The time has come to hold the entire Rothschild and Rockefeller bloodlines accountable and remove them from this reality. They have and continue to cause unspeakable harms to everyone. And the list goes deeper.
Shocking that when you see a physician 7 times per year (vaccinated group) they're more likely to diagnose a disease than when you see a physician only 2 times per year (unvaccinated group). The vaccinated group was also watched for twice as long (follow up time of approx 2.7 years in vaccinated vs 1.3 years in unvaccinated). More time = more opportunity for diagnosis.
That's just one confounder, not even addressing poor methods, unrecognized confounders, statistic implausibilities, decreased power of the smaller sample size in unvaccinated, attrition bias, etc. It's very easy to feed this *crap* to laypeople who don't have enough background knowledge to see through all of that.
I think one statistic from the study really sums up the findings considering that in the first 10 years of life the greatest amount of vaccines are given. It's the fact that by the age of 10 only 43% of the vaccinated children remained free from chronic health conditions compared to 83% of unvaccinated children.
You speak as though this is some antivaxxer study that was bad in design and cofounders were left unconsidered yet the issues you speak of were taken into consideration and the researcher who by the way was part of moderna covid vaccine approval stands by the research but doesn't want to lose his career.
The results of the study are the opposite to what he was hoping to find. Which is why he agreed to do it in the first place.
There is nothing wrong with the research and it is not a stand alone study.
A number of studies into vaxxed verses unvaxxed show the same time and time again. The only difference here is that it's a pro vaxxer that did the study. The only other one I can think of that was also from a provaxxer was the Peter aarby study looking at 30 years worth of data on the dpt vaccine in Guinea Bissau whereby the mortality rate was at least 5 times higher in those who received the vaccine compared to those who didn't.
Well now this is certified what has been discussed for long. So now t here is hope t hat Bobby and all will do something drastic about it. I suppose this will be a strong pusher at t he HHS and many many thanks to Del and the ICAN to have produced the much needed evidence.....
Carolyn, I opt out as well for $11.00 per month. The opt-out meters are not good either. They put DE - Dirty Electricity on the wiring of your home. Basically, making your wiring a huge antenna. If you can, find a building biologist nearby to take readings in your home and put in filters. I've had one at my home 4 different times. People need to know that your utilities WILL 'LIE' too you. Smart meters have no surge protectors in them as well and the gas ones have lithium batteries installed. Very, very dangerous...ugh.
'public health' was likely just the cover excuse for ushering us closer to transhumanism
any coincidence AI has exploded since the Plandemic and technocrat elites are now talking about "mRNA cancer vaccines" that can be produced in 24-48 hrs?
Good news for everyone. A new case was filed in PA this morning against Smart Meters! This is via the CHD (Children's Health Defense) with Robert Kennedy Jr. Just to remind everyone, smart meters were never intended to be an 'Opt-Out.' They were intended to be an 'Opt-In' issue. This new case is linked to the CHD/EHT win in August of 2021. The evidence is clear that wireless is a huge health issue in this country. The FCC is also a CAPTURED agency! Same as the Big Pharma! Reading the ICAN/Bigtree study now. Keep up the fight. GOOD always wins against EVIL!
I opted out and pay an extra $15.00 a month to have a guy come over to read the meter. I’ve talked to him a few times. He told me that a surprising number of people opted out and he thanked me for keeping him in a job
What are the endgame and exit strategy for captured systems such as Henry Ford who know the truth about the impact of vaccines on chronic health issues, but are making every dsperate attempt to cover it up? Is it a matter of circling the wagons to buy time and somehow escaqpe accountability? It's obvious the health of children and their fully vaccinated staff not factor into the equation. Denial won't make the truth go away, and cover ups of serious safety hazards never end well for the perpetrators.
I am thankful for the production... watched it last night... I have been wanting the world to awaken to the travesty of the vax system for well over 30 years after my son was vax injured. By the grace of God, I had access to earlier warriors for truth who were speaking out against vax injuries and long term dangers, like Dr. Robert S Mendelsohn MD. I pray the illumination of this situation continues to grow.
You may be interested in reading some of my writings, the idea is to illuminate the layperson in order to help them avoid being misled around health since it is such an incredibly complex topic.
Looking at your name and the above comment you made belittling anyone taking the inconvenient truth on board, I would surmise that a person who has seen vaccine injury first hand will probably not be interested in your research. The person stated that their child was vaccine injured. Did you miss that part or just hope to convince them that it wasn't the vaccine I wonder.
