35 Comments

James, why haven't our Representatives or Senators answered the questions I pose about this? I am perplexed as to the silence. I continue to forward all of your articles with no answer at all, nothing! I inform people about the fact that the entire Senate voted to keep us in the WHO, and they are surprised to hear this. If they get there way and adopt this illegal agreement, I will not comply! I did not take the jab because I knew better, and my VA Doctor asked me if I had the jab, it is safe and effective he said. I said that I did not have the two hours to educate him on the facts nor did he, but I refused it. I remember the HIV-AIDS fraud, and Fauci was involved in it as well, so I knew better than to trust this little mass murderer about anything. I did want to tell you that there is no scientific evidence that a virus exists any more than a Unicorn does! Once you realize what a fraud virology is and has been for 70 years, their arguments fail completely. If there is no virus then how there is no viral pandemic. I know you are busy but take a look at Dr. Sam Bailey.com a New Zeeland Doctor who has demonstrated the scientific facts about this fraud called virology, and how the use pseudoscience to show a virus exists. It is a pathetic farce. Jack

Expand full comment

James and Australians especially:

There appears to be some confusion - still trying to sort - any help appreciated.

Submissions to the Australian Covid -19 Royal Commission, are to be submitted by January 12, according to the official government website.

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Legal_and_Constitutional_Affairs/COVID19RC47

However, Australia Exits the WHO has posted an urgent request for submissions to the Covid inquiry by 15 DECEMBER, calling for a Royal Commission.

https://www.pmc.gov.au/covid-19-response-inquiry/consultation

Expand full comment

And given, the negociations between the European countries and the WHO go the wrong and improper way, which is the most probable, there will be none who could stop them in time. They are negotiating outside the law as the folk made it up between themselves and their governors long ago = our laws which all pretended to respect befor corona (b. c. :-) This law is good for the people of the world. And nobody has ever invalidated this good law, and nobody can (!), it is still valid, only nobody handles according to it! And so make it apparently unvalid with his own hands! Hold on to the law and the law will protect you, for this is why it is here and still working!

Maybe it is silly, but I see them operating within their "circle of no law" and us operating within a totally other Circle. And these two circles don´t overlap because they are totally different. And so each is ineffective within the field of power of the other. In great things just as in small: Think of your conversations with the people who think and talk as a televion. Could you acchive any effect on them? And then, you say the same as I believe - you say: let them do, they are going to the WHO and we going to the NEW. I guess I mean the same.

But we still have to do something so I will see to it that your suggestion will reach the right hands. Ralf Ludwig does the same thing as you and he pictures it with these words:

You surely know the story about David and Goliath? Do you also know why David could defeat Goliath? David decided to fight for the truth instead of to yield to superiority. The essential step towards his victory was his decision to fight for the truth.

I would move people to read this story in the Bible, but it is written complicated and one need to understand the big context. Simply said, Goliath was larger, better armed and he was a fighter, David was a shepherd.

But nevertheless, us and them, all will be judged according to the Law at the end.

Expand full comment

I´ll forward your suggestions to the 2 lowyer unions which I know and I´ll call them first to make sure I´ve got their attention. And I´ll talk about it to the people I know who works for the channell which says the truth, they are well connected.

Yesterday, I´ve been to the demonstration in Karlsruhe which is bond to the submission of 592 criminal complaints against more then 500 persons responsible for the implemention of the compulsory vaccination for health service workers and all who belongs to the German army. Under these responsibles are 1 federal president, some judges, some Budestag members (comparable to your Senate maybe) and so on. The way is according to the Statut of Rome, to go first to the German authority, that is the federal general office of public prosecutor, (which is situated on the Square Of Human Rights in Karlsruhe, Platz der Menschenrechte!). And when they do not want or cannot handle these complaints, then to go to the Haag, which is a court of the same effect but comprising the European Union. And then, other complaints will maintain this German one, since in many other European countries there have been such barbarian wrongs as in Germany. Austria will produce a similar complaint, Italy and other countries, so said Ralf Ludwig, a Lawyer as a lowyer has to be.

On this demonstration, the WHO matter doesn´t miss out! The people beared slogans as: Do you know who pays the WHO? Plus a quadrat-code to straightly find out the answer. The speakers, German, Austrian and Swiss lowyers, mentioned the WHO as the instance which supervises all this lawless absurdity. I just wanted you to know. The people know the truth about the doings of the WHO, only each of them in his own way...

Expand full comment

Hi James,

The House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic will be hosting its "Reforming the WHO" hearing on Wednesday, December 13, at 2:00 PM. I just submitted some of the questions you posed in your article from October 21 (https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/questions-for-loyce-pace) along with these four action items:

A. Require all witnesses at the hearing to testify under oath

B. Compel the Biden Administration to become transparent about the content of the texts being negotiated

C. Object to submitting the United States to whatever accords, conventions, treaties, or international agreements that result without their formal approval by a two-thirds supermajority of the U.S. Senate

D. Co-sponsor H.R. 79, the W.H.O. Withdrawal Act

On a separate note, state legislatures will be convening next month. I think you should start calling for state legislatures to pass laws prohibiting enforcement of World Health Organization edicts in the event the treaty and IHR regulations are adopted.

