Register To Watch This Zoom Meeting
Register now to attend the Zoom meeting on Tuesday, February 24, 2026 at 7am Pacific, 8am Mountain, 9am Central, 10am Eastern, 3pm United Kingdom, 4pm Central Europe, 5pm Eastern Europe.
While people across the United States (and the world) are working to BAN geoengineering, some other people see it as an important weapon of war… oops, excuse me, I mean… “Security.”
Register now to attend this Zoom meeting:
Tuesday, February 24, 2026.
7am Pacific
8am Mountain
9am Central
10am Eastern
3pm United Kingdom
4pm Central Europe
5pm Eastern Europe
https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_0xOfXWNFTteXURGa80nObA#/registration
Can’t join live? Register to receive the recording.
Yes, this group will have your name and email address if you register to attend the Zoom meeting.
No, I am not supporting this group, nor am I affiliated with them in any way.
Will you be able to speak? Probably not.
Will you be able to ask questions? Yes. You can submit your questions in writing when you register.
Will they answer your questions? I have no idea.
This is an opportunity to listen to the opinions of others and to potentially learn something new.
Download the document below:
Solar Radiation Management (SRM)
Sunlight Reflection Methods (SRM)
https://srm360.org/primers/security/
How Might Solar Geoengineering Affect Global Security?
Join SRM360 for a live discussion on the geopolitical and security risks of climate change and solar geoengineering.
Featuring: Erin Sikorsky, Beth Chalecki, and Sofia Kabbej
Discussion:
How climate change affects global and regional security dynamics
Whether solar geoengineering could reduce some climate-driven security risks
What new security risks or geopolitical tensions solar geoengineering might introduce
https://srm360.org/person/erin-sikorsky/
https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/climate-change-on-the-battlefield-9781350407657/
https://srm360.org/person/elizabeth-chalecki/
https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/381-weaponizing-weather-the-global-security-threat-of-the-future/
https://srm360.org/person/sofia-kabbej/
Different Takes: Should SRM Be Seen as a Serious Security Issue?
https://srm360.org/perspective/should-srm-be-seen-as-a-security-issue/
SRM360.org
https://srm360.org/primers/security/
https://srm360.org/guide/why-consider-srm/
https://srm360.org/perspective/should-srm-be-seen-as-a-security-issue/
https://srm360.org/article/could-srm-be-weaponised/
https://srm360.org/article/does-international-law-prohibit-srm/
ClimateAndSecurity.org
https://climateandsecurity.org/advisory-board/





















Hi James. So solar geoengineering is the next project now? How will it affect global security? Let's see now, the geoengineering they've done to the weather has caused extreme floodings and rain as a sideeffect of the geoengineering. Has this affected the security in these countrys where the floods are? Where the rain just poors down in 20 minutes the same amount as a year of rain? Off course it has affected the security.
What could possibly go wrong? Because the "experts" and the "scientists" came up with some fucked up idea about the sun?
When are America shutting down these places where they come up with such ludacris ideas? Why are they keeping up with the chemtrails? What is the genious plan for such engineering? Why should we trust them? What have they done to earn blind loyalty and respect?
Why is it even a topic?
Regards
Bjørn Leif-oscar Liptovari
Mr. Roguski. First thank you for providing the opportunity, to view. As well, thank you for the work to collate diverse materials in your works. As for my reasoning to comment? well, for any discussion such as this coming, to be of value, a genesis of subject and the foundation are implicit and indicative of the resulting conclusion. In other words if the initial premise is skewed the resulting narrative and conclusion will be skewed by equal percentage. This is a well established maxim. Modern examples, as I am ( only 80 & change years old ):
- 1905 - The I.S.S. was founded in 1905 by Upton Sinclair, Walter Lippmann, Clarence Darrow, and Jack London. In the spring of 1921, the ISS held a vote regarding the name and goals of their organization. Harry Laidler announced:
"the members of the Intercollegiate Socialist Society had declared themselves in favor of the
change in name and purpose. In November, the organization assumed its new name: "League For Industrial Democracy" or ( L.I.D. ) and enlarged its scope to addressing society at large. They also presented their new guiding principle: "Education for a New Social Order Based on Production for Public Use and Not for Private Profit. By 1934 ( L.I.D. ) League for Industrial Democracy had student groups in 150 colleges.
- 1913 - Roscoe Pound, Saint-Simon. Socialized Law Peers/minions substitute appointed
Administrators for judicial Law. This to adjust social interests over the individual rights.
Supreme Court Justice Frankfurter spoke about “ throughgoing overturning” of society. It must be done from the outside and translated by those in office.
