48 Comments
User's avatar
Margaret Maraventano's avatar

I’m a flight attendant for 29 years. Nothing has ever been done to help us fight this. Unions are too weak. Hundreds of flight attendants have been injured in fume events for as long as I have been working with the airlines. The hospital will not draw blood nor take hair samples as part of the ongoing denial and coverup of these events from the general public. It’s criminal!!!!

None DENNIS WILLIAMS's avatar

I MYSELF DO NOT FLY BUT THE PEOPLE THAT DO THIS IS HORRIBLE.THIS IS NEW TO A LOT OF

PEOPLE.MOST ARE NOT EVEN AWARE OF THIS.WEL THE PEOPLE AFFECTED OUGHT TO BE

TAKEN CARE OF.GOD BLESS THEM.

Rachel Girshick's avatar

Hi James, as a non sequoia, just saw this info & thought ( if you haven't seen already) would appreciate for the plandemic heist info: https://nzdsos.com/2026/03/11/epstein-gates-pandemic-new-zealands-connection/

Kathlean J Keesler's avatar

Wow Sending gratitude with love.

Collette's avatar

Sayer Ji did an article on this >10yrs ago , showing the exhaust system & the Boeing 787 - 757 😎

Flowingbrooke's avatar

I am not buying the fact that there are no Chemtrails. Every time airplanes release a Chemtrail, labs have found particles of aluminum, barium, and other molecules within them that are harmful to living beings. I've noticed on days when Chemtrails criss-cross the sky, storms appear the following day. In comparison, Contrails dissipate at a rate proportional to the airplane's speed. I am not a pilot nor a doctor; I research our changing world and why some common-sense issues are not what the professionals say they are. Dane Wigington has performed many tests on Chemtrails versus Contrails, and his work is recognized worldwide. His site is: www.geoengineeringwatch.org Please look up not down at your phones.

Piki's avatar

Gosh....we better all stay home!

Thanks for this info!!!!

Kaylene Emery's avatar

Wonderful work James . Thank you.

David walker's avatar

It’s fat soluble ..so it builds up and a silent killer …. Exhumed bodies show high levels effects organs ….. killing you with un detectable symptoms

Fager 132's avatar

I was an airline pilot for 30 years. The air being routed into the cabin and cockpit bypasses the combustion section of the engine. Once you get above the haze layer or above about 10,000' you will not find cleaner air anywhere. That's what you're breathing for nearly the entire flight.

If you've ever flown into someplace warm and humid, like Miami, you've probably noticed that as you descend below the scattered cumulus clouds you start to feel the humidity and smell the vegetation. That's because you're breathing outside air that's continually fed into the cabin. It's absolutely untrue that the air is unfiltered: It's fed through HEPA filters that filter out 99.97% of particulates. The entire pressure vessel is refreshed about every 2-3 minutes, so there's no "stale" air. It's clean, continually refreshed air from the atmosphere that hasn't touched anything except the ducting that routes it to the cabin. Some of it is recirculated from the cabin, but it's still "new" every 2-3 minutes because the air is constantly discharged through the outflow valves to maintain the cabin pressure. It's cleaner than what's in your house and car and what you're exposed to at your job. It smells sometimes? Yeah, because condensation created as bleed air pressure is reduced is added back in before the air goes into the cabin so people don't complain about how dry the air is. That humidified air can have an odor for the same reason a humidifier does. And oil doesn't "generally" leak into the air. That's ridiculous. It happens rarely. The last thing the airlines want is to lose operating fluids through bad seals. That list of alleged symptoms is ridiculous, too. "Strong emotions and crying spells"? Seriously? Is that why you see people constantly bawling as they drive around? Because they're breathing way more unfiltered oil in traffic than they are in airplanes. And "burnout symptoms" being listed as a consequence should get the whole idea dismissed as a joke.

If crews were at the greatest risk then after 30 years of that I should be dead, or beset with respiratory ailments, strong emotions, and crying spells. I'm not, because the air doesn't get any cleaner than it does when it's pulled in from 30,000'. In fact, I flew for a cargo airline that was usually in no hurry to load the airplanes, so we'd sit there typically at least 30 minutes past departure time sucking diesel fumes from the loaders and tugs. Even after that much exposure, five nights a week for 26 weeks a year, I can't check off one item on that list of alleged symptoms. So everybody can stop panicking about the extremely rare occasions when "fume events" happen. In 30 years and 17,000 hours of flying, I never saw one, and a single exposure is far less than you get cumulatively from driving around with the fresh air intake open or the windows down on your car.