Article Six of the Constitution is often misrepresented to mean that any action by the Federal Government overrides state and local laws and ordinances. However, the actual language of the article is as follows: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made [in Pursuance thereof]; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land". This means federal laws are only supreme to the states when done in pursuance of the powers vested to the federal government by the Constitution. This is confirmed by Alexander Hamilton, who wrote the following in Federalist #33:

"But it will not follow from this doctrine that acts of the large society which are NOT PURSUANT to its constitutional powers, but which are invasions of the residuary authorities of the smaller societies, will become the supreme law of the land. These will be merely acts of usurpation, and will deserve to be treated as such. Hence we perceive that the clause which declares the supremacy of the laws of the Union, like the one we have just before considered, only declares a truth, which flows immediately and necessarily from the institution of a federal government. It will not, I presume, have escaped observation, that it EXPRESSLY confines this supremacy to laws made PURSUANT TO THE CONSTITUTION; which I mention merely as an instance of caution in the convention; since that limitation would have been to be understood, though it had not been expressed."

Hamilton wrote this in Federalist #78:

"There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid."

Expand full comment

Seems to me, the EU has just tossed the salad around a bit, but it is still basically the same salad.

Possibly they just want people to think, that they are doing something responsible, when actually they are not.

Expand full comment

I just have a difficult time understanding how a "free" people could then be placed under some foreign authority for anything!! I'm going to say "no" to whatever that means, even if it is my hill.

Expand full comment

FEAR = FORGET EVERYTHING AND RUN -- OR MY CHOICE = FACE EVERYTHING AND RISE --- UNITE --- FAITH = FOR ALL I TRUST HIM --- IN GOD WE TRUST ONE NATION UNDER GOD WE THE PEOPLE MADE THE GOVERNMENT... WE OWN THE GOVT....., THEY DO NOT OWN US....,. THE GOVT., GOT TOO BIG FOR ITS BRITCHES BY TAKING BRIBES, BLOOD MONEY AGAINST US AND USING OUR TAX DOLLARS AGAINST US. TREASON THUS USURPERS ILLEGALS FOR VOTES BECAUSE WE THE MAKERS OF OUR GOD BLESSED AMERICA KNOW THE TRUTH THEREFORE WE MUST UNITE WITH GOD AND LIKE MINDED SOLDIERS OF CHRIST FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS TO PREVAIL IN GOD WE TRUST ALL PEOPLE UNITE WITH GOD

Expand full comment

My maiden name is Sokoloski like yours I wonder how Poland is faring and all of this I’ve been following the save the Polish countryside farmers standing up to GMO‘s, but I haven’t heard anything for a while.

Expand full comment

I found this awhile ago for Belgium. It is open for interpretation but it might be important:

'Foreign policy.

Treaties with foreign countries are concluded by the government (the king). If they are trade treaties, or treaties that bind Belgians or impose challenges on the state, they can only have effect in Belgium after the approval of parliament.'

https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgische_federale_regering

Expand full comment

Most Canadians do not want digital wallets with digital identification and digital currency. Many are realizing the dangers in this trap. Yet, behind Canadians' backs are signing deals with the European Union, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and the International Monetary Fund to make these things possible. People all over are having their constitutional rights trampled on.

Expand full comment

We the people declare that since Bill Gates 'stolen' credibility and honesty from the World Health Organization by becoming their biggest financial benefactor (supporter and influencer), the WHO has become CORRUPT and manipulative for (the Insane) Gates's further financial gain and CONTROL of humanity.

We, the people hereby declare the World Health Organisation is terminated and no longer has any influence on world health matters!

We the [people have spoken! The WHO IS FINISHED!

Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!

Expand full comment

EVIL GATES OF HELL IS NOT A FARMER NOR A DOCTOR JUST A DERANGED MURDERER SAME

AS ALL GLOBALLASSED ATHEIST CONMUNIST DELUSIONAL WANKERS

Expand full comment

No it is not legal it is Corruption Evil Sick Abuse

Expand full comment

NO.

Count me in on the resistance side as always.

I´m busy building a device to generate power in my house.

BUT RESISTANCE THAT´S A LOT OF THINGS.

Another is, that the "authorities" in Europe are pulling their nasal hairs out in frustration: WHAT?? HOW COME THE EUROPEANS AREN´T TAKING NO MORE CLOT SHOTS??

SURE, WE NEED MORE BRIGHT HEADS TO RISE.

SO RISE.

DO WHATEVER YOU CAN TO PUT A STICK IN THE GOVERNMENT MACHINE TO PREVENT IT FROM RUNNING SMOOTHLY.

GIVE THEM THE MIDDLE FINGER IN ALL YOU DO.

WE KNOW.

WE ACT.

WE FIGHT.

Expand full comment

Hi James, i have shared it with 16 journalists, two tv stations and all my friends in high places! Don't know what will come of it but I shared it. The main national tv station nrk have a restrainingorder on me because of my harrassment! I don't care! I want answers! It's my rigth to know. Thats democracy? Well here i would say we have democratic dictatorship as our goverments policy on us! So we are basicly all fucked here! We have Schengendeal with the EU and they are really trying to get us in as members! But they can't get the whole percentige they need to get in! And they won't either, not in my lifetime!

Have a nice sunday and thanks for the mails!

Regards

Bjørn leif-oscar Liptovari

Expand full comment