The deadline to REJECT the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations is July 19, 2025. I call upon leaders around the world to invoke Article 61 of the IHR and REJECT the amendments.
Here we go again. The buggers are taking our freedoms and the people don't have a clue. This makes the hair stand on the back of my neck! I saw an article the other day asking / questioning if we "really need informed consent". I'd like to know why no one ever reports on the increased TB numbers. It's alarming compared to Measles. But no one is saying a word.
Anyway- it's a big NO for me. I was unable to vote. So, my guess is, you will receive only yes votes. These organizations do not have our best interests at heart. And it's not just us, they don't care about other countries either. So- nothing personal.
I might be being a bit dim (quite possible) but I'm seeing exactly what I can do as a UK citizen, who I should write to or which petition I should sign ect.
I sent letter to Trump via the White House website. I also created a graphic to post to all my social media. I'd share here but I don't see a way to add an attachment.
“We’re undergoing a soft coup and the idea is to create a new set of laws, and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda. 70 countries are involved in this, with 50 supported by the US and the justification requires you to believe that pandemics are common and that they are caused by humans, catching diseases from animals, from what they call ‘spillover’. Fauci and Dazek have pushed this idea continuously over the last three years. Two examples, this is what Tony Fauci said, in one journal cell: ‘in a human-dominated world in which our human activities represent aggressive damaging and unbalanced interactions with nature. We will increasingly provoke new disease emergencies’. Dazek and Fauci’s two lieutenants said the same thing: ‘We must realise in our crowded world, human behaviours, environmental changes, and inadequate public health mechanisms can turn obscure animal viruses into existential human threats.’ And who is going all along with this? Basically, all the major, multinational, organisations as well as all our health authorities.
The WHO is developing, through all its nations, but with the WHO directorate in the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently embedded in the ihrs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative.
Also, we will be subject, if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in a hundred days, which the organization Sepi is planning to do and one of the people who founded Sepi was Jeremy Ferrar who is now the chief scientist at the WHO to bring this forward.
Other things that the amendments do is bind the states so there are no longer recommendations but enforceable edicts, provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from one country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of WHO can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists. He can just declare it with no standards and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can’t use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world, by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, ecosystems, are all central to health.
Also, embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.”
Thank you so much, James, for this and all you do. You are relentless and no doubt exhausted by all your efforts to protect your fellow humans from these arrogant, megalomaniacal, greedy for money and power and control globalist anti-human monsters. We all owe you a big debt of gratitude.
All countries that have trial by jury express their sovereignty through the conscientious verdict of the jurors. This is constitutional common law that is in effect all across the commonwealth. It just needs to be educated back into public consciousness!
Anything that usurps the sovereign voice of the people -jury independence - is treason.
So how do they plan to enforce this on countries that didn't submit the proper paperwork by the end date? Does WHO have some huge, independently funded, military force at their disposal? Never mind that this deadline could only apply to countries that actually belong to WHO. This clause exists for the sole purpose of allowing local politicians to claim later on "What can we do? We missed the deadline so we have to comply!"
Reject…& get us totally out of WHO & WEF..how about the YS out of the UN?? Just saying???
Here we go again. The buggers are taking our freedoms and the people don't have a clue. This makes the hair stand on the back of my neck! I saw an article the other day asking / questioning if we "really need informed consent". I'd like to know why no one ever reports on the increased TB numbers. It's alarming compared to Measles. But no one is saying a word.
Anyway- it's a big NO for me. I was unable to vote. So, my guess is, you will receive only yes votes. These organizations do not have our best interests at heart. And it's not just us, they don't care about other countries either. So- nothing personal.
I might be being a bit dim (quite possible) but I'm seeing exactly what I can do as a UK citizen, who I should write to or which petition I should sign ect.
WHITE HOUSE phone #: 1(202)456-1111, leave a message
re: IHR ammendment
Same message as Paola !!!
The REJECT button doesn't work!!!! Please fix. We're running out of time.
Reject amendments button doesn't work
I sent letter to Trump via the White House website. I also created a graphic to post to all my social media. I'd share here but I don't see a way to add an attachment.
https://rumble.com/v3bjn30-dr-meryl-nass-at-european-parliament-on-who-takeover.html?ysclid=mctlbiqrf4903407241
Dr Meryl Nass at European Parliament On WHO Takeover
5:53 video runtime
HealingEarth
Transcript source:
https://maricamicallef.com/2023/08/dr-meryl-nass-about-the-who-pandemic-treaty-during-third-international-covid-summit-in-the-european-parliament/
“We’re undergoing a soft coup and the idea is to create a new set of laws, and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda. 70 countries are involved in this, with 50 supported by the US and the justification requires you to believe that pandemics are common and that they are caused by humans, catching diseases from animals, from what they call ‘spillover’. Fauci and Dazek have pushed this idea continuously over the last three years. Two examples, this is what Tony Fauci said, in one journal cell: ‘in a human-dominated world in which our human activities represent aggressive damaging and unbalanced interactions with nature. We will increasingly provoke new disease emergencies’. Dazek and Fauci’s two lieutenants said the same thing: ‘We must realise in our crowded world, human behaviours, environmental changes, and inadequate public health mechanisms can turn obscure animal viruses into existential human threats.’ And who is going all along with this? Basically, all the major, multinational, organisations as well as all our health authorities.
The WHO is developing, through all its nations, but with the WHO directorate in the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently embedded in the ihrs, will enforce surveillance, censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative.
Also, we will be subject, if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in a hundred days, which the organization Sepi is planning to do and one of the people who founded Sepi was Jeremy Ferrar who is now the chief scientist at the WHO to bring this forward.
Other things that the amendments do is bind the states so there are no longer recommendations but enforceable edicts, provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from one country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of WHO can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists. He can just declare it with no standards and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also, the WHO will tell you what drugs you can and can’t use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO with these documents to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world, by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, ecosystems, are all central to health.
Also, embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.”
I don't want apps, so no.
Thank you so much, James, for this and all you do. You are relentless and no doubt exhausted by all your efforts to protect your fellow humans from these arrogant, megalomaniacal, greedy for money and power and control globalist anti-human monsters. We all owe you a big debt of gratitude.
Noor Bin Laden is an amazing woman!
Critical test here for Trump. If he doesn’t pass it we’re in Big trouble sooner rather than later.
Leave a comment on Lara Trump's youtube.
All countries that have trial by jury express their sovereignty through the conscientious verdict of the jurors. This is constitutional common law that is in effect all across the commonwealth. It just needs to be educated back into public consciousness!
Anything that usurps the sovereign voice of the people -jury independence - is treason.
Despite receiving a Substack verification code I still can't vote vs the IHR Amendments -- Why not?
J. Pride
Were you able to?
So how do they plan to enforce this on countries that didn't submit the proper paperwork by the end date? Does WHO have some huge, independently funded, military force at their disposal? Never mind that this deadline could only apply to countries that actually belong to WHO. This clause exists for the sole purpose of allowing local politicians to claim later on "What can we do? We missed the deadline so we have to comply!"
That was my thought too