- 1913 - Or, as the old Red dictum goes, "Communism must be built with non-
Communist hands." To engage the non-Communist dupes in these endeavors, though,
requires rhetorical camouflage and deception. A prime example of this rhetorical treachery can be found in the judicial revolution launched in 1913 with the Conference on Legal and Social Philosophy organized by Fabian Socialists Harold Laski, John Dewey, Morris Cohen, and
Roscoe Pound. Cohen's son, Felix, later boasted that it is from this conference that "much of
the social and philosophical consciousness of modern American jurisprudence derives." Felix
Cohen openly proclaimed; It is impossible to attempt overthrow of Capitalism as an economic
system without at the same time attacking the substance of capitalist law. As well, Federal
Reserve pushed through Congress. Wilson hired, to effect this. Taft had to be defeated to inject this into American structure. Rockefeller & Morgan bought up 159 News Corporations, while J.P. Morgan financed the Roosevelt “Bull Moose” vote splitting campaign.
- 1916 - Dewey & Education 1916 - Socialist Leader John Dewey’s Textbook STILL used today,
Dewey said "dependency is a power, individuality an illness". There-upon the sane are insane,
the dependent is sane, as he needs the community. The collective is the norm.
Noting the premise of our Founding Document being the actual target here, ( unspoken ) but implicit, the obvious arrises. To the obvious: Two names among the Ice age & flooding crowd:
Al Gore & Maurice Strong - repeat: AL Gore & Maurice Strong.
https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2015R1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/49379
One must now engage the mind in a sort of Hovering "mode" : Repeating the conclusion of the Wizard of OZ - Flames Whoosh Whoosh - and the fat bald guy pulling the cord appears.
To illustrate: A private quoted statement from Climate guru Chris Folland: Quote: “The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models” Prof. - Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.
Another just for fun: concerning the deception in Climate political language. Some historical quotes to gain proper understanding of Orwells Theory of Doublespeak & Doublethink: Orwell noted:
Doublespeak: language that deliberately obscures, disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words. ( author ) this is major element of Fabian-ism, Socio-commun-ism,
Commune-itarian-ism, and then after a couple more of "Whoosh Whoosh" tyranny of the global citizenry.
Doublethink: is to know and to not know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancel out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic.
Quote: “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” — Club of Rome. Founded 1968.
Now an oblique subject, my entrance in to the pit of ( Truth ? ) drafted - 1965 after the Kennedy Assassination. If the "Whoosh Whoosh" was going to continue, Kennedy had to go. This is not debatable, and to insure everyones servile position, ( for the future ) that means you the reader this came about :
- 1963 - Kennedy is Assassinated. The invented Term: “Conspiracy Theory”- Began here
after inferior Warren Report outing. The clumsy and inaccurate Report, led to many Forensic
Historical Analysts intimation that the CIA was involved. Imagine that, "no answer an answer"
1965 - Ghosts in the Machine: by U.S. Army-psyop-division known as “mindwar”
https://vigilantcitizen.com... the-u-s-armys-psyop-division/
A Facebook version exists but scrubbed: Here is the reel number: 826882020239092
The ultimate goal of MindWar is to make people willingly do what they’re supposed to do,
while not realizing they’ve been pushed towards that decision at every step of the way.
“For the mind to believe in its own decisions, it must feel that it made those decisions without
coercion. Coercive measures used by the operative, consequently, must not be
detectable by ordinary means. There is no need to resort to mind-weakening drugs such as
those explored by the CIA; in fact the exposure of a single such method would do
unacceptable damage to MindWar’s reputation for truth.”
Authors NOTE: Reputation for truth is directly relative to ( Whose Truth ? )
In conclusion as to Climate as a fear porn tool - brilliant as to validity of the subject?
Like an abused person in a marriage, if the action goes on, the abused begins to believe.
Narrative must be continuous, and it has been since the realization by the opposition that the
Founding Documents were impeccable, and with "true" in use, a bulwark, a wall against the subordination of individuals into a society that in fact is a death sentence. For buttress of the statement I provide this:
In a 1994 article for Dissent called "The Question" -- the question being "what did you know and when did you know it" about communist atrocities -- Eugene Genovese, a historian (and Marxist) had this to say:
Our justification began to look seedy when the grand liberation featured hideous political regimes under which no sane person would want to live. It became preposterous when our project ended in the ignominious collapse of the social system that was supposed to undergird a brave new world and justify the staggering sacrifice of human life.
The horrors did not arise from perversions of radical ideology but from the ideology itself.... We have yet to answer our right-wing critics' claims, which are regrettably well documented, that throughout history, from ancient times to the peasant wars of the sixteenth century to the Reign of Terror and beyond, social movements that have espoused radical egalitarianism and participatory democracy have begun with mass murder and ended in despotism.
My implicit position after years is this: the narrative is key, not the subject - ICE Coring and Stalingrad are the foundation of "Climate deception", the rest becomes the Pied Piper leading the children, meantime the "band plays on-
Raven6 1965 - 1993 nominally - In Service to Citizen Via Oath