That's all well and good but if your attempts to help people understand involve making them feel that they aren't knowledgeable enough to understand the nuances of vaccine research and then go on to try to convince people that vaccines are safe and effective you are being a lacky for the pharma industry and that's not something to be proud of in my veiw.
I personally have been looking into the dangers of vaccines for nigh on a couple of decades and it is clear that not only do they not do what they proport to do, they do in fact maim and kill often on the day of vaccination or withing 48 hour's. For those who escape the initial demise there is the risk of life long autoimmune disease, cancer, myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, strokes, turbo cancers, epilepsy, to name just a few of the hundreds of conditions related to vaccines. And it's no surprise to anyone with half a brain. It's only human hubris that thinks it can avoid illness which is an important bodily detox by vaccinating without making the body react to the constant assault violently due to its natural defenses being breached and toxic substances injected straight into it, often straight into the bloodstream as many don't even aspirate the needle.
99% of people don't have the background knowledge necessary to understand these subjects or critically read studies. I've also never tried to convince people vaccines are safe and effective, you're just once again trying to set up a straw man.
I personally have been golfing for nigh on a couple of decades and it is clear that I am nowhere remotely close to a professional.
As to a straw man argument not at all. I may have however misunderstood your intentions and if that is true please excuse my ignorance. The nam scam doctor and your calling out the study in question lead me to believe that you are pro vaccine and if I'm wrong in that assumption please excuse me and feel free to enlighten me on your view point. For all i know you may just have issues with this study in general but be against vaccines as a whole so feel free to enlighten me if I am wrong and genuinely if I have assumed wrongly I do apologise.
So the medical profession would have you believe that 99% of people can not understand the research because it serves their purpose to make medical research akin to learning magic when in fact its just years of book learning and its practice application but that's absolute rot to say that people don't have the background knowledge.
In this day and age information is easily accessible or it used to be. Now it's censored so badly I feel for people attempting to disseminate the information made available but I would challenge your notion that most people do not have the ability to understand the science due to a lack of background knowledge . All it takes is to research the research. If you do not understand a term or if the research has been created in an impartial manner or not you can literally research the terms you do not understand or you can read what the professionals have to say on the research methodology. It all depends on a person's attention span to the subject and those of us who have seen vaccine injury first hand as have I and the person who's comment you answered. That experience alone can send you down a number of rabbit holes that show that the safety testing is minimal with new vaccines often just tested against the previous vaccine which also had no safety testing. Rarely do we come to our conclusions without masses of researching first because to be honest who actually wants to be what's generally termed a conspiracy theorist? It tends to come with lots of derision and high cost in both personal relationships and in the way we are treated generally. We don't tend to chose to step outside of the mainstream because it's uncomfortable but we do it because we realise that the science is glaringly obvious that the vaccinated suffer far worse than the unvaccinated. As to golf perhaps you just do not have a natural propensity for it hence a professional golfer may have an advantage over you even after years of experience. I would argue that reading and researching are a different ball game as it were. No pun intended. As you read you gain knowledge as long as you don't stay myopic and only focus on one aspect or your own bias. If you listen to both sides of the argument and research both points you can very well gain an understanding and an overall view.
And as I have already stated, seeing the damage first hand in real time pretty much immediately after administration of a vaccine can give you a pretty good grasp of what occurred.
So much attention on vaccines since 2020 yet no one 'speaking out' wants to speak out about consistently nor make a documentary on as to what really happened to people during the Spring of 2020.
It should be possible to extract similar results from many population wide databases with just a few SQL queries.
I look forward to seeing smart database engineers publishing such queries that potential whistleblowers could make on data they work with to see if they want to come forward with more smoking guns.
The time has come to hold the entire Rothschild and Rockefeller bloodlines accountable and remove them from this reality. They have and continue to cause unspeakable harms to everyone. And the list goes deeper.
Great film. Please watch and share.
Shocking that when you see a physician 7 times per year (vaccinated group) they're more likely to diagnose a disease than when you see a physician only 2 times per year (unvaccinated group). The vaccinated group was also watched for twice as long (follow up time of approx 2.7 years in vaccinated vs 1.3 years in unvaccinated). More time = more opportunity for diagnosis.