Margaret Maraventano's avatar

Says the pilot who’s not in the cabin during these events….

Fager 132's avatar

The pilots breathe the same air as the passengers, FFS. And how do you think airlines move crews from one place to another? They put them in the cabin.

Fager 132's avatar

Okay, but that study's stated goal is to quantify the difference between model outputs and what's collected from real life instrumentation so they can "nudge" their computer models to correspond more closely with actual measurements because they want to predict how quickly particulates contribute to wear on moving engine parts. They're sampling around airports because that's where their metric of black carbon is most concentrated. I'm not disputing that the air within and around the boundary of a busy commercial airport is dirty: both aircraft and vehicle exhaust is high there. And I don't dispute that airborne particulates cause wear on engine components. It's one reason manufacturers warn you in big red letters about not flying through volcanic ash. Engineers determine inspection and replacement intervals partly because of the microscopic wear on moving components caused by contact with particulates. (That's in addition to preventing catastrophic failures from metal fatigue and stress.)

Particulates exist throughout the troposphere, but except for the air on the ground at the airport itself, it's still the case that the air coming into the cabin is the cleanest people will encounter anywhere, not just because it's coming from well above where the highest concentration of pollutants is, but because it's routed through HEPA filters before it enters the cabin. I'm not saying it’s completely pure but that it's cleaner than any other ambient air and that it’s absolutely false that it’s unfiltered.

Any time the existence of a pathology is asserted with a list of symptoms that lengthy, vague, and wide-ranging, people’s skepticism radar should go into overdrive. I mean, come on: “changed personality”? “Feeling of unease”? “Crying spells”? From combustion products? No one’s even claimed that happens to people hospitalized with smoke inhalation. Did we not just go through this six years ago, where the listed symptoms attributed to something were so broad that everyone either experienced them or knew someone who did? That’s a hallmark of fake ailments. If incidental exposure to a few whiffs of airplane exhaust is enough to cause all those things, then why doesn’t daily exposure to automobile exhaust cause a syndrome? And how would anyone distinguish symptoms caused by one vs. the other? How would anyone ever prove that tinnitus is caused by fumes and not exposure to the jet engine noise itself, and why would anyone even suggest that tinnitus is a symptom of air pollution? What does “reduced vision” even mean? When I was 30 my vision was 20/10. Now it’s 20/25. Is that because I breathed bleed air for 30 years or because I got old?

Collette's avatar

1989 Returning from Zambia , I couldn’t get enough Air ,I felt like I was going to collapse which made me feel very anxious ,with an impending sense of doom ,I asked to use the oxygen face mask above my head , the Air hostesses were not taking me seriously , I was an Intensive Care Nurse not apt to hysteria ,

Valerie Bressler's avatar

Sot it wasn't only the fucking masks......In 2022 I had a very scary incident on a plane, where I could barely breathe and felt like I was going to faint. Of course the situation wasn't helped by the flight attendant insisting I have to put my mask back on. I made it through, obviously, but I really detest flying now and sometimes am choosing long road trips as a better option. This is just one more fact to make me hate flying even more.

LWB's avatar

I have a book on this topic: Toxic Airlines, What the airlines don't tell you in the pre-flight safety briefing, by Tristan Loraine, 2007, publisher dftenterprises, copies appear to be available on Amazon.

Other sources linked from the title page of that book are:

https://www.susanmichaelis.com/

"Dr Susan Michaelis is a former ATPL Pilot and Cranfield University trained qualified Air Accident Investigator" in England

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1142585/ Movie "Welcome Aboard Toxic Airlines

Anna's avatar

«Forget About Chemtrails... The Real Toxic Exposure Is Inside the Cabin»

How can we forget about THAT DAILY (and night) POISONING IF THEY ARE TRUE?

DEPOPULATION rings a bell?

https://books.brightlearn.ai/Under-the-Poisoned-Sky-The-Silent-War-on-d181187e2-en/index.html

About aerosols:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-20447-2

And the most stupid thing I ever read in my entire life:

«Scientists reveal controversial plan to launch 50,000 MIRRORS into space for ‘sunlight on demand’ – but sceptics warn it poses ‘serious risks’ to wildlife and humans»

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15631695/Scientists-plan-launch-MIRRORS-space.html

Cheerio's avatar

Definitely experienced this in a Beechcraft 1900 thought I was going to die after only one hour flight.