-one who is informed believes the WHO performed anything other than appallingly during Covid, with disastrous results. Yet there seems no attempt to reform this unelected, unaccountable organisation, which we British taxpayers fund in the millions. On the contrary, there is an evident drive to give it ever more power, ever more of our money, and ever less scrutiny.
Amendments that are being negotiated include:
Making WHO emergency guidance legally binding (currently ‘advisory’) on member states.
Removing the IHR clause requiring the WHO to uphold ‘full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms’ of individuals.
Empowering the WHO Director General to single-handedly to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), giving this unelected, unaccountable individual unprecedented levels of power to dictate UK public health policy and restrict fundamental human rights and freedoms.
Implementation of an International Global Health Certification system, enabling nations to enforce travel restrictions using tools such as vaccine certificates, passenger locator forms and traveller health declarations; all tied to a personal QR code.
Seeking to increase censorship of dissenting voices by mandating systematic global collaboration to counter dissent to official governmental or WHO guidance.
Taken together, the proposed amendments could empower the WHO to issue “requirements” for the UK to mandate highly restrictive measures such as lockdowns, masks, quarantines, border closures, travel restrictions, medication of individuals including vaccination, medical examinations etc, in a PHEIC declared by themselves. This constitutes an existential threat to basic human rights, medical ethics and the doctor-patient relationship, and must be opposed.
As Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, you have the authority to reject any adopted IHR amendment, to release the UK from their legal obligation to be bound by them. Please inform the WHO Director-General that the UK wishes to reject the Amendment to Article 59, reducing the time to reject future amendments from 18 months to 10 months. This simple action must be performed by 1 December 2023.
Yours sincerely
Step 3: POST ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Use or adapt the following text, tagging in Steve Barclay, Will Quince and your local MP if you can. (Note the tags below work for Twitter but may need adjusting/be unavailable on other social media platforms.)
The @WHO failed the world badly over Covid
Why would we give it more power, UK taxpayer money & even less scrutiny?
“IHR Amendments” sounds boring but contains many nasties
Proper scrutiny needed: #RejectAmendment59 @SteveBarclay
@willquince @andrewmitchmp @annietrev
LETTER FOR YOUR LOCAL Member of Parliament
Step 4: FIND YOUR LOCAL MP’s CONTACT DETAILS AND OPEN UP A BLANK EMAIL TO THEM
Find your local MP’s contact info HERE
Step 5: USE OR ADAPT THE FOLLOWING TEMPLATE MESSAGE
(Use a subject line such as Please ask Steve Barclay to Reject Amendment 59) – be sure to include your postal address so your MP knows you are a constituent
Re: Rejecting Amendment to Article 59 of the International Health Regulations Adopted in May 2022
I am writing to you as my MP and representative in Parliament, to ask for urgent action and lobbying of the Secretary of State of Health and Social Care, on my behalf, in relation to the information below.
Almost no-one who is informed believes the World Health Organization (WHO) performed anything other than appallingly during Covid, with disastrous results. Yet there seems no attempt to reform this unelected, unaccountable organisation, which British taxpayers fund in the millions. On the contrary, a drive is evident to give the totally undemocratic WHO ever more power, ever more of our money, and ever less scrutiny.
You should be aware that on 31 May 2022, the delegates of the WHO World Health Assembly formally adopted five new amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005).
You should also be aware that these amendments come into force, under international law, for all member states after 24 months (31 May 2024) UNLESS they actively opt out of any of them within 18 months (30 November 2023) invoking Article 61 “If a State notifies the Director-General of its rejection of these Regulations or of an amendment thereto within the applicable period provided in paragraph 1 or 1bis of Article 59, these Regulations or the amendment concerned shall not enter into force with respect to that State…”.
Of the five new Amendments, there is one which I am very concerned about that will severely compromise the ability of the public to lobby politicians to reject future amendments, by reducing the time available. This is an Amendment to Article 59, which significantly reduces the time allowed for a country’s leadership to reject IHR Amendments adopted at future World Health Assemblies, from 18 months to 10 months.
We are now less than one month away from the deadline for the UK Government to reject this worrying Amendment. Failure to do so will mean that we are legally bound by this new, tighter timeframe for rejecting future amendments.
This will be problematic in the very near future, as there are around 300 Amendments to the International Health Regulations which are currently being negotiated and finalised, to be voted on in May 2024 at the 77th World Health Assembly, by the largely unknown, unelected and unaccountable delegates from each country. Adoption of these amendments will require NO UK Parliamentary scrutiny or vote.
The draft amendments that have been made public include many that pose a serious threat to human rights, and individual and national sovereignty, and which will massively increase the power and reach of the WHO.
Amendments that are being negotiated include:
Making WHO emergency guidance legally binding (currently ‘advisory’) on member states.
Removing the IHR clause requiring the WHO to uphold ‘full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms’ of individuals.
Empowering the WHO Director General to single-handedly to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), giving this unelected, unaccountable individual unprecedented levels of power to dictate UK public health policy and restrict fundamental human rights and freedoms.
Implementation of an International Global Health Certification system, enabling nations to enforce travel restrictions using tools such as vaccine certificates, passenger locator forms and traveller health declarations; all tied to a personal QR code.
Seeking to increase censorship of dissenting voices by mandating systematic global collaboration to counter dissent to official governmental or WHO guidance.
Taken together, the proposed amendments could empower the WHO to issue “requirements” for the UK to mandate highly restrictive measures such as lockdowns, masks, quarantines, border closures, travel restrictions, medication of individuals including vaccination, medical examinations etc, in a PHEIC declared by themselves. This constitutes an existential threat to basic human rights, medical ethics and the doctor-patient relationship, and must be opposed.
The UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Rt Hon Steve Barclay MP, has the authority to reject any adopted IHR amendment, to release the UK from our legal obligation to be bound by them. Please lobby Mr Barclay to urgently inform the WHO Director-General that the UK wishes to reject the Amendment to Article 59, reducing the time to reject future amendments from 18 months to 10 months. This simple action must be performed by 1 December 2023.
Yours sincerely,
CLICK HERE TO SIGN THE UK PETITION TO EXIT THE WHO
RejectTheAmendments.com
CanadianPetition.com
ThePeoplesDeclaration.com
ExitTheWHO.org
ExitTheWHO.com
StopTheGlobalAgenda.com
StopTheAmendments.com
StopTheWHO.com
ScrewTheWHO.com
MaskCharade.com
RejectDigitalEnslavement.com
HealthFreedomBillOfRights.com
PreventGenocide2030.org
DoorToFreedom.org
SovereigntyCoalition.org
James Roguski
The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.
If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.
JamesRoguski.substack.com/about
JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive
310-619-3055
All content is free to all readers.
All support is deeply appreciated.
Thanks for bringing us all together James
Canada's doctor Trozzi is in danger of losing his medical license following a disciplinary hearing with the CPSO. Dr. Trozzi has worked diligently to safeguard patient and doctor freedom of choice and freedom of speech regarding Covid Protocols. There is a Public Petition in support of Dr. Trozzi -
https://citizengo.org/en-ca/ot/212245-save-dr-mark-trozzi-defend-his-medical-license-suspension?tcid=111642405