That's just one confounder, not even addressing poor methods, unrecognized confounders, statistic implausibilities, decreased power of the smaller sample size in unvaccinated, attrition bias, etc. It's very easy to feed this *crap* to laypeople who don't have enough background knowledge to see through all of that.
I think one statistic from the study really sums up the findings considering that in the first 10 years of life the greatest amount of vaccines are given. It's the fact that by the age of 10 only 43% of the vaccinated children remained free from chronic health conditions compared to 83% of unvaccinated children.
You speak as though this is some antivaxxer study that was bad in design and cofounders were left unconsidered yet the issues you speak of were taken into consideration and the researcher who by the way was part of moderna covid vaccine approval stands by the research but doesn't want to lose his career.
The results of the study are the opposite to what he was hoping to find. Which is why he agreed to do it in the first place.
There is nothing wrong with the research and it is not a stand alone study.
A number of studies into vaxxed verses unvaxxed show the same time and time again. The only difference here is that it's a pro vaxxer that did the study. The only other one I can think of that was also from a provaxxer was the Peter aarby study looking at 30 years worth of data on the dpt vaccine in Guinea Bissau whereby the mortality rate was at least 5 times higher in those who received the vaccine compared to those who didn't.
Well now this is certified what has been discussed for long. So now t here is hope t hat Bobby and all will do something drastic about it. I suppose this will be a strong pusher at t he HHS and many many thanks to Del and the ICAN to have produced the much needed evidence.....
I think Bobby might need to get a better understanding of statistics before he's able to do anything drastic: https://thescamdoctor.substack.com/p/how-to-cherry-pick-data-to-scam-people?r=6hgshq
In English with French Subtile https://youtu.be/-x7yyXhOprI?si=nMvOEM9AHWn9tT8X
https://www.francesoir.fr/videos-les-debriefings/pour-l-avocat-aaron-siri-le-gouvernement-doit-se-retirer
Carolyn, I opt out as well for $11.00 per month. The opt-out meters are not good either. They put DE - Dirty Electricity on the wiring of your home. Basically, making your wiring a huge antenna. If you can, find a building biologist nearby to take readings in your home and put in filters. I've had one at my home 4 different times. People need to know that your utilities WILL 'LIE' too you. Smart meters have no surge protectors in them as well and the gas ones have lithium batteries installed. Very, very dangerous...ugh.
Charts from that and another study are at
https://hlahore.substack.com/p/25-x-more-chronic-health-problems
Links to 25 other studies are there as well
"Oh well, they have to die of something"???
I think that says it all. These people are knowingly murdering and maiming our children! AVOID DOCTORS AND ALL SHOTS!!!
"There was NO Pandemic, it was pre-meditated murder." Dr. David E Martin
He is absolutely correct! 100%
'public health' was likely just the cover excuse for ushering us closer to transhumanism
any coincidence AI has exploded since the Plandemic and technocrat elites are now talking about "mRNA cancer vaccines" that can be produced in 24-48 hrs?
https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/nano-neuro-warfare
Ford's next vaccine study should be on common sense and its relationship to big Pharma.
Trust me- Henry Ford will NEVER go near the topic of vaccines again
Good news for everyone. A new case was filed in PA this morning against Smart Meters! This is via the CHD (Children's Health Defense) with Robert Kennedy Jr. Just to remind everyone, smart meters were never intended to be an 'Opt-Out.' They were intended to be an 'Opt-In' issue. This new case is linked to the CHD/EHT win in August of 2021. The evidence is clear that wireless is a huge health issue in this country. The FCC is also a CAPTURED agency! Same as the Big Pharma! Reading the ICAN/Bigtree study now. Keep up the fight. GOOD always wins against EVIL!
I opted out and pay an extra $15.00 a month to have a guy come over to read the meter. I’ve talked to him a few times. He told me that a surprising number of people opted out and he thanked me for keeping him in a job
Thank you for sharing!
What are the endgame and exit strategy for captured systems such as Henry Ford who know the truth about the impact of vaccines on chronic health issues, but are making every dsperate attempt to cover it up? Is it a matter of circling the wagons to buy time and somehow escaqpe accountability? It's obvious the health of children and their fully vaccinated staff not factor into the equation. Denial won't make the truth go away, and cover ups of serious safety hazards never end well for the perpetrators.
I am thankful for the production... watched it last night... I have been wanting the world to awaken to the travesty of the vax system for well over 30 years after my son was vax injured. By the grace of God, I had access to earlier warriors for truth who were speaking out against vax injuries and long term dangers, like Dr. Robert S Mendelsohn MD. I pray the illumination of this situation continues to grow.
You may be interested in reading some of my writings, the idea is to illuminate the layperson in order to help them avoid being misled around health since it is such an incredibly complex topic.
Looking at your name and the above comment you made belittling anyone taking the inconvenient truth on board, I would surmise that a person who has seen vaccine injury first hand will probably not be interested in your research. The person stated that their child was vaccine injured. Did you miss that part or just hope to convince them that it wasn't the vaccine I wonder.
I don't do medical research, I write to try to help laypeople understand it. I also never said anything about their personal anecdote.
That's all well and good but if your attempts to help people understand involve making them feel that they aren't knowledgeable enough to understand the nuances of vaccine research and then go on to try to convince people that vaccines are safe and effective you are being a lacky for the pharma industry and that's not something to be proud of in my veiw.
I personally have been looking into the dangers of vaccines for nigh on a couple of decades and it is clear that not only do they not do what they proport to do, they do in fact maim and kill often on the day of vaccination or withing 48 hour's. For those who escape the initial demise there is the risk of life long autoimmune disease, cancer, myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, strokes, turbo cancers, epilepsy, to name just a few of the hundreds of conditions related to vaccines. And it's no surprise to anyone with half a brain. It's only human hubris that thinks it can avoid illness which is an important bodily detox by vaccinating without making the body react to the constant assault violently due to its natural defenses being breached and toxic substances injected straight into it, often straight into the bloodstream as many don't even aspirate the needle.
99% of people don't have the background knowledge necessary to understand these subjects or critically read studies. I've also never tried to convince people vaccines are safe and effective, you're just once again trying to set up a straw man.
I personally have been golfing for nigh on a couple of decades and it is clear that I am nowhere remotely close to a professional.
As to a straw man argument not at all. I may have however misunderstood your intentions and if that is true please excuse my ignorance. The nam scam doctor and your calling out the study in question lead me to believe that you are pro vaccine and if I'm wrong in that assumption please excuse me and feel free to enlighten me on your view point. For all i know you may just have issues with this study in general but be against vaccines as a whole so feel free to enlighten me if I am wrong and genuinely if I have assumed wrongly I do apologise.
So the medical profession would have you believe that 99% of people can not understand the research because it serves their purpose to make medical research akin to learning magic when in fact its just years of book learning and its practice application but that's absolute rot to say that people don't have the background knowledge.
In this day and age information is easily accessible or it used to be. Now it's censored so badly I feel for people attempting to disseminate the information made available but I would challenge your notion that most people do not have the ability to understand the science due to a lack of background knowledge . All it takes is to research the research. If you do not understand a term or if the research has been created in an impartial manner or not you can literally research the terms you do not understand or you can read what the professionals have to say on the research methodology. It all depends on a person's attention span to the subject and those of us who have seen vaccine injury first hand as have I and the person who's comment you answered. That experience alone can send you down a number of rabbit holes that show that the safety testing is minimal with new vaccines often just tested against the previous vaccine which also had no safety testing. Rarely do we come to our conclusions without masses of researching first because to be honest who actually wants to be what's generally termed a conspiracy theorist? It tends to come with lots of derision and high cost in both personal relationships and in the way we are treated generally. We don't tend to chose to step outside of the mainstream because it's uncomfortable but we do it because we realise that the science is glaringly obvious that the vaccinated suffer far worse than the unvaccinated. As to golf perhaps you just do not have a natural propensity for it hence a professional golfer may have an advantage over you even after years of experience. I would argue that reading and researching are a different ball game as it were. No pun intended. As you read you gain knowledge as long as you don't stay myopic and only focus on one aspect or your own bias. If you listen to both sides of the argument and research both points you can very well gain an understanding and an overall view.
And as I have already stated, seeing the damage first hand in real time pretty much immediately after administration of a vaccine can give you a pretty good grasp of what occurred.
It will inevitbaly grow, and as I see it, now has the characteristics of a supersaturated solution that is about to crystallize.
So much attention on vaccines since 2020 yet no one 'speaking out' wants to speak out about consistently nor make a documentary on as to what really happened to people during the Spring of 2020.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-module-6-care
It should be possible to extract similar results from many population wide databases with just a few SQL queries.
I look forward to seeing smart database engineers publishing such queries that potential whistleblowers could make on data they work with to see if they want to come forward with more smoking